Abstracts
This study aimed to characterize the quality of child health care and explore its relationship with municipal characteristics. Using data from the external assessment of the first cycle of the Brazilian National Program for Access and Quality Improvement in Primary Care (PMAQ-AB, acronym in Portuguese), this cross-sectional study evaluated 16,566 Family Health Strategy teams. In total, nine binary indicators were created based on recommendations from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. We employed latent class analysis and multinomial logistic regression to assess the quality of care and its association with region and the Brazilian Deprivation Index. Three patterns of quality of care were identified: high, intermediate, and low adequacy. The “high adequacy” pattern included 22.5% of teams, “intermediate adequacy” 60.2%, and “low adequacy” only 17.3%. Teams in the Northeast Region were over twice as likely to belong to the “high adequacy” pattern (OR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.15-4.76) compared with those in the Central-West Region. For teams located in municipalities with moderate and low deprivation, the chance of belonging to the “high adequacy” pattern was 2.04 (95%CI: 1.44-2.89) and 9.08 (95%CI: 4.54-18.14) times higher, respectively, compared with the high deprivation municipalities. This study identified three patterns of quality of child care, with most teams characterized by an “intermediate adequacy” pattern. The quality of care was associated with the municipality’s characteristics. The methodology used in this study proved effective in characterizing the quality of care in a more consistent way.
Keywords:
Primary Health Care; Child Health; Latent Class Analysis; Quality of Health Care; Health Services Research
Este estudo objetivou caracterizar a qualidade da assistência à saúde infantil e explorar sua relação com características municipais. Utilizando dados da avaliação externa do primeiro ciclo do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ-AB), este estudo transversal avaliou 16.566 equipes da Estratégia Saúde da Família. Nove indicadores binários foram criados com base nas recomendações do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Utilizamos análise de classe latente e regressão logística multinomial para avaliar a qualidade da assistência e associações com região do país e com o Índice de Privação Brasileiro. Três padrões de qualidade da assistência foram identificados: alta, intermediária e baixa adequação. O padrão denominado “alta adequação” incluiu 22,5% das equipes, enquanto 60,2% das equipes foram categorizadas como “intermediária adequação” e apenas 17,3% estavam na categoria de “baixa adequação”. A chance de uma equipe pertencer ao padrão “alta adequação” foi mais de duas vezes maior (OR = 2,34; IC95%: 1,15-4,76) na Região Nordeste em comparação à Região Centro-oeste. Para equipes localizadas em municípios com privação moderada e baixa, a chance de pertencer ao padrão “alta adequação” foi de 2,04 (IC95%: 1,44-2,89) e 9,08 (IC95%: 4,54-18,14) vezes maior, respectivamente, em comparação aos municípios com alta privação. Este estudo identificou três padrões de qualidade do cuidado à criança. A maioria das equipes estava incluída no padrão “adequação intermediária”. A qualidade do cuidado estava associada com as características do município. A metodologia utilizada neste estudo permitiu caracterizar a qualidade do cuidado de forma mais consistente.
Palavras-chave:
Atenção Primária à Saúde; Saúde da Criança; Análise de Classes Latentes; Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde; Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde
El objetivo de este estudio fue caracterizar la calidad de la atención a la salud infantil y explorar su relación con las características municipales. Utilizando datos de la evaluación externa del primer ciclo del Programa Nacional de Mejoría del Acceso y Calidad de la Atención Básica (PMAQ-AB, por su sigla en portugués), este estudio transversal evaluó a 16.566 equipos de la Estrategia de Salud Familiar. Se crearon nueve indicadores binarios basados en las recomendaciones del Ministerio de Salud de Brasil. Utilizamos análisis de clases latentes y regresión logística multinomial para evaluar la calidad asistencial y su asociación con la región y el Índice de Privación Brasileño. Se identificaron tres patrones de calidad asistencial: alta, intermedia y baja adecuación. El patrón denominado “alta adecuación” incluyó al 22,5% de los equipos, el patrón “adecuación intermedia” agrupó al 60,2% de los equipos, y el patrón “baja adecuación” solo comprendió al 17,3%. La probabilidad de que un equipo perteneciera al patrón de “alta adecuación” fue más del doble (OR = 2,34; IC95%: 1,15-4,76) en la Región Noreste en comparación con la Región Centro-oeste. Para los equipos ubicados en municipios con privación moderada y baja, la probabilidad de pertenecer al patrón de “alta adecuación” fue 2,04 (IC95%: 1,44-2,89) y 9,08 (IC95%: 4,54-18,14) veces mayor, respectivamente, en comparación con los municipios de alta privación. Este estudio identificó tres patrones de calidad en la atención infantil. La mayoría de los equipos se incluyeron en el patrón de “adecuación intermedia”. La calidad asistencial mostró asociación con las características municipales. Nuestros resultados demuestran que la metodología empleada permitió caracterizar la calidad asistencial de manera más consistente.
Palabras-clave:
Atención Primaria de Salud; Salud Infantil; Análisis de Clases Latentes; Calidad de la Atención de Salud; Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud
Background
Primary health care (PHC) is a cornerstone of health systems, delivering services ranging from health promotion and prevention to treatment and rehabilitation. It is crucial for fostering trust between health systems and communities 1. Despite commendable progress made by many countries in health indicators during the era of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), recent years have seen a growing concern about enhancing the quality of health care services.
The focus on quality improvement has been underscored by the World Health Organization (WHO), particularly in prioritizing efforts to reduce preventable child deaths 2. Recognizing the critical role of health systems in child health care, it is imperative to acknowledge that poor quality care can contribute to increased morbidity and mortality among children 3.
Measuring the quality of health services remains a challenge. First, defining the meaning of quality of care and what should be measured is important 4. Donabedian’s approach has been the most widely used in health systems studies 5. Thus, measuring the quality of structures, processes, and outcomes from the perspective of health professionals, managers, and patients is necessary 5. However, countries rarely conduct health facility surveys to collect data directly from health facilities or professionals at the national level. Overall, household surveys have been the main source of data to assess health service quality 6.
Facchini et al. defined quality of care as adherence to standards delineated in official documents and international guidelines for different age groups 7. In addition, the WHO emphasizes that health care must embody safety, effectiveness, timeliness, efficiency, equity, and a people-centered approach 2.
In Brazil, a notable expansion of PHC coverage, guided by the Family Health Strategy (FHS) − within the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS, acronym in Portuguese) − and its commitment to universal and comprehensive care, substantially increased health care access 8. Despite these advancements, the quality of care remains a considerable challenge within SUS.
The Brazilian National Program for Access and Quality Improvement in Primary Care (PMAQ-AB, acronym in Portuguese) was established in 2011 to address this challenge. This initiative aimed to enhance health care quality by providing financial incentives to municipalities based on external infrastructure and work process assessments 9. Coordinated by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, in conjunction with academic institutions, the assessment was conducted via interviews with municipal managers, health care professionals, and service users at the PHC facilities whose teams voluntarily decided to participate. The FHS teams received a score, and based on this, the Brazilian Ministry of Health provided financial incentives to the municipalities, which were used to provide salaries, training, technical assistance, supplies, infrastructure, and other resources that could aid improve the PHC quality 10.
In Brazil, standards for child health care provision within PHC services are guided by the Cadernos de Atenção Básica nº 3311, which provides for service provision for fostering child growth and development, as well as promoting strategies for child care. Using PMAQ-AB data, previous studies had assessed the quality of child care via municipal aggregated (ecological) analyses 12,13, constructing a composite indicator 14,15, or estimating a composite index score 16,17 at the national or regional level.
Despite these efforts to assess the quality of child health care, the methods used did not enable a comprehensive characterization the quality of child care or measurement of the contribution of each indicator to identify strengths and weakness of PHC teams, nor for observing the differences in PHC performance. Furthermore, it is essential to analyze how municipal characteristics may influence care quality.
This study aims to characterize the quality of child health care provided by Brazilian PHC teams and explore its relationship with municipal characteristics.
Methods
Study design and data
This cross-sectional study used data from the external assessment of the first cycle (2011-2012) of the PMAQ-AB, conducted by a national consortium of higher education institutions on behalf of the Brazilian Ministry of Health.
The evaluation instrument and logistics of the external assessment were developed under the coordination of the Brazilian Ministry of Health’s Department of Primary Care in partnership with Brazilian universities and other research institutions 9. This study used data from the following components of the survey instrument: Module I (observation of the structure of the PHC facility) and Module II (interview on PHC teams’ work processes). The dataset can be accessed at https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/saps/pmaq. Further information on the logistics of data collection is available at http://aps.saude.gov.br/ape/pmaq.
Study population
In the first cycle of the PMAQ-AB, 17,202 PHC teams participated in the external assessment (by voluntary adherence), representing 51% of PHC teams of Brazil. These teams were distributed across 3,935 municipalities (70.7%) 18. In Brazilian primary care, there are different modalities of health teams. The Family Health Strategy (FHS) is the main model of primary care organization in Brazil and serves as the gatekeeper to the national health system. The FHS is characterized by providing comprehensive and universal care to a defined geographical catchment area (up to 4,000 inhabitants) 10. Considering the alignment of this modality of PHC teams with the recommended PHC principles for the Brazilian context, we included 16,566 PHC teams from the FHS, corresponding to 49.6% of all active FHS teams in 2012, distributed across 69.3% of Brazilian municipalities.
Indicators of the quality of child health care and covariates
Following the Brazilian Cadernos de Atenção Básica nº 3311 for child care from the Brazilian Ministry of Health 11, 20 yes/no questions were selected from the PMAQ-AB external assessment instrument. These were used to construct eight indicators: postnatal care, record-keeping practices, traditional surveillance activities, surveillance of external causes, community outreach, breastfeeding guidance, care provision, and child care program offer. For each of these eight indicators to be considered “adequate”, they had to comply with standards established for child care in PHC by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. In addition, a list of medicines for child care was selected according to WHO and Brazilian lists of essential medicines 19,20,21. These medicines were arranged into five groups: antiparasitic drugs; vitamins, multivitamins and oral rehydration salts; anti-asthmatic agents; analgesics and antipyretics; and antibacterials. To consider this indicator “adequate”, the PHC facility had to supply of at least one medicine from each group. An indicator of medicines was then defined. In total, nine binary indicators (adequate/inadequate) were constructed to characterize the quality of child care, as detailed in Table 1.
In total, two municipal level variables were used as covariates to describe their relationships with the quality of child health care: geographic region and the Brazilian Deprivation Index (IBP, acronym in Portuguese). The Brazilian regions are North, Northeast, South, Southeast, and Central-West. The IBP was created using data from the 2010 Brazilian Population Census and combined three indicators: percentage of households with per capita income below half the minimum wage; percentage of illiterate people aged seven or older; and percentage of people with inadequate access to sewage, water, garbage collection, and without an indoor toilet or bath/shower. The composite measure was divided into quintiles and classified from least to most deprived. Allik et al. 22 describe the details of the IBP’s construction. For this study, the IBP was categorized as low deprivation (first and second quintiles), moderate deprivation (third quintile) and high deprivation (fourth and fifth quintiles).
Statistical analysis
All variables in this study were categorical. Thus, frequencies were used to describe the nine indicators of child health care quality and the covariates (region and IBP). Latent class analysis (LCA) was adopted to characterize child care quality based on the nine PMAQ-AB binary indicators. LCA is commonly used when a categorical variable of interest is not measured directly or without error, referred to as a latent variable, and the indicators are categorical. In this study, the latent variable identified patterns of quality of child care. The method evaluates response patterns from the observed categorical indicators to identify and characterize latent classes representing the concept of interest (i.e., quality of child health care). The results of LCA are described based on two sets of parameters: the probability of membership in each latent class (or class prevalence) and the probability of a given response for the observed variable, conditional on class membership 23. The number of classes for the model was selected using the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test (which compares the model with K classes and the model with K-1 classes). Entropy was used to describe classification error, with higher entropy values indicating greater precision in group membership classification and clearer distinction between latent classes. Bivariate residuals from LCA fit were analyzed to evaluate the local independence assumption.
An LCA with covariates was then used to assess associations between latent class membership (quality of child care) and the covariates (region and IBP) (Figure 1). This methodology employs multinomial logistic regression, in which the outcome is the latent variable, providing odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). In addition, all analyses corrected standard errors for the non-independence of observations due to cluster sampling 24, with clusters defined at the municipality level, as multiple health teams may be located in the same municipality. Moreover, the LCA residual association model was used to address violations of the local independence assumption 25. Parameter estimation for the LCA with covariates was performed using a three-step approach, which includes a simple correction for a common source of bias 26, known as the BCH ,(Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars) method.
Latent classes analysis (LCA) model for quality of child health care in primary health care teams: indicators, latent variable and associated determinants.
LCA is used in contexts in which multiple observed binary indicators reflect an underlying, unobservable dimension. In this study, it was employed to characterize and describe distinct team profiles, revealing the underlying heterogeneity in the quality of child care.
Analyses were performed using Stata version 17.0 (https://www.stata.com) and Mplus version 8.6 (https://www.statmodel.com/).
Ethical consideration
This study used public data from the PMAQ-AB external assessment; therefore, according to Brazilian regulations, no ethical approval was necessary. Moreover, the first cycle of the PMAQ-AB protocol was approved at the national level by the Federal University of Pelotas (code 38/2012).
Results
Table 1 shows the percentage of adequacy of PHC teams for the child health care indicators. The indicator with the highest adequacy was the provision of health education and promotion activities related to breastfeeding for pregnant and postpartum women (87.4%). In contrast, the indicators with the lowest adequacy were PHC teams performing actions to ensure a postnatal visit within 10 days after delivery (30.2%) and maintaining records for children in the territory related to accidents and domestic violence (28.3%).
Regarding the covariates, 38% of PHC teams were located in municipalities in the Southeast, 32.1% in the Northeast, 17.2% in the South, 6.4% in the Central-West, and 6% in the North regions. In relation to the IBP, 54.7% of PHC teams were in municipalities with high deprivation, whereas 16.7% and 28.6% were in municipalities with moderate and low deprivation, respectively. We highlight that this distribution reflects the voluntary participation of PHC teams in the external assessment during the first cycle of the PMAQ-AB.
LCA models with one, two, three, and four latent classes were adjusted, and their goodness of fit measures were compared (Table 2). The AIC and BIC values for the model with three classes were 31,193.2 and 31,301.2, respectively, and the entropy value was 0.535. Based on these results, as well as better interpretability in highlighting indicators of child care quality, the three-class model was selected.
Table 3 shows the class prevalence and conditional probabilities for the three empirically identified patterns (latent classes). The pattern labeled “high adequacy” included 22.5% of PHC teams, characterized by higher conditional probabilities for seven indicators (greater than 70%) compared to the other PHC teams. Only the indicators surveillance of external cause and postnatal care had conditional probabilities lower than 70% (62.1% and 49.9%, respectively) in this class. The pattern called “intermediate adequacy” involved 60.2% of PHC teams and had the highest probabilities for adequate breastfeeding guidance (87.8%) and child care program offer (81.9%), and the lowest probability for surveillance of external causes (20%). The third pattern, “low adequacy”, included 17.3% of PHC teams and was characterized by low probabilities for all indicators, except for breastfeeding guidance (70.7%). This pattern had the lowest probabilities for both surveillance indicators: traditional surveillance activities (10%) and surveillance of external causes (3.8%).
Characterization of child health care quality pattens via latent class analysis for primary health care teams. Brazilian National Program for Access and Quality Improvement in Primary Care (PMAQ-AB, acronym in Portuguese), Cycle I, 2012.
Table 4 shows the estimates for the relationships (OR and 95%CI) between municipality characteristics and the latent patterns of child care quality. The pattern “low adequacy” was the reference latent class. In the adjusted analysis, the chance of belonging to the “high adequacy” pattern for PHC teams in the Northeast Region was more than twice (OR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.15-4.76) that of those from the Central-West Region. Regarding the IBP, when PHC teams were located in municipalities with moderate and low deprivation, the chance of belonging to the “high adequacy” pattern was 2.04 (95%CI: 1.44-2.89) and 9.08 (95%CI: 4.54-18.14) times, respectively, compared to PHC teams in municipalities with high deprivation. Moreover, a similar result was observed for the “intermediate adequacy” pattern. PHC teams in the Northeast Region had more than twice the chance of belonging to the “intermediate adequacy” pattern compared to PHC teams in the Central-West Region (OR = 2.77; 95%CI: 1.84-4.17). When PHC teams were in municipalities with moderate and low deprivation, the chance of belonging to the “intermediate adequacy” pattern was 1.67 (95%CI: 1.26-2.22) and 2.79 (95%CI: 1.91-4.09) times, respectively, compared to those in municipalities with high deprivation.
Discussion
This study proposed a pragmatic way to measure the quality of child care, characterizing PHC teams according to their performance on a set of nine indicators developed following Brazilian Ministry of Health guidelines for the care of children in primary health care. We highlight the use of LCA in this study to characterize child care quality, as it enabled us to distinguish three patterns of care quality and identify the contribution of each indicator to the respective pattern, demonstrating weaknesses in the compliance with interventions needed to deliver a high quality of care.
Our findings identified three patterns of child health care quality among PHC teams: high adequacy, intermediate adequacy, and low adequacy. More than half of the PHC teams were characterized as having intermediate or low adequacy. Moreover, the municipality’s geographical region and the IBP were associated with PHC team adequacy patterns.
The analysis of child health care quality across regions showed that PHC teams in the Northeast Region were more likely to be characterized by high or intermediate adequacy. Despite historically facing socioeconomic disadvantages, barriers to accessing health services, poorer health indicators, and greater inequalities, the Northeast has demonstrated substantial improvements in health indicators over time. This progress is likely associated with the implementation of national programs that primarily focused on the Northeast and North regions.
An early example is the Community Health Workers Program (PACS, acronym in Portuguese), created in 1991 to improve maternal and child mortality indicators, initially in the Northeast Region 27. In 2002, the Brazilian Ministry of Health estimated that the highest concentration of active community health workers (CHW) was in the Northeast 28. Building on the experience with PACS, the Ministry recognized the importance of focusing on the family − rather than only the individual − as the unit of health intervention, leading to the creation of the Family Health Program (PSF, acronym in Portuguese) in 1994. From 1999 to 2004, the Northeast Region had the greatest increase in PSF coverage as shown by Facchini et al. 29. Similarly, from 2006 to 2012, this region had the highest coverage levels of the FHS 30. Dourado et al. 31 demonstrated an association between more consolidated FHS implementation and the presence of a usual source of care, particularly in the Northeast, North, and Central-West regions. The FHS, the main organizational model of PHC in Brazil, has played a key role in expanding access, organizing and coordinating care, and promoting health equity. Notable results of these implementations include reductions in under-5 mortality rates 32,33,34, increased antenatal care indicators 35, and better performance on prenatal care quality indicators in the Northeast Region 36.
The IBP was also an important factor for PHC teams belonging to the high or intermediate adequacy patterns, with the greatest likelihood among teams from municipalities with low deprivation. The socioeconomic context of a municipality, region, or country is associated with health indicators. A study using the IBP also observed lower mortality and hospitalization rates due to primary care sensitive conditions in municipalities with low deprivation 37.
Studies in low- and middle-income countries have shown that the wealthier deciles or quintiles had the highest rates of skilled attendance at delivery 38 and skilled antenatal and postnatal care 39. This may be because municipalities, regions, or countries with better financial resources are able to provide stronger infrastructure for health services and have greater economic capacity to hire more health professionals.
Regarding child care quality, most studies employ the PCATool child version. Results have varied greatly, and these studies are generally conducted in specific municipalities or regions. The attribute continuity of care seemed to have the highest score, and PHC teams in services with the FHS model in Brazil performed better than those in the traditional model 40,41. The PCATool child version is used to assess care for children of all ages, typically aged from 0 to 14 years. In our study, we did not employ the PCATool, and instead, information on child care was provided by a health professional who is part of the PHC team. Despite this, our approach offers a comprehensive picture of quality performance based on both normative standards and the Donabedian’s approach. In addition, the LCA method enabled the identification of different classes and the performance of each indicator within them.
Studies using national PMAQ-AB data have employed different methods to measure child care quality. Vieira-Meyer et al. 16 constructed a composite index with nine questions on the child care process and obtained a score over 0.70 (range of 0 to 1.0) in 2012, suggesting good quality of care. Another study, also using work process information, found that 63.5% of PHC teams had a high level of quality in child health care, and strong coordination among PHC teams was associated with better quality of care 42. These studies, which used information similar to ours, produced results in the same direction, demonstrating the efforts of PHC teams to achieve good quality of child care.
Both international and national studies, using different datasets and methodologies, converge on the need for strategies to improve health care quality, with a particular emphasis on child care, as this population requires continuous care. Additionally, there is a clear need for quality monitoring systems, with appropriately gathered information directly from health services and professionals to assess structure and work processes. This collection should be conducted periodically with a standardized instrument to enable effective monitoring over time. An example is the PMAQ-AB itself, which − with its significant amount of data − enabled a robust analysis such as the LCA used in this study, identifying indicators that still need to improve their level of adequacy, for example, in intermediate adequacy teams, which was the majority in the first cycle of the Program.
In this study, the breastfeeding indicator had the highest frequency of adequacy compared to the other eight indicators, and the highest conditional probability across all three adequacy patterns. This finding demonstrates PHC teams strong efforts to promote breastfeeding during prenatal and postpartum periods. Systematic reviews have shown that educational and structured breastfeeding programs at the primary care level during these periods significantly improve breastfeeding practices in both the short and long term 43,44. In the Brazilian PHC context, successful initiatives such as the Brazilian Breastfeeding Network may explain the good performance of this indicator 45,46.
In contrast, postnatal care had only 30.2% adequacy and the lowest conditional probability in the “high adequacy” pattern. Despite this low performance, Brazil has normative documents and policies that guide interventions in this period, highlighting the importance of the First Comprehensive Healthcare Week 47. During this period, maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality can be prevented. The mother needs a physiological and clinical-gynecological assessment, an investigation of difficulties with breastfeeding, and an evaluation of her psycho-emotional condition 48. The baby should undergo a complete physical examination. Weight and height should be measured; the umbilical cord should be examined for possible infection; breastfeeding technique should be observed; advice should be given on the supine position for sleeping to prevent sudden infant death; and the heel prick test, as recommended by the Brazilian National Newborn Screening Program (PNTN, acronym in Portuguese), should be conducted to detect any conditions that, with timely treatment, could improve the baby’s health 11,14.
Two studies showed that postpartum consultations remained at around 50% or less, with the Central-West Region showing the lowest adequacy 18,49. An explanation may be that this region has lower FHS coverage compared to the national average, also seen in the Southeast 31. The expansion the FHS model could increase the provision of actions and services 7. A characteristic of the FHS is the composition of a minimum team (a physician, nurse, nursing technician, and two or more CHWs) that can provide comprehensive care. CHWs in particular play an important role in ensuring postpartum consultations, as shown in a study in Pernambuco State where only 42.1% of women received a home visit within the first week after hospital discharge, most often performed by a CHWs (46.2%) 50.
The indicator for surveillance of external causes had the lowest adequacy (28.3%) and the lowest conditional probabilities in the intermediate and low adequacy patterns. This indicator refers to PHC teams keeping records of children in their territory regarding accidents and domestic violence. According to the Brazilian National Policy for Comprehensive Child Health Care, violence and accidents are classified as external causes and represent a serious public health issue 51. Exposure to violence − physical or psychological − is a risk factor for child development, especially in the first years of life 52. Likewise, inadequate child care can increase the risk of accidents, some of which may result in death 52.
A UNICEF Brazil report indicated that from 2016 to 2020, of 34,918 intentional violent deaths among children and adolescents, 1,070 were children under the age of nine, and 40% of these occurred at home. The report also highlighted a 27% increase in annual violent deaths among children aged 0 to 4, which may reflect domestic violence 53.
Surveillance of external causes does not appear to have been established as a routine activity, unlike surveillance of traditional indicators such as child growth, development, and nutritional status. This may have occurred because the latter became global priorities due to childhood malnutrition being recognized as a major health issue.
However, the WHO highlights the need for training health professionals to screen, prevent, and manage cases of violence or accidents involving children 2. In Brazil, Cadernos de Atenção Básica n o 33 for child health care also highlights that PHC professionals have close contact with communities − particularly children and their families − and that home visits represent a unique opportunity to conduct educational activities on accident prevention, identify and monitor children and families in situations of violence, and develop strategies for continuity of care 11.
The identification of low performance in certain indicators of child health care − such as postnatal care and surveillance of external causes − highlights opportunities for targeted interventions aimed at improving these essential services. Efforts should also focus on strengthening the work of PHC teams − whether or not they are part of the FHS − recognizing their central role in delivering comprehensive and equitable care. Furthermore, the observed association between higher adequacy levels in child health care indicators and better socioeconomic conditions underscores the importance of directing policies and investments toward more vulnerable contexts to promote equity in the quality of health services.
This study has some limitations. First, the results should not be generalized to all Brazilian PHC teams because participation in the PMAQ-AB was voluntary, introducing selection bias, particularly in the first cycle of the Program, when only slightly more than 50% of teams were evaluated. Furthermore, participating teams belonged to municipalities whose managers had voluntarily decided to participate, which suggests that these teams were already higher performing and that their facilities may have had better infrastructure to achieve good ratings and benefit from incentives offered by the Program. This limitation could have led to overestimation of quality. However, we found that the largest proportion of teams fell into the “intermediate” quality pattern. Information bias may also have impacted results. Nonetheless, in constructing indicators, whenever the PMAQ-AB instrument included a complementary question asking whether documentation was available to verify an action, this information was incorporated to classify it as adequate. In addition, the medicines indicator was constructed based on Module 1 data gathered via direct observation by a trained interviewer.
The study’s strengths include the use of a large nationwide sample. In the first PMAQ-AB cycle, the PHC teams included in this study represented 49.6% of all teams active in Brazil in 2012. Another strength is the data collection, which combined direct observation of the PHC facilities and interviews with health professionals. The constructed indicators were based on national guidelines and standards for child care, mainly from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Additionally, the methodological strategy adopted to describe child care quality in primary care in Brazil incorporated potential measurement errors by employing LCA with covariates, along with corrections for: (i) violations of local independence assumptions, using the approach proposed by Visser et al. 25, and (ii) the correlated data structure (multiple health teams in the same municipality). Thus, the estimates from these analyses are prone to be more robust.
Conclusion
Our findings identified three patterns of quality of care for children, as well as the contribution of each indicator included in the model, showing that latent class analysis enabled the identification of both strengths and weaknesses in complying with the strategies recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health for child care in PHC. Likewise, our study demonstrated that region and the IBP are associated with teams being characterized by patterns of high, intermediate, or low adequacy. This highlights the need, at national, regional, and municipal levels, to reduce inequalities in the provision of child care within PHC. Policy implementation should consider these discrepancies and formulate strategies and actions to mitigate them.
-
Data availability
The databases used in the study, including extraction codes, analyses, and results, are available in the repository: https://github.com/cidacslab/cidacs-phc/tree/be454ff81b3d7afa07dcf5f341ff2ceca0fe3390/Latent%20Class%20Analysis_Child%20Care_GITHUB. The sources of information used in the study are indicated in the body of the article.
References
- 1 World Health Organization. Alma-Ata 1978: atención primaria de salud. Informe de la Conferencia Internacional sobre Atención Primaria de Salud. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978.
- 2 World Health Organization. Standards for improving the quality of care for children and young adolescents in health facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
- 3 Kruk ME, Lewis TP, Arsenault C, Bhutta ZA, Irimu G, Jeong J, et al. Improving health and social systems for all children in LMICs: structural innovations to deliver high-quality services. Lancet 2022; 399:1830-44.
- 4 Raven JH, Tolhurst RJ, Tang S, Van den Broek N. What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery 2012; 28:e676-83.
- 5 Donabedian A. An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
- 6 Macarayan EK, Gage AD, Doubova SV, Guanais F, Lemango ET, Ndiaye Y, et al. Assessment of quality of primary care with facility surveys: a descriptive analysis in ten low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6:e1176-85.
- 7 Facchini LA, Tomasi E, Dilélio AS. Qualidade da atenção primária à saúde no Brasil: avanços, desafios e perspectivas. Saúde Debate 2018; 42:208-23.
- 8 Castro MC, Massuda A, Almeida G, Menezes-Filho NA, Andrade MV, de Souza Noronha KVM, et al. Brazil's unified health system: the first 30 years and prospects for the future. Lancet 2019; 394:345-56.
- 9 Departamento de Atenção Básica, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ): manual instrutivo. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. (Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos).
- 10 Macinko J, Harris MJ, Rocha MG. Brazil's National Program for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality (PMAQ): fulfilling the potential of the world's largest payment for performance system in primary care. J Ambul Care Manage 2017; 40 Suppl 2:S4-11.
- 11 Departamento de Atenção Básica, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Saúde da criança: crescimento e desenvolvimento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. (Cadernos de Atenção Básica, 33).
- 12 Santos DMA, Alves CMC, Rocha TAH, Queiroz RCS, Silva NC, Thomaz EBAF. Estrutura e processo de trabalho referente ao cuidado à criança na atenção primária à saúde no Brasil: estudo ecológico com dados do Programa de Melhoria do Acesso e Qualidade da Atenção Básica 2012-2018. Epidemiol Serv Saúde 2021; 30:e2020425.
- 13 Dilélio AS, Natividade M, Facchini LA, Pereira M, Tomasi E. Estrutura e processo na atenção primária à saúde das crianças e distribuição espacial da mortalidade infantil. Rev Saúde Pública 2024; 58:21.
- 14 Flores-Quispe MP, Duro SMS, Blumenberg C, Facchini LA, Zibel AB, Tomasi E. Quality of newborn healthcare in the first week of life in Brazil's primary care network: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis of the National Programme for Improving Primary Care Access and Quality - PMAQ. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e049342.
- 15 Brum LW, Thumé E, Dilélio AS, Flores-Quispe MP, Barros NBR, Facchini LA, et al. Qualidade da atenção a crianças menores de dois anos na rede básica do Brasil em 2018: indicadores e fatores associados. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2023; 26:e230005.
- 16 Vieira-Meyer APGF, Machado MFAS, Gubert FA, Morais APP, Paula Sampaio Y, Saintrain MVL, et al. Variation in primary health care services after implementation of quality improvement policy in Brazil. Fam Pract 2020; 37:69-80.
- 17 Vieira-Meyer APGF, Morais APP, Guimarães JMX, Campelo ILB, Vieira NFC, Machado MFAS, et al. Infraestrutura e processo de trabalho na atenção primária à saúde: PMAQ no Ceará. Rev Saúde Pública 2020; 54:62.
- 18 Luz LA, Aquino R, Medina MG. Avaliação da qualidade da atenção pré-natal no Brasil. Saúde Debate 2018; 42(spe2):111-26.
- 19 World Health Organization. World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines for Children, 3rd List, 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
- 20 Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica e Insumos Estratégicos, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Ministério da Saúde. Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais: Rename. 8ª Ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
- 21 Coelho HLL, Rey LC, Medeiros MSG, Barbosa RA, Fonseca SGC, Costa PQ. Uma comparação crítica entre a Lista de Medicamentos Essenciais para Crianças da Organização Mundial de Saúde e a Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais (Rename). J Pediatr (Rio J) 2013; 89:171-8.
- 22 Allik M, Ramos D, Agranonik M, Pinto Júnior EP, Ichihara MY, Barreto ML, et al. Developing a small-area deprivation measure for Brazil. Technical report. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2020.
- 23 Collins LM, Lanza ST. Latent class and latent transition analysis with applications in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
- 24 Vermunt JK. Latent class analysis of complex sample survey data: application to dietary data. J Am Stat Assoc 2002; 97:736-7.
- 25 Visser M, Epaoli S. A guide to detecting and modeling local dependence in latent class analysis models. Struct Equ Modeling 2022; 29:971-82.
- 26 Bolck A, Croon M, Hagenaars J. Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: one-step versus three-step estimators. Polit Anal 2004; 12:3-27.
- 27 Barros DF, Barbieri AR, Ivo ML, Silva MG. O contexto da formação dos agentes comunitários de saúde no Brasil. Texto & Contexto Enferm 2010; 19:78-84.
- 28 Levy FM, Matos PES, Tomita NE. Programa de agentes comunitários de saúde: a percepção de usuários e trabalhadores da saúde. Cad Saúde Pública 2004; 20:197-203.
- 29 Facchini LA, Piccini RX, Tomasi E, Thumé E, Silveira DS, Siqueira FV, et al. Desempenho do PSF no Sul e no Nordeste do Brasil: avaliação institucional e epidemiológica da atenção básica à saúde. Ciênc Saúde Colet 2006; 11:669-81.
- 30 Neves RG, Flores TR, Duro SMS, Nunes BP, Tomasi E. Tendência temporal da cobertura da Estratégia Saúde da Família no Brasil, regiões e Unidades da Federação, 2006-2016. Epidemiol Serv Saúde 2018; 27:e2017170.
- 31 Dourado I, Medina MG, Aquino R. The effect of the Family Health Strategy on usual source of care in Brazil: data from the 2013 National Health Survey (PNS 2013). Int J Equity Health 2016; 15:151.
- 32 Macinko J, Guanais FC, Fátima M, Souza M. Evaluation of the impact of the Family Health Program on infant mortality in Brazil, 1990-2002. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60:13-9.
- 33 Aquino R, Oliveira NF, Barreto ML. Impact of the family health program on infant mortality in Brazilian municipalities. Am J Public Health 2009; 99:87-93.
- 34 França EB, Lansky S, Rego MAS, Malta DC, França JS, Teixeira R, et al. Leading causes of child mortality in Brazil, in 1990 and 2015: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2017; 20 Suppl 1:46-60.
- 35 França GV, Restrepo-Méndez MC, Maia MF, Victora CG, Barros AJ. Coverage and equity in reproductive and maternal health interventions in Brazil: impressive progress following the implementation of the Unified Health System. Int J Equity Health 2016; 15:149.
- 36 Tomasi E, Fernandes PAA, Fischer T, Siqueira FCV, Silveira DS, Thumé E, et al. Qualidade da atenção pré-natal na rede básica de saúde do Brasil: indicadores e desigualdades sociais. Cad Saúde Pública 2017; 33:e00195815.
- 37 Barros RD, Aquino R, Souza LEPF. Evolution of the structure and results of Primary Health Care in Brazil between 2008 and 2019. Ciênc Saúde Colet 2022; 27:4289-301.
- 38 Wong KLM, Restrepo-Méndez MC, Barros AJD, Victora CG. Socioeconomic inequalities in skilled birth attendance and child stunting in selected low and middle income countries: wealth quintiles or deciles? PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174823.
- 39 Mujica OJ, Sanhueza A, Carvajal-Velez L, Vidaletti LP, Costa JC, Barros AJD, et al. Recent trends in maternal and child health inequalities in Latin America and the Caribbean: analysis of repeated national surveys. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:125.
- 40 Araujo JP, Viera CS, Oliveira BRG, Gaiva MA, Rodrigues RM. Assessment of the essential attributes of primary health care for children. Rev Bras Enferm 2018; 71 Suppl 3:1366-72.
- 41 Samelli AG, Tomazelli GA, Almeida MHM, Oliver FC, Rondon-Melo S, Molini-Avejonas DR. Evaluation of at-risk infant care: comparison between models of primary health care. Rev Saúde Pública 2019; 53:98.
- 42 Cruz MJB, Santos AFD, Araújo LHL, Andrade EIG. A coordenação do cuidado na qualidade da assistência à saúde da mulher e da criança no PMAQ. Cad Saúde Pública 2019; 35:e00004019.
- 43 Kaunonen M, Hannula L, Tarkka MT. A systematic review of peer support interventions for breastfeeding. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21:1943-54.
- 44 Beake S, Pellowe C, Dykes F, Schmied V, Bick D. A systematic review of structured compared with non-structured breastfeeding programmes to support the initiation and duration of exclusive and any breastfeeding in acute and primary health care settings. Matern Child Nutr 2012; 8:141-61.
- 45 Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Análise de implantação da Rede Amamenta Brasil: relatório de pesquisa. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013.
- 46 Venancio SI, Martins MC, Sanches MT, Almeida H, Rios GS, Frias PG. Deployment analysis of the Brazilian Breastfeeding Network: challenges and prospects for promoting breastfeeding in primary care. Cad Saúde Pública 2013; 29:2261-74.
- 47 Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Agenda de compromissos para a saúde integral da criança e redução da mortalidade infantil. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004.
- 48 Departamento de Atenção Básica, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. (Cadernos de Atenção Básica, 32).
- 49 Baratieri T, Lentsck MH, Falavina LP, Soares LG, Prezotto KH, Pitilin EB. Longitudinalidade do cuidado: fatores associados à adesão à consulta puerperal segundo dados do PMAQ-AB. Cad Saúde Pública 2022; 38:e00103221.
- 50 Silva LL, Feliciano KV, Oliveira LN, Pedrosa EN, Corrêa MS, Souza AI. Women's care during home visits for the "First Comprehensive Healthcare Week". Rev Gaúcha Enferm 2016; 37:e59248.
- 51 Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Criança: orientações para implementação. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2018.
- 52 Ertem IO. Developmental difficulties in early childhood. Prevention, early identification, assessment and intervention in low- and middle-income countries: a review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
- 53 Fundo das Nações Unidas para a Infância; Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Panorama da violência letal e sexual contra crianças e adolescentes no Brasil. São Paulo: Fundo das Nações Unidas para a Infância/Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública; 2021.
Edited by
Data availability
The databases used in the study, including extraction codes, analyses, and results, are available in the repository: https://github.com/cidacslab/cidacs-phc/tree/be454ff81b3d7afa07dcf5f341ff2ceca0fe3390/Latent%20Class%20Analysis_Child%20Care_GITHUB. The sources of information used in the study are indicated in the body of the article.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
10 Nov 2025 -
Date of issue
2025
History
-
Received
07 Mar 2025 -
Reviewed
19 June 2025 -
Accepted
21 July 2025


