Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly

O desempenho do Mini-Cog em uma amostra de idosos com baixo nível educacional

Abstract

Objectives:

To study the criterion validity of the Mini-Cog in low educational level elderly.

Design:

Cross-sectional and validation design.

Setting:

Policlínica Piquet Carneiro, an outpatient unit of Rio de Janeiro State University Hospital, in Brazil. Participants: A convenient sample consisting of 306 individuals, 65 yrs or older, selected from April 8th to July 15th, 2002.

Methods:

All participants underwent comprehensive geriatric evaluations which included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the cognitive part of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly - Revised (CAMCOG-R). They were classified as demented or non-demented (DSM-IV). A post-hoc analysis was performed on the data from the 3 word recall test of the MMSE, and the Clock Drawing Test from the CAMCOG-R, and respective scores were added and interpreted in accordance with the Mini-Cog protocol.

Results:

293 individuals completed all the study steps; 211 had 4 or less years of schooling and were included in the data analysis. 32% had dementia. Mini-Cog sensitivity and specificity was consistently low independently of the different cut-off points considered. The best performance was found at the cut-off point of 2/3 which yielded sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 65%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The Mini-Cog is not a good cognitive screening tool for individuals with less than five years of formal education.

Key words:
neuropsychology; dementia; mass screening; aging; ambulatory care; validity.

Resumo

Estudar a validade de critério do Mini-Cog em idosos com baixo nível educacional.

Desenho:

transversal e de validação.

Cenário:

Policlínica Piquet Carneiro, uma unidade ambulatorial do Hospital da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, no Brasil. Participantes: Uma amostra de conveniência constituída de 306 indivíduos, 65 anos ou mais, selecionados entre 8 de abril e 15 de julho de 2002.

Métodos:

Todos foram submetidos a uma avaliação geriátrica abrangente, que incluiu o Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM) e a parte cognitiva do Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly - Revised (CAMCOG-R), e foram classificados segundo sua condição de ser ou não portador de demência (DSM-IV). Foi feita uma análise post-hoc dos dados do teste de evocação de três palavras, incluído no MEEM, e do Teste do Desenho do Relógio, incluído no CAMCOG-R. Os resultados de cada teste foram agrupados e interpretados de acordo com o protocolo do Mini-Cog.

Resultados:

293 indivíduos completaram todas as etapas do estudo, e 211 tinham quatro ou menos anos de escolaridade e tiveram seus dados analisados; 32% tinham demência. A sensibilidade e a especificidade do Mini-Cog foram consistentemente baixas, independente do ponto de corte considerado. O melhor desempenho, no ponto de corte 2/3, registrou sensibilidade e especificidade de 60% e 65%, respectivamente.

Conclusão:

O Mini-Cog não é uma boa ferramenta para triagem cognitiva de indivíduos com menos de cinco anos de educação formal.

Palavras-chave:
neuropsicologia; demência; envelhecimento; programas de rastreamento; assistência ambulatorial; validade.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

References

  • 1
    Lopez OL, Becker JT, Wisniewski S, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment alters the natural history of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:310-314.
  • 2
    Hashimoto M. Does donepezil treatment slow the progression of hippocampal atrophy in patients with Alzheimer's disease? Am J Psychiatry 2005;62:676-682.
  • 3
    Lyseng-Williamson KA. Galantamine: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacoeconomics 2002;20:919-942.
  • 4
    Brodaty H. Screening for cognitive impairment in general practice: toward a consensus. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998;12:1-13.
  • 5
    Ganguli M. Detection and management of cognitive impairment in primary care: The Steel Valley Seniors Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1668-1675.
  • 6
    Valcour VG, Masaki KH, Curb JD, Blanchette PL. The detection of dementia in the primary care setting. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2964-2968.
  • 7
    Silvestre J, Kalache A, Ramos LR, Veras RP. Population ageing in Brazil and the health care sector. Bold: Q J Int Inst Ageing 1998;7:4-12.
  • 8
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-98.
  • 9
    Shulman, KI. Clock-drawing: Is it the ideal cognitive screening test? Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 2000;15:548-561.
  • 10
    Schramm U, Berger G, Müller R, et al. Psychometric properties of Clock Drawing Test and MMSE or Short Performance Test (SKT) in dementia screening in a memory clinic population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 2002;17:254-260.
  • 11
    Manos PJ. The utility of the ten-point clock test as a screen for cognitive impairment in general hospital patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1997;19:439-444.
  • 12
    Shulman KI, Gold DP, Cohen CA, Zucchero CA. Clock-drawing and dementia in the community: a longitudinal study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 1993;8:487-496.
  • 13
    Wolf-Klein GP, Silverstone FA, Levy AP, et al. Screening for Alzheimer's Disease by clock drawing. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:730-734.
  • 14
    Sunderland T, Hill JL, Mellow AM, et al. Clock drawing in Alzheimer's Disease. A novel measure of dementia severity. J Am Geriat Soc 1989;37:725-729.
  • 15
    Lourenço RA, Ribeiro-Filho ST, Moreira IFH, Paradela EMP, Miranda AS. The Clock Drawing Test: performance in low educational level elderly. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2008;30:309-315.
  • 16
    Storey JE, Rowland JTJ, Basic D, et al. Accuracy of the Clock Drawing Test for detecting dementia in a multicultural sample of elderly Australian patients. Int Psychogeriatr 2002;14:259-271
  • 17
    Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, et al. The Mini-Cog: a cognitive "vital signs" measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15:1021-1027
  • 18
    Borson S, Scanlan J, Chen P, Ganguli M. The Mini-Cog as a screen for dementia: validation in a population-based sample. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1451-1454
  • 19
    Scanlan J, Borson S. The Mini-Cog: receiver operating characteristics with expert and naïve raters. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001;16:216-222.
  • 20
    Borson S, Scanlan JM, Watanabe J, Tu SP, Lessig M. Simplifying detection of cognitive impairment: comparison of the Mini-Cog and Mini-Mental State Examination in a multiethnic sample. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:871-874.
  • 21
    Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-Exame do Estado Mental: características psicométricas em idosos ambulatoriais. Rev Saude Publica 2006;40:712-719.
  • 22
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC; 1994.
  • 23
    Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:94-99.
  • 24
    Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179-186.
  • 25
    Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982;17:37-49.
  • 26
    Roth M, Huppert FA, Montjoy CQ, Tym E. CAMDEX-R: the Cambridge examination for mental disorders of the elderly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  • 27
    Ostrosky-Solis F, Ardila A, Rosselli M et al. Neuropsychological test performance in illiterate subjects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998;13:645-660
  • 28
    Ardila A, Rosselli M, Rosas P. Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: visuospatial and memory abilities. Brain Cogn 1989;11:147-166
  • 29
    Marcopulos BA, Gripshover DL, Broshek DK, McLain RH. Neuropsychological assessment of psychogeriatric patients with limited education. Clin Neuropsychol 1999;13: 147-56.
  • 30
    Tuokko H, Hadjistavropoulos T, Miller JA, Beattie BL. The Clock Test: a sensitive measure to differentiate normal elderly from those with Alzheimer disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:579-584.
  • 31
    Fillenbaum GG, Wilkinson WE, Welsh KA, Mohs RC. Discrimination between stages of Alzheimer's disease with subsets of Mini-Mental State Examination items. An analysis of Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease data. Arch Neurol 1994;51:916-921.
  • 32
    Braekhus A, Laake K, Engedal K. The Mini-Mental State Examination: identifying the most efficient variables for detecting cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:1139-1145.
  • 33
    Chandler MJ, Lacritz LH, Cicerello AR, et al. Three-word recall in normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004;26:1128-1133.
  • 34
    Cullum CM, Thompson LL, Smernoff EN. Three-word recall as a measure of memory. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993;15: 321-329.
  • 35
    Lourenço RA, Ribeiro-Filho ST. The accuracy of the Mini-Cog in screening low-educated elderly for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:376-378.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr-Jun 2009

History

  • Received
    16 Feb 2009
  • Accepted
    21 May 2009
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento R. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices, Torre Norte, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, CEP 04101-000, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistadementia@abneuro.org.br | demneuropsy@uol.com.br