cento e trinta molas foram divididas em treze subgrupos, de acordo com suas características e fabricantes (Morelli, Orthometric, Ormco e GAC), com ativação entre 100% e 1.000% do comprimento efetivo de níquel-titânio presente na mola (Y), a 37 °C. Dados de desativação foram coletados e a deformação foi obtida de forma gráfica. Os valores foram comparados por meio de análise de variância e teste post-hoc de Tukey.

Resultados:

as molas da Morelli apresentaram a mesma quantidade de deformação considerando-se 700% de ativação de Y; as molas da Orthometric tiveram a mesma quantidade de deformação até 600-700% de Y; as molas da Ormco tiveram a mesma quantidade de deformação até 700-800% de Y; e, por fim, a maioria das molas da GAC apresentou deformação semelhante até 800-1.000% de ativação. Todas as molas testadas puderam ser ativadas até 700% sem ruptura.

Conclusões:

a maioria dos subgrupos se deformou de maneira semelhante até 700% de ativação, sem ruptura das molas. Os subgrupos 4B, 4C, 4D e 4E demonstraram a mesma quantidade de deformação até 1.000% de ativação, sem nenhuma ruptura.

Palavras-chave:
NiTi; Deformação; Biomecânica.

Autoria

Camilla Ivini Viana Vieira

MSc,Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilAraraquara, São Paulo, BrazilMSc,Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Reis

Assistant Professor, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Dental Material, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilAraraquara, São Paulo, BrazilAssistant Professor, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Dental Material, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Luiz Geraldo Vaz

Full Professor, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Dental Material, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilAraraquara, São Paulo, BrazilFull Professor, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Dental Material, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Lídia Parsekian Martins

Assistant Professor, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilAraraquara, São Paulo, BrazilAssistant Professor, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Renato Parsekian Martins

Private practice and part-time Faculty, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.Universidade Estadual PaulistaBrazilAraraquara, São Paulo, BrazilPrivate practice and part-time Faculty, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Contact address: Renato Parsekian Martins E-mail: dr_renatopmartins@hotmail.com

Author contributions Conception or design of the study: JMSNR, LGV, LPM. Data acquisition, analysis or interpretation: CIVV, JMSNR, LGV. Writing the article: CIVV, RPM. Critical revision of the article: LGV, LPM. Final approval of the article: JMSNR, LPM, RPM. Obtained funding: CIVV, LPM. Overall responsibility: RPM.

" The authors report no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Figuras | Tabelas

Figuras (7)
Tabelas (5)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Nickel-titanium closed coil spring, the X dimension corresponds to the total length of the spring and the Y dimension corresponds to the length of the nickel-titanium portion.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Nickel-titanium closed coil spring, before activation (B) and after 900% of activation (A). After heating it above a certain temperature (Af), the martensitic deformation will resume due to the shape memory effect.

Thumbnail

Figure 3
Space closure after extraction of first premolars where a nickel titanium spring was attached to a hook from the first molar to a hook distal to the canine (23 mm distance), remaining active even after space closure (minus 7 mm of pre-molar space).

Thumbnail

Figure 4
A) Load/deflection graph for the springs of the subgroup 1A activated at 900% of Y (20.7 mm of activation or 29.3 mm if the size of the spring is accounted). The blue box corresponds to the distance between the hook of the first molar and a hook distal to the upper canine (minus size of the spring), as in Figure 3 (23 mm minus X). Note that to take full advantage of the springs' SE properties, an increase of approximately 3 mm in the eyelets (not in nickel titanium portion) would be required in order to maintain the force in the SE plateau. That would shift the blue box to the left the same 3 mm. B) Same situation on the subgroup 1B, however, full SE capability would not be achieved in last 2 mm or so of space closure, since the force would start to decrease due to lack of stress.

Thumbnail

Figure 5
A 15- mm long nickel-titanium spring (nickel-titanium portion with 9.8 mm), activated 9.8mm. A spam of activation from the hook of a first molar to the canine, from 23 mm to 16 mm (similar to Figure 3), is shown by the blue arrow. In this case, due to the springs length, that activation would account 8 mm, deactivating to 1 mm after space closure. Note that no superelasticity will not exist in this spring at this activation.

Thumbnail

Figure 6
A 7 -mm long nickel-titanium spring (2.3 mm of nickel-titanium portion) activated approximately 16 mm, which would result in an activation of 23 mm. It can be observed that due to the shape of the load-deflection graph, the pseudo-plateau area, or the near-to-constant force, of the spring would not be used during a 7 mm space closure.

Thumbnail

Figure 7
A 9- mm long nickel-titanium spring (3.9 mm of nickel-titanium portion) activated 23.4 mm, or 600% the length of its SE material. A spam of activation from 14 mm to 7 mm is shown by the blue arrow. Note that a pseudo-plateau can be used in this situation only if the spring is overactivated 10 mm beyond its affixation. The amount of overactivation will depend on the spring's total length, the length of nickel-titanium portion, and the interbracket distance.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Commercial brands and groups division.

Thumbnail

Table 2
Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of the total length of group 1 springs.

Thumbnail

Table 3
Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of group 2 springs.

Thumbnail

Table 4
Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of the total length of group 3 springs.

Thumbnail

Table 5
Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of the total length of group 4 springs.

Figure 1 Nickel-titanium closed coil spring, the X dimension corresponds to the total length of the spring and the Y dimension corresponds to the length of the nickel-titanium portion.

Figure 2 Nickel-titanium closed coil spring, before activation (B) and after 900% of activation (A). After heating it above a certain temperature (Af), the martensitic deformation will resume due to the shape memory effect.

Figure 3 Space closure after extraction of first premolars where a nickel titanium spring was attached to a hook from the first molar to a hook distal to the canine (23 mm distance), remaining active even after space closure (minus 7 mm of pre-molar space).

Figure 4 A) Load/deflection graph for the springs of the subgroup 1A activated at 900% of Y (20.7 mm of activation or 29.3 mm if the size of the spring is accounted). The blue box corresponds to the distance between the hook of the first molar and a hook distal to the upper canine (minus size of the spring), as in Figure 3 (23 mm minus X). Note that to take full advantage of the springs' SE properties, an increase of approximately 3 mm in the eyelets (not in nickel titanium portion) would be required in order to maintain the force in the SE plateau. That would shift the blue box to the left the same 3 mm. B) Same situation on the subgroup 1B, however, full SE capability would not be achieved in last 2 mm or so of space closure, since the force would start to decrease due to lack of stress.

Figure 5 A 15- mm long nickel-titanium spring (nickel-titanium portion with 9.8 mm), activated 9.8mm. A spam of activation from the hook of a first molar to the canine, from 23 mm to 16 mm (similar to Figure 3), is shown by the blue arrow. In this case, due to the springs length, that activation would account 8 mm, deactivating to 1 mm after space closure. Note that no superelasticity will not exist in this spring at this activation.

Figure 6 A 7 -mm long nickel-titanium spring (2.3 mm of nickel-titanium portion) activated approximately 16 mm, which would result in an activation of 23 mm. It can be observed that due to the shape of the load-deflection graph, the pseudo-plateau area, or the near-to-constant force, of the spring would not be used during a 7 mm space closure.

Figure 7 A 9- mm long nickel-titanium spring (3.9 mm of nickel-titanium portion) activated 23.4 mm, or 600% the length of its SE material. A spam of activation from 14 mm to 7 mm is shown by the blue arrow. Note that a pseudo-plateau can be used in this situation only if the spring is overactivated 10 mm beyond its affixation. The amount of overactivation will depend on the spring's total length, the length of nickel-titanium portion, and the interbracket distance.

Table 1 Commercial brands and groups division.

Commercial brand	Specification	Length (mm)*	X (mm)	Y (mm)	Force plateau (gf)*	Subgroup	n
Group 1 (Morelli Ortodontia, Brazil)		7	8.6	2.3	250	1A	10
Group 1 (Morelli Ortodontia, Brazil)		9	10.3	3.9	250	1B	10
Group 2 (Orthometric, Brazil)		7	6.8	2.1	175	2A	10
Group 2 (Orthometric, Brazil)		9	8.9	4.1	250	2B	10
Group 3 (Ormco, USA)	Light	9	8.85	3.25	80	3A	10
Group 3 (Ormco, USA)	Heavy	9	9	3.1	150	3B	10
Group 4 (GAC, USA)	Sentalloy 25g	10	8.5	3.2	25	4A	10
	Sentalloy 50g	10	8.5	3.2	50	4B	10
	Sentalloy 100g	10	8.5	3.2	100	4C	10
	Sentalloy 150g	10	8.5	3.2	150	4D	10
	Sentalloy 200g	10	8.5	3.2	200	4E	10
	Sentalloy 250g	10	8.5	3.2	250	4F	10
	Sentalloy 300g	10	8.5	3.2	300	4G	10

* information supplied by manufacturer.

Table 2 Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of the total length of group 1 springs.

Activation	Subgroup 1A Deformation			Subgroup 1B Deformation
Activation	n	%	mm	n	%	mm
400%	10	2.6%	0.06 (0.05)^A	10	1.3%	0.05 (0.07)^A
500%	10	3.9%	0.09 (0.05)^A	10	3.1%	0.12 (0.08)^A
600%	10	3.9%	0.09 (0.11)^A	10	5.6%	0.22 (0.18)^A
700%	10	9.1%	0.21 (0.09)^AB	10	7.7%	0.30 (0.33)^A
800%	10	17.4%	0.40 (0.18)^B	10	16.4%	0.64 (0.50)^AB
900%	10	29.6%	0.68 (0.26)^C	10	36.4%	1.42 (0.68)^BC
1000%	10	35.2%	0.81 (0.36)^C	9	55.9%	2.18 (1.28)^C
p		< 0.001			< 0.001

Table 3 Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of group 2 springs.

Activation (%)	Subgroup 2A Deformation			Subgroup 2B Deformation
Activation (%)	n	%	mm	n	%	mm
400%	10	10.0%	0.21 (0.18)^A	10	6.6%	0.27 (0.18)^A
500%	10	13.8%	0.29 (0.24)^A	10	14.4%	0.59 (0.26)^A
600%	10	15.7%	0.33 (0.28)^A	10	22.4%	0.92 (0.37)^AB
700%	10	36.2%	0.76 (0.38)^AB	10	36.8%	1.51 (0.84)^BC
800%	9	66.2%	1.39 (0.68)^BC	5	44.1%	1.81 (0.63)^C
900%	7	96.7%	2.03 (0.84)^C	1	81.2%	3.33
1000%	4	102.4%	2.15 (1.74)^C	0	-	-
p		< 0.001			< 0.001

Table 4 Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of the total length of group 3 springs.

Activation (%)	Subgroup 3A Deformation			Subgroup 3C Deformation
Activation (%)	n	%	mm	n	%	mm
300%	10	3.7%	0.12 (0.08)^A	-	-	-
400%	10	6.5%	0.21 (0.10)^A	-	-	-
500%	10	9.5%	0.31 (0.16)^A	-	-	-
600%	10	17.5%	0.57 (0.23)^A	10	17.7%	0.55 (0.24)^A
700%	10	42.1%	1.37 (0.37)^A	10	31.6%	0.98 (0.39)^A
800%	10	107.1%	3.48 (1.58)^B	10	66.1%	2.05 (1.05)^A
900%	5	147.1%	4.78 (0.98)^B	10	120.0%	3.72 (1.81)^B
1000%	3	137.5%	4.47 (3.67)^B	6	154.5%	4.79 (1.38)^B
p		< 0.001			< 0.001

- Non SE.

Table 5 Average deformation in millimeters (SD in parenthesis) and in percentage values of the total length of group 4 springs.

Activation	Subgroup 4A Deformation			Subgroup 4B Deformation			Subgroup 4C Deformation			Subgroup 4D Deformation
Activation	n	%	mm	n	%	mm	n	%	mm	n	%	mm
300%	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	2.2%	0.07 (0.05)	-	-	-
400%	10	3.4%	0.11 (0.09)^A	10	2.2%	0.07 (0.05)	10	2.2%	0.07 (0.06)	10	3.4%	0.10 (0.07)
500%	10	2.5%	0.08 (0.05)^A	10	2.2%	0.07 (0.06)	10	2.5%	0.08 (0.05)	10	4.1%	0.13 (0.13)
600%	10	3.4%	0.10 (0.12)^A	10	2.2%	0.07 (0.06)	10	2.5%	0.08 (0.06)	10	4.1%	0.13 (0.13)
700%	10	2.8%	0.11 (0.08)^A	10	2.2%	0.07 (0.06)	10	2.5%	0.08 (0.06)	10	3.4%	0.10 (0.12)
800%	10	14.0%	0.45 (0.29)^A	10	1.6%	0.05 (0.05)	10	2.5%	0.08 (0.04)	10	3.4%	0.10 (0.12)
900%	10	59.7%	1.91 (1.02)^B	10	1.3%	0.04 (0.04)	10	1.3%	0.04* (0.07)	10	3.8%	0.12 (0.19)
1000%	10	44.1%	1.41 (0.96)^B	10	-0.6%	-0.02 (0.14)	10	1.3%	0.04* (0.25)	10	2.8%	0.09* (0.19)
p	< 0.001			0.076			0.965			0.981
Activation	Subgroup 4E Deformation			Subgroup 4F Deformation			Subgroup 4G Deformation
Activation	n	%	mm	n	%	mm	n	%	mm
300%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
400%	-	-	-	10	4.1%	0.13 (0.05)^A	-	-	-
500%	10	1.6%	0.05 (0.04)	10	4.1%	0.13 (0.07)^A	10	3.4%	0.10 (0.09)^A
600%	10	0.6%	0.02 (0.03)	10	3.8%	0.12 (0.08)^A	10	3.4%	0.10 (0.08)^A
700%	10	0.9%	0.03 (0.03)	10	3.4%	0.11 (0.06)^A	10	1.6%	0.05 (0.05)^A
800%	10	-0.01	-0.02* (0.18)	10	0.9%	0.03* (0.07)^A	10	0.9%	0.03* (0.86)^A
900%	10	1.6%	0.05* (0.27)	10	12.5%	- 0.4 (0.23)^B	9	38.1%	1.22 (1.41)^B
1000%	10	1.6%	0.05* (0.38)	10	72.5%	2.32 (0.66)^C	7	89.7%	2.87 (1.11)^C
p	0.975			< 0.001			< 0.001

* Non significant values.
- Non SE.

Como citar

copiar

Dental Press International Av. Luís Teixeira Mendes, 2712 , 87015-001 - Maringá - PR, Tel: (55 44) 3033-9818 - Maringá - PR - Brazil
E-mail: artigos@dentalpress.com.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Mensagem

[1] Contact address: Renato Parsekian Martins E-mail: dr_renatopmartins@hotmail.com