abstract
With this article we seek to problematize the perception of the so called "periphery literature" as a cultural and linguistic tendency that opposes a center or a "hegemonic circuit" in which the periphery should be "included", once the antagonisms are overcome. In view of the concept of the multitude offered by thinkers Hardt and Negri, we propose, on the contrary, a subversion of the relation center/periphery, rendering the poor and "marginal" literature a centrality not in relation to yet another peripheral territory, but as paradigm of a linguistic production marked by resistance lines at once communitarian, networked and syncretic.
Keywords:
marginal literature; periphery; multitude; Ferréz; Sarau Vira-Lata