Mapeo sistemático de la literatura sobre evaluación docente (2013-2017)

Corona, Claudia Navarro; Montoya, María Soledad Ramírez

doi:10.1590/S1678-4634201844185677

Claudia Navarro Corona

- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México. Contactos: c.navarrocorona@gmail.com; solramirez@itesm.mx

María Soledad Ramírez Montoya

- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México. Contactos: c.navarrocorona@gmail.com; solramirez@itesm.mx

Claudia Navarro Corona es doctora en Ciencias Educativas por el Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo de la Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (IIDE-UABC), México. Es profesora-investigadora en la Escuela de Humanidades y Educación del Tecnológico de Monterrey. Es miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI), en México y miembro del Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa (COMIE). Su línea de investigación es la gestión educativa.

María Soledad Ramírez Montoya es profesora-investigadora de la Escuela de Humanidades y Educación del Tecnológico de Monterrey. Es coordinadora del Grupo de Investigación e Innovación en Educación del Tecnológico de Monterrey, directora de la oficina del Consejo Internacional para la Educación Abierta de la Educación a Distancia (ICDE) y directora de la Cátedra UNESCO: Movimiento educativo abierto para América Latina.

	Pregunta	Información buscada
RQ1	¿Qué tendencias de producción se observan en el periodo comprendido entre2013 y 2017 en el tema de evaluación docente?	Aumento o disminución en la producción a través de los años.
RQ2	¿En qué idiomas y en qué países se produce la investigación sobre evaluación docente?	Idiomas. Países de producción.
RQ3	¿Cómo se caracteriza la producción sobre evaluación docente, en cuanto al tipo de trabajos y accesibilidad?	Acceso abierto o cerrado. Tipos de documentos: artículos, libros, capítulos, otros.
RQ4	¿Qué trabajos han tenido mayor impacto en la producción científica sobre evaluación docente?	Número de citas.
RQ5	¿Qué líneas se han desarrollado en la investigación sobre evaluación docente?	Temas específicos de producción

Criterios	SCOPUS	WOS
Periodo	Enero 2013- 26 de junio de 2017
Idioma	Todos
Tipos de documentot	Todos
Área de conocimiento	Social Sciences	Education educational research Education Scientific Disciplines Social Sciences interdisciplinary

Criterio de exclusión	Número
Documentos duplicados	19
Documentos sin resumen disponible	10
Documentos no pertinentes	7
Total	36

Idioma	Total	%	Documentos
inglés; croata	1	1,14	[15]
chino	1	1,14	[54]
francés	1	1,14	[48]
turco	2	2,27	[58][94]
portugués	3	3,41	[9][77][92]
español	5	5,68	[20][21][31][50][80]
inglés	75	85,23	[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19] [22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][32][34][35][36][37][39][40] [43][44][45][46][49][51][52][53][55][56][57][59][60][61][62] [63][64][65][66][68][69][70][71][72][75][82][83][84][85][86] [87][89][91][93][95][96][98][99][101][103][104][105][106]
Total	88	100

Tipo de documento	Cantidad	%	Documentos
Capítulo de libro	1	1,14	[4]
Editorial	1	1,14	[29]
Artículo de difusión	1	1,14	[32]
Revisiones	3	3,41	[2][43][55]
Artículo en prensa	3	3,41	[37][66][93]
Conference Paper	6	6,82	[11][16][40][45][64][91]
Proceedings Paper	10	11,36	[36][54][57][63][71][72][83][84][86][87]
Artículo	63	71,59	[1][3][5][6][7][8][9][10][12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20][21] [22][23][24][25][27][28][30][31][34][35][39][44][46][48][49] [50][51][52][53][56][58][59][60][61][62][65][68][69][70][75] [77][80][82][85][89][92][94][95][96][98][99][101][103][104] [105][106]
Total	88	100

Tipo de acceso	Total	%	Documentos
Acceso abierto	12	13, 63	[6][31][39][50][51][59][68][69][77][80][92][98]
Acceso cerrado	76	86,36	[1][2][3][4][5][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] [19][20][21][22][23][24][27][28][29][30][32][34][35][36][37] [40][43][44][45][46][48][49][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][60] [61][62][63][64][65][66][70][71][72][75][76][82][83][84][85][86][87][89] [91][93][94][95][96][99][101][103][104][105][106]
Total	88

Revista de acceso abierto	No. de documentos	JCR*	H
Educational Assessment	1	Q2	20
Ensaio	1	Q2	7
Formacion Universitaria	1	Q3	6
Profesorado	2	Q3	4
Sage Open	1	Q3	9
Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology	1	Q3	21
Meta: Avaliacao	1	Q4	3
Cogent Education	2	No encontrado
Journal For Educators Teachers And Trainers	1	No encontrado
Journal Of New Approaches In Educational Research	1	No encontrado

Documentos	Cantidad	Número de veces citado
[13]	1	59
[1]	1	9
[29]	1	8
[34]	1	7
[12][16][23][24]	4	6
[25]	1	5
[2][35]	2	4
[17][22][30][44]	4	3
[3][28][40][50][51]	5	2
[9][18][21][37][49][52][105][106]	8	1
[4][5][6][7][8][10][11][14][15][19][20][27][31][32][36][39][43][45] [46][48][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][68] [69][70][71][72][75][77][80][82][83][84][85][86][87][89][91][92][93] [94][95][96][98][99][101][103][104]	60	0
Total	88	--

Documento	País de procedencia	Número de citas
[34]	Australia	7
[24]		6
[35]		4
[13]	Bélgica	59
[16]	Brasil	6
[2]	Francia, Italia	4
[29]	Reino Unido	8
[12]		6
[25]		5
[1]	Estados Unidos	9
[23]	Estados Unidos	6

	Línea	Total	Documentos
	En consolidación	1. Evaluación de los docentes	19	[1][7][9][11][20][29][31][37][40][50][57][58][68][70][72][83][84][86][94]
		2. Propuestas de evaluación	16	[3][14][24][51][53][56][60][63][64][69][71][75][80][89][93][99]
		3. Relación de resultados y factores asociados	14	[2][16][18][19][22][27][32][43][44][45][52][59][87][106]
		4. Percepciones sobre procesos de evaluación	13	[4][5][15][17][28][35][36][39][65][91][92][98][105]
		5. Calidad de las evaluaciones	10	[6][8][10][13][30][49][62][82][85][101]
Emergentes	1. Uso e interpretación de resultados	7	[12][21][25][77][96][103][104]
	2. Evaluaciones realizadas por superiores	3	[23][48][95]
	3. Efecto de las evaluaciones	3	[34][55][61]
	4. Condiciones de valor agregado de los docentes	2	[46] [66]
	5. Participación de los docentes en su evaluación	1	[54]
Total		88	documentos

[1]	BERK R. A. Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness. Medical Teacher , v. 35. n. 1. p. 15-26, 2013.
[2]	BIANCHINI S., LISSONI F., PEZZONI M. Instructor characteristics and students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Evidence from an Italian engineering school. European Journal of Engineering Education , v. 38. n. 1. p. 38-57, 2013.
[3]	BRAND M. W., EKAMBARAM V., TUCKER P., AGGARWAL R. Residents as teachers: Psychiatry and family medicine residents’ self-assessment of teaching knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Academic Psychiatry , v. 37. n. 5. p. 313-316, 2013.
[4]	BURDEN P. Teacher perceptions of the introduction of student evaluation of teaching in Japanese tertiary education. Enhancing Learning and Teaching Through Student Feedback in Social Sciences , p. 145-169, 2013.
[5]	CEKIC O. Evaluation of teacher candidates’ views on scientific research methods. Anthropologist , v. 16. n. 3. p. 595-603, 2013.
[6]	DODEEN H. Validity, reliability, and potential Bias of short forms of students’ evaluation of teaching: The case of UAE university. Educational Assessment , v. 18. n. 4. p. 235-250, 2013.
[7]	ELANNANI H. Evaluation of teachers for the 21st century training project. International Education Studies , v. 6. n. 3. p. 48-54, 2013.
[8]	KIM B.J., OTANI K., CHO J.-I.L. Customer Satisfaction Theory in Public Administration Education: Revisiting Student Evaluation of Teaching. International Journal of Public Administration , v. 36. n. 11. p. 791-797, 2013.
[9]	MATUICHUK M., DA SILVA M.C. Evaluation of teachers by students in the improvement of institutional performance: UTFPR/SIAVI [Avaliação do docente pelo discente na melhoria do desempenho institucional: UTFPR/SIAVI]. Ensaio , v. 21. n. 79. p. 323-348, 2013.
[10]	PANG J., LIU X. A study on the quantitative analysis and evaluation of teaching quality for higher education institutions. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education , v. 11. n. 2. p. 57-63, 2013.
[11]	REZAC M., CIHLAROVA D., STANKOVA H. Assessment of teaching results at technical university. IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2013. IEEE global… [S. l.: s. n.], 2013. p. 247-252.
[12]	SABRI D. Student evaluations of teaching as ‘fact-totems’: The case of the UK national student survey. Sociological Research , Online. v. 18. n. 4, 2013.
[13]	SPOOREN P., BROCKX B., MORTELMANS D. On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art. Review of Educational Research , v. 83. n. 4. p. 598-642, 2013.
[14]	TINOCA L., OLIVEIRA I. Formative assessment of teachers in the context of an online learning environment. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice , v. 19. n. 2. p. 221-234, 2013.
[15]	UZUNBOYLU H., HURSEN C. Evaluation of teachers’ attitudes and perceptions of competence regarding lifelong learning [Evaluacija nastavničkih stavova i poimanja kompetentnosti u pogledu cjeloživotnog učenja]. Croatian Journal of Education , v. 15. n. Spec. Ed. 3. p. 177-204, 2013.
[16]	VASCONCELOS F.H.L., DA SILVA T.E.V., DE ALMEIDA A.L.F., MOTA J.C.M., ANDRIOLA W.B. Multilinear decomposition application into students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness. IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON). IEEE global… [S. l.: s. n.], 2013. p. 910-916.
[17]	CHAN C.K.Y., LUK L.Y.Y., ZENG M. Teachers’ perceptions of student evaluations of teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation , v. 20. n. 4. p. 275-289, 2014.
[18]	CHOI B.-K., KIM J.-W. The influence of student and course characteristics on monotonic response patterns in student evaluation of teaching in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review , v. 15. n. 3. p. 483-492, 2014.
[19]	CHRISTIAENS W., SPOOREN P., MORTELMANS D., VAN LOON F. J. A. Students’ perceptions of learning, course grades, and student evaluation of teaching: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation , v. 20. n. 3. p. 13-21, 2014.
[20]	ELVIRA CARPINTERO M., CORAL GONZÁLEZ B., DIANA CABEZAS G. Comprehensive assessment of teachers. Profiles of teachers regarding their perception of the assessment [Evaluación integral en docentes. Perfiles de docentes con respecto su percepción de la evaluación]. Estudios Pedagogicos , v. 40. n. 1. p. 61-74, 2014.
[21]	FERNÁNDEZ B.C. Meanings given to the assessment of teaching and learning. interpretation from a group of physical education teachers [Significados otorgados a la evaluación de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. interpretación a partir de un grupo de maestros de educación física]. Estudios Pedagogicos , v. 40. n. 2. p. 65-82, 2014.
[22]	GRIFFIN T.J., HILTON III J., PLUMMER K., BARRET D. Correlation between grade point averages and student evaluation of teaching scores: taking a closer look. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , v. 39. n. 3. p. 339-348, 2014.
[23]	HARRIS D. N., SASS T. R. Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review , v. 40. p. 183-204, 2014.
[24]	HUYBERS, T Student evaluation of teaching: the use of best-worst scaling. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , v. 39. n. 4. p. 496-513, 2014.
[25]	JONES J., GAFFNEY-RHYS R., JONES E. Handle with care! An exploration of the potential risks associated with the publication and summative usage of student evaluation of teaching (SET) results. Journal of Further and Higher Education , v. 38. n. 1. p. 37-56, 2014.
[27]	MORI S., TANABE Y. Influence of instructor personality on student evaluation of teaching: A comparison between english majors and non-english majors. English Language Teaching , v. 8. n. 1, 2014.
[28]	POWELL N.J., RUBENSTEIN C., SAWIN E.M., ANNAN S. Student evaluations of teaching tools a qualitative examination of student perceptions. Nurse Educator , v. 39. n. 6. p. 274-279, 2014.
[29]	RICHARDSON J., GROSE J., DOMAN M., KELSEY J. The use of evidence-informed sustainability scenarios in the nursing curriculum: Development and evaluation of teaching methods. Nurse Education Today , v. 34. n. 4. p. 490-493, 2014.
[30]	SPOOREN P., MORTELMANS D., CHRISTIAENS W. Assessing the validity and reliability of a quick scan for student’s evaluation of teaching. Results from confirmatory factor analysis and G Theory. Studies in Educational Evaluation , v. 43. p. 88-94, 2014.
[31]	TERRÓN A.M., YAPO W. Q. Assessment of teacher’s competences in mathematical teachers of Puno (Perú) [Evaluación de las “competencias docentes” en maestros de matemáticas de puno (Perú)]. Profesorado , v. 18. n. 1. p. 257-278, 2014.
[32]	TSAMAKIS K., TOUMANIDIS S., NIKITEAS N., SFIKAKIS P. P. Personal characteristics may affect evaluation of teaching: A prospective study in medical students. Medical Teacher , v. 36. n. 1. p. 86-, 2014.
[34]	WINCHESTER T. M., WINCHESTER M.K. A longitudinal investigation of the impact of faculty reflective practices on students’ evaluations of teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology , v. 45. n. 1. p. 112-124, 2014.
[35]	WONG W. Y., MONI K. Teachers’ perceptions of and responses to student evaluation of teaching: purposes and uses in clinical education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , v. 39. n. 4. p. 397-411, 2014.
[36]	ABACI, O An evaluation of teacher candidates’ opinions about art education and form-meaning relationship. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION (INTE), 2014. v. 174. Anais… [S. l.: s. n.], 2015. p. 1791-1797.
[37]	AKINYEMI F. O. Technology use in Rwandan secondary schools: an assessment of teachers’ attitudes towards geographic information systems (GIS). International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education , 2015.
[39]	ATAIZI M. Communication education: Student perceptions and evaluations of teaching and learning quality. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , v. 2015. p. 104-107, 2015.
[40]	BHARADWAJ A. K. An evaluation of teaching theoretical graduate engineering courses adapting different techniques. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOOCS, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (IEEE MITE 2014). Anais… [S. l.: s. n.], 2015.p. 84-88.
[43]	DENNISON C. R., BUTZ R., SHAWN FUHRER R., CAREY J .P. Comparison of student evaluation of teaching results when stratified by protocol, course content, and course structure. International Journal of Engineering Education , v. 31. n. 6. p. 1476-1490, 2015.
[44]	ESTELAMI, H. The Effects of Survey Timing on Student Evaluation of Teaching Measures Obtained Using Online Surveys. Journal of Marketing Education , v. 37. n. 1. p. 54-64, 2015.
[45]	FAWAD H., MANARVI I.A. Student feedback & systematic evaluation of teaching and its correlation to learning theories, Pedagogy & Teaching skills. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING: LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE NOW, TALE 2014. Proceedings… [S. l.: s. n.], 2015. p. 398-404.
[46]	GANSLE K.A., NOELL G.H., GRANDSTAFF-BECKERS G., STRINGER A., ROBERTS N., BURNS J.M. Value-Added Assessment of Teacher Preparation: Implications for Special Education. Intervention in School and Clinic , v. 51. n. 2. p. 106-111, 2015.
[48]	LAPOINTE, JR; GUILLEMETTE, F The evaluation of teaching practicums by supervisors in schools. Revue des Sciences de L’Education , v. 41. n. 2. p. 199-217, 2015.
[49]	MITTAL S., GERA R., BATRA D.K. Evaluating the validity of student evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SET) in India. Education and Training , v. 57. n. 6. p. 623-638, 2015.
[50]	MORÁN R., CARDOSO E.O., CERECEDO M.T., ORTÍZ J.C. Evaluation of teaching skills of teachers graduated from institutes of higher education in México. The case of the subject technology in the secondary school [Evaluación de las competencias docentes de profesores formados en instituciones de educación superior: El caso de la asignatura de tecnología en la enseñanza secundaria]. Formación Universitaria , v. 8. n. 3. p. 57-64, 2015.
[51]	MORENO-MURCIA, JA; TORREGROSA, YS; PEDRENO, NB Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. Evaluation of teaching competencies in the university. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research , v. 4. n. 1. p. 54-, 2015.
[52]	PALMER S., HALL W. The impact of increasing course enrolment on student evaluation of teaching in engineering education. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education , v. 20. n. 1. p. 31-40, 2015.
[53]	RUPRICH, C; URHAHNE, D Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of teacher goals from a content perspective. International Journal of Educational Research , v. 72. p. 173-184, 2015.
[54]	WANG, DH; WANG, WJ Rethink on the Students’ Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Vocational Colleges. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CREATIVE EDUCATION, 2., 2015 (ICCE 2015). Proceedings… v. 11. pt. 2. [S. l.: s. n.], 2015. p. 155-160.
[55]	WARMAN S.M. Challenges and issues in the evaluation of teaching quality: How does it affect teachers’ professional practice? A UK perspective. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education , v. 42, n. 3. p. 245-251, 2015.
[56]	WICKS D., LUMPE A. Electronic portfolios as pedagogy: Using Portfolios for authentic assessment of teacher knowledge and skills in the U.S. Advances in Research on Teaching , v. 22c, p. 219-232, 2015.
[57]	YANG, RH; SUN, XD Implementation and evaluation of teaching of College English. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION (ICSSTE 2015). Proceedings of the… v. 18. [S. l.: s. n.], 2015. p. 450-452.
[58]	YUKSEL, M; GEBAN. O Evaluation of Teacher Performance According to the Special Area Competencies of Chemistry Teachers. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal of Education , v. 30. n. 1. p. 299-312, 2015.
[59]	AL KUWAITI, A; ALQURAAN, M; SUBBARAYALU, AV Understanding the effect of response rate and class size interaction on students evaluation of teaching in a higher education. Cogent Education , v. 3. 2016.
[60]	ASHKAN M. The phenomenological evaluation of teaching professionalism in the architecture design studio culture: A case at the University of Kansas. Archnet-IJAR , v. 10. n. 1. p. 41-61, 2016.
[61]	BARROW M., GRANT B. M. Changing mechanisms of governmentality? Academic development in New Zealand and student evaluations of teaching. Higher Education , v. 72. n. 5. p. 589-601, 2016.
[62]	BRABECK M.M., DWYER C.A., GEISINGER K.F., MARX R.W., NOELL G.H., PIANTA R.C., SUBOTNIK R.F., WORRELL F. C. Assessing the Assessments of Teacher Preparation. Theory Into Practice , v. 55. n. 2. p. 160-167, 2016.
[63]	CHENG, JT; XIONG, Y. Research on the Evaluation of Teaching Quality Based on CGSAB. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ECONOMICS (ICEMSE 2016). Proceedings of the… [S. l.: s. n.], v. 65. 2016. p. 318-320.
[64]	DE PAULA SANTOS F., LECHUGO C. P., SILVEIRA-MACKENZIE I.F. ‘Speak well’ or ‘complain’ about your teacher: A contribution of education data mining in the evaluation of teaching practices. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION (SIIE 2016): Learning Analytics Technologies, 2016. International… [S. l.: s. n.], 2016.
[65]	DHAKAL R.K., PANT B. P. Assessment of teacher education curricula in Nepal: An ICT perspective. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change , v. 2. n. 3. p. 96-107, 2016.
[66]	EVANS C. M., LEE J. C. Value-added assessment of teacher preparation programs in the United States: a critical evaluation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice , p. 1-21. 2016.
[68]	GÓMEZ-ARIZAGA M. P., CONEJEROS-SOLAR M. L., MARTIN A. How Good Is Good Enough? A Community-Based Assessment of Teacher Competencies for Gifted Students. SAGE Open , v. 6. n. 4, 2016.
[69]	GORBANEFF Y. Is student evaluation of teacher a wrong incentive? Profesorado , v. 20. n. 2. p. 424-431, 2016.
[70]	GUTIÉRREZ-ESTEBAN P., YUSTE-TOSINA R., ARIAS-MASA J., CUBO-DELGADO S., ALONSO-DÍAZ L. Evaluation of teaching design in synchronous virtual classrooms. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning , v. 26. n. 1. p. 72-89, 2016.
[71]	HAN, ZH; ZHAO, J. H. Application of AHP in the evaluation of teaching quality in Independent Colleges. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH, 5., 2016. Proceedings of… v. 69. [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. p. 1047-1051.
[72]	HARAHAP, J. Evaluation of Teaching Methods in the Individual and Team. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL, MANAGEMENT, ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP, 6., 2016 (6TH ICEMAL 2016). v. 14. Proceedings of the… [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. p. 256-258.
[75]	NEWMAN, L. R; BRODSKY, D; JONES, R. N; SCHWARTZSTEIN, R. M; ATKINS, K. M; ROBERTS, D. H. Frame-of-Reference Training: Establishing Reliable Assessment of Teaching Effectiveness. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions , v. 36. n. 3. p. 206-210, 2016.
[77]	PAIXÃO R.B., DE ALMEIDA B.C. Student’s assessment of teachers: Perception analysis of ideal and effective use [Avaliação do Docente pelo Discente: Análise das percepções de utilização ideal e efetiva]. Meta: Avaliação , v. 8. n. 22. p. 48-68, 2016.
[80]	ROMERA, D. D. M; ROBLES, D. C; DE LA SERNA, M. C. Assessment of teaching skills with e-Rubrics in Master of Teacher Training. Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers , v. 7. p. 121-141, 2016.
[82]	SETARI A. P., LEE J., BRADLEY K. D. A psychometric approach to the validation of a student evaluation of teaching instrument. Studies in Educational Evaluation , v. 51. p. 77-87, 2016.
[83]	WANG, Y; LI, J. Study on the Evaluation of Teaching Quality of College Teachers with Undergraduate Students as Study Samples. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 3., 2016. Proceedings of the… v. 105. [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. p. 456-459.
[84]	WANG, Y; ZHU, Z. F. Study on the Evaluation of Teaching Quality of College Teachers with Graduate Students as Study Samples. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 3., 2016. v. 105. Proceedings of the… v. 105. [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. p. 460-463.
[85]	WOLBRING T., TREISCHL E. Selection Bias in Students’ Evaluation of Teaching: Causes of Student Absenteeism and Its Consequences for Course Ratings and Rankings. Research in Higher Education , v. 57. n. 1. p. 51-71, 2016.
[86]	XIANG, F. The Research on the Evaluation of Teaching Effect in Foreign Teachers’ Language and Professional Classes. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, EDUCATION, INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 6., 2016 (MEICI 2016). v. 135. Proceedings of the… [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. p. 534-539.
[87]	ZHANG, LP; LIU. XX Analyzing the Factors Influencing Students’ Evaluation of Teaching Quality in College English Classes through Partial Correlation Analysis. 2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2., 2016 (ICSSD 2016). [S. l.: s. n.], 2016. p. 55-59.
[89]	AHN H., CLERMONT M., HÖFER-DIEHL Y. Performance evaluation of teaching in higher education: A gap model and its application. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management , v. 3. n. 2. p. 119-147, 2017.
[91]	BASARI S. Evaluation of teachers’ opinions regarding the causes of the School Failure of adolescents’. Ponte , v. 73. n. 6. p. 145-162, 2017.
[92]	BISINOTO C., ALMEIDA L.S. Teacher’s perceptions about quality evaluation of teaching in higher education [Percepções docentes sobre avaliação da qualidade do ensino na educação superior]. Ensaio , v. 25. n. 96. p. 652-674, 2017.
[93]	DE JAGER T., COETZEE M.J., MAULANA R., HELMS-LORENZ M., VAN DE GRIFT W. Profile of South African secondary-school teachers’ teaching quality: evaluation of teaching practices using an observation instrument. Educational Studies . p. 1-20, 2017.
[94]	ECEVIT T., ŞIMŞEK P. Ö. The evaluation of teachers’ science concept teaching and their action to diagnose and eliminate misconceptions [Öğretmenlerin fen kavram öğretimleri, kavram yanilgilarini saptama ve giderme çalişmalarinin değerlendirilmesi]. Elementary Education Online , v. 16. n. 1. p. 129-150, 2017.
[95]	GRISSOM J. A., LOEB S. Assessing principals’ assessments: Subjective evaluations of teacher effectiveness in low-and high-stakes environments. Education Finance and Policy , v. 12. n. 3. p. 369-395, 2017.
[96]	HAMMONDS F., MARIANO G. J., AMMONS G., CHAMBERS S. Student evaluations of teaching: improving teaching quality in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education , v. 21. n. 1. p. 26-33, 2017.
[98]	KOLOI-KEAIKITSE, S. Assessment of teacher perceived skill in classroom assessment practices using IRT Models. Cogent Education , v. 4, 2017.
[99]	LA ROCCA, M; PARRELLA, ML; PRIMERANO, I; SULIS, I; VITALE, M. P. An integrated strategy for the analysis of student evaluation of teaching: from descriptive measures to explanatory models. Quality & Quantity , v. 51. n. 2. p. 675-691, 2017.
[101]	OON P.-T., SPENCER B., KAM C.C.S. Psychometric quality of a student evaluation of teaching survey in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , v. 42. n. 5. p. 788-800, 2017.
[103]	PAVLOVIĆ, N. The role of social participants in the evaluation of teachers at universities in Serbia. Transylvanian Review , v. 26. n. 1. p. 74-89, 2017.
[104]	ROYAL, K. A guide for making valid interpretations of Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) results. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education , v. 44. n. 2. p. 316-322, 2017.
[105]	SPOOREN P., CHRISTIAENS W. I liked your course because I believe in (the power of) student evaluations of teaching (SET). Students’ perceptions of a teaching evaluation process and their relationships with SET scores. Studies in Educational Evaluation , v. 54. p. 43-49, 2017.
[106]	UTTL, B; WHITE, CA; GONZALEZ, D. W. Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation , v. 54. n. p. 22-42, 2017.

[1] Claudia Navarro Corona es doctora en Ciencias Educativas por el Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo de la Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (IIDE-UABC), México. Es profesora-investigadora en la Escuela de Humanidades y Educación del Tecnológico de Monterrey. Es miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI), en México y miembro del Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa (COMIE). Su línea de investigación es la gestión educativa.

María Soledad Ramírez Montoya es profesora-investigadora de la Escuela de Humanidades y Educación del Tecnológico de Monterrey. Es coordinadora del Grupo de Investigación e Innovación en Educación del Tecnológico de Monterrey, directora de la oficina del Consejo Internacional para la Educación Abierta de la Educación a Distancia (ICDE) y directora de la Cátedra UNESCO: Movimiento educativo abierto para América Latina.

Brasil

Brasil

Mapeo sistemático de la literatura sobre evaluación docente (2013-2017)

Resumen