Abstract
This article presents a dialogue between the experiences of Brazil, Canada, and Italy in addressing the challenges posed by ethical evaluations, both “external” (by ethics committees and related bodies) and “internal” (in debates among researchers themselves), of oral history. It attempts to demonstrate the different ways impositions from outside the area have been handled, the action strategies adopted, and issues central to responsible work in the sphere of oral history. It is written with the spirit of rethinking one’s own experiences and learning from those of others.
research ethics; oral history; Brazil; Canada; Italy