Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

External validation of EORTC risk scores to predict recurrence after transurethral resection of brazilian patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer stages Ta and T1

ABSTRACT

Validate the EORTC risk tables in Brazilian patients with NMIBC.

Methods:

205 patients were analyzed. The 6 parameters analyzed were: histologic grading, pathologic stage, size and number of tumors, previous recurrence rate and concomitant CIS. The time for first recurrence (TFR), risk score and probability of recurrence were calculated and compared to the probabilities obtained from EORTC risk tables. C-index was calculated and accuracy of EORTC tables was analyzed. Results: pTa was presented in 91 (44.4%) patients and pT1 in 114 (55.6%). Ninety-seven (47.3%) patients had solitary tumor, and 108 (52.7%) multiple tumors. One hundred and three (50.2%) patients had tumors smaller than 3 cm and 102 (40.8%) had bigger than 3 cm. Concomitant CIS was observed in 21 (10.2%) patients. Low grade was presented in 95 (46.3%) patients, and high grade in 110 (53.7%). Intravesical therapy was utilized in 105 (56.1%) patients. Recurrence was observed in 117 (57.1%) patients and the mean TFR was 14,2 ± 7,3 months. C-index was 0,72 for 1 year and 0,7 for 5 years. The recurrence risk was 28,8% in 1 year and 57,1% in 5 years, independently of the scoring risk. In our population, the EORTC risk tables overestimated the risk of recurrence in 1 year and underestimated in 5 years.

Conclusion:

The validation of the EORTC risk tables in Brazilian patients with NMIBC was satisfactory and should be stimulated to predict recurrence, although these may overestimated the risk of recurrence in 1 year and underestimated in 5 years.

Keywords:
Urinary Bladder; Carcinoma; Recurrence; Transurethral Resection of Prostate

INTRODUCTION

At least 85% of patients with bladder cancer (BCa) present the disease confined to the mucosa (Ta and Tis) or submucosa (T1), representing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). These are heterogeneous tumors with high variation of reported recurrence rates in literature. They vary from 15–61% at first year to 31–78% at five years (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 22. Sylvester RJ. Natural history, recurrence, and progression in superficial bladder cancer. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006;6:2617–25.). Stratification is responsible for the correct choice of treatment, based on recurrence and progression risks (33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626.).

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has published a score system based on the risks of progression and recurrence of patients with NMIBC following TRUS (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Recently, the European Association of Urology (EAU) has adopted in its guidelines the risk tables and recommends stratification of NMIBC with low, intermediate and high risk of recurrence (55. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64:639–53.). However, external validations are necessary to adopt these risk tables in clinical practice and in different populations (66. Mallett S, Royston P, Waters R, Dutton S, Altman DG. Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med. 2010;8:21.99. Pillai R, Wang D, Mayer EK, Abel P. Do standardised prognostic algorithms reflect local practice? Application of EORTC risk tables for non-muscle invasive (pTa/pT1) bladder cancer recurrence and progression in a local cohort. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:751–9.).

Although score EORTC risks are widely used in daily urological practice, there are not enough data from South America, particularly from Brazil, to apply them in the Brazilian population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospectively and consecutively, 205 patients with NMIBC stages Ta and T1 submitted to bladder TRUS resection, from January 2003 to October 2010 were analyzed. Patients were treated at the Department of Uro-oncology of Instituto Catarinense de Urologia in Itajaí, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The patients were attended by the public health service and private practice and had all socio-economic status. Ethnic background was not considered, since it is virtually impossible to distinguish these characteristics in this widely genetic and ethnic variant population.

New and recurrent cases were considered. It was excluded patients submitted to previous radiotherapy and chemotherapy due to other tumors throughout the period of study, patients with incomplete data or follow-up, who missed clinical and laboratory follow-up, and those who refused to participate in the study and failed to sign the Consent Form. These excluded patients were not considered for evaluation. Data collection was performed by one author and histologic exam by two pathologists, in order to minimize interpretation variability among observers. Pathologic exam was performed in a non-blind manner, that is, the pathologists had access to all clinical and laboratory data. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Universidade do Vale do Itajaí.

Use of intravesical therapy (IVT) was determined previously to inclusion and during follow-up: none IVT, use of intravesical mitomicin C, intravesical immunotherapy with BCG and combined mitomicin C and BCG IVT. Mitomicin C administration was performed in the post-surgical period after up to 12 hours of TURS. BCG was administered using induction protocol (once a week during 6 weeks after 2 to 4 weeks of TURS) and maintenance protocol (one series of three weekly cycles of IVT during 6 weeks repeated at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after induction protocol). A second bladder TRUS was performed 2 to 6 weeks after the initial TURS and always when it was detected incomplete initial resection or absence of muscle, T1 and/or high grade except primary CIS, according to EAU guidelines (55. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64:639–53.).

Follow-up included urological consultation, urethrocistoscopy, urinary cytology and image exams. It was performed every 3 months in the first 2 years, every 6 months in the next 3 years, and annually until the end of the study and/or one of the end-points. Recurrence was defined as a new lesion after the treatment of the primary tumor diagnosed by cystoscopy and/or image exam and confirmed by histopathology.

The six parameters described by EORTC study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) were analyzed: histologic grade, pT stage (TNM 2009), size and number of tumors, presence of in situ carcinoma (CIS) and previous recurrence rate. Risk scores (Table-1) and recurrence probability in 1 and 5 years and time to first recurrence (TFR) were estimated in order to compare them with the data of the study by Silvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) and accuracy analysis. Patients were divided in 4 risk groups according to their scores (Table-2) and it was determined the number of patients in risk of TFR in 1 and 5 years.

Table 1
Recurrence predictors for risk score calculus.
Table 2
Score system for NMIBC risk of recurrence calculus.

Five end-points were analyzed for the end of the study: free of disease, death, death due to disease, noncompliance with treatment, and disease progression.

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (version 17, SPSS, Chicago Illinois) was used. For statistical validation, recurrence rates at 1 and 5 years were determined. TFR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Validation method included discrimination by accordance index (C index), representing the probability of accordance between predicted value (EORTC) and observed (1010. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.). When C is equal to 0.5, there is no discrimination (random distribution) or when it is 1, there is discrimination with perfect accordance (1111. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Matchar DB, Reichert TA. Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1071–77.). An adequate C index was assumed when it was equal or higher than the one of Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Accuracy was determined by calibration between recurrence probabilities in 1 and 5 years obtained by the present study and by Silvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.).

RESULTS

Table-3 shows patients characteristics and comparison with Siylvester et al. data (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.).

Table 3
Sample characteristic of the present study and of EORTC series.

Tumor recurrence was observed in 117 (57.1%) patients. 137 (66.5%) presented primary tumor and 68 (33.2%) previous recurrent tumors, among which 35 (17.1%) with less than 1 recurrence per year and 33 (16.1%) with more than 1 recurrence per year. TFR medium was 14.2±months, minimum 3 and maximum 36 months. Recurrence in 1 year was identified in 59 (28.8%) patients and in 5 years in all 117 (571%) patients. Figures 1 and 2 show TFR in 1 and 5 years, respectively, stratified according to risk score groups of EORTC and show the number of patients at risk in each interval of 3 months, when TFR was evaluated in 1 year, and every 12 months, when it was evaluated in 5 years.

Figure 1
Time to first recurrence in 1 year according to EORTC score in this series.
Figure 2
Time to first recurrence in 5 years according to eortc score in this series.

Calculated C index for tumor recurrence was 0.72 for 1 year and 0.7 for 5 years, superior to 0.66 described by Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) for the same periods.

Risk of recurrence was 28.8% in 1 year and 57.1% in 5 years, regardless the score. Comparison of probabilities of recurrence in 1 and 5 years with Sylvester et al. results (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) in each group of risk score is shown in Table-4. Probability of recurrence in 1 year was lower in all risk groups than those described by Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). In 5 years, risk was superior, except in risk group score zero. For this sample, EORTC Tables overestimated the risk of recurrence in 1 year and underestimated in 5 years, except when score was zero, but the confidence interval overlapped.

Table 4
Comparision of recurrence probabilities according to risk score of EORTC and of this study in 1 and 5 years

DISCUSSION

BC has a higher incidence in men, 3 to 4 times higher than in women. Median age of patients with BC is 70 years (1212. BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Internet. Disponível em: <http://www.inca.gov.br/>. Accessed in: 16 jun. 2014.
http://www.inca.gov.br/...
). Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) identified a relationship of men/women of 3.96 with 80% of male patients and median age of 65 years. We observed a 2.3/1 proportion of men/women with 70.2% of male patients and a median age of 66.61 years. This observed difference may have occurred to the increasing smoking habitus and higher search for preventive medical attention of women observed in daily practice.

Our sample showed higher tumor potential aggressiveness and of high risk than literature (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626.) and Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) due to a higher proportion of patients stage T1 than literature (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626.) (5.6% versus 20%) and of high grade tumors (53.7 versus 10.7%), multiple (52.7% versus 42%), larger than 3cm (49.8% versus 17.9%) and with CIS (10.2% versus 4.4%) than Sylverster et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Also, the reduced number of CIS cases in Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) study lead to low accuracy of EORTC risk tables to predict recurrence and progression of these patients (33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626.). However, the present study observed the same proportion of CIS described in literature (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626., 55. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64:639–53.) expressing a population close to reality.

Pillai et al. (99. Pillai R, Wang D, Mayer EK, Abel P. Do standardised prognostic algorithms reflect local practice? Application of EORTC risk tables for non-muscle invasive (pTa/pT1) bladder cancer recurrence and progression in a local cohort. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:751–9.) described some limitations of Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.): collection of data by a single researcher and pathologic exam by a single pathologist may minimize interpretation variability among observers. The present study has not shown significant variability among observers, reducing the possibility of bias of interpretation and analysis of data.

Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) based their study in 7 clinical trials, that used several IVT for adjuvant treatment following TURS. In their sample, 78.4% of patients received IVT, a number significantly higher when compared to present study and to the actual need on clinical daily practice. Intravesical chemotherapy protocols used by Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) were old and the use of instillation of chemotherapy drug right after surgery, protocol of induction and maintenance of adjuvant intravesical BCG and re-TURS were not considered for the development of EORTC risk Tables. In our sample, 43.9% of patients did not receive any adjuvant IVT. In the other 56.1% patients, 11.7% received chemotherapy using mitomicin C, 22.45 BCG and 22% a combination of Mitomicin C and BCG. The high use of intravesical chemotherapy and the old protocols used by Sylvester t al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.), the improvement of chemotherapy administration and the increased adjuvant use of BCG nowadays may reduce the predictive power of the EORTC Tables.

Although submitted to adequate treatment, up to 70% of patients with Ta and T1 tumors will present recurrence in 1 year following TURS as single treatment (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 1313. Allard P, Bernard P, Fradet Y, Têtu B. The early clinical course of primary Ta and T1 bladder cancer: a proposed prognostic index. Br J Urol. 1998;81:692–8.). Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) reported 47.8% of recurrence in a 14-year follow-up and 44.3% with at least one recurrence when admitted to study. Among these, recurrence occurred at least once a year in 19.5% and more than once a year in 24.8%. Our results are slightly close to those reported in literature (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626., 55. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64:639–53.) than those of Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Recurrence rate was 57.1% in the 12-year follow-up. Also, 33.2% of patients had already presented previous recurrence prior to admittance to study. Among these, 17.1% with less than one recurrence per year and 16.1% with more than one recurrence per year. The lowest recurrence observed by Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) when compared to literature (11. Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562., 33. Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626., 55. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64:639–53.) and to this study may be explained by the significant difference of patients that received IVT (78.4% versus 56.1%). This fact may have been caused by a selection bias of Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.), that included patients from clinical studies proposed to analyze prophylactic value of IVT following TURS and not the study of prognostic factors of recurrence and progression. A vicious sample was selected, since almost 80% of patients received IVT.

In a medium follow-up of 5.5 years with maximum 12 years, among 117 patients that presented recurrence, TFR was 14.2±7.3 months, minimum 3 months, maximum 36 months. Recurrence in 1 year was verified in 28.8% and in 100% in 5 years, while in Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) TFR was 31 months. It was observed more than 50% lower TFR in the studied population. But the time graphic of stratified recurrence of risk groups presented a similar behavior of that of Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.), mainly at 5 years. In our patients, recurrence was observed in a significant earlier time that could be explained by the lack of use of intravesical chemotherapy and due to tumor characteristics previously described.

Evaluated end-points were similar to those of Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) except for death, with a significant difference in this study (32.9% versus 7.3%). Their study showed a higher proportion of men, with a usually lower life expectancy that can explain this difference between studies. Follow-up was similar to Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.), although lower in total (144 versus 177.6 months) but with a medium higher time (66 versus 46.8 months).

Our C index was 0.72 for recurrence in 1 year and 0.7 for 5 years, superior to 0.66 described by Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) for both periods. When C indexes are compared, we conclude that there was discrimination or accordance between them. Also, our C-index showed a better performance than those of Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) showing a better accordance of our results to clinical reality. This aspect allows this study to be applied in daily practice.

In relation to accuracy, risk tables overestimated the recurrence risk in 1 year and underestimated in 5 years, probably due to the low use of BCG and high use of intravesical chemotherapy with old protocols utilized by the Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.), the use of immediate intravesical chemotherapy with more modern drugs, more adequate use of BCG and routine use of re-TURS in the high risk groups of our study.

In a recent systematic review, Kluth et al. (1414. Kluth LA, Black PC, Bochner BH, Catto J, Lerner SP, Stenzl A, et al. Prognostic and Prediction Tools in Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Eur Urol. 2015;68:238–53.) pointed out the importance of treatment impact on end-points of the predictive models and the need of external validations before incorporation in daily practice. External validations of EORTC tables are shown in Table-5.

Table 5
Comparision of external validation studies of risk tables of EORTC.

Fernandez-Gomez et al. (88. Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E, Unda M, Martinez-Piñeiro L, Ojea A, et al. The EORTC tables overestimate the risk of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: external validation of the EORTC risk tables. Eur Urol. 2011;60:423–30.) performed external validation of EORTC risk Tables in patients treated with intravesical BCG, although overestimated the recurrence risk. Ding et al. (1515. Ding W, Chen Z, Gou Y, Sun C, Xu K, Tan J, et al. Are EORTC risk tables suitable for Chinese patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;38:157–61.) and Hernandez et al. (1616. Hernández V, De La Peña E, Martin MD, Blázquez C, Diaz FJ, Llorente C. External validation and applicability of the EORTC risk tables for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2011;29:409–14.) validated the EORTC model, since the confidence intervals of recurrence rates matched those of Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Xu et al. (1717. Xu C, Jiang XZ, Zhang NZ, Ma L, Xu ZS. [Efficacy of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after intravesical pirarubicin instillation]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012;34:609–12.) also validated the model in patients treated with intravesical epirrubicin, although the score overestimated the recurrence rate. Seo et al. (1818. Seo KW, Kim BH, Park CH, Kim CI, Chang HS. The efficacy of the EORTC scoring system and risk tables for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin instillation. Korean J Urol. 2010;51:165–70.) validated the risk Tables, since identified a recurrence rate similar to Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Ajili et al. (1919. Ajili F, Darouiche A, Chebil M, Boubaker S. The efficiency of the EORTC scoring system for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated by bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2013;37:249–53.) and Ather and Zaidi (2020. Ather MH, Zaidi M. Predicting recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using European organization of research and treatment of cancer risk tables. Urol J. 2009;6:189–93.) identified significant correlation for recurrence in 1 year with the Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). Altieri et al. (2121. Altieri VM, Castellucci R, Palumbo P, Verratti V, Sut M, Olivieri R, et al. Recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables. Urol Int. 2012;89:61–6.) identified a recurrence rate similar to those of EORTC Tables and confirmed their use essential to daily practice. Van Rijin et al. (2222. van Rhijn BW, Zuiverloon TC, Vis AN, Radvanyi F, van Leenders GJ, Ooms BC, et al. Molecular grade (FGFR3/MIB-1) and EORTC risk scores are predictive in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;58:433–41.) validated the EORTC Tables with a multicenter study treating patients with primary NMIBC and they also advocated their use in that population.

Pillai et al. (99. Pillai R, Wang D, Mayer EK, Abel P. Do standardised prognostic algorithms reflect local practice? Application of EORTC risk tables for non-muscle invasive (pTa/pT1) bladder cancer recurrence and progression in a local cohort. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:751–9.) showed a significant difference of recurrence probabilities between their study and that of Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). An inadequate number of patients did not allow a conclusion for external validation. Xylinas et al. (2323. Xylinas E, Kent M, Kluth L, Pycha A, Comploj E, Svatek RS, et al. Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1460–6.) analyzed the discrimination of the EORTC Tables and the CUETO score system and identified that both models overestimated the recurrence risk of patients with high risk, but their study was retrospective and multicenter. Sakano et al. (2424. Sakano S, Matsuyama H, Takai K, Yoshihiro S, Kamiryo Y, Shirataki S, et al. Risk group stratification to predict recurrence after transurethral resection in Japanese patients with stage Ta and T1 bladder tumours: validation study on the European Association of Urology guidelines. BJU Int. 2011;107:1598–604.) affirmed that the EORTC model could not be used in Japanese patients. Borkowska et al. (2525. Borkowska EM, Jedrzejczyk A, Marks P, Catto JW, Kału ewski B. EORTC risk tables - their usefulness in the assessment of recurrence and progression risk in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Polish patients. Cent European J Urol. 2013;66:14–20.) pointed out that risk scores of EORTC overestimated the recurrence risk but, similar to Sylvester et al. (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) study, their sample did not use modern intravesical protocols, what could have limited their results.

Our study presents several limitations. Although our population was homogeneous and close to clinical reality, the size was significantly smaller than the original EORTC study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.). However, the inclusion of 205 patients was satisfactory after comparison with already published validations; the design study and long follow-up allow us to trust in our results. However, although we had a rigorous control of data inclusion and follow-up, sometimes clinical follow-up is difficult in Brazil. It is common difficulties to re-TURS following 3 months, as recommended, delayed control cystoscopies, delayed ambulatory consultation, and lack of comprehension of the actual severity of the disease by the patients.

The greatest difficulty we observed for external validation was the significant disparity between samples of our study and that of EORTC. Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) was not proposed to create prognostic Tables, as previously described, while our study was proposed to analyze those Tables in a more real population. The great merit of Sylvester et al. study (44. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.) was the development of the idea to stablish a mechanism to calculate the recurrence risk of patients with NMIBC. However, EORTC Tables must be adapted in order to become more reliable and used in daily urological practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The already accepted use of the EORCT model requires some reflections. There is a need to improve risk tables of recurrence in order to minimize distinct ethnic, geographic and clinical practice differences around the World. Tumor markers and genetic mapping are necessary to identify more precisely the biologic behavior of those tumors.

Although EORTC risk Tables overestimated the recurrence risk of tumor in 1 year and underestimated in 5 years, their external validation in patients with NMIBC in the south region of Brazil was adequate and their use to predict recurrence must be reinforced.

    ABBREVIATIONS
  • BC  = bladder cancer
  • CIS  = carcinoma in situ
  • EORTC  = European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
  • EAU  = European Association of Urology
  • IVT  = intravesical treatment
  • NMIBC  = Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
  • TURS  = Transurethral resection
  • TFR  = Time to first recurrence
  • CUETO  = Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Van der Heijden AG, Alfred Witjes J: Recurrence, Progression, and Follow-Up in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2009;8:556–562.
  • 2
    Sylvester RJ. Natural history, recurrence, and progression in superficial bladder cancer. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006;6:2617–25.
  • 3
    Colombel M, Soloway M, Akaza H, Bóhle A, Palou J, Buckley R et al. Epidemiology, Staging, Grading, and Risk Stratification of Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Supplements. 2008;7:618–626.
  • 4
    Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–5; discussion 475–7.
  • 5
    Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64:639–53.
  • 6
    Mallett S, Royston P, Waters R, Dutton S, Altman DG. Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med. 2010;8:21.
  • 7
    Sylvester RJ. How well can you actually predict which non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients will progress? Eur Urol. 2011;60:431–3; discussion 433–4.
  • 8
    Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E, Unda M, Martinez-Piñeiro L, Ojea A, et al. The EORTC tables overestimate the risk of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: external validation of the EORTC risk tables. Eur Urol. 2011;60:423–30.
  • 9
    Pillai R, Wang D, Mayer EK, Abel P. Do standardised prognostic algorithms reflect local practice? Application of EORTC risk tables for non-muscle invasive (pTa/pT1) bladder cancer recurrence and progression in a local cohort. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:751–9.
  • 10
    Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.
  • 11
    Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Matchar DB, Reichert TA. Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1071–77.
  • 12
    BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Internet. Disponível em: <http://www.inca.gov.br/>. Accessed in: 16 jun. 2014.
    » http://www.inca.gov.br/
  • 13
    Allard P, Bernard P, Fradet Y, Têtu B. The early clinical course of primary Ta and T1 bladder cancer: a proposed prognostic index. Br J Urol. 1998;81:692–8.
  • 14
    Kluth LA, Black PC, Bochner BH, Catto J, Lerner SP, Stenzl A, et al. Prognostic and Prediction Tools in Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Eur Urol. 2015;68:238–53.
  • 15
    Ding W, Chen Z, Gou Y, Sun C, Xu K, Tan J, et al. Are EORTC risk tables suitable for Chinese patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;38:157–61.
  • 16
    Hernández V, De La Peña E, Martin MD, Blázquez C, Diaz FJ, Llorente C. External validation and applicability of the EORTC risk tables for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2011;29:409–14.
  • 17
    Xu C, Jiang XZ, Zhang NZ, Ma L, Xu ZS. [Efficacy of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after intravesical pirarubicin instillation]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012;34:609–12.
  • 18
    Seo KW, Kim BH, Park CH, Kim CI, Chang HS. The efficacy of the EORTC scoring system and risk tables for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin instillation. Korean J Urol. 2010;51:165–70.
  • 19
    Ajili F, Darouiche A, Chebil M, Boubaker S. The efficiency of the EORTC scoring system for the prediction of recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated by bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2013;37:249–53.
  • 20
    Ather MH, Zaidi M. Predicting recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using European organization of research and treatment of cancer risk tables. Urol J. 2009;6:189–93.
  • 21
    Altieri VM, Castellucci R, Palumbo P, Verratti V, Sut M, Olivieri R, et al. Recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables. Urol Int. 2012;89:61–6.
  • 22
    van Rhijn BW, Zuiverloon TC, Vis AN, Radvanyi F, van Leenders GJ, Ooms BC, et al. Molecular grade (FGFR3/MIB-1) and EORTC risk scores are predictive in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;58:433–41.
  • 23
    Xylinas E, Kent M, Kluth L, Pycha A, Comploj E, Svatek RS, et al. Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1460–6.
  • 24
    Sakano S, Matsuyama H, Takai K, Yoshihiro S, Kamiryo Y, Shirataki S, et al. Risk group stratification to predict recurrence after transurethral resection in Japanese patients with stage Ta and T1 bladder tumours: validation study on the European Association of Urology guidelines. BJU Int. 2011;107:1598–604.
  • 25
    Borkowska EM, Jedrzejczyk A, Marks P, Catto JW, Kału ewski B. EORTC risk tables - their usefulness in the assessment of recurrence and progression risk in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Polish patients. Cent European J Urol. 2013;66:14–20.
  • 26
    Lammers RJ, Palou J, Witjes WP, Janzing-Pastors MH, Caris CT, Witjes JA. Comparison of expected treatment outcomes, obtained using risk models and international guidelines, with observed treatment outcomes in a Dutch cohort of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2014;114:193–201.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Sep-Oct 2016

History

  • Received
    25 Mar 2015
  • Accepted
    26 Oct 2015
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia Rua Bambina, 153, 22251-050 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel. +55 21 2539-6787, Fax: +55 21 2246-4088 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br