Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Toward a Core Outcome Set for Head, Neck, and Respiratory Disease in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Systematic Literature Review and Assessment of Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting

Abstract

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a relatively uncommon group of inherited metabolic disorders, with significant negative implications for life span and aspects of quality of life. Their rarity means that producing evidence to guide best practice has often entailed assimilating findings from multiple studies. Core outcome sets (COS) are being increasingly used across medicine as a potential solution to the problems arising from heterogeneous reporting of outcomes in effectiveness studies. A COS is a recommended minimum set of outcomes that should be measured for a given condition in an effectiveness study, with the ultimate aim of increasing the value of clinical information by enabling meaningful comparison and combination of data from various sources. A systematic review identified 41 outcomes measured in published studies and ongoing and completed clinical trials, with individual outcomes being measured using a variety of measurement instruments/tools. This work represents the important initial steps in the development of COS for head, neck, and respiratory disorders in MPS type II, raising awareness of the extent of heterogeneity in outcome reporting and determining the scope of outcomes and corresponding instruments currently used. The next step will be to use the generated “longlist” of outcomes to develop an electronic Delphi prioritization exercise with the intention of reaching a consensus regarding the most important outcomes to measure in effectiveness studies for head, neck, and respiratory disease in MPS type II.

Keywords:
core outcome set; systematic review; mucopolysaccharidosis; outcome domain; outcome measure instrument

Background

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a family of inherited metabolic disorders, caused by specific lysosomal enzyme deficiencies, with resultant accumulation of partially degraded glycosaminoglycans (GAG) within tissues.11 Muenzer, J. Overview of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(suppl 5):v4–v12. The ubiquitous nature of GAG within the body means that a number of different organ systems can be affected. Eleven distinct types of MPS disorders have been classified, according to the particular enzyme that is deficient.11 Muenzer, J. Overview of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(suppl 5):v4–v12.33 Clark, BM, Sprung, J, Weingarten, TN, Warner, ME. Anesthesia for patients with mucopolysaccharidoses: comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on airway management. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017;18(1):1–7.

Involvement of the upper and lower respiratory tract in MPS type II results in significant airway compromise, with progressive airway obstruction being responsible for a significant proportion of the morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.44 Jones, SA, Almassy, Z, Beck, M. Mortality and cause of death in mucopolysaccharidosis type II-a historical review based on data from the hunter outcome survey (HOS). J Inherit Metab Dis. 2009;32(4):534–43. Airway disease is characterized by adenotonsillar hypertrophy, macroglossia, recurrent upper respiratory tract infections, thickened nasal mucosa, airway deposits, and tracheomalacia.55 Kamin, W. Diagnosis and management of respiratory involvement in Hunter syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(457):57–60.77 Simmons, MA, Bruce, IA, Penney, S, Wraith, E, Rothera, MP. Otorhinolaryngological manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(5):589–595. These changes within the airway are considered to result from GAG accumulation in soft tissues.55 Kamin, W. Diagnosis and management of respiratory involvement in Hunter syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(457):57–60. Sleep disordered breathing, or obstructive sleep apnoea, has been reported in 90% (27/30 patients) of patients with MPS type II when tested using polysomnography.88 Wooten, WI, Muenzer, J, Vaughn, BV, Muhlebach, MS. Relationship of sleep to pulmonary function in mucopolysaccharidosis II. J Pediatr. 2013;162(6):1210–1215. Obstructive events during sleep can lead to learning impairment, behavioral problems, developmental, and learning delay as well as cardiovascular disease (pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular hypertrophy).99 Garg, RK, Afifi, AM, Garland, CB, Sanchez, R, Mount, DL. Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: consensus, controversy, and craniofacial considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5):987–997. Skeletal abnormalities (eg, small ribs and short neck), enlarged internal organs, restrictive lung disease, neurocognitive impairment, and cardiac disease may further compound multilevel upper airway involvement, leading to respiratory compromise that may significantly restrict lifestyle and ultimately lead to death.55 Kamin, W. Diagnosis and management of respiratory involvement in Hunter syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(457):57–60.,66 Rutten, M, Ciet, P, van den Biggelaar, R. Severe tracheal and bronchial collapse in adults with type II mucopolysaccharidosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:50.

Hearing loss is a universal finding in MPS, with a third of patients having severe profound hearing loss.1010 Napiontek, U, Keilmann, A. Hearing impairment in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Acta Paediatrica Suppl. 2006;451:113–117. More is understood about the hearing loss in MPS type II in comparison with the other subtypes, due to the publication of hearing data from an international observational study (The Hunter outcome survey [HOS]).1111 Keilmann, A, Nakarat, T, Bruce, IA, Molter, D, Malm, G, Investigators, HOS. Hearing loss in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II: data from HOS—the Hunter Outcome Survey. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(2):343–353. At the time of reporting, 84% (70/83) of the children surveyed had a hearing loss; 24% (20/83) had a mild hearing loss, 31% (26/83) a moderate loss, 22% (18/83) a severe loss, and 7% (6/83) a profound loss (WHO-ICIDH criteria). The conductive component of the hearing loss in MPS type II is predominantly related to an increased tendency toward the development and persistence of otitis media with effusion (OME, glue ear) and recurrent acute otitis media (rAOM). In MPS type II, GAG deposits are believed to accumulate within the nasopharynx contributing to Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and the development and persistence of OME. The increased tendency toward upper respiratory tract infections in MPS may manifest as chronic adenoiditis, further contributing to ETD and AOM. The tendency toward OME may last into adolescence and adulthood in MPS. Long- and short-term ventilation tubes and hearing aids have been used in the management of persistent OME with hearing loss,1010 Napiontek, U, Keilmann, A. Hearing impairment in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Acta Paediatrica Suppl. 2006;451:113–117.,1212 Peck, JE . Hearing loss in Hunter’s syndrome—mucopolysaccharidosis II. Ear Hear. 1984;5(4):243–246.,1313 Motamed, M, Thorne, S, Narula, A. Treatment of otitis media with effusion in children with mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;53(2):121–124. with greater emphasis now being placed on hearing aids due to the anticipated longevity of OME and the attendant risk of recurrent general anaesthesia.

There is an unmet need for strong clinical evidence to guide treatment of head, neck, and respiratory disease in MPS disorders, with much of the published evidence reflecting the experience of larger centres based on the retrospective analysis of patient outcomes.

A Core Outcome Set (COS) describes the minimum outcome data that should be measured in a clinical study for a particular condition.1414 Williamson, PR, Altman, DG, Blazeby, JM. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132. The lack of an agreed COS for MPS type II in general, and specifically respiratory/head and neck disease, crucially hinders comparison between studies. In addition, purchasers and regulatory bodies are likely to prefer evidence from clinical studies that adhere to an agreed set of outcome measures. There is also a paucity of information detailing patient and parent perspectives on the symptomatology of MPS disorders. The ideal COS for respiratory/head and neck disease associated with MPS type II would combine both patient/parent and clinician opinion and could be used in the design of all subsequent clinical studies. Currently, the tendency to only report those findings that researchers consider to be significant or positive can lead to outcome reporting bias (ORB).1515 Cooney, RM, Warren, BF, Altman, DG, Abreu, MT, Travis, SP. Outcome measurement in clinical trials for Ulcerative Colitis: towards standardisation. Trials. 2007;8:17. The development of a COS can help to negate the effect of ORB in future study designs and limit heterogeneity of chosen outcomes in studies investigating different interventions in the same organ system.

The aim of this systematic literature review was to generate a “long list” of outcome measures and corresponding list of outcome measurement instruments reported in the MPS type II literature for respiratory/head and neck disease. This information would help to determine the extent of heterogeneity of outcome reporting in this MPS subtype and enable the subsequent development of a COS specific for respiratory/head and neck disease.

Methods

Literature Search

Studies were identified using a systematic search strategy applied to EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL (using http://www.library.nhs.uk/hdas) over the 24-year period (1990-2014). The time period selected represents contemporary practice and current understanding of the disease, reflecting the introduction of disease-modifying therapies, along with centralized, coordinated, and multidisciplinary care.

Multiple databases were used to maximize the sensitivity of the search. Within EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL a Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) search (mapped to the Thesaurus) was performed. Within the Thesaurus, the subject heading was “exploded” and the “OR” setting applied. The general MeSH headings (Table 1) was subsequently combined with the mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) II MeSH heading using the “AND” option.

Table 1
MeSH headings for systematic review search.

The COS being developed is specifically for 2 interrelated body systems (respiratory and head and neck) within MPS type II. Reflecting our understanding of the literature, it was considered necessary to include a range of study types in order to achieve a meaningful summary of outcomes used in studies related to these 2 body systems. We were concerned that the information contained in abstracts for less formal study designs might be insufficient to appropriately screen, and formal studies may not include all outcomes in the abstract. As such, a search strategy using additional general MESH headings considered relevant to these body systems was chosen with the aim of limiting reliance upon the quality of abstracts at the screening stage.

The following limits were applied to the search strategy:

  • 1990 to 2014

  • English language only

  • Human only

Clinical Trials Registry Search

The World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Portal (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/, last accessed January 02 2018) and ClinicalTrials.Gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/, last accessed January 02 2018) were searched for Mucopolysaccharidosis II. This search revealed 45 and 10 results from the ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO databases, respectively. Both open and closed trials were included.

Inclusion Criteria

Any otolaryngology surgical or medical intervention in patients with MPS II was included, along with studies focusing on ERT and HSCT. We also included all systematic reviews with/without meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, case-controlled trials, case series, prospective cohorts, and review articles.

Exclusion Criteria

We excluded studies that were not specifically related to MPS type II, studies that did not investigate or report respiratory/head and neck disease in patients with MPS type II (the exception to this were papers looking at bone marrow transplant [BMT] and HSCT), case series with fewer than 3 patients, expert opinion papers, discussion papers, and consensus papers.

Study Selection

Two researchers (J.M. and N.B.) independently reviewed the abstracts produced by the above-mentioned literature search strategy, and a comprehensive list of studies was obtained. The full-text articles of studies that appeared to fit the inclusion criteria and those that have insufficient information in the title and abstract were obtained. The articles were assessed independently by the 2 reviewers (J.M. and N.B.). Any disagreement between the reviewers regarding including the inclusion of a paper was resolved through discussion. Where agreement was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted (I.A.B.).

The reference section of each paper was cross-referenced to identify any further relevant papers. Outcomes relevant to respiratory/head and neck disease were identified in published studies involving patients with MPS type II, receiving either medical or surgical interventions. Clinical trials were reviewed by one researcher (A.M.) and were included if they measured outcomes relevant to respiratory/head and neck disease in patients with MPS type II.

Results

The systematic review of relevant literature was performed. Databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched from 1990 to 2014. Literature search yielded 228 results which subsequently were reduced to 90 records following the removal of 138 duplicates. Of 90 publications following the thorough screening process of abstracts against inclusion and exclusion criteria, further 68 results were excluded. Consequently, 22 publications were left. Full-text articles were collected for those 22 results, and they were assessed using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The total of 10 full-text articles were excluded for the following reasons: 7 results had less than 3 patients, 1 result was a consensus paper, 1 result was a review article, and 1 publication was a duplicate study published in 2 different journals under a different name. Ultimately 12 publications were identified and reviewed for outcomes (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flowchart illustrating the review of methodology.

A total of 55 clinical trials were identified following a clinical trials registry search for “Mucopolysaccharidosis II.” Five trials were duplicated between the databases. Of the remaining 50 clinical trials, 7 studies did not investigate MPS type II. Among the remaining 43 trials, 4 studies were already included in the literature search, and 33 studies did not consider any respiratory/head and neck disease outcomes. Following the review process, 6 clinical trials were identified and outcomes measured were included in this review (Figure 1). Of particular note, the clinical trial NCT03292887 reported data from the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS). The HOS collects a wealth of data on patients with MPS type II who are or have been treated with ERT (Elaprase) or those who receive no treatment at all. Data collection began in 2005, and it is anticipated to continue for a minimum of 17 years. In addition to general outcomes (eg, GAG status and mobility), HOS collects information about respiratory and ENT outcomes. One publication identified during the systematic literature search have reported on HOS findings relating to otological outcomes.1111 Keilmann, A, Nakarat, T, Bruce, IA, Molter, D, Malm, G, Investigators, HOS. Hearing loss in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II: data from HOS—the Hunter Outcome Survey. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(2):343–353.

A total of 41 outcomes were extracted (Table 2). The HOS collects 26 outcomes, and the remaining studies reported between 1 and 8 outcomes. The most frequently reported outcome was exercise tolerance, which was reported by 9 out of 17 studies, followed by pulmonary function, which was reported by 8 of the 16 reviewed studies, while sleep apnoea and hearing were assessed in 4 and 5 research studies, respectively (see Table 2 for references). Identified outcomes were subsequently organized according to the most recent COS taxonomy (Table 3).1616 Dodd, S, Clarke, M, Becker, L. A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:84–92. Such classification of outcomes will be presented to stakeholders in the next stage of this project of COS identification, the electronic Delphi (eDelphi) exercise.

Table 2
Long-list of outcome measures and corresponding outcome measurement instruments (OMI).
Table 3
Long-list of outcome measures organised according to COMET COS taxonomy.

Discussion

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II is rare with an incidence of approximately 1 per 100 000 male births. In the period between 1992 and 2002, 52 babies with Hunter syndrome were born in the United Kingdom (http://www.mpssociety.org.uk/diseases/mps-diseases/mps-ii/). The rarity of this condition makes it difficult to obtain sufficient amounts of good-quality data to guide practice and decision-making, both for clinicians and for carers alike. Currently, we are reliant on case series from larger tertiary referral centers to support evidence-based practice, with only limited conformity in choice of outcome reporting. Pathology found in MPS type II may affect both the lower and the upper aerodigestive tract, and we suggest that combining assessments of both has direct clinical application. Mucopolysaccharidosis type II is an expensive disease to treat; ERT has been reported by de Bitencourt to cost over £100 000 per year for a child and twice as much for an adult.2626 Fernanda, HBTAV, Steiner, CE, Neto, JC, Boy, R, Schwartz, VD. Medical costs related to enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis types I, II, and VI in Brazil: a multicenter study. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2015;8(December 2015):99–106. It is difficult to assess “value for money” when the evidence for efficacy is so limited.

The core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative (http://www.comet-initiative.org) promotes standardization of outcome reporting in research, supporting researchers in developing COS. A COS is an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, which should, as a minimum, be measured and reported in all trials in a specific clinical area. Core outcome measures in effectiveness trials also provide a database resource for researchers and patients, detailing what COS have been, or are being developed for a particular medical condition or intervention. This study was the first step toward determining a COS for head, neck, and respiratory disease for patients with MPS type II. This systematic literature review highlights the extent of heterogeneity in outcome reporting, in terms of both outcome measures and corresponding outcome measurement instruments.

It is important to note that only 2 publications and 2 clinical trials considered QoL as an outcome.2020 da Silva, EM, Strufaldi, MW, Andriolo, RB, Silva, LA. Enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase for mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD008185.,2424 Raluy-Callado, M, Chen, WH, Whiteman, DA, Fang, J, Wiklund, I. The impact of Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type II) on health-related quality of life. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:101. One of the publications was a systematic review that established QoL as one of its secondary outcomes. However, only 1 publication subsequently fulfilled the criteria to be included in the systematic review1818 Muenzer, J, Wraith, JE, Beck, M. A phase II/III clinical study of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). Genet Med. 2006;8(8):465–473. and in that study QoL was not measured. The second publication which considered the QoL used 4 different questionnaires of which only 1 was MPS type II specific (HS-FOCUS). Mucopolysaccharidosis type II has been shown to be associated with significant impact on the QoL of both patients and their families.2424 Raluy-Callado, M, Chen, WH, Whiteman, DA, Fang, J, Wiklund, I. The impact of Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type II) on health-related quality of life. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:101.,2727 Guffon, N, Heron, B, Chabrol, B, Feillet, F, Montauban, V, Valayannopoulos, V. Diagnosis, quality of life, and treatment of patients with Hunter syndrome in the French healthcare system: a retrospective observational study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:43. Raluy-Callado et al used the Health Utility Index (HUI) which specifically investigated the impact of disease on hearing. They have shown that hearing is the biggest deficiency suffered by patients with MPS type II in agreement with previous publications.55 Kamin, W. Diagnosis and management of respiratory involvement in Hunter syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(457):57–60. Inclusion of hearing in the HUI makes it particularly relevant for studies involving the head and neck. It is difficult to predict why it was not considered in any of the studies reviewed in this work, although the cost of purchasing a license for use may be a barrier.2828 Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54. Another tool to consider when evaluating head and neck and respiratory-related QoL is HS-FOCUS which measures patient and parental views in 6 areas, including breathing.2929 Wiklund, I., Raluy-Callado, M., Chen, WH., Muenzer, J., Fang, J., Whiteman, D. The Hunter Syndrome-Functional Outcomes for Clinical Understanding Scale (HS-FOCUS) Questionnaire: item reduction and further validation. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2457–2462. The use of QoL scales in complex diseases such as MPS type II presents additional challenges to clinicians and researchers: (1) generic scales may not be sufficiently sensitive or specific to detect meaningful change in the patient cohort, that is, ask the wrong questions and (2) bespoke disease-specific scales may not be validated and we do not understand their utility.

The next step in this project is to use the outcomes “long list” in an eDelphi prioritization and consensus exercise to reach agreement between clinical stakeholder groups (ear, nose, and throat surgeons, metabolic physicians, clinical geneticists, specialist nurses, physiotherapists, and respiratory pediatricians) and patients and parents/carers regarding the most important outcomes to be measured in clinical studies of MPS type II. Involvement of a variety of stakeholders will help ensure that the resultant COS will be inclusive, helpful, and provide a valuable resource for any future clinical studies investigating the head, neck, and respiratory manifestations of MPS type II. Additionally, this study provides a component of the information needed to develop a “general” COS for studies involving patients with MPS type II. Finally, the prioritization and consensus seeking involved in COS development could be used to inform review of the existing HOS database for MPS type II.

Funding

  • The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by an investigator-led research grant from Shire, Zug, Switzerland. IAB and NB are supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

References

  • 1
    Muenzer, J. Overview of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(suppl 5):v4–v12.
  • 2
    Muenzer, EFNJ . 136: the mucopolysaccharidoses. In: Scriver, CRBA, Sly, WS, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001:3421–3452.
  • 3
    Clark, BM, Sprung, J, Weingarten, TN, Warner, ME. Anesthesia for patients with mucopolysaccharidoses: comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on airway management. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017;18(1):1–7.
  • 4
    Jones, SA, Almassy, Z, Beck, M. Mortality and cause of death in mucopolysaccharidosis type II-a historical review based on data from the hunter outcome survey (HOS). J Inherit Metab Dis. 2009;32(4):534–43.
  • 5
    Kamin, W. Diagnosis and management of respiratory involvement in Hunter syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(457):57–60.
  • 6
    Rutten, M, Ciet, P, van den Biggelaar, R. Severe tracheal and bronchial collapse in adults with type II mucopolysaccharidosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:50.
  • 7
    Simmons, MA, Bruce, IA, Penney, S, Wraith, E, Rothera, MP. Otorhinolaryngological manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(5):589–595.
  • 8
    Wooten, WI, Muenzer, J, Vaughn, BV, Muhlebach, MS. Relationship of sleep to pulmonary function in mucopolysaccharidosis II. J Pediatr. 2013;162(6):1210–1215.
  • 9
    Garg, RK, Afifi, AM, Garland, CB, Sanchez, R, Mount, DL. Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: consensus, controversy, and craniofacial considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5):987–997.
  • 10
    Napiontek, U, Keilmann, A. Hearing impairment in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Acta Paediatrica Suppl. 2006;451:113–117.
  • 11
    Keilmann, A, Nakarat, T, Bruce, IA, Molter, D, Malm, G, Investigators, HOS. Hearing loss in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II: data from HOS—the Hunter Outcome Survey. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(2):343–353.
  • 12
    Peck, JE . Hearing loss in Hunter’s syndrome—mucopolysaccharidosis II. Ear Hear. 1984;5(4):243–246.
  • 13
    Motamed, M, Thorne, S, Narula, A. Treatment of otitis media with effusion in children with mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;53(2):121–124.
  • 14
    Williamson, PR, Altman, DG, Blazeby, JM. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.
  • 15
    Cooney, RM, Warren, BF, Altman, DG, Abreu, MT, Travis, SP. Outcome measurement in clinical trials for Ulcerative Colitis: towards standardisation. Trials. 2007;8:17.
  • 16
    Dodd, S, Clarke, M, Becker, L. A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:84–92.
  • 17
    Muenzer, J, Gucsavas-Calikoglu, M, McCandless, SE, Schuetz, TJ, Kimura, A. A phase I/II clinical trial of enzyme replacement therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). Mol Genet Metab. 2007;90(3):329–337.
  • 18
    Muenzer, J, Wraith, JE, Beck, M. A phase II/III clinical study of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). Genet Med. 2006;8(8):465–473.
  • 19
    Sohn, YB, Cho, SY, Park, SW. Phase I/II clinical trial of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase beta in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:42.
  • 20
    da Silva, EM, Strufaldi, MW, Andriolo, RB, Silva, LA. Enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase for mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD008185.
  • 21
    Glamuzina, E., Fettes, E., Bainbridge, K. Treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) with idursulfase: the relevance of clinical trial end points. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34(3):749–754.
  • 22
    Vellodi, A, Young, E, Cooper, A, Lidchi, V, Winchester, B, Wraith, JE. Long-term follow-up following bone marrow transplantation for hunter disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1999;22(5):638–648.
  • 23
    Cho, YS, Kim, JH, Kim, TW, Chung, SC, Chang, SA, Jin, DK. Otologic manifestations of Hunter syndrome and their relationship with speech development. Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(3):206–212.
  • 24
    Raluy-Callado, M, Chen, WH, Whiteman, DA, Fang, J, Wiklund, I. The impact of Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type II) on health-related quality of life. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:101.
  • 25
    Jeong, HS., Cho, DY., Ahn, KM., Jin, DK. Complications of tracheotomy in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses type II (Hunter syndrome). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70(10):1765–1769.
  • 26
    Fernanda, HBTAV, Steiner, CE, Neto, JC, Boy, R, Schwartz, VD. Medical costs related to enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis types I, II, and VI in Brazil: a multicenter study. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2015;8(December 2015):99–106.
  • 27
    Guffon, N, Heron, B, Chabrol, B, Feillet, F, Montauban, V, Valayannopoulos, V. Diagnosis, quality of life, and treatment of patients with Hunter syndrome in the French healthcare system: a retrospective observational study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:43.
  • 28
    Horsman, J., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.
  • 29
    Wiklund, I., Raluy-Callado, M., Chen, WH., Muenzer, J., Fang, J., Whiteman, D. The Hunter Syndrome-Functional Outcomes for Clinical Understanding Scale (HS-FOCUS) Questionnaire: item reduction and further validation. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2457–2462.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    2019

History

  • Received
    07 Aug 2018
  • Accepted
    04 Sept 2018
Latin American Society Inborn Errors and Neonatal Screening (SLEIMPN); Instituto Genética para Todos (IGPT) Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, CEP: 90035-903, Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil, Tel.: 55-51-3359-6338, Fax: 55-51-3359-8010 - Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil
E-mail: rgiugliani@hcpa.edu.br