Compact Triple Band Notched Pentagonal Shaped UWB Antenna Loaded with Slots and Parasitic Resonator

Kadam, Ameya A.; Deshmukh, Amit A.

doi:10.1590/2179-10742021v20i21157

Ameya A. Kadam

Research Scholar, EXTC Department, SVKM’s DJSCE, Mumbai, India, ameyakadam@rediffmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-9973

Amit A. Deshmukh

Professor & Head, EXTC Department, SVKM’s DJSCE, Mumbai, India, amitdeshmukh76@rediffmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8299-5758

Thumbnail

Fig. 1
PMSA backed by square ground plane (a) Front View, (b) Side View and its (c) resonance curve plots for variation in length of ground plane Lg .

Thumbnail

Fig. 2
Surface current distribution at TM₁₁ and TM₂₁ modes for different length of ground plane L_g in mm (a,b) 32, (c, d) 22, (e, f) 17, and (g, h) 11.5.

Thumbnail

Fig. 3
(a) Simulated resonance curve and S₁₁ plots, (b, c) fabricated prototype of UWB antenna, and simulated surface current distribution at (d) f_TM11 = 3.12 GHz, (e) f_TM21 = 5.72 GHz and (f) f_TM02= 8.54 GHz for pentagonal UWB patch antenna.

Thumbnail

Fig. 4
The design evolution of the triple band notch antenna (a) pair of Γ -shape slots, (b) pair of L-shape slots, (c) bent C-shape parasitic resonator loaded Pentagonal patch antenna and its (d) side view antenna.

Thumbnail

Fig. 5
Simulated resonance curve plots and magnitude of S₁₁ for variation in (a) L_h1 and (b) L_v1 for Γ-shape slot loaded pentagonal UBW antenna (dimensions in mm).

Thumbnail

Fig. 6
Simulated resonance curve plots and magnitude of S₁₁ for variation in (a) L_v2 and (b) L_h2 for L-shape slot loaded pentagonal UBW antenna. (dimensions in mm).

Thumbnail

Fig. 7
Simulated resonance curve plots and S₁₁ for (a) varying vertical dimension L_v3 , and (b) varying horizontal dimension of parasitic resonator L_h3 (dimensions in mm).

Thumbnail

Fig. 8
(a) Measured and simulated S₁₁ for proposed triple band notch antenna, its simulated surface current distribution at the notched frequencies, (b) 3.46 GHz, (c) 5.78 GHz and (d) 8.21 GHz.

Thumbnail

Fig. 9
The fabricated prototype of a triple band notch antenna (a) Front and (b) Back views.

Thumbnail

Fig. 10
Gain plot for the pentagonal shape UWB antenna and triple-band notch antenna.

Thumbnail

Fig. 11
Simulated and measured E-field (yz-plane) and H-field (xz-plane) radiation patterns in the pass bands.

Thumbnail

Fig. 12
Simulated and measured group delay and S₂₁ of the proposed triple band-notch UWB antenna (a) face to face and (b) side by side configuration.

Thumbnail

Fig. 5
Simulated resonance curve plots and magnitude of S₁₁ for variation in (a) L_h1 and (b) L_v1 for Γ-shape slot loaded pentagonal UBW antenna (dimensions in mm).

Thumbnail

Fig. 6
Simulated resonance curve plots and magnitude of S₁₁ for variation in (a) L_v2 and (b) L_h2 for L-shape slot loaded pentagonal UBW antenna. (dimensions in mm).

Thumbnail

Fig. 7
Simulated resonance curve plots and S₁₁ for (a) varying vertical dimension L_v3 , and (b) varying horizontal dimension of parasitic resonator L_h3 (dimensions in mm).

Thumbnail

Fig. 8
(a) Measured and simulated S₁₁ for proposed triple band notch antenna, its simulated surface current distribution at the notched frequencies, (b) 3.46 GHz, (c) 5.78 GHz and (d) 8.21 GHz.

Thumbnail

Fig. 9
The fabricated prototype of a triple band notch antenna (a) Front and (b) Back views.

Thumbnail

Fig. 10
Gain plot for the pentagonal shape UWB antenna and triple-band notch antenna.

Thumbnail

Fig. 11
Simulated and measured E-field (yz-plane) and H-field (xz-plane) radiation patterns in the pass bands.

Thumbnail

Fig. 12
Simulated and measured group delay and S₂₁ of the proposed triple band-notch UWB antenna (a) face to face and (b) side by side configuration.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Comparison with reported single, dual and triple band notched uwb antennas

Thumbnail

(1)

Thumbnail

(2)

Reference	Antenna size (mm²)	Notched bands	Operating Frequency Range (GHz)
[ ¹⁶[16] T. Mandal and S. Das, “Design of dual notch band UWB printed monopole antenna using electromagnetic‐bandgap structure”, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. , vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2195–2199, 2014. ]	52 × 32 = 1664	2	3.11-10.60
[ ¹⁷[17] M. Ghahremani, C. Ghobadi, J. Nourinia, M. S. Ellis, F. Alizadeh, and B. Mohammadi, “Miniaturised UWB antenna with dual-band rejection of WLAN/WiMAX using slitted EBG structure”, IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag. , 2019. ]	30 × 40 = 1200	2	2.80-11.00
[ ¹⁸[18] T. A. Denidni and Z. Weng, “Hybrid ultrawideband dielectric resonator antenna and band-notched designs”, IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag. , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 450–458, 2011. ]	50 × 40 = 2000	2	2.90-10.82
[ ¹⁹[19] L. C. Tsai, “A ultrawideband antenna with dual-band band-notch filters”, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. , vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1861–1866, 2017. ]	78 × 45= 3478	2	2.63–10.86
[ ²⁰[20] S. Kundu and S. K. Jana, “Leaf-shaped CPW-fed UWB antenna with triple notch bands for ground penetrating radar applications”, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. , vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 930–936, 2018. ]	38 × 34 = 1292	3	2.58-11.62
[ ²¹[21] D. Sarkar, K. V. Srivastava, and K. Saurav, “A compact microstrip-fed triple band-notched UWB monopole antenna”, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. , vol. 13, pp. 396–399, 2014. ]	35 × 35 = 1225	3	2.31-12.83
[ ²²[22] Y. K. Choukiker and S. K. Behera, “Modified Sierpinski square fractal antenna covering ultra-wide band application with band notch characteristics”, IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag. , vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 506–512, 2014. ]	34 × 34 = 1156	1	3.10–10.60
[ ²³[23] F. Zhu et al. , “Dual band-notched tapered slot antenna using λ/4 band-stop filters”, IET Microwaves, Antennas Propag. , vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 1665–1673, 2012. ]	40 × 43 = 1720	2	2.90-11.00
[ ²⁴[24] J. Zhang, T. Chen, L. Hua, and W. Wang, “A compact differential-fed UWB antenna with band-notched characteristics”, Prog. Electromagn. Res. M , vol. 83, no. 8 pp. 171–179, 2019. ]	35 × 30 = 1050	1	3.10-12.00
[ ²⁵[25] M. Debab and Z. Mahdjoub, “Single band notched characteristics UWB antenna using a cylindrical dielectric resonator and U-shaped slot”, J. Microwaves, Optoelectron. Electromagn. Appl. , vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 340–351, 2018. ]	40 × 50 = 2000	1	3.30-12.00
This paper	32 × 24 = 768	3	2.71-11.00

Brasil

Brasil

Compact Triple Band Notched Pentagonal Shaped UWB Antenna Loaded with Slots and Parasitic Resonator

Abstract