Fig. 1
(a) Geometry of arbitrary FSS (b) Unit cell in the FSS structure.
Fig. 2
The parallel metallic strips FSS: (a) Realized FSS with an array of 10 unit cells and (b) FSS unit cell geometry.
Fig. 3
Simulated and measured transmission coefficient for the : (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 4
Simulated and measured transmission coefficient for the : (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 5
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L3 for the x polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 6
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L4 for the x polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 7
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L1 for the y polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 8
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L2 for they polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 9
The parallel metallic strips FSS: (a) With gaps (b) With diode switches.
Fig. 10
Simulated transmission coefficient for the : (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 11
Simulated transmission coefficient for the x polarized FSS : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 12
Parallel metallic strips FSS with three horizontal strips.
Fig. 13
Simulated transmission coefficient for the: (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 14
FSS ring structure with parallel metallic strips: (a) Realized FSS with an array of 10 × 10 unit cells and - (b) FSS unit cell geometry.
Fig. 15
Simulated and measured transmission coefficient for the: (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 4
Simulated and measured transmission coefficient for the : (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 5
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L3 for the x polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 6
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L4 for the x polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 7
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L1 for the y polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 8
Transmission coefficient versus frequency for different Values of L2 for they polarization : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 9
The parallel metallic strips FSS: (a) With gaps (b) With diode switches.
Fig. 10
Simulated transmission coefficient for the : (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 11
Simulated transmission coefficient for the x polarized FSS : (a) WCIP results - (b) Simulated results.
Fig. 12
Parallel metallic strips FSS with three horizontal strips.
Fig. 13
Simulated transmission coefficient for the: (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 14
FSS ring structure with parallel metallic strips: (a) Realized FSS with an array of 10 × 10 unit cells and - (b) FSS unit cell geometry.
Fig. 15
Simulated and measured transmission coefficient for the: (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 16
Strips length and ring circumference determination procedure outlines.
Fig. 17
FSS unit cell geometry : (a) Metallic strip - (b) Metallic ring.
Fig. 18
Flowchart summarizing the different steps for obtaining the fr as a function of the strip length L or the ring length La.
Fig. 19
Resonance frequency as a function of the metallic strip length.
Fig. 20
Transmission Coefficient of the dual polarized parallel metallic strips FSS the equivalent metallic structure for the: (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 21
Transmission coefficient of the dual polarized FSS with metallic parallel strips and a ring for the: (a) x polarization -(b) y polarization.
Fig. 22
Effective dielectric constant as a function of the: (a) Metallic FSS metallic strip/ring length (b) Resonant frequency of the strip/ring FSS
Fig. 23
Strip/ring length error versus the desired resonant frequency for: (b) Metallic strip FSS (c) Metallic ring FSS
Fig. 24
Strip/ring resonant frequency error versus given strip/ring lengths for: (b) Metallic strip FSS (c) Metallic ring FSS
Fig. 17
FSS unit cell geometry : (a) Metallic strip - (b) Metallic ring.
Fig. 18
Flowchart summarizing the different steps for obtaining the fr as a function of the strip length L or the ring length La.
Fig. 19
Resonance frequency as a function of the metallic strip length.
Fig. 20
Transmission Coefficient of the dual polarized parallel metallic strips FSS the equivalent metallic structure for the: (a) x polarization - (b) y polarization.
Fig. 21
Transmission coefficient of the dual polarized FSS with metallic parallel strips and a ring for the: (a) x polarization -(b) y polarization.
Fig. 22
Effective dielectric constant as a function of the: (a) Metallic FSS metallic strip/ring length (b) Resonant frequency of the strip/ring FSS
Fig. 23
Strip/ring length error versus the desired resonant frequency for: (b) Metallic strip FSS (c) Metallic ring FSS
Fig. 24
Strip/ring resonant frequency error versus given strip/ring lengths for: (b) Metallic strip FSS (c) Metallic ring FSS
Fig. 25
The open notched quasi-square metallic ring FSS unit cell dimensions [2222. [22] I. Adoui, M. Titaouine, H. Choutri, A. Djouimaa, T. R. De Sousa, A. G. Neto, H. Baudrand, “Characterization Of Novel Open Notched Quasi-Square Metallic Ring FSS Using WCIP Method For Multiband Applications,” Microwave And Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 58, No. 9, pp. 2071-2075, September 2016.].
Fig. 26
Unit cell of the equivalent dual polarized FSS based on parallel metallic strips.
Fig. 27
Transmission power of the equivalent structure for the x and y source polarizations.
Table I
error percent of the resonant frequencies corresponding to the metallic strip L3
Table II
Error in the present approach resonant frequency as compared to the measured resonant frequency for an x polarized source exciting the dual polarized parallel metallic strips FSS
Table III
Error in the present approach resonant frequency as compared to the measured resonant frequency for a y polarized source exciting a dual polarized parallel metallic strips FSS
Table IV
Error in the present approach resonant frequency as compared to the measured resonant frequency for an x polarized source exciting the dual polarized fss with parallel metallic strip and a ring
Table V
Error in the present approach resonant frequency as compared to the measured resonant frequency for a y polarized source exciting the dual polarized fss with parallel metallic strip and a ring
Table 6
Equivalent FSS strips lengths and resonant frequency error as compared to measurements
