EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INTERVAL TRAINING PROTOCOLS ON ADIPOSITY INDICATORS IN OVERWEIGHT-OBESE CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

de Menezes-Junior, Francisco José; Jesus, Íncare Correa de; Ferreira, Vinícius Lins; Wiens, Astrid; Mota, Jorge; Leite, Neiva

doi:10.4025/jphyseduc.v31i1.3161

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Journal of Physical Education

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Review Article • J. Phys. Educ. 31 • 2020 • https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v31i1.3161 copy

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INTERVAL TRAINING PROTOCOLS ON ADIPOSITY INDICATORS IN OVERWEIGHT-OBESE CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

EFEITO DE DIFERENTES PROTOCOLOS DE TREINAMENTO INTERVALADO SOBRE INDICADORES DE ADIPOSIDADE EM CRIANÇAS E ADOLESCENTES COM SOBREPESO E OBESIDADE: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA E METANÁLISE

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

The present meta-analysis verified the impact of different protocols of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on indicators of adiposity in overweight and obese children and adolescents. Searches were performed in the databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, SPORTDiscus, LILACS and SciELO. Were included studies without caloric restriction that aimed to verify the effect of HIIT interventions on the adiposity indicators in overweight children and adolescents published until December 2018. The PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias. The meta-analysis was conducted in the Revman software using standardized mean difference (SMD) data and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Seventeen studies were selected, which involved 289 children and adolescents with overweight and obesity. HIIT interventions (mean=11.7±5.9 weeks) produced significant decreases in body fat percentage (SMD=-0.65; CI=-1.07, -0.23) and waist circumference (SMD=-0.34; CI=-0.49, -0.18). Also, major relative risk of decrease in body fat percentage were observed in favour to protocols with work/recovery interval ratios of 1:1 and 2:1. HIIT protocols with ratios (work/recovery intervals) 1:1 and 2:1 promote significant reductions in fat percentage and waist circumference in overweight and obese children, independently of the total work time.

Keywords:
Interval training; Body fat; Waist circumference; Obesity; Adolescents

Author/ Year	Sample	Protocol datail	Intensity	Frequency	Duration	Risk of bias	Work (total) (min)
Tjønna et al., 2009	(n=20) ♀♂ 14.0±0.3	HIIT (2:1) 4x/240s/180s (AR)	90%/70% HR_max	2x/week	12 weeks	Low	16 (28)
Corte de Araujo et al., 2012	(n=15) ♀♂ 8-12	SIT (1:2) 6x/60s/180s (AR)	100%/50% V_peak	*x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	6 (24)
Koubaa et al., 2013	(n=14) ♂ 13.0±0.8	HIIT (2:1) *x/120s/60s (PR)	80-95% VO2_peak	3x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	*
Racil et al., 2013	(n=11) ♀ 15.6±0.7	SIT (1:1) (2) 6-8x/30s/30s (AR)	100-110%/50% V_peak	3x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	8 (16)
Starkoff et al., 2014	(n=14) ♀♂ 14.7±1.5	HIIT (2:1) 10x/120s/60s (AR)	90-95%/55% HR_max	3x/week	6 weeks	Moderate	20 (30)
Lambrick et al., 2015	(n=15) ♀♂ 8-10	SIT (2:1) 5x/360s/120s (PR)	V_max	2x/week	6 weeks	Moderate	30 (40)
Lau et al., 2015	(n=15) ♀♂ 10.4±0.9	SIT (1:1) 12x/15s/15s (PR)	120%V_peak	3x/week	6 weeks	High	3 (6)
Murphy et al., 2015	(n=10) ♀♂ 12-18	HIIT (1:2) 10x/60s/120s (AR)	90%/60% HR_max	3x/week	24 weeks	High	10 (30)
Racil et al., 2016	(n=23) ♀ 16.6±1	SIT (1:1) 8x/30s/30s (AR)	100%/50% VO_2peak	3x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	4 (8)
Racil et al., 2016	(n=17) ♀ 14.2±1.2	SIT (1:1) 8-18x/15s/15s (AR)	100%/50% V_peak	3x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	4:30 (9)
Alvarez et al., 2017	G1 (n=12) G2 (n=17) ♂ 11.4±1.7	HIIT (1:2) 8-12x/60s/120s (PR)	70-100% HR_max	3x/week	6 weeks	Low	12 (36)
Blüher et al., 2017	(n=20) ♀♂ 13-18 y	HIIT (2:1) 8x/20s/10s (PR)	80-95%/50-60% HR_max	2x/week	24 weeks	Moderate	2:40 (4)
Lee et al., 2017	(n=12) ♀♂ 14.9±1.4	HIIT (1:2) 10x/60s/90s (AR)	90%/40-50% HR_max	3x/week	4 weeks	Moderate	10 (25)
Ouerghi et al., 2017	(n=9) ♀♂ 18.1±0.9	SIT (1:1) (2) 8-10x/30s/30s (AR)	110%/50% V_peak	*x/week	8 weeks	High	8-10 (16-20)
Pizzi et al., 2017	(n=20) ♀♂ 10-15	SIT (1:2) 8x/30s/60s (AR)	100%/50% V_peak	3x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	4 (12)
Álvarez et al., 2018	(n=29) ♀♂ 11.2±1.6	HIIT (1:2) 8-14x/40s/60s (PR)	70-100% HR_max	3x/week	6 weeks	Moderate	5:20-9:20 (13:20-23:20)
Chuensiri et all., 2018	G1(n=16) G2 (n=16)♀♂ 8-18	HIIT G1 (2:1) 8x/120s/60s (PR) SIT G2 (2:1) 8x/20s/10s (PR)	G1 - 90% (watt) G2 - 170% (watt)	3x/week	12 weeks	Moderate	16 (24) 2:40 (4)

Universidade Estadual de Maringá Avenida Colombo, 5790 - cep: 87020-900 - tel: 44 3011 4315 - Maringá - PR - Brazil
E-mail: revdef@uem.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Author address: Francisco José de Menezes-Junior -Rua Coração de Maria, nº 92, Campus Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil - CEP: 80210-132 - E-mail: franciscomenezes@ufpr.