Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Linking activity participation, socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel patterns: a comparison of industry and commerce sector workers

Relações entre participação em atividades, características socioeconômicas, uso do solo e padrões de viagens: uma comparação entre trabalhadores nos setores industrial e comercial

Abstracts

The objective of this work is to analyze the travel behavior of industry and commerce sector workers in terms of three variables groups: activity participation, socioeconomic characteristics and land use. This work is based on the Origin-Destination survey carried out in the São Paulo Metropolitan Area (SPMA) in 1997. Relationships were found between the concerned variables (Decision Tree), and the statistical significance of independent variables was assessed (Multiple Linear Regression). We analyzed the influence of the three variables groups on travel pattern choices: (A) socioeconomic variables (Household Income, Transit Pass Ownership and Car-ownership) affect the travel mode sequence; (B) activity participation (Study, Work) has an effect on the trip purpose sequence; and (C) land use variables (accumulated proportion of jobs by distance buffers starting from the home traffic zone centroid) influence the sequence of destinations chosen, especially in the case of industry sector workers. The different spatial distributions of economic activities (commercial and industrial) in the urban environment influence the travel of workers. This paper contributes essentially proposing the land use variable, through the intervening opportunities model as well as the presentation of a methodology, formed by application of exploratory and confirmatory techniques of multivariate data analysis.

travel behavior; land use; activity participation; socioeconomic variables


O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o comportamento relacionado a viagens de trabalhadores do setor industrial e comercial, em termos de três grupos de variáveis: participação em atividades, características socioeconômicas e uso do solo. Este trabalho baseia-se na Pesquisa Origem-Destino, realizada na Região Metropolitana de São Paulo (RMSP) em 1997. Foram encontradas relações entre as variáveis consideradas (Árvore de Decisão), e a significância estatística das variáveis independentes (Regressão Linear Múltipla). Foi analisada a influência dos três grupos de variáveis na escolha dos padrões de viagens: (A) Variáveis socioeconômicas (Renda domiciliar, Vale transporte e Posse de automóveis) afetam a sequencia do modo de transporte; (B) Participação em atividades (Estuda e Trabalha) tem um efeito na sequencia dos motivos de viagem; e (C) variáveis de uso do solo (proporção acumulada de empregos por determinado raio a partir dos centroides das zonas de tráfego dos domicílios) influenciam a sequencia de destinos escolhidos, sobretudo para o caso de trabalhadores na indústria. Os diferentes arranjos espaciais das atividades econômicas (comerciais e industriais) na cidade influenciam a viagem dos trabalhadores. Este artigo contribui essencialmente através da proposta de uma variável de uso do solo, proveniente do modelo de oportunidades intervenientes, bem como na apresentação de um método que combina a aplicação conjunta de técnicas de análise multivariada de dados exploratórias e confirmatórias.

comportamento relacionado a viagens; uso do solo; participação em atividades; variáveis socioeconômicas


  • Arentze, T., Hofman V, Mourik van, H. and Timmermans, H. (2000). ALBATROSS: Multiagent, Rule-Based Model of Activity Pattern Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 1706, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, pp. 136-144.
  • Balasubramaniam, C. and Goulias, K. (1999) Exploratory longitudinal analysis of solo and joint trip making. 78th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, 1999, Washington, D.C.
  • Bhat, C.R. and Singh, S.K (2000) A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for workers. Transportation Research Part A, v.34, pp.1-22.
  • Bhat C.R. and Koppelman , F.S (1991) A conceptual framework of individual activity program generation. Transportation Research Part A, v. 27, 1991, pp.433-446.
  • Breiman, L., Friedman J.H, Olshen, R.A. and Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group, California.
  • Bowman, J.L. and Ben-Akiva, M.E. (2000) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transportation Research Part A, v.35, pp.1-28.
  • Cervero, R. and Radisch, M.E. (1996). Pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy, v.3, pp.127-141.
  • Ewing, R. (1995) Beyond density, mode choice, and single-purpose trips. Transportation Quarterly, v.49, pp. 16-23.
  • Golob, T.F and Mcnally, M. (1997) A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transportation Research Part B, v.31, pp.177-194.
  • IBGE - INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Censo Demográfico 2000. Características urbanísticas em torno dos domicílios. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, 2000. In portuguese
  • Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L and Laidet, L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area., Transportation, n. 24, pp. 125-158.
  • Kwan M. (2000) Interactive revisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C, v.8, pp.185-203.
  • Lu, X. and Pas, E.I. (1999). Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A, v.33, pp.1-18.
  • Mcguckin, N. and Murakami, E. (1999) Examining trip-chaining behavior: Comparison of travel by men and women. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 1693, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, pp. 79-85.
  • METRO (2000) Pesquisa Origem Destino 1997 - Região Metropolitana de São Paulo: Síntese das informações. In portuguese.
  • Piramuthu, S. (2008) Input data for decision trees. Expert Systems with applications, v.34, pp. 1220-1226.
  • Schneider, M (1959). Gravity models and trip distribution theory. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, v.5, p.51-56.
  • Simma, A. and Axhausen, K.W. (2001) Within household allocation of travel: the case of upper Austria. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 1752, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, pp. 69-75.
  • Srinivasan, K.K. and Athuru, S.R. (2005). Analysis of within-household effects and between household differences in maintenance activity allocation. Transportation, v.32, pp.495-521.
  • Strambi, O., Vespucci, K.M and van de Bilt, K. (2004) Analysis of the evolution of classes of individual patterns and their relation to socio-demographic and economic variables. 83rdAnnual Meeting of Transportation Research Board Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Washington, D.C.
  • Strathman, J.G., and Dueker, K.J. (1990). Understanding Trip Chaining. 1990 NPTS Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes Publication FHWA-PL-95-033. FHWA, U.S Department of Transportation.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    07 Nov 2013
  • Date of issue
    July 2013

History

  • Received
    11 June 2012
  • Accepted
    11 Nov 2012
  • Reviewed
    29 Oct 2012
Sociedade Brasileira de Planejamento dos Transportes Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Faculdade de Tecnologia - Pavilhão Rio Japurá - Setor Norte, Av. Gal Rodrigo Otávio, n. 3000, Coroado, CEP 69077-000, Tel.: (55 92) 3305-4613 | 3305-4607 - Manaus - AM - Brazil
E-mail: editor.jtl@gmail.com