Accessibility / Report Error

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA): molecular background, virulence, and relevance for public health

MF Bonesso SA Marques MLRS Cunha About the authors


Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) are frequently found in nosocomial environments as the main pathogen in several infections. In 1961, reports of nosocomial S. aureus resistant to methicillin, the drug of choice against penicillin-resistant strains, required new alternatives and vancomycin started being used to treat infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) was first reported in 1990 affecting patients without risk factors for infection with MRSA of hospital origin. MRSA of community origin harbor the genes responsible for the synthesis of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), a toxin associated with skin and soft tissue infections and that carries the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV. CA-MRSA emergence has caused great impact on the worldwide medical community since the presence of this pathogen in patients without risk factors represents a high risk to public health.

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; mecA gene; oxacillin; Panton-Valentine leukocidin; drug resistance; epidemiology


Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA): molecular background, virulence, and relevance for public health

Bonesso MFI, II;Marques SAIII; Cunha MLRSI

IDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Botucatu Biosciences Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil

IIDepartment of Tropical Diseases, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil

IIIDepartament of Dermatology e Radiotherapy, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil

Correspondence to Correspondence to: Mariana Fávero Bonesso Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP Rubião Júnior, Botucatu, SP 18618-970, Caixa Postal 510, Brasil Phone: +55 14 3811 6058 Email:


Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) are frequently found in nosocomial environments as the main pathogen in several infections. In 1961, reports of nosocomial S. aureus resistant to methicillin, the drug of choice against penicillin-resistant strains, required new alternatives and vancomycin started being used to treat infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) was first reported in 1990 affecting patients without risk factors for infection with MRSA of hospital origin. MRSA of community origin harbor the genes responsible for the synthesis of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), a toxin associated with skin and soft tissue infections and that carries the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV. CA-MRSA emergence has caused great impact on the worldwide medical community since the presence of this pathogen in patients without risk factors represents a high risk to public health.

Key words: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, mecA gene, oxacillin, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, drug resistance, epidemiology.


Staphylococcus aureus belongs to the family Staphylococcaceae and the genus Staphylococcus with 45 species, of which 17 can be isolated from human samples. Staphylococcus aureus is the most important species and can be found in both healthy and immunocompromised individuals (1, 2).

The genus Staphylococcus is divided into two groups known as coagulase-positive, represented by Staphylococcus aureus, S. intermedius, S. hyicus, S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi, S. lutrae and S. delphini, and coagulase-negative, represented by the remaining species (3). Both groups can cause infections to humans and the main species are: S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. warneri, S. capitis, S. saccarolyticus, S. lugdunensis, S. cohnii, S. xylosus, S. simulans, S. auricularis, S. caprae and S. schleiferi (4, 5).

Humans are the main source of this genus, which can be found in the skin, throat, intestine and nose without causing damage to the host. In hospitals, asymptomatic hosts can disseminate S. aureus to immunocompromised patients (2). Since they are ubiquitous, these bacteria can cause several types of infections such as: necrotizing pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia, as well as food poisoning through enterotoxin production (2, 6-9).

Staphylococcal infections used to be treated with penicillin, which was introduced in 1940; two years later, however, penicillinase-producing strains arose in the hospitals, becoming resistant to penicillin (10). Soon after, the same occurred with the community strains, requiring the use of alternative antibiotics to treat infections caused by S. aureus (11).

In the late 1950s in Europe, resistant Staphylococcus spp. of community and nosocomial origin showed penicillin resistance rates of 70 and 90%, respectively (10). This finding led to the search for alternative drugs and in 1959 6-aminopenicillanic acid was shown to cause a change in the precursor of penicillin, protecting the β-lactam ring. Methicillin is a semi-synthetic penicillin (oxacillin is the other member of this antimicrobial class, commonly used in Brazil) that showed resistance to the action of β-lactamase. However, both drugs were efficient for a short period, since in 1961 the first strains resistant to the semi-synthetic penicillin emerged. These new strains were named MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and were so far exclusive of hospitals (10, 12).

In 1990, infections by S. aureus in individuals without risk factors for acquiring hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) were first reported, and the strains isolated from the community were then called community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) to differentiate from HA-MRSA (10). The former infections are distinct from the latter because CA-MRSA are generally resistant to β-lactam antibiotics only and may carry the gene for the synthesis of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL), responsible for tissue invasion before skin infections (13).

To be considered a case of CA-MRSA, the infection must be in patients who: have no previous history of MRSA infection; show MRSA-positive culture during the first 48 hours of hospitalization; have no history of hospitalization during the last 12 months or admission to a nursing home; and have no history of dialysis, surgery, or any previous invasive treatment (12).

The transmission occurs due contact between the susceptible individual and the asymptomatic carrier. CA-MRSA dissemination is reported to be frequent among homosexuals; soldiers; athletes; illicit injecting drug users; prisoners; people with compromised skin and mucosae, poor hygiene habits and postpartum mastitis; descendants of native North American populations; and children due to their contact with contaminated nasal secretions (13, 14).

CA-MRSA isolates are associated with skin and soft tissue infections since they reach both surface and deeper tissues, into which they penetrate by rupturing natural barriers (15). The main characteristics of these infections are similar to those caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (3).

CA-MRSA infection outbreaks are increasing worldwide among all age groups. Several countries have reported its presence as emerging pathogen, including the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Samoa, as well as European countries and South America (Brazil, Uruguay and Colombia) (16).

In Brazil, there are several reports of confirmed cases of this pathogen in the community involving cases of boils, metastatic infections leading to serious complications and pneumonias (17-20).

Despite all those reports the real prevalence and incidence of CA-MRSA remains unknown. Some reports reveal that the prevalence in three centers in the United States were variable, ranging from 9 to 20% and, from these, 77% had skin and soft tissue infections (21).

There are no data about the prevalence of SCCmec IV in Brazilian communities, but Reinert et al. (22) characterized through pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) a culture collection recovered between 1995 and 1999. The results showed that the predominant profile (80%) corresponded to the Brazilian endemic clone (BEC). Three of 50 selected samples carried the cassette type IVc and the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was different among them: ST3, ST5 and ST88. Even though the study was performed with hospital samples, these data showed that SCCmec IV has long been present in Brazil and must have passed unnoticed in the laboratory practice. These strains must be detected both in community and in the hospital to better elucidate their epidemiology and control their dissemination (22).

MRSA dissemination among the members of one same family was reported in a study involving ten families. Strains with PFGE ST8 (USA 300), ST59 (USA 1000) and ST80 and PVL-positive were found in that study (23). They can cause serious pulmonary infections since their symptoms are similar to those of pneumonia in children; thus, it is important to consider MRSA infection, especially when there is a previous report (23).

Risk factors for acquiring MRSA must be evaluated due to its wide dissemination. In places that provide great proximity among individuals, the risk of S. aureus infection is higher. Studies carried out with people who keep close contact have shown that poor hygiene habits are an important factor in the acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus. In addition, younger and obese individuals have higher tendency to colonization by MRSA. Objects of common use (such as soaps) and the environment are related to outbreaks of infections by this pathogen (24).

There is transmission between humans and animals of CA-MRSA of pathogenic multiresistant strains which can carry genes for PVL production (25, 26).

CA-MRSA colonization is different between adults and children as to the resistance profile of non-β-lactam antibiotics; it is more common for multi-sensitive strains to colonize or affect children. In addition, the antibiotics used for children may differ from those prescribed for adults, providing thus a different selective pressure in the community. CA-MRSA resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin and erythromycin is more frequent in adults than in children (27).


Studies have been carried out into the genetic and molecular features responsible for the resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics, indicating that MRSA strains acquired and integrated in their genome the mobile element that harbors resistance genes called staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This element harbors the gene responsible for the resistance to methicillin (mecA) and remaining β-lactam antibiotics, as well as the genes that determine the resistance to other antibiotic classes. Strains related to community infections carry the small and lighter element, SCCmec IV or V (21 to 25 kb), which is generally resistant to β-lactams only (28). HA-MRSA strains carry the heavier mobile elements (SCCmec I to III) since they have genes that codify the resistance to antibiotics of several classes (29).

The mobile element SCCmec is characterized by the presence of essential genetic elements: complexes mec (A to E) and ccr, junkyards (J) and 3' extremity regions linked to the open reading frame (orfX) (30, 31). SCCmec is integrated to Staphylococcus chromosome at a specific site named attBscc and located downstream to orfX (32). There are several types of SCCmec (I to XI) besides the subtypes IIA to IIE, IVa to IVg, and VT (30, 33). The complex ccr has four allotypes for ccrA and ccrB: ccrA1 to ccrA4, ccrB1 to ccrB4, and ccrC. The allotypes of the complex SCCmec are characterized according to the presence of certain ccr genes (34). The genes ccrA and ccrB codify the recombinases of the family "invertases/resolvases". These enzymes mediate the integration inside and outside the chromosome, promoting the cassette mobility (28).

The J regions codify several pseudogenes that seem to have no role in bacterial metabolism and contain non-β-lactam or heavy metal resistance genes mediated by plasmids or transposons (28, 31). There are three main regions: J1, between the right extremity and the complex ccr; J2, between the complexes ccr and mec; and J3, between mec and orfX. The J1 region has been identified in SCCmec as types II and IV. The presence or lack of resistance genes in the J3 region could be a marker to classify the SCCmec elements (35).

SCCmec are found in several Staphylococcus species besides S. aureus, including S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis and S. warneri (30). SCCmec origin is unknown and there are no reports of other bacterial genera presenting this chromosome cassette. The presence of SCCmec type IV in S. epidermidis colonizing healthy people suggests it is responsible to convert CA-MSSA into CA-MRSA and the transmission occurs mainly by bacteriophage transduction (36, 37).

The gene mecA encodes for the penicillin binding protein PBP2 or PBP2a present in the outer surface of the cytoplasmic membrane (11, 38). Strains that are sensitive to traditional PBP easily bind to β-lactam antibiotics, preventing the correct formation of the cell wall. However, PBP2a has low affinity to this antimicrobial class, explaining the resistance to methicillin/oxacillin (38, 39).

The gene mecA is regulated by the genes mecI and mecR1, the roles of which are analogous to those of blaI and blaR1 in the mechanism of regulation of β-lactamase production. The precise regulation mechanism is still unknown, but basically the gene blaI is a DNA-binding protein that suppresses the transcription of the gene β-lactamase, and blaR1 codifies for a signal transduction PBP that leads to the transcription of the enzyme in the presence of β-lactam antimicrobials (40).

Other resistance mechanisms have been discovered in strains that lack the gene mecA, such as the β-lactamase overproduction, which is responsible for oxacillin inactivation or modified resistance (MOD-SA), mediated by different PBP types with altered affinity to this antimicrobial. Strains with this resistance pattern are called borderline (41).

The microorganisms that harbor SCCmec can carry toxin genes such as lukS and lukF which encode for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) (42). Leukocidin was first associated with skin and soft tissue infection by Panton and Valentine in 1932. PVL genes are obtained through the transduction of a specific phage type, phiSLT, which lyses a cell that harbors this gene and transports it to another cell. From its transcription, two exoproteins are synthesized: LukS-PV and LukF-PV. When secreted, LukS-PV links to the membrane of the polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte and is dimerized with LukF-PV, alternating with the former until the heptamer is completely formed. Calcium channels are also formed, triggering the production of interleukins and inflammatory mediators. Depending on the toxin concentration, PMN lysis or apoptosis may occur. This evidences that PVL may be not directly associated with tissue necrosis but with the cytotoxic lysosomal granules released due to PMN lysis, with reactive oxygen species released from granulocytes and/or with inflammatory mediators (43).

Boyle-Vavra et al. (44) carried out a study with patients who had skin and soft tissue infections or were colonized by CA-MRSA to test the resistance to several antimicrobials and isolate the strains that harbored the gene mecA. The results showed that 94% strains recovered from infections and 85.3% strains colonizing healthy patients were resistant to three or more non-β-lactam antibiotics. SCCmec type IV was found in 34% samples from patients who had at least one risk factor for MRSA (44).

Another feature that CA-MRSA can express is the induced resistance to clindamycin, an alternative antibiotic to treat both MSSA and MRSA infections, especially in cases of toxic shock syndrome. Among positive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B inducible (MLSBi) strains, an inducer promotes the synthesis of methylase by the gene erm and the subsequent methylation of 23S ribosome unit, leading the strain to express resistance to lincosamine (such as clindamycin). Phenotipically, these strains are resistant to erythromycin and susceptible to clindamycin; however, when the erythromycin disk is at 15 mm from the clindamycin disk the strains express induced resistance, forming a D zone. The presence of gene mecA itself is not a criterion for induced resistance (45).


S. aureus pathogenicity depends on several determinants, such as toxin production and extracellular membrane compounds (8, 9). The molecular bases of S. aureus pathogenicity are related to the expression of broad classes of accessory genes producing cell wall compounds and extracellular proteins. The expression of these virulence factors is regulated by genes present in the operon agr (accessory gene regulator), which codifies toxin and adhesion genes (46). Enzymes like coagulase and catalase are responsible for the invasion of the immune system (9).

Staphylococcal toxins can cause toxic shock syndrome (TSS), staphylococcal scarlatin (both due to the toxic shock syndrome toxin 1[TSST-1] and staphylococcal enterotoxins), scalded skin syndrome (SSSS, due to exfoliatins) and food poisoning (se's staphylococcal enterotoxins) (2, 8, 47).

Group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) is another bacterium frequently associated with TSS. S. pyogenes produces a toxin very similar to that synthesized by Staphylococcus aureus, differing in the infection clinical evolution. The pathogen can only be determined based on the result of the culture of a sample from the infection site (48). In addition, both pathogens have the potential to cause impetigo, cellulites and necrotizing fasciitis. There are reports of the association between Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes causing non-bolus impetigo (49).

Deep skin and soft tissue infections such as boils and abscesses, besides necrotizing pneumonia, are caused by the presence of the toxin PVL produced by S. aureus. PVL-positive strains are rarely found in hospital environments associated with bacteremia (50, 51). This toxin acts by means of a synergic action between two proteins LukS-PV and LukF-PV, which are codified by the genes in the CA-MRSA chromosome (51, 52).

In the lungs, PVL can lead to hemorrhage, extensive necrosis in the alveolar septa, and destruction of the epithelium covering the bronchi and bronchioles (28). In addition, histopathological sections showed necrotic lesions of the tracheal mucosa (50). Thus, previous studies suggested that the propensity of CA-MRSA to cause severe skin and soft tissue infections and necrotizing pneumonia is due to the gene that codifies PVL production (52).

The sequencing of a strain named MW2, from CA-MRSA, revealed the presence of genes responsible for specific virulence factors such as the toxin PVL and the staphylococcal enterotoxins H (seh) and C (sec) (52).


Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) and new protocols have proposed rapid, cheap and practical typing for the differentiation of CA-MRSA clones. Some techniques are capable of differentiating clone USA 300 from clone USA 400, besides detecting the gene that determines the resistance to oxacillin, mecA, the target gene of 16S RNA which differentiates Staphylococcus from other bacteria, the gene nuc, specific for S. aureus, PVL genes and other specific genes (32). M-PCR also allows the detection of genes that encode for the toxins and the chromosomal cassettes responsible for the resistance to antimicrobials in a rapid and reliable manner, compared to other methods (53).

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is widely used for typing genes that encode for essential proteins defining each species based on the sequence of fragments from the seven loci of the essential genes. There are no identical profiles due to the different combinations for each gene, and the matching profiles are considered members of one same clone. This technique can be used to study evolutionary and population biology of these bacteria (54).

Strains isolated in the United States were classified as pulsed-field types (PFT) USA 300, USA 400, USA 500, USA 600, USA 700, USA 100 and USA 800, USA 900, USA 1000 and USA 1100 (55). It is estimated that most CA-MRSA show the genetic profile USA 300, US A400, USA 1000 and USA 1100, of which USA 300 predominates among community isolates. On the other hand, USA 100, USA 200 and USA 500 are frequently associated with nosocomial infections and most of them show multiresistance at the chromosomal cassette type II (13).

For MRSA typing, PCR and PFGE-based techniques such as ribotyping and plasmid typing have been widely used with successful results. The high genetic similarity among these microorganisms requires the use of more than one method to obtain an accurate characterization (56).

The spa typing method is a sequencing technique used to characterize the polymorphic region X in the protein A gene (spa), which has a certain number of repeated regions of 24 bp flanked by well conserved regions. This typing, based on the sequence of one locus, is a practical and rapid method of low cost which also has lower error probability compared to PFGE and MLST techniques and can be applied in local and global epidemiological studies due to the micro and macro variations present simultaneously in the X region. In CA-MRSA, the following spa types can be found: t008, t019, t021, t044, t131, and t216 (57).


After the emergence of CA-MRSA strains there have been reports of strains resistant to other antibiotics such as mupirocin, quinolones, clindamycin and tetracycline. One of the main community strains, USA 300, showed plasmid-mediated resistance to tetracycline, mupirocin and clindamycin (55).

Another concern nowadays is the emergence of resistance to the antibiotic of choice for MRSA treatment, vancomycin. There are few drugs left to treat MRSA infections and vancomycin is one of them. Reports of resistance and low sensitivity to this antibiotic in nosocomial environments are common worldwide (5).

The first case of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin was reported by Hiramatsu (58), in Japan, in a pediatric patient who had positive culture for MRSA and was treated with glycopeptides. Phenotypic analyses have shown that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for this strain was 8 mg/L in the microdilution test, and molecular analyses have resulted negative for the presence of the genes vanA or vanB. The strain Mu50, recovered from this patient, is the first S. aureus strain showing such a level of vancomycin resistance (58).

The first report of resistance to vancomycin in the United States was described by Sievert et al. (59). The patient was treated with several antimicrobials, including vancomycin, and developed a blood infection caused by MRSA due to the hemodialysis catheter. The patient received vancomycin, rifampicin and required the removal of the infected device. A sample culture of the catheter revealed oxacillin- and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. One week later, vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) were isolated. Surveillance cultures did not recover VRSA from the patient, who responded well to the treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Molecular analyses revealed the presence of the gene vanA of enterococci, which explains the resistance to glycopeptides, and the gene mecA (59).

Cases of vancomycin-intermediate resistant (VISA) and heteroresistant S. aureus (hVISA) are increasingly common in healthcare centers where MRSA infections are treated with vancomycin (26, 60, 61).

Kim et al. (61) reported vancomycin-resistant strains presenting changes in the cell wall due to the selective pressure caused by the prolonged use of vancomycin to control MRSA infections (61). On the other hand, in vitro studies indicated that the resistance of the gene vanA can be transferred from vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus to S. aureus strains (59).

Resistance detection is controversial to some researchers, who state that the disk diffusion method may not be effective to detect resistance to glycopeptides, specially vancomycin (61, 62).

Biofilms are easily formed by these microorganisms, requiring the removal of catheters in case the infection persists. S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus resistant to oxacillin are present in the microbiota found in biofilms from catheters (5).

In San Francisco, USA, a patient with several successive complications was diagnosed with MRSA initially susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. A more accurate study was carried out proving that the strain belonged to PFGE USA 300-0114 of community origin and had intermediate resistance to vancomycin. This strain is closely related to skin and soft tissue infections besides pneumonia. The United States surveillance in San Francisco shows an explosive increase in infections caused by CA-MRSA USA300, capable of replacing other strains (63).

Adhikari at el. (64) studied strains from clinical isolates as to the deletion of gene mecA induced by the use of vancomycin. Forty-nine strains were cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB), which contained 6 mg/L vancomycin, and were stored at 37°C. There was a decrease in the incubation time of plates to 1 or 2 days of growth. Five of 49 samples showed reduced susceptibility to oxacillin, of which four kept the gene mecA and one strain, Vr6-1126a, lost this gene. Lines of this strain that had MIC above 4 mg/L for vancomycin completely deleted the gene mecA. The deletion of this gene is related to increased vancomycin resistance, deletion of regions SmaI-G to SmaI-I in SCCmec, and phenotypic pleiotropic changes (64).


The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community as the main agent of severe skin and soft tissue infections constitutes a concern since oxacillin would be the drug of choice to treat infections caused by microorganisms resistant to other antibiotics.

Several techniques can be used to identify resistance to oxacillin; however, PCR still remains the safest and most effective technique. Besides PCR, other techniques allow the typing of more than one genetic feature of CA-MRSA, detailing the existing toxins and differentiating the clones involved in outbreaks. These techniques help the epidemiologist to find the correct measures to control the dissemination of this pathogen.

The emergence of CA-MRSA strains showing low susceptibility to vancomycin is alarming and may impair the treatment. Several studies are being made in order to determine the prevalence, risk factors and also elucidating the real importance of CA-MRSA in the clinical practice and for public health. Educational resources that are available on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) inform people how to prevent and control MRSA skin and soft tissue infections (65). This initiative is really valuable especially when applied seriously in the community. It should be taking into consideration in many countries where CA-MRSA spread in not under control.

The lack of the prevalence and incidence data worldwide reveals the importance of a surveillance system in this field. Studies that are being currently developed will clarify the role and the prevalence of CA-MRSA, which can be useful for management in public health. Despite all those information, more studies are required to know the real prevalence and incidence of CA-MRSA in Brazil and worldwide.


We are grateful to The State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for the financial grants.

Submission status

Received: March 21, 2011.

Accepted: June 28, 2011.

Abstract published online: June 30, 2011.

Full paper published online: November 31, 2011.

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict.

Financial source

FAPESP (process number 2009/09569-0) provided the financial grants.

  • 1. Euzéby, JP. List of Prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature - genus Staphylococcus [Internet]. France : Centre Interuniversitaire de Calcul de Toulouse (CICT); [updated 2010 june 4; cited 2011 june 7]. Available from:
  • 2. Santos AL, Santos DO, Freitas CC, Ferreira BL, Afonso IF, Rodrigues CR, et al. Staphylococcus aureus: visitando uma cepa de importância hospitalar. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2007;43(6):413-23.
  • 3. Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, Yuzawa H, Aoki K, Oguchi A, et al. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet. 2002;359(9320):1819-27.
  • 4. Layer F, Ghebremedhin B, Moder KA, König W, König B. Comparative study using various methods for identification of Staphylococcus species in clinical specimens. J Clin Micr. 2006;44(8):2824-30.
  • 5. Martins A, Cunha M de L. Methicilin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci: epidemiological and molecular aspects. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51(9):787-95.
  • 6. Cavalcanti SM, de França ER, Vilela MA, Montenegro F, Cabral C, Medeiros AC. Estudo comparativo da prevalência de Staphylococcus aureus importado para as unidades de terapia intensiva de hospital universitário, Pernambuco, Brasil. Rev Bras Epidemol. 2006;9(4):436-46.
  • 7. Cunha ML, Peresi E, Calsolari RA, Araújo Jr. Detection of enterotoxin genes in coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolated from foods. Braz J Micr. 2006;37(1):70-4.
  • 8. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002;70(2):631-41.
  • 9. Silva WP, Gandra EA. Estafilococos coagulase positiva: patógeno de importância em alimentos. Hig Aliment. 2004;18(122):32-40.
  • 10. Mimica MJ, Mendes CMF. Diagnóstico laboratorial da resistência à oxacilina em Staphylococcus aureus J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2007;43:399-406.
  • 11. Ricardo SB. Emergência de S. aureus meticilina-resistente (MRSA) na comunidade. Prat Hosp. 2004;4(34):131-4.
  • 12. Lopes HV. CA-MRSA: um novo problema para o infectologista. Rev Panam Infectol. 2005;7(3):34-6.
  • 13. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, et al. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(15):1763-71.
  • 14. Stemper ME, Brady JM, Qutaishat SS, Borlaug G, Reed J, Reed KD, et al. Shift in Staphylococcus aureus clone linked to an infected tattoo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(9):1444-6.
  • 15. Ribeiro A, Dias C, Silva-Carvalho MC, Berquó L, Ferreira FA, Santos RN, et al. First report of infection with community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in South America. J Clin Micr. 2005;43:1985-8.
  • 16. Alvarez CA, Barrientes OJ, Leal AL, Contreras GA, Barrero L, Rincón S, et al. Community associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(12):2000-1.
  • 17. Razera F, De Stefani S, Bonamigo RR, Olm GS, Dias CAG, Narvaez GA. CA-MRSA in furunculosis case report of southern Brazil. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84(5):515-8.
  • 18. Fortes CQ, Espanha CA, Bustorff FP, Zappa BC, Ferreira AL, Moreira RB, et al. First reported case of infective endocarditis caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus not associated with healthcare contact in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12(6):541-3.
  • 19. d'Azevedo PA, Inoue FM, Andrade SS, Tranchesi R, Pignatari AC. Necrotizing pneumonia due to methillicin-resistent Staphylococcus aureus Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42(4):461-2.
  • 20. Gelatti LC, Sukiennik T, Becker AP, Inoue FM, do Carmo MS, Castrucci FM, et al Sepsis due to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in southern Brazill. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42:458-460.
  • 21. Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(14):1436-44.
  • 22. Reinert C, McCulloch JA, Watanabe S, Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Mamizuka EM. Type IV SCCmec found in decade old Brazilian MRSA isolates. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12(3):213-6.
  • 23. Huijsdens XW, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Spalburg E, Heck ME, Pluister GN, Eijkelkamp BA, et al. Multiple cases of familial transmission of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2994-6.
  • 24. Turabelidze G, Lin M, Wolkoff B, Dodson D, Gladbach S, Zhu BP. Personal hygiene and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(3):422-7.
  • 25. Rutland BE, Weese JS, Bolin C, Au J, Malani AN. Human-to-dog transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(8):1328-30.
  • 26. van Duijkeren E, Wolfhagen MJ, Heck ME, Wannet WJ. Transmission of a Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain between humans and a dog. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(12):6209-11.
  • 27. David MZ, Crawford SE, Boyle-Vavra S, Hostetler MA, Kim DC, Daum RS. Contrasting pediatric and adult methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(4):631-7.
  • 28. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec Types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):5026-33.
  • 29. Okuma K, Iwakawa K, Turnidge JD, Grubb WB, Bell JM, O'brien FG, et al. Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J Clin Micr. 2002;40(11):4289-94.
  • 30. Hanssen AM, Sollid JU. Multiple staphylococcal cassette chromosomes and allelic variants of cassette chromosome recombinases in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from Norway. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(5):1671-7.
  • 31. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Conly JM. Novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type, tentatively designated type VIII, harboring class A mec and type 4 ccr gene complexes in a Canadian epidemic strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(2):531-40.
  • 32. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous identification of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains USA300 and USA400 and detection of mecA and Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes, with discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(3):1118-22.
  • 33. IWG-SCCmec. International Working Group on the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome elements. [Internet]. [updated unknown; cited 2011 june 07]. Available from:
  • 34. Ito T, Ma XX, Takeuchi F, Okuma K, Yuzawa H, Hiramatsu K. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(7):2637-51.
  • 35. Kondo Y, Ito T, Ma XX, Watanabe S, Kreiswirth BN, Etienne J, et al. Combination of Multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(1):264-74.
  • 36. Hanssen AM, Kjeldsen G, Sollid JUE. Local variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(1):285-96.
  • 37. Ito T, Katayama Y, Hiramatsu K. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(6):1449-58.
  • 38. Menegotto FR, Picoli SU. Staphylococcus aureus oxacilina resistente (MRSA): incidência de cepas adquiridas na comunidade (CA-MRSA) e importância da pesquisa e descolonização em hospital. Rev Bras Anal Clin. 2007;39(2):147-50.
  • 39. Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K, Mori N, Tsutsumimoto, K, Tiensasitorn C, Hiramatsu K. Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(5):1323-36.
  • 40. Chambers HF. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Micr Rev. 1997;10(4):781-91.
  • 41. Wey SB, Cardo DM, Halker E, Carratu FP, Saes AC. Distribution and analysis of 8,268 nosocomial infections at the Hospital São Paulo: 1985 to 1989. Rev Hosp S Paulo Esc Paul Med. 1989;1(4):169-74.
  • 42. Nunes JO, Passos DT. Gene mecA e gene PVL em Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (MRSA) em animais [Internet]. Guaíba (RS): Universidade Luterana do Brasil, ULBRA. [cited 2010 june 15]. Available from:
  • 43. Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab Invest. 2007;87;3-9.
  • 44. Boyle-Vavra S, Ereshefsky B, Wang CC, Daum RS. Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4719-30.
  • 45. Patel M, Waites KB, Moser SA, Cloud GA, Hoesley CJ. Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance among community and hospital-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(7):2481-4.
  • 46. Purcell K, Fergie J. Epidemic of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a 14 year study at Duscoll children´s hospital. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(10):980-5.
  • 47. Johnson WM, Tyler SD, Ewan EP, Ashton FE, Pollard DR, Rozee KR. Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(3):426-30.
  • 48. Rebouças VLC, Simões SO, Pimentel JSC, Nascimento EH, Lima RES, Matos SG. Síndrome do choque tóxico com necrose tecidual extensa: relato de caso [Internet]. [place unknown: Publisher unknown] [cited 2008 april 02]. Available from:
  • 49. Bisno AL, Stevens DL. Streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues N Eng J Med. 1996;334(4):240-5.
  • 50. Lina G, Piémont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, Gauduchon V, et al. Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clinic Infect Dis. 1999;29(5):1128-32.
  • 51. Melles DC, van Leeuwen WB, Boelens HA, Peeters JK, Verbrugh HA, van Belkum A. Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes in Staphylococcus aureus Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(7):1174-5.
  • 52. SaÏd-Salim B, Mathema B, Braughton K, Davis S, Sinsimer D, Eisner W, et al. Differential distribution and expression of Panton-Valentine leucocidin among community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(7):3373-9.
  • 53. Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(7):2155-61.
  • 54. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(3):1008-15.
  • 55. Han LL, McDougal LK, Gorwitz RJ, Mayer KH, Patel JB, Sennott, JM, et al. High frequencies of clindamycin and tetracycline resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsed-field type USA300 isolates collected at a Boston ambulatory health center. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(4):1350-2.
  • 56. Oliveira GA, Faria JB, Levy CE, Mamizuka, EM. Characterization of the Brazilian endemic clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from hospitals throughout Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2001;5(4):163-70.
  • 57. Hallin M, Deplano A, Denis O, De Mendonça R, De Ryck R, Struelens MJ. Validation of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa typing for long-term, nationwide epidemiological surveillance studies of Staphylococcus aureus infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(1):127-33.
  • 58. Hiramatsu K. Reduced susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin Japan, 1996. MMWR. 1997;46(27);624-626. Available from:
  • 59. Sievert DM, Boulton ML, Stoltman G, Johnson D, Stobierski MG, Downes FP, et al. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin, United States, 2002. MMWR. 2002;51(26):565-7. Available from:
  • 60. Trakulsomboon S, Danchaivijitr S, Rongrungruang Y, Dhiraputra C, Susaemgrat W, Ito T, et al. First report of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Thailand. J Clin Micr. 2001;39(2):591-5.
  • 61. Kim MN, Pai CH, Woo JH, Ryu JS, Hiramatsu K. Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(10):3879-81.
  • 62. Walsh TR, Howe RA, Wootton M, Bennett PM, MacGowan AP. Detection of glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus J Antimcrob Chemoth. 2001;47:357-8.
  • 63. Graber CJ, Wong MK, Carleton HA, Perdreau-Remington F, Haller BL, Chambers HF. Intermediate vancomycin susceptibility in a community-associated MRSA clone. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(3):491-3.
  • 64. Adhikari RP, Scales GC, Kobayashi K, Smith JMB, Berger-Bächi B, Cook GM. Vancomycin-induced deletion of the methicillin resistance gene mecA in Staphylococcus aureus J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54(2):360-3.
  • 65
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). [Internet]. Atlanta GA, USA: CDC; [updated 2011 may 09; cited 2011 june 07]. Available from:
    » link
  • Correspondence to:
    Mariana Fávero Bonesso
    Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP
    Rubião Júnior, Botucatu, SP
    18618-970, Caixa Postal 510, Brasil
    Phone: +55 14 3811 6058
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      05 Dec 2011
    • Date of issue


    • Accepted
      28 June 2011
    • Received
      21 Mar 2011
    Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP) Av. Universitária, 3780, Fazenda Lageado, Botucatu, SP, CEP 18610-034, Brasil, Tel.: +55 14 3880-7693 - Botucatu - SP - Brazil