BACKGROUND: Considering that peripheral arterial obstruction is a diffuse condition, manifesting as a variable clinical feature and with varied intervention outcomes, it is important to assess patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease using instruments that may provide objective and reliable data. OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the reliability of both the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and the shuttle walking test (SWT) in patients with claudication secondary to peripheral artery occlusive disease. METHODS: Fourteen Fontaine stage II patients participated in the study. Eleven patients were submitted to both tests, while three patients only performed the 6MWT. After familiarization, the patients were tested on two occasions, with maximal 1-week interval between measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to check for test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Mean maximal walking distance for the 6MWT in both test and retest was 397.04±120.74 and 408.6±153.64 m (p = 0.58) respectively; ICC = 0.87 (p = 0.00005). For the SWT, mean was 345±145.75 m, and 345.91±127.97 m in the retest (p = 0.92); ICC = 0.99 (p = 0.00005). Mean times for claudication onset with the 6MWT test-retest were 172.25±88.23 and 148.58±70.36 s (p = 0.13); ICC = 0.81 (p = 0.0004); while for the SWT these values were 282±141.90 and 267.14±150.58 s (p = 0.55); ICC = 0.91 (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Both walking tests are reliable and can be used for clinical and functional assessment of these patients. The SWT, however, yielded higher reliability coefficients, which suggests that it may be preferable to evaluate these individuals' performance.
Reliability test; intermittent claudication; walking
