Age and sex and their influence on the anatomy of the abdominal aorta and its branches

Abstract

Background

It is not clear how patients’ age and sex influence the anatomy of the aorta and its branches.

Objectives

To determine the most frequent anatomical patterns of diameter and angulation of the abdominal aorta and its branches and the influence of patients’ sex and age on these patterns.

Methods

CT scans with intravenous contrast from 157 patients were analyzed. Diameter and angulations of the abdominal aorta and its branches were measured in individuals of both sexes, classified into five age groups: 20 to 30 years, 31 to 40 years, 41 to 50 years, 51 to 60 years, and 61 to 70 years. Eighteen variables were analyzed: 6 arterial origin angles, 9 arterial diameters, rate of diameter enlargement, and patient’s sex and age. RadiAnt 4.2.1 DICOM viewer software was used for measurements.

Results

The total of 157 CT scans were from 69 men and 88 women. There were statistical differences (p <0.05) in the following results: angle of origin and diameter of the superior mesenteric artery; renal artery angle and diameter; diameter of the common iliac arteries, and diameter and rate of diameter enlargement of the aorta in several segments, but not the segment immediately proximal to the celiac trunk.

Conclusions

The diameters of several aorta segments and of its branches (except the left renal artery) increase progressively with age in both sexes and are larger and have a higher rate of diameter enlargement in men than in women in the same age ranges. Between sexes, the angle of origin of the superior mesenteric artery was larger in men, except between 20 and 30 years, and the angle of origin of the left renal artery was larger in women between 51 and 60 years old.

Keywords:
aging; remodeling; tomography; anatomy; arteries

Resumo

Contexto

Não se sabe ao certo como a idade e o sexo do paciente influenciam na anatomia da aorta abdominal e de seus ramos.

Objetivos

Determinar os padrões anatômicos (diâmetro e angulações) mais frequentes da aorta abdominal e de seus ramos e a influência do sexo e da idade dos pacientes sobre esses padrões.

Métodos

Foram avaliadas tomografias computadorizadas de abdome com contraste endovenoso de 157 pacientes. Foram aferidos calibre e angulação de artérias abdominais em indivíduos de ambos os sexos, agrupados em cinco faixas etárias: 20 a 30 anos, 31 a 40 anos, 41 a 50 anos, 51 a 60 anos e 61 a 70 anos. Foram analisadas 18 variáveis: seis ângulos de emergências arteriais, nove diâmetros arteriais, taxas de dilatação, sexo e faixa etária. Para a obtenção das medidas, utilizou-se o programa de computador RadiAnt 4.2.1 DICOM viewer (Medixant, Poznan, Polônia).

Resultados

Entre as 157 tomografias, 69 eram de homens e 88, de mulheres. Apresentaram diferença estatística (p < 0,05): ângulo de origem e diâmetro da artéria mesentérica superior; ângulo e diâmetro das artérias renais; diâmetro das artérias ilíacas comuns; diâmetro e taxa de dilatação em diversos segmentos da aorta, exceto na porção proximal ao tronco celíaco.

Conclusões

Os diâmetros da aorta (em diversos segmentos) e de seus ramos (exceto da artéria renal esquerda) aumentam progressivamente com o passar da idade em ambos os sexos e são maiores e possuem taxa de dilatação mais elevada em homens do que em mulheres da mesma faixa etária. Entre os sexos, o ângulo de emergência da artéria mesentérica superior foi maior em homens, exceto entre 20 e 30 anos; o ângulo de origem da artéria renal esquerda foi maior em mulheres entre 51 e 60 anos.

Palavras-chave:
envelhecimento; remodelação; tomografia; anatomia; artérias

INTRODUCTION

Anatomic knowledge is indispensable for planning and execution of surgical procedures, whether performed by open or endovascular approaches.^1-4 The anatomy of the cardiovascular system undergoes changes related to age, lifestyle habits, and diseases. Aging causes structural and functional changes, particularly in the major arteries.^5-11 These changes result in increased vascular rigidity due to increased production and deposition of collagen and loss of elastin fibers, primarily in the tunica media of large and medium arteries.^5,9,10,12-14

Vascular rigidity has been known as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases since the nineteenth century.^9,14 However, noninvasive methods that enable the anatomy and physiology of the circulatory system to be studied (blood flow, diameter, angles, and other details), relating them to their clinical repercussions and utilities, have only recently become available.^13,14

Studies have already proven that aging affects vascular changes differently in men and women and while there is already evidence of biochemical and functional differences,⁶ much still remains to be investigated in relation to the changes to the arterial anatomy that occur as aging advances and in relation to how patient sex influences these changes.

The objectives of this study were to determine the most frequent anatomic patterns of diameter and angles of the abdominal aorta and its branches and the influence of patients’ sex and age on these patterns.

METHODS

This is an analytical, descriptive, and retrospective study based on anatomic measurements of abdominal arteries examined using computed tomography (CT). It was approved by the institutional ethics committee (decision number 2.621.934).

The inclusion criteria were: patients of both sexes, aged from 20 to 70 years, who underwent an abdominal CT with intravenous contrast from January 2015 to September 2018. Exclusion criteria were: technical inability to perform the measurements, diseases that change vascular anatomy, such as aneurysms, vascular compression syndromes, and tumors with blood vessel distortions, among others, and anatomic variants, such as accessory/polar renal arteries and anomalous origins of visceral arteries.

No sample size calculation was performed. The sample comprised all examinations provided by a radiology service that partners the university that were conducted within the study period and met inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Examinations were conducted in a GE healthcare 16-channel CT scanner, with a 512 × 512 resolution matrix and slice thickness of 1.25 mm. Data were organized using a standardized protocol developed by the researchers and RadiAnt 4.2.1 DICOM viewer software (Medixant, Poznan, Poland) was used to perform measurements.

The following variables were analyzed by patient sex and age groups (20 to 30 years, 31 to 40 years, 41 to 50 years, 51 to 60 years, and 61 to 70 years): diameter, angle of origin, and rate of diameter enlargement of the superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), right renal arteries (RRA) and left renal arteries (LRA), the aortoiliac bifurcation (AB) angle, and the diameter and dilation index of the aorta in 4 different segments, specifically, proximal of the celiac trunk (ACT), proximal of the upper renal artery (AUR), distal of the lower renal artery (ALR), and proximal of the aortoiliac bifurcation (AAB), and the diameter and dilation index of the right common iliac artery (RCIA) and left common iliac artery (LCIA), as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Points at which angles and diameters of the abdominal aorta and its branches were measured. SMA: superior mesenteric artery; RRA: right renal artery; LRA: left renal artery; AB: aortoiliac bifurcation; ACT: aorta proximal of the celiac trunk; AUR: aorta proximal of the upper renal artery; ALR: aorta distal of the lower renal artery; AAB: aorta proximal of the aortoiliac bifurcation; RCIA: right common iliac artery; LCIA: left common iliac artery [[Q1: Q1]].

For statistical analysis, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to confirm normality of values; Student’s t test was used for comparisons by sex, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons between age groups. The dilation index for each sex was calculated by subtracting the mean diameter found in the oldest age group (61 to 70 years) from that found in the youngest age group (20 to 30 years), dividing the result by the mean diameter in the youngest age group and then multiplying by 100; as in the following formula: DM1-DM2/DM2 x 100 (where DM1 is the mean diameter in the oldest age group and DM2 is the mean diameter in the youngest age group). BioEstat® 5.4 (Ayres, Belém) software was used and the significance level adopted was α = 0.05 or 5%.

RESULTS

A total of 198 CTs were analyzed. After application of exclusion criteria, 41 were rejected. The final sample therefore comprised 157 CTs, 69 from men and 88 from women, distributed across the following age groups: 20 to 30 years (20 patients); 31 to 40 years (24 patients); 41 to 50 years (35 patients); 51 to 60 years (42 patients); and 61 to 70 years (36 patients).

Superior mesenteric artery

The angle of origin of the SMA was statistically similar for men and women in all age groups, except from 61 to 70 years, in which male patients had a mean angle of 81.27° while female patients had a mean angle of 61.06°. Among female patients, this angle also did not vary significantly with increasing age, whereas in older men the SMA tended to emerge at an angle that was around 26° larger than in younger men (81.27° in the seventh decade of life vs. 54.64° in the third decade) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Mean superior mesenteric artery angles for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

The SMA diameter was similar among young men and women (7.66 mm for women aged 20 to 30 years and 7.64 mm for males in the same age group), but in older age groups this diameter was statistically larger among men (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Mean diameters of the superior mesenteric artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Renal arteries

The right renal artery (RRA) had a larger angle (mean = 67.92°) in young female patients (20 to 30 years) than in male patients in the same age group (mean = 55.07°) (p = 0.0335). The inverse relationship was observed in the oldest age group (61 to 70), in which men had a mean angle of 69.80° and women had a mean angle of 57.85° (p = 0.0140). There was no statistical difference in this angle as age increased in either sex (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Mean right renal artery angles for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

On the left, the renal artery (LRA) also did not exhibit a statistically significant difference in angle as age increased when individuals of the same sex were compared and, in common with the RRA, the angle of origin was larger among older men (61 to 70 years) than among women in the same age group (means of 77.57° and 64.60° with p = 0.0084) (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Mean left renal artery angles for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

The diameters of the renal arteries were larger on the right; men aged from 41 to 70 years had larger RRA diameters than women in the same age range, whereas the LRA was statistically of larger caliber in men for the 20 to 30 years age group only (p = 0.0354). The diameters of the renal arteries are shown in Figures 6 and 7.

Figure 6
Mean diameters of the right renal artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Figure 7
Mean diameters of the left renal artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Common iliac arteries

The common iliac arteries tend to have larger caliber in men than in women. On the right side, this was the case in the majority of age groups, with the exception of the youngest patients, among whom the mean diameter was the same in both sexes (Figure 8). On the left side, the common iliac artery was statistically of larger caliber in men aged 20 to 30 years, 31 to 40 years, and 51 to 60 years than in women in the same age groups (Figure 9).

Figure 8
Mean diameters of the right common iliac artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Figure 9
Mean diameters of the left common iliac artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

The iliac arteries progressively increased in diameter as age increased in both sexes; but the increase in diameters was only statistically significant in men, specifically on the right (p = 0.0227).

Angle of the aortic bifurcation

Among women, the mean angle remained in the region of 44° in all age groups, whereas in men it varied from 45.48° from 20 to 30 years to 50.85° from 61 to 70 years, although

without statistical difference. There was only a statistically significant difference between patients of different sexes in the 31 to 40 years age group, in which the angle was larger in women (46.40°) than in men (37.31°) (p = 0.0187) (Figure 10).

Figure 10
Mean aortoiliac bifurcation angle for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Mean diameters of the abdominal aorta

At all points, statistically significant increases in the diameter of the aorta were observed as age increased, in both men and women. There was a trend for all diameters to be larger in men than in women. In the ACT (Figure 11) and ALR segments (Figure 12), differences were statistically significant in the age groups 31 to 40, 51 to 60, and 61 to 70, whereas in the AUR (Figure 13) and AAB segments (Figure 14) diameters were statistically larger in all age groups.

Figure 11
Mean diameters of the aorta proximal of the celiac trunk for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Figure 12
Mean diameters of the aorta distal of the lower renal artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Figure 13
Mean diameters of the aorta proximal of the upper renal artery for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Figure 14
Mean diameters of the aorta proximal of the aortoiliac bifurcation for both sexes in the preestablished age groups.

Rate of diameter enlargement

The rate of diameter enlargement was significantly higher in men in the following segments: SMA (p = 0.0023); RRA (p = 0.0003), and RCIA (p = 0.0191) (Figure 15).

Figure 15
Comparison of dilation indexes for men and women in the 20-30 and 61-70 years age groups. *: p<0.05.

Moreover, when patients in the oldest and youngest age groups were compared, the rates of diameter enlargement for the aortic segments analyzed were statistically higher in men than in women (p < 0.05), with the exception of the segment immediately proximal of the celiac trunk (Figure 16).

Figure 16
Comparison of dilation indexes for abdominal aorta segments in men and women in the 20-30 and 61-70 years age groups. In (A), in the segment proximal of the celiac trunk; in (B), proximal of the upper renal artery; in (C), distal of the lower renal artery; and in (D), proximal of the aortic bifurcation. *: p<0.05.

DISCUSSION

Aging is a dynamic, progressive, and irreversible process, intimately linked to biological, psychological, and social factors.⁵ Its effects are not only dependent on age, but also on sex, lifestyle, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and constitutional influences. This is why the elderly population is not uniform.^5,10,15-17 Surgeons should strive to acquire the most detailed knowledge possible of the structures involved in each procedure performed, because this has positive impacts on the quality of the technique employed and on avoidance of iatrogenic injuries.

The aorta and other large caliber arteries, particularly those with a more developed elastic layer, become more dilated, stretched, and tortuous as patients age.^13,18,19 Understanding of the changes arterial anatomy undergoes as it ages can be useful when planning invasive procedures, for example, when choosing approaches, the curvature of catheters, and the diameters of angioplasty balloons and stents in endovascular procedures, and, in the future, may also be of use in the manufacture of endovascular devices with diameters and curvatures that fit patients better on the basis of their sex and age group.

Obviously, when available, planning of an intervention should take into consideration anatomic information provided by noninvasive examinations; but the results of this study should nevertheless help to prevent certain difficulties. For example, when attempting selective catheterization of the LRA in a 68-year-old patient using a right femoral artery puncture for access, based on the differences in angles observed in the present study, it is probable that a female patient would present greater difficulty than a male in the same age group (Figure 17).

Figure 17
Abdominal computed tomography with contrast in coronal view, comparing measurements of the angle of origin of the left renal artery (LRA) in patients of both sexes aged 61 to 70 years. (A) angle of origin of the LRA in a man; (B) angle of origin of the LRA in a woman.

It is of interest to note that the study detected a greater tendency in men to dilation of arteries as age advances, such as the abdominal aorta and RCIA, as has been suggested before in other studies.^17-22

The SMA also exhibited greater changes in angle and diameter in men. The lesser predisposition towards changes in arterial anatomy among women may be related to the role played by estrogen,^6,9,22 which increases the bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) without increasing expression and/or activity of endothelial nitric oxide-synthase (eNOS), which has antioxidant properties that may induce or accelerate vascular aging.^6,8,9 Nitric oxide bioavailability is essential for normal endothelial function and it is known that advanced age leads to compromised endothelial NO production and increased NO inactivation by superoxide, contributing to age-related endothelial dysfunction.^{6,10,16,23,24}

The most notable characteristics of vascular aging described in the literature are the mechanical and structural changes to vessel walls, including arterial dilation and thickening, primarily seen in the abdominal aorta and highlighted in many publications.^{5,12,15,22,25} Arterial changes over the course of life are also influenced by modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, obesity, smoking, and lifestyle, and also by unmodifiable factors, such as genetics, age, and family history.^15,16,21

It is known that aortic rigidity increases after 50 years of age even in healthy patients^7,26 and post-mortem studies show that thickening of the aorta wall during aging occurs through increased tunica intima thickness, even in populations with low incidence of atherosclerosis.^7,8,10,15,17 Anatomically, these changes do not only manifest as increased diameter, but also as aortic elongation, and, from a physiological point of view, arterial thickening, which is related to pulse wave velocity, and has been shown to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events.^5,9,13,14

Although we did not investigate thickening, the changes to arterial diameter detected in this study corroborate findings in the literature. However, in a review of the literature, we did not find any studies that had correlated the angles of emergence of the branches of the abdominal aorta with patient sex and age.

Unfortunately, the retrospective nature of this study only enabled access to sex and age group of the patients examined, which meant that it was only possible to confirm that the diameter of the aorta was larger in men and that it increased progressively with age in both sexes (Figure 18). Several published articles have shown that the diameters of the aorta are larger in men than in women,^{12,18-20,22,25,26} but did not determine that the dilation index of these diameters is greater among men than among women in all age groups, as was detected in the present study.

Figure 18
Abdominal computed tomography with contrast in axial view, comparing measurements of diameters of the abdominal aorta proximal of the upper renal artery in patients of both sexes and different age groups. (A) male patient in the 20-30 years age group; (B) female patient in the 20-30 years age group; (C) male patient in the 60-70 years age group; (D) female patient in the 60-70 years age group.

Just as occurred with the aorta, the RCIA and LCIA also exhibited larger mean diameters in men than in women and the RCIA exhibited a significant increase in caliber as age increased.

The literature on aneurysms of the iliac arteries is scant, but there is evidence to suggest common iliac arteries without aneurysms have larger caliber on the right than on the left and that when aneurysms do occur they are both more frequent and tend to have larger diameter on the right,^21,27-29 coinciding with the findings in our sample. This fact may be related to greater occurrence of aneurysms in the aorta (4 male cases:1 female case)³⁰ and iliac arteries (5 male cases:1 female case),²⁷ since the Laplace law states that the larger the radius of a vessel, the greater the tension exerted on its wall.³¹ In other words, since men have larger caliber vessels, they may have an anatomic predisposition to develop aneurysms in these arteries.

Obviously, this observation does not alone explain the increased incidence of aneurysms in segments of smaller diameter, since it is known that aneurysms of the abdominal segment of the aorta are around four times more frequent than those in the thoracic aorta, which has a larger diameter.^13,28 The origins of a complex disease such as an aneurysm are undoubtedly multifactorial. It is known, for example, that there are considerable histological changes in the aorta over the course of life, since the aortas of young people have thick elastin fibers that are concentric and uniform, whereas in the elderly they are thinner and more fragmented, occupying a smaller volume in the tunica media of the artery.^{5,7,10,14,32,33}

The ideal method for evaluating changes to arterial anatomy associated with age in patients of both sexes would be to follow a cohort of patients using imaging exams over the course of their lives. However, such a study design would have to overcome enormous obstacles to its execution. Other limitations of the present study include a relatively small number of CTs and the absence of information on patients’ comorbidities and lifestyle habits, such as smoking, which could predispose to changes to arterial anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The diameter of many different segments of the aorta increase progressively as age increases in patients of both sexes and diameters are larger in men than in women among patients in the same age groups. With the single exception of the LRA, the diameters of all of the branches of the aorta were larger in men than in women in all age groups. The angle of origin of the superior mesenteric artery was larger in men than in women in all age groups except for 20 to 30 years. The angle of origin of the left renal artery was larger in women than in men in the 51 to 60 years age group. With the exception of the aortic segment proximal of the celiac trunk, the dilation indexes for the diameters of all other segments of the abdominal aorta were higher in men than in women.

• How to cite: Góes Junior AMO, Albuquerque FBA, Beckmann FA, Centeno FV, Andrade MC, Vieira WB. Age and sex and their influence on the anatomy of the abdominal aorta and its branches. J Vasc Bras. 2020;19:e20200073. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.200073

• Financial support:

  None.
• The study was carried out at Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará (CESUPA), Belém, PA, Brazil.

REFERÊNCIAS

• ¹
  Majernik J, Szerdiova L. Preparation of medical students for cadaveric anatomy using multimedia education tools. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT); 2017; Zilina, Slovakia. New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 252-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DT.2017.8024305
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DT.2017.8024305
• ²
  Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010 PMid:26996541.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010
• ³
  Bock A, Modabber A, Hölzle F, Prescher A, Classen-Linke I. Improvement of anatomical knowledge and surgical skills in head and neck region: an interdisciplinary hands-on course for clinical students. Ann Anat. 2019;224:97-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.03.011 PMid:30998972.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.03.011
• ⁴
  Sheikh AH, Barry DS, Gutierrez H, Cryan JF, O’Keeffe GW. Cadaveric anatomy in the future of medical education: What is the surgeons view? Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):203-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.1560 PMid:26213365.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.1560
• ⁵
  Mikael LRP, Gomes AMG, Sousa MM, et al. Envelhecimento vascular e rigidez arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(3):253-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170091 PMid:28678931.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170091
• ⁶
  Han S, Aydin MM, Akansel S, et al. Age-and sex-dependent alteration of functions and epigenetic modifications of vessel and endothelium related biomarkers. Turk J Biol. 2018;42(4):286-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/biy-1803-59 PMid:30814892.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/biy-1803-59
• ⁷
  Ferruzzi J, Madziva D, Caulk AW, Tellides G, Humphrey JD. Compromised mechanical homeostasis in arterial aging and associated cardiovascular consequences. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018;17(5):1281-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1026-7 PMid:29754316.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1026-7
• ⁸
  Costa-Fraga FP, Goncalves GK, Souza-Neto FP, et al. Age-related changes in vascular responses to angiotensin-(1-7) in female mice. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2018;19(3):1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470320318789332 PMid:30024321.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470320318789332
• ⁹
  Ogola BO, Zimmerman MA, Clark GL, et al. New insights into arterial stiffening: does sex matter? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315(5):H1073-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00132.2018 PMid:30028199.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00132.2018
• ¹⁰
  Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Donato AJ, Galvan V, Csiszar A. Mechanisms of vascular aging. Circ Res. 2018;123(7):849-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311378 PMid:30355080.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311378
• ¹¹
  Foote K, Bennett MR. Molecular insights into vascular aging. Aging. 2018;10(12):3647-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101697 PMid:30521484.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101697
• ¹²
  Costantino S, Paneni F, Cosentino F. Ageing, metabolism and cardiovascular disease. J Physiol. 2016;594(8):2061-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP270538 PMid:26391109.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP270538
• ¹³
  Tawfik AM, Sobh DM, Gadelhak B, Sobh HM, Batouty NM. The effect of age and gender on tortuosity of the descending thoracic Aorta. Eur J Radiol. 2019;110:54-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.017 PMid:30599873.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.017
• ¹⁴
  Adji A, O’Rourke MF, Namasivayam M. Arterial stiffness, its assessment, prognostic value, and implications for treatment. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24 (1):5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2010.192 PMid:20940710.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2010.192
• ¹⁵
  Terentes-Printzios D, Vlachopoulos C, Xaplanteris P, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors accelerate progression of vascular aging in the general population: results from the CRAVE study (Cardiovascular Risk Factors Affecting Vascular Age). Hypertension. 2017;70(5):1057-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09633 PMid:28923899.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09633
• ¹⁶
  Qazi S, Massaro JM, Chuang ML, D’Agostino RB, Hoffmann U, O’Donnell CJ. Increased aortic diameters on multidetector CT scan are independent predictors of incident adverse cardiovascular events: the framingham heart study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(12):e006776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006776 PMid:29222122.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006776
• ¹⁷
  Adriaans BP, Heuts S, Gerretsen S, et al. Aortic elongation part I: The normal aortic ageing process. Heart. 2018;104(21):1772-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312866 PMid:29593078.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312866
• ¹⁸
  Kamenskiy A, Miserlis D, Adamson P, et al. Patient demographics and cardiovascular risk factors differentially influence geometric remodeling of the aorta compared with the peripheral arteries. Surgery. 2015;158(6):1617-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.013
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.013
• ¹⁹
  Rylski B, Desjardins B, Moser W, Bavaria JE, Milewski RK. Gender-related changes in aortic geometry throughout life. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(5):805-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt597 PMid:24431164.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt597
• ²⁰
  Gameraddin M. Normal abdominal aorta diameter on abdominal sonography in healthy asymptomatic adults: impact of age and gender. J Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 2019;12(1):186-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2019.1617553
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2019.1617553
• ²¹
  Bannazadeh M, Jenkins C, Forsyth A, et al. Outcomes for concomitant common iliac artery aneurysms after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(5):1390-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.02.058 PMid:28697942.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.02.058
• ²²
  Eikendal ALM, Bots ML, Haaring C, et al. Reference values for cardiac and aortic magnetic resonance imaging in healthy, young caucasian adults. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164480 PMid:27732640.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164480
• ²³
  Persson PB. The multiple functions of the endothelium: more than just wallpaper. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015;213(4):747-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apha.12464 PMid:25683245.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apha.12464
• ²⁴
  Pagan LU, Gomes MJ, Okoshi MP. Endothelial function and physical exercise. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;111(4):540-2. PMid:30365677.
• ²⁵
  Virmani R, Avolio AP, Mergner WJ, et al. Effect of aging on aortic morphology in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension and atherosclerosis: comparison between occidental and Chinese communities. Am J Pathol. 1991;139(5):1119-29. PMid:1951629.
• ²⁶
  Benetos A, Laurent S, Hoeks AP, Boutouyrie PH, Safar ME. Arterial alterations with aging and high blood pressure: a noninvasive study of carotid and femoral arteries. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13(1):90-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.13.1.90 PMid:8422344.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.13.1.90
• ²⁷
  Huang Y, Gloviczki P, Duncan AA, et al. Common iliac artery aneurysm: Expansion rate and results of open surgical and endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(6):1203-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.050 PMid:18514838.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.050
• ²⁸
  Brunkwall J, Hauksson H, Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D, Takolander R, Bergentz SE. Solitary aneurysms of the iliac arterial system: an estimate of their frequency of occurrence. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10(4):381-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(89)90411-4 PMid:2795762.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(89)90411-4
• ²⁹
  Armon MP, Wenham PW, Whitaker SC, Gregson RHS, Hopkinson BR. Common iliac artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15(3):255-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80186-X PMid:9587341.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80186-X
• ³⁰
  Zommorodi S, Leander K, Roy J, Steuer J, Hultgren R. Understanding abdominal aortic aneurysm epidemiology: Socioeconomic position affects outcome. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(10):904-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-210644 PMid:29967003.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-210644
• ³¹
  Grimshaw GM, Thompson JM. Changes in diameter of the abdominal aorta with age: an epidemiological study. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25(1):7-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199701)25:1<7::AID-JCU2>3.0.CO;2-M PMid:9010802.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199701)25:1<7::AID-JCU2>3.0.CO;2-M
• ³²
  Raaz U, Zöllner AM, Schellinger IN, et al. Segmental aortic stiffening contributes to experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm development. Circulation. 2015;131(20):1783-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012377 PMid:25904646.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012377
• ³³
  Kuivaniemi H, Ryer EJ, Elmore JR, Tromp G. Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13(9):975-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2015.1074861 PMid:26308600.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2015.1074861

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  11 Dec 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  01 June 2020
• Accepted
  12 Aug 2020