**Figure 1:**

Geometric parameters and coordinate system of the considered variable thickness functionally graded auxetic shell with arbitrary distributions of the normal and shear tractions.

**Figure 2:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on the radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the C-C annular plate, under shear traction.

**Figure 3:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on the radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the S-C annular plate, under shear traction.

**Figure 4:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on the radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the F-C annular plate, under shear traction.

**Figure 5:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of the C-C annular plate, under shear traction.

**Figure 6:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of the S-C annular plate, under shear traction.

**Figure 7:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of the F-C annular plate, under shear traction.

**Figure 8:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on axial distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 9:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on axial distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 10:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on axial distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 11:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 12:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a S-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 13:**

Influence of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a F-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 14:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on meridian distribution of the lateral deflection of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 15:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on meridian distribution of the lateral deflection of a S-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 16:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on meridian distribution of the lateral deflection of a F-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 17:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 18:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a S-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 19:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a F-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.

**Figure 20:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on radial distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.

**Figure 21:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on radial distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.

**Figure 22:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on radial distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.

**Figure 23:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of in-plane stress of a C-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.

**Figure 24:**

Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of in-plane displacement of a C-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.

**Figure 25:**

Axial distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 26:**

Axial distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 27:**

Axial distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 28:**

Transverse distribution of in-plane stress of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 29:**

Transverse distribution of in-plane displacement component of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 30:**

Meridian distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 31:**

Meridian distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 32:**

Meridian distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 33:**

Transverse distribution of in-plane stress of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 34:**

Transverse distribution of in-plane displacement of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 35:**

Meridian/radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the C-C annular plate and conical and cylindrical shells under variable normal and shear tractions, for various Poisson ratios.

**Figure 36:**

Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on meridian/radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the considered plates and shells.

**Figure 37:**

Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on transverse distribution of the radial stress of the C-C annular plate.

**Figure 38:**

Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on transverse distribution of the axial stress of the C-C cylindrical shell.

**Figure 39:**

Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on transverse distribution of the meridian stress of the C-C truncated conical shell.

**Figure 40:**

Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and parabolic thickness variability on meridian/radial distributions of the lateral deflection of the C-C plates and shells.

**Figure 41:**

Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and parabolic thickness variability on meridian/radial distributions of the lateral deflection of the S-C plates and shells.