Figure 1:
Geometric parameters and coordinate system of the considered variable thickness functionally graded auxetic shell with arbitrary distributions of the normal and shear tractions.
Figure 2:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on the radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the C-C annular plate, under shear traction.
Figure 3:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on the radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the S-C annular plate, under shear traction.
Figure 4:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on the radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the F-C annular plate, under shear traction.
Figure 5:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of the C-C annular plate, under shear traction.
Figure 6:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of the S-C annular plate, under shear traction.
Figure 7:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of the F-C annular plate, under shear traction.
Figure 8:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on axial distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 9:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on axial distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 10:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on axial distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 11:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 12:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a S-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 13:
Influence of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a F-C cylindrical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 14:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on meridian distribution of the lateral deflection of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 15:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on meridian distribution of the lateral deflection of a S-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 16:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on meridian distribution of the lateral deflection of a F-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 17:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 18:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a S-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 19:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of the in-plane stress of a F-C truncated conical shell subjected to a shear traction.
Figure 20:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on radial distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.
Figure 21:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on radial distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.
Figure 22:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on radial distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.
Figure 23:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of in-plane stress of a C-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.
Figure 24:
Effects of the auxeticity of the material on transverse distribution of in-plane displacement of a C-C annular plate subjected to combined shear and normal tractions.
Figure 25:
Axial distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 26:
Axial distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 27:
Axial distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 28:
Transverse distribution of in-plane stress of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 29:
Transverse distribution of in-plane displacement component of a C-C cylindrical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 30:
Meridian distribution of lateral deflection of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 31:
Meridian distribution of lateral deflection of a S-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 32:
Meridian distribution of lateral deflection of a F-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 33:
Transverse distribution of in-plane stress of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 34:
Transverse distribution of in-plane displacement of a C-C truncated conical shell subjected to combined shear and normal tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 35:
Meridian/radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the C-C annular plate and conical and cylindrical shells under variable normal and shear tractions, for various Poisson ratios.
Figure 36:
Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on meridian/radial distribution of the lateral deflection of the considered plates and shells.
Figure 37:
Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on transverse distribution of the radial stress of the C-C annular plate.
Figure 38:
Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on transverse distribution of the axial stress of the C-C cylindrical shell.
Figure 39:
Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and linear thickness variability on transverse distribution of the meridian stress of the C-C truncated conical shell.
Figure 40:
Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and parabolic thickness variability on meridian/radial distributions of the lateral deflection of the C-C plates and shells.
Figure 41:
Simultaneous effects of the auxeticity and parabolic thickness variability on meridian/radial distributions of the lateral deflection of the S-C plates and shells.
