CENTRALITY AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIFFERENTIATED MESOREGION OF RIBEIRA VALLEY/GUARAQUEÇABA

Freitas, Lara Brunelle Almeida; Lima, Jandir Ferrera de

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Article • Mercator (Fortaleza) 20 • 2021 • https://doi.org/10.4215/rm2021.e20030 copy

CENTRALITY AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIFFERENTIATED MESOREGION OF RIBEIRA VALLEY/GUARAQUEÇABA

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

Under the National Development Regional Policy and Promotion Program Sustainability of Sub-regional Spaces, debates emerge wrapped around the articulation and implementation of actions to support the socioeconomic development of regions. From this perspective, this paper analyzes the profile of centrality and socioeconomic development of the municipalities that make up the Vale do Ribeira/Guaraqueçaba region in Brazil, in the period 2005 and 2016. For the analysis, centrality and regional disparity indicators were used, which have as parameters the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the population and socioeconomic data. The Centrality and Disparity indicators reflect the hierarchy of places related to market areas, defined both by the population contingent and by the urban productive structure of the regions, especially by the ability to generate jobs and product. The results of this study showed that Cajati city in the state of São Paulo, and Paranaguá city in the state of Paraná are the central places in the Vale do Ribeira/ Guaraqueçaba region, with a centrality index higher than the other municipalities.

Keywords:
Regional Development; Urban Economy; Public Policies; Regional Economy

State	Municipality	Population estimate	Total area (km²)	Demographic density (km²)
SP	Apiaí	24,226	974	25,85
	Barra do Chapéu	5,760	406	12.93
	Barra do Turvo	7,632	1,008	7.67
	Cajati	28,494	454	62.43
	Cananéia	12,541	1,243	9.84
	Eldorado	15,544	1,654	8.85
	Iguape	3(1989	1,977	14.59
	Ilha Comprida	11,362	188	47.9
	Iporanga	4,199	1,152	3.73
	Itaoca	3,330	183	17.64
	Itapirapuã Paulista	4,268	407	9.55
	Itariri	17,598	274	56.5
	Jacupiranga	17,889	704	24.44
	Juquiá	18,718	822	23.41
	Juquitiba	31,646	522	55.04
	Miracatu	19,643	1,002	20.56
	Pariquera-Açu	19,723	359	51.34
	Pedro de Toledo	11,421	670	15.22
	Registro	56,393	722	75.11
	Ribeira	3,330	336	10
	São Lourenço da Serra	15,978	186	74.96
	Sete Barras	12,780	1,054	12.34
	Tapirai	7,766	755	10.61
PR	Adrianópolis	5,857	1,349	4.73
	Antonina	18,949	882	21.41
	Bocaiúva do Sul	13,129	826	13.3
	Campina Grande do Sul	43,685	539	71.93
	Cerro Azul	17,833	1,341	12.63
	Guaraqueçaba	7,594	2,020	3.9
	Guaratuba	37,527	1,326	24.21
	Itaperuçu	29,070	314	75.97
	Matinhos	35,219	118	249.93
	Morretes	16,446	685	22.96
	Paranaguá	156,174	827	169.92
	Pontal do Paraná	27,915	200	104.67
	Rio Branco do Sul	32,517	812	37.73
	Tunas do Paraná	9,022	669	9.36
	Doutor Ulysses	5,552	782	7.33

		2005		2016
State	Municipality	Part, % Meso	Rank.	Part, % Meso	Rank.
SP	Apiaí	2.2%	12th	2.5%	9th
	Cajati	6.5%	3rd	5.3%	3rd
	Iguape	2.0%	15th	2.5%	10th
	Itapirapuã Paulista	0.2%	37th	0.1%	39th
	Registro	4.6%	5th	7.2%	2nd
PR	Campina Grande do Sul	3.7%	8th	4.5%	5 th
	Guaratuba	2.6%	11th	3.0%	8th
	Matinhos	3.8%	7th	3.7%	7th
	Paranaguá	29.4%	1st	32.8%	1st
	Quatro Barras	4.8%	4th	4.9%	4th
	Rio Branco do Sul	6.8%	2nd	4.2%	6th

		GPD 1st sector		GPD 2nd sector		GPD 3rd sector
State	Municipality	Δ%	Rank.	Δ%	Rank.	Δ%	Rank.
SP	Apiaí	16%	13th	17%	9th	8%	38^th
	Barra do Chapéu	37%	2nd	15%	15th	10%	26^th
	Barra do Turvo	7%	37th	13%	20th	10%	23^rd
	Cajati	21%	10th	15%	14th	9%	35^th
	Cananéia	16%	14th	77%	4th	9%	29^th
	Eldorado	19%	12th	11%	31st	10%	24^th
	Iguape	13%	28th	170%	2nd	10%	20^th
	Ilha Comprida	15%	19th	714%	1st	11%	16^th
	Iporanga	25%	5th	15%	13th	9%	31^st
	Itaoca	6%	38th	37%	6th	10%	19^th
	Itapirapuã Paulista	2%	39th	12%	29th	11%	15^th
	Itariri	13%	26th	4%	39th	10%	25^th
	Jacupiranga	28%	4th	15%	12th	9%	34^th
	Juquiá	25%	6th	10%	33rd	9%	37^th
	Juquitiba	10%	33rd	9%	36th	9%	32^nd
	Miracatu	14%	20th	10%	32nd	9%	33^rd
	Pariquera-Açu	22%	9th	14%	16th	9%	28^th
	Pedro de Toledo	11%	30th	7%	37th	10%	22^nd
	Registro	32%	3rd	9%	35th	10%	21^st
	Ribeira	15%	18th	12%	26th	10%	27^th
	São Lourenço da Serra	14%	23rd	18%	8th	9%	30^th
	Sete Barras	23%	8th	14%	18th	9%	36^th
	Tapirai	10%	34th	3 2%	28th	8%	39^th
PR	Adrianópolis	11%	32nd	87%	3rd	11%	13rd
	Antonina	14%	21st	12%	24th	11%	14^th
	Bocaiúva do Sul	8%	36th	13%	21st	12%	7^th
	Campina Grande do Sul	13%	25th	12%	27th	12%	8^th
	Cerro Azul	13%	27th	16%	11th	13%	6^th
	Guaraqueçaba	20%	11th	12%	25th	10%	17^th
	Guaratuba	24%	7th	11%	30th	13%	5^th
	Itaperuçu	16%	15th	12%	23rd	12%	9^th
	Matinhos	14%	24th	16%	10th	13%	4^th

			2005		2016
	Municipality	Pop.	Part. % Meso.	Pop.	Part. % Meso.	Δ%
SP	Apiaí	27,551	3.3%	25,077	3.0%	-9%
	Barra do Chapéu	4,802	0.6%	5,619	0.7%	17%
	Barra do Turvo	8,724	1.1%	7,804	0.9%	-11%
	Cajati	32,724	3.9%	28,916	3.4%	-12%
	Cananéia	13,906	1.7%	12,606	1.5%	-9%
	Eldorado	14,769	1.8%	15,388	1.8%	4%
	Iguape	28,575	3.4%	30,519	3.6%	7%
	Ilha Comprida	9.177	1.1%	10,476	1.2%	14%
	Iporanga	4.529	0.5%	4.316	0.5%	-5%
	Itaoca	2,912	0.4%:	3.339	0.4%	15%
	Itapirapuã Paulista	3,775	0.5%	4,161	0.5%	10%
	Itariri	14,869	1.8%	16,913	2.0%	14%
	Jacupiranga	18,676	2.3%	17,876	2.1%	-4%
	Juquiá	22,748	2.7%	19,274	2.3%	-15%
	Juquitiba	30,525	3.7%	30,837	3.7%	1%
	Miracatu	24,521	3.0%	20.409	2.4%	-17%
	Pariquera-Açu	20,459	2.5%	19,465	2.3%	-5%
	Pedro de Toledo	10,033	1.2%	11,053	1.3%	10%
	Registro	56,759	6.8%	56,356	6.7%	-1%
	Ribeira	3,151	0.4%	3.399	0.4%	8%
	São Lourenço da Serra	15,139	1.8%	15,323	1.8%	1%
	Sete Barras	14,458	1.7%	13,098	1.6%	-9%
	Tapirai	10,347	1.2%	8.010	0.9%	-23%
PR	Adrianópolis	5,799	0.7%	6,293	0.7%	9%
	Antonina	20,492	2.5%	19,418	2.3%	-5%
	Bocaiúva do Sul	9,841	1.2%	12,320	1.5%	25%
	Campina Grande do Sul	44,103	5.3%	42,187	5.0%	-4%
	Cerro Azul	16,527	2.0%	17,821	2.1%	8%
	Guaraqueçaba	8,618	1.0%	7.944	0.9%	-8%
	Guaratuba	33,058	4.0%	35,588	4.2%	8%
	Itaperuçu	24,725	3.0%	27,131	3.2%	10%
	Matinhos	32,240	3.9%	33,024	3.9%	2%
	Morretes	16,616	2.0%	16,488	2.0%	-1%
	Paranaguá	144,797	17.5%	151,829	18.0%	5%
	Pontal do Paraná	18,158	2.2%	24,878	2.9%	37%
	Quatro Barras	20,017	2.4%	22,353	2.7%	12%
	Rio Branco do Sul	30,469	3.7%	32,369	3.8%	6%
	Tunas do Paraná	4.076	0.5%	7,767	0.9%	91%
	Doutor Ulysses	6,631	0.8%	5,794	0.7%	-13%

Municipality	CI degree
Municipality	2005	2016
Apiaí (SP), Iguape (SP), Ilha Comprida (SP), Registro (SP), Adrianópolis (PR), Antonina (PR), Campina Grande do Sul (PR), Guaratuba (PR), Itaperuçu (PR).	Low	High
Jacupiranga (SP), Juquiá (SP), Juquitiba (SP), Miracatu (SP), Pariquera-Açu (SP), Sete Barras (SP), Cerro Azul (PR), Morretes (PR).	Low	Median
Matinhos (PR), Pontal do Paraná.	Median	High
Cajati (SP), Paranaguá (PR), Rio Branco do Sul (PR).	High	High
Cananéia (SP).	High	Median
Barra do Chapéu (SP), Barra do Turvo (SP), Eldorado (SP), Iporanga (SP), Itaoca (SP), Itapirapuã Paulista (SP), Itariri (SP), Pedro de Toledo (SP), Ribeira (SP), São Lourenço da Serra (SP), Tapirai (SP), Bocaiuva do Sul (PR), Guaraqueçaba (PR), Tunas do Paraná (PR), Doutor Ulysses (PR).	Low	Low

State	Municipality	DI 2005	DI 2016	DI Classification
SP	Apiaí	0.52	0.64	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Barra do Chapéu	0.36	0.60	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Barra do Turvo	0.64	0.62	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Cajati	0.60	0.59	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Cananéia	0.57	0.53	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Eldorado	0.48	0.62	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Iguape	0.59	0.61	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Ilha Comprida	0.66	0.59	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Iporanga	0.63	0.62	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Itaóca	0.53	0.57	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Itapirapuã Paulista	0.64	0.59	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Itariri	0.48	0.64	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Jacupiranga	0.57	0.56	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Juquiá	0.63	0.56	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Juquitiba	0.39	0.60	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Miracatu	0.52	0.61	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Pariquera-Açu	0.55	0.64	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Pedro de Toledo	0.46	0.51	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Registro	0.57	0.70	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Ribeira	0.44	0.63	Convergent to the most dynamic
	São Lourenço da Serra	0.63	0.71	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Sete Barras	0.68	0.50	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Tapirai	0.69	0.60	Convergent to the most dynamic
PR	Adrianópolis	0.63	0.54	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Antonina	0.36	0.63	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Bocaiúva do Sul	0.35	0.35	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Campina Grande do Sul	0.37	0.65	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Cerro Azul	0.41	0.53	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Guaraqueçaba	0.44	0.63	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Guaratuba	0.41	0.57	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Itaperuçu	0.42	0.52	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Matinhos	0.37	0.50	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Morretes	0.41	0.57	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Paranaguá	0.53	0.51	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Pontal do Paraná	0.60	0.39	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Sete Barras	0.41	0.58	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Rio Branco do Sul	0.43	0.56	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Tunas do Paraná	0.63	0.49	Convergent to the most dynamic
	Doutor Ulysses	0.44	0.47	Convergent to the most dynamic

Universidade Federal do Ceará UFC - Campi do Pici, Bloco 911, 60440-900 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, Tel.: (55 85) 3366 9855, Fax: (55 85) 3366 9864 - Fortaleza - CE - Brazil
E-mail: edantas@ufc.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] (*)CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Address: UNIOESTE. Rua da Faculdade, 645. CEP: 85903-000. Jd. Santa Maria, Toledo (PR), Brasil. Tel (+ 55 45) 3379 7053. E-mail: lara.freitas@unioeste.br