Wyeomyia exallos , a new species of sylvatic mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) from Brazil

brown setae on apex. Proboscis brown, very expanded apically, length 2.0 mm, approximately 0.85 length of forefemur; basal labial setae brown. Thorax: integument brownish. Antepronotum completely brown-scaled with greenish-blue reflections, lobes well separated, a row of strong dark-brown setae dorsally. Postpronotum covered with white scales, upper postpronotal scales, dark. Scutum brown-scaled with greenish-blue reflections; scutal scales brownish with faint greenish-blue reflections. Wyeomyia exallos , a new mosquito species from Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil, is described based on morphological characters of the adult female, male, male genitalia, pupa and fourth-instar larva. The morphological characters of Wy. exallos sp. nov. are compared with those of different subgenera of Wyeomyia as well as of species without subgeneric position. It is proposed that the new species should be placed in genus Wyeomyia Theobald without subgeneric assignment.

The new mosquito species validated and described herein was obtained during field collections performed at the Parque Nacional do Itatiaia (PARNA Itatiaia), state of Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil, in 2002, when immature where taken from bromeliads and Aracea leaf axils, bamboos and tree holes, as well as adult captures.Only one adult female of the new species was caught when blood-feeding on one of the authors (MA Motta), in August 2002.It laid four eggs in the laboratory, one of which was unviable.Five year later, we conducted a one-year study on bromeliad mosquitoes in the same site at PARNA Itatiaia, in which immature and adult mosquitoes of several species were collected monthly, except Wyeomyia exallos sp.nov.Other eventual mosquito collections performed in the same site in recent years were negative for Wy.exallos sp.nov.Therefore, we are describing this new species based on the few available specimens.We were encouraged to describe the new species because the genus Wyeomyia Theobald, the largest genus of tribe Sabethini among the Neotropical Culicidae, probably includes a small fraction of the true species diversity, as stressed by Belkin et al. (1970), Harbach and Peyton (1990) and Judd (1996).

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphological characters of the male, male genitalia, female, pupa and fourth-instar larva were examined.Pupal chaetotaxy was studied and the range and mode of branches are in Table .Because some setae of a few segments were lost from the available larval exuviae, chaetotaxy of the fourth-instar larva was not tabled.Illustrations are provided based on direct observation of morphological characters of the specimens and common setal position in Wyeomyia species.The descriptive terminology and abbreviations follow Belkin et al. (1970) and Harbach and Knight (1980).The specimens exam-ined are listed in the specific section.The holotype and the paratype are deposited in the Culicidae Collection (CCULI), Oswaldo Cruz Institute (IOC), RJ.
(Figs 1-4) Diagnosis -Wy.exallos sp.nov.may be easily distinguished by the combination of the following morphological characters: male genitalia with short gonocoxite bearing three moderately long tergal setae; gonostylus with a short stem, apically divided into three lobes; larva with maxilla bearing a short apical tooth, seta 4-Mx single, pointed, seta 6-Mx single, abdomen with free scales on segment VIII (comb plate absent), forming one irregular row, siphon with a row of pectinate accessory setae (2a-S) and a pecten in two irregular rows, each comprised of about seven scales; pupa with seta 5-CT double, 1-II forked, 6-II as long as segment III, 7-II inserted dorsally, 6-VII inserted dorsally, 9-VII 0.5 length of 9-VIII; paddle shorter than length of segment VIII.
Female -Small mosquito.Head: vertex and occiput covered with dark scales with greenish-blue reflection, semi-erect scales absent, postgena with white scales; ocular line with dark brown scales, ocular setae dark brown, two long dark-brown interocular setae.Narrow interocular space, without setae and scales; clypeus ovate, brown, pruinose, without scales and setae; frons cream, pubescent, without setae and scales.Antenna: as long as proboscis, pedicel dark-brown, pruinose, with some bronzy scales and minute setae; flagellum slightly verticillate, whorls with about eight setae, flagellomere 1 with one tuff of scales.Maxillary palpus short, slightly longer than clypeus, brown-scaled, brown setae on apex.Proboscis brown, very expanded apically, length 2.0 mm, approximately 0.85 length of forefemur; basal labial setae brown.Thorax: integument brownish.Antepronotum completely brown-scaled with greenishblue reflections, lobes well separated, a row of strong dark-brown setae dorsally.Postpronotum covered with white scales, upper postpronotal scales, dark.Scutum brown-scaled with greenish-blue reflections; scutal scales brownish with faint greenish-blue reflections.
Anterior promontory area with few white scales and with approximately 10 dark-brown setae of different sizes.Scutellum with scales concolorous with those from scutum, about four, five long and six short dark-brown setae on each lobe.Mesopostnotum brown with a tuft of approximately six brown setae, without scales.Pleuron covered with whitish (cream-colored) scales, except on anterior lateral margin of mesokatespisternum, mesomeron and paratergite.Pleural setae: one yellowish prespiracular setae; postspiracular setae absent; five long yellowish (with dark insertion) upper proepisternal setae; five bronzy lower mesokatepisternal setae above anterior margin of mesomeron; upper mesokatepisternal setae absent; five brown prealar setae; lower mesepimeral setae absent; 11 yellowish upper mesepimeral setae.Legs: fore, mid and hindcoxae with white scales on anterior surface and bronzy setae over all.Forefemur longer than proboscis, ventrally with a longitudinal stripe of white scales, foretibia and foretarsomeres dark-scaled.Midlegs broken (lost); hindfemur with a longitudinal stripe of white scales ventrally; hindtibiae same length as hindfemur, dark-scaled, hindtarsomeres dark-scaled.Ungues simple.Wing: length 2.7 mm. Upper calypter with two dark-brown setae.Alula with nine simple, dark-brown setae.Wing with brown scales.Dorsal scales: R 1 , R 2+3 , R 2 , R s , R 3 , R 4+5 , M 1 and M 2 with lateral setae elongate, slightly broad; proximal part of vein M with anterior scales narrow, ligulate, decumbent scales not exceeding the vein width; CuA with narrow decumbent scales, not exceeding the vein width.Halter: integument yellowish, scabellum and pedicel darkscaled dorsally, capitellum dark-scaled.Abdomen: terga covered with brown scales; without lateral incisions of white scales, tergum I with a row of yellowish setae on posterolateral margin; some short bronzy setae on apex of tergum VIII; sterna with white scales similar in colour to pleural scales.
Male -Similar to female, except for antenna slightly more verticillate, proboscis length 1.5 mm.Wing length 2.4 mm.Legs: midfemur, midtibia and midtarsomeres I, II dark-scaled; midtarsomeres III-V darkish, with a line of whitish scales ventrally; hindtarsomere V with some whitish scales on one side.
Male genitalia (Fig. 1) -Tergum and sternum VIII not examined (not possible).Tergum IX (Fig. 1E) narrow, interlobar space slightly concave, lobes not pronounced, each bearing four, five long setae with fine apex.Proctiger (Fig. 1D) membranous, tergum X weakly pigmented; paraproct sclerotized with one main tooth and one adjacent, nearly indistinct, narrow tooth above; three short cercal setae.Aedeagus (Fig. 1C) with rounded apical tergal arms fused, forming a slightly concave apex; median sternal plate membranous, apically folded outward; submedian tergal arms fused.Gonocoxite (Fig. 1A): short, larger on base; tergal surface with minute setae and three moderately long setae.Sternal surface with minute setae and scales, a tubercle on anterior surface; basal mesal lobe slightly rectangular covered with minute setae, about four-six moderately long setae and one long seta on inner angle.Gonostylus (Fig. 1A, B) shorter than gonocoxite, approximately 0.5 length of gonocoxite, formed by a stem apically divided into three lobes: lobe A digitiform, apically with two stout setae, lobe E rounded with numerous short setae along the anterior surface; lobe C slender, slightly curved with pointed apex.
Etymology -The Greek adjective exallos is both masculine and feminine, meaning quite distinct.
Taxonomic discussion -Wy.exallos is very distinct in practically all life stages from the other described Wyeomyia species.In general view, the adult female of Wy. exallos is a typical mosquito belonging to genus Wyeomyia in presenting the greenish-blue opaque coloration, on the antepronotum and scutum.Thus, its distinction based on the overall feature of the female is not possible.However, the other species of genus Wyeomyia that share this feature are very distinct from Wy. exallos in the other life stages and male genitalia.We compared the female morphological characters of Wy. exallos with those of three Wyeomyia species that have been described only from females.We contrasted the female morphology of Wy. exallos with the lectotype female of Wyeomyia rooti (Del Ponte), as well as with the description of Wyeomyia moerbista (Dyar & Knab) and Wyeomyia cesari Del Ponte & Cerqueira.Female of Wy. exallos differs from Wy. rooti in the absence of white scales forming a spot in the occiput and vertex and white scales on the ocular line.Wy. exallos is distinct from Wy. moerbista and Wy.cesari in the absence of white scales on dorsal and ventral area of the antepronotum.
Several Wyeomyia species have been described based only on morphological characters of one gender whereas several other species have not been associated with immature stages.This has made it difficult to determine the taxonomic status of several species as well as to clearly establish the phylogenetic relationships within the genus Wyeomyia.In an attempt to assign Wy. exallos to a subgenus in the genus Wyeomyia, we compared its morphological features with those of well characterized Wyeomyia subgenera and the Wyeomyia species of uncertain placement (Motta & Lourenço-de-Oliveira 1995).However, Wy. exallos did not fit into any known group and the natural affinities of the new species could not be determined.In fact, morphological features of Wy. exallos are quite different from species of the recognized Wyeomyia subgenera.In the subgenera Dendromyia Theobald, Prosopolepis Lutz and Caenomyiella Harbach & Peyton, the male genitalia have the gonostylus basally divided, without a stem; the fourth-instar larva possesses developed maxillary apical tooth and a short seta 4-X.The subgenera Zinzala Zavortink, Miamyia Dyar and Antunesmyia Lane & Cerqueira possess male genitalia with numerous setae on the proctiger or the gonostylus is not divided into three lobes and with the fourth-instar larva have conspicuous stellate setae on the abdominal segments.In the subgenera Hystatomyia Dyar, Phoniomyia Theobald and Dodecamyia, the gonostylus has no apical lobes and the fourth-instar larvae have a siphon with numerous accessory setae and comb scales in more than one row.Species of subgenus Triamyia Dyar possesses a gonostylus with different features and larvae without pecten.In the poorly known subgenus Nunezia Dyar, the larva of the only species whose immature stages is described has more than one row of comb scales and the gonostylus does not possess the lobe C. Subgenera Spilonympha Motta & Lourenço-de-Oliveira and Cruzmyia Lane & Cerqueira include species in which the gonostylus has very distinct lobes apically, larva possess numerous accessory setae on the siphon and a comb plate on segment VIII.Species of Decamyia Dyar have the basal plate of the male genitalia with a long seta and larvae with more than two rows of comb scales.Wy. exallos differs from species of the subgenus Exallomyia by having the gonostylus with a tuft of long setae, the larva with a row of long seta 1a-S and a well-developed seta 1-A inserted on the 0.5 basal of the antenna.The subgenus Wyeomyia Theobald is a very heterogeneous group of numerous species and is considered to be polyphyletic (Judd 1996, Motta et al. 2007).Therefore determining affinities with Wy. exallos is problematic at present.
Wy. exallos is morphologically similar to Wyeomyia melanocephala Dyar & Knab, a species of uncertain subgenus (Motta & Lourenço-de-Oliveira 1995), in having the gonostylus apically divided into three lobes.In the larval stage, Wy. exallos also shares some characters with Wy. melanocephala, such as seta 4-X usually double, long and inserted at the margin of the saddle and the siphon with a row of pectinate accessory setae, which is also characteristic of Wyeomyia (Menolepis) leucostigma (Lutz).Nonetheless, none of these morphological comparisons have not allowed establishing the subgeneric position of Wy. exallos, neither elucidated its taxonomic position into the genus Wyeomyia.Currently the genus Wyeomyia comprises 17 subgenera (Harbach 2012), however, not all subgenera are well characterized in all life stages and much needs to be done to clarify in the taxonomy of Wyeomyia.We consider that it would be premature at this time to propose a new subgenus for Wy.exallos, which would not help to realize a natural classification for the genus Wyeomyia.Thus, we propose Wy. exallos be placed in genus Wyeomyia, without subgeneric assignment.

TABLE
Range of branches for pupal setae in Wyeomyia exallos sp.nov.(mode in parentheses) (n = 2)