Correlation Between Morphological Properties and Ionic Conductivity in an Electrolyte Based on Poly ( Vinylidene Fluoride ) and Poly ( 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate )

aDepartamento de Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais, Universidade de Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil bCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais – CEFET-MG, Av. Amazonas, 5253, CEP 30421-169, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil cDepartamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil


Introduction
Polymer electrolytes are important for technology because they can be used in the fabrication of special devices, such as electrochromic 1,2 devices, lithium batteries [3][4][5] , supercapacitors 6 , sensors 7,8 , and fuel cell polymer electrolyte membranes (PEM) [9][10][11] .A large number of materials have been tested in this area, but conducting polymers and gel polymer electrolytes stand out.
Solid polymer electrolytes (SPE) are frequently studied for advanced uses 12,13 .The considerable interest in this type of material is due to the large variety of applications for which it can be used, such as electrochromic devices 14 , ion-batteries, ion selective membranes 15,16 , and sensors 17,18 .For this type of electrolyte, the use of hydrogels is very interesting because they can be easily manipulated and synthesized; the main reason that ions are easily transported through their backbones is because of their porosity and amorphous structure.They are also electrochemically stable, and their byproducts are not combustible.These properties are very beneficial for the performance of batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells 19 .A hydrogel electrolyte must also have favorable mechanical properties and be compatible with the electrodes.To have these characteristics, the materials need to be very homogenous.One of the strategies used to obtain the desired characteristics is to prepare polymer blends with added salts so that they have a good balance between conductivity and SPE composition.
Baskaran et al. 18 studied the effect of the variation in the composition of poly(vinyl acetate)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) blends containing lithium perchlorate (LiClO 4 ) on the ionic conductivity of this SPE.Electrolyte relaxation was discussed in terms of impedance and dielectric analysis.Rajendran et al. 20 verified the effect of LiClO 4 and LiBF 4 salt concentration in blends of PVDF/PVC maintaining a composition 20 of 80/20 wt.%.
Performance tests of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) are presented in this study.Although other hydrogels have been tested with PVDF, there is no information on the use of a poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel electrolyte in this type of application.The PHEMA hydrogel has already been used for the transfer of ions in biological studies, the mobilization and transfer of biomolecules using this ion mobility 21 , and frequently, for the selection and separation of ions in solution 22,23 ; PHEMA has not yet been used in the study of ion-generated potential energy.
In this work, hydrogel polymer electrolytes were produced.The polymers were poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), PHEMA, and poly(vinylidene fluoride), PVDF.Electrolytes were prepared with different compositions of PVDF and PHEMA and a specific concentration of LiClO 4 to determine the relationship between their structural properties, morphologies, thermal properties, and conductivities.Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Modulated Temperature Differential Scanning Calorimetry (MDSC), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Impedance Spectroscopy (IS) were used to characterize the materials at different structural levels.PVDF is used in fuel cells 24,25 and battery systems 26,27 , and PHEMA has biomedical 28 , polymer electrolyte 29 , and other applications.
PHEMA was synthesized by combining an ethyl alcohol solution of 2.5 wt.% and 4,4'azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) initiator in a two-neck flask which contained 4 mL of 2 -hydroxyethyl methacrylate, HEMA (97%) dissolved in 40 mL of ethanol.The reaction medium was stirred rapidly with a magnetic stir plate for 2 hours at 80 °C.Next, the solution was stirred slowly under a dynamic vacuum for 15 minutes to evaporate the solvent.After the solvent had been evaporated, the PHEMA was placed in a petri dish and dried in a desiccator under a dynamic vacuum for 48 hours.After that, the dry polymer was macerated to a fine grain size so that it could be used easily.
A Perkin Elmer 1000 spectrophotometer equipped with a horizontal attenuated reflection (ATR) accessory was used to take Fourier transform infrared measurements of the sample.The spectra of the samples were obtained in the region from 4000 to 500 cm -1 using a ZnSe crystal.
Thermal analyses were performed in a TA Instruments MDSC 2920 using approximately 9 mg of each sample placed in an aluminum recipient, which was then purged with helium gas at 40 mL/min.An initial run was performed to erase the thermal history of the samples.A second run was made from -140 to 180 °C at a heating rate of 3 °C/min with an amplitude modulation of 1 °C for 60 seconds.
The morphological study of the PVDF/PHEMA electrolytes and neat polymers was carried out with a JEOL model 6360LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at 15 kV.The samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen and were broken.
An AutoLab PG100/FRA was used for impedance spectroscopy.The frequency range was 1×10 -2 Hz -1×10 5 Hz and the perturbation potential was 10 mV.All measurements were performed at ~ 25 °C.The electrolyte disk samples (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thick) were sandwiched between two stainless steel disks.FTIR spectra of the electrolytes prepared with these polymers had bands related to the vibrations of groups present in both PVDF and PHEMA.Generally, typical bands of PVDF were more prominent in the PVDF/ PHEMA/LiClO 4 75/15/10 and 50/40/10 electrolytes than in the 25/65/10.On the other hand, in electrolytes with a 50 wt.% PVDF content, an inversion of the relative intensity was observed between the 1022 and 1150 cm -1 bands, unlike electrolytes with 75 wt.% PVDF.This fact can be attributed to the high intensity of the band in the spectrum of PHEMA, which became more pronounced in the PVDF/PHEMA/LiClO 4 25/65/10 system.However, in the FTIR spectrum of PHEMA, a shoulder can be observed at approximately 1000 cm -1 , which is more intense compared to the highest frequency one in the same band.This region, approximately 1000-1200 cm -1 , is very important to the PVDF/LiClO 4 system because of the characteristic formation of coordination complexes of the salt with CF 2 moieties in PVDF 30 .The change in the relative intensities of the bands in the FTIR spectrum of the electrolyte with added PHEMA was influenced by the complexes formed between the lithium salt and the PVDF.The hydroxyl group of PHEMA is possibly involved in hydrogen bonding interactions with the fluoride atom of PVDF, which includes hydrogen atoms or preferential interactions with the Li + salt cations and oxygen atoms.Thermal analysis using a modulated differential scanning calorimeter (MDSC) was carried out to observe the change in transition temperature (T g ) that is caused by adding PHEMA to the electrolyte.Figure 2 shows the MDSC curves obtained for the following polymer electrolytes: PVDF/LiClO 4 90/10 and PVDF/PHEMA/LiClO 4 75/15/10 and 25/65/10.The MDSC curves have one glass transition temperature for all of the systems.The glass transition temperature (T g ) of PVDF/LiClO 4 was obtained through heat capacity curves using the first derivate at approximately -110 °C.In other works, authors identified a higher T g , possibly because of the plasticizer effect caused by the salt, as has been reported 18 .It was not possible to identify the glass transition of PHEMA.Sanchez et al. 31 identified only the glass transition of the expanded gel in the experimental DSC on heating.The event observed at -40 °C in the MDSC curve of PVDF/PHEMA/LiClO 4 25/65/10 electrolyte, which has a high concentration of PHEMA, is typical of polymer hydrogels and occurred at temperatures near the glass transition.This endothermic event is associated with the existence of different states of water sorbed in the hydrogels.The MDSC thermal investigation illustrated this event better than conventional DSC.

Results and Discussion
A significant shift in T g to higher temperatures can be observed when comparing the curves of electrolytes containing 25 and 75 wt.% PHEMA and the samples without PHEMA.The presence of PHEMA gives the electrolytes the characteristics of rigid materials.The glass transition of the electrolytes shifts towards the PHEMA endothermic event, as has been described previously.Moreover, the shift of T g clearly indicates some degree of miscibility between the polymers in the electrolyte.In the MDSC curve of 75 wt.% PVDF (75/15/10), T g was very close to -108 °C -the T g of pure PVDF.The interaction suggested by the IR spectra could be responsible for the partial miscibility of the polymers.particles, as shown in Figure 3a.PVDF clusters have a regular morphology similar to spheres.The addition of 25 wt.% PHEMA to the samples reduced the porosity and decreased the size of the domains, see Figure 3b.The average spheroid size of the domains was estimated using SEM images with high magnification, Figure 4a, b.In the case of PVDF, average sphere size was approximately 5µm and for electrolyte it is nearly 2µm.
When the concentration of PHEMA was high, the morphology of the electrolyte was modified substantially, see Figure 3c, d.The electrolyte with 50 wt.% PVDF had a heterogeneous fracture with two phases: (i) a continuous phase rich in PHEMA and (ii) a dispersed phase similar to the clusters typically observed in images of PVDF, Figure 3c.Spherical domains were homogenous along the length of the samples.This difference from the others samples suggests a lower level of miscibility for this specific composition.Figure 3d shows the SEM images of the samples with 25 wt.% PVDF.These samples had only one phase, which was similar to pure PHEMA electrolyte, as seen in Figure 3e.Ionic conductivity of the electrolytes could be controlled by varying the concentrations of each polymer in the materials.Conductivity was higher with greater PHEMA concentrations in the samples because the ionic conductivity depends on the level of crystallinity, amorphous phase, and molecular mobility.PVDF is a polymer with a high level of crystallinity, and PHEMA is an amorphous polymer.The ionic conductivity increases when the amorphous part is larger than the crystalline part.Thus, the larger the amorphous part is, the higher the ionic conductivity will be.In terms of the mobility of the Li ions, PHEMA also offers OH and C = O polar groups in its structure that favor the mobility of the ions that produce the ionic current.Therefore, a large amount of PHEMA is important to reach high levels of ionic conductivity, as observed in Figure 5.

Conclusions
Electrolytes containing pure poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) or poly(2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) and mixtures of the polymers with a range of concentrations were prepared with added LiClO 4 .The results of the structural (FTIR), thermal (MDSC), morphological analyses (SEM), and measurements of the electrical properties (IS) confirmed that there are polymer interactions in the materials.The electrolyte containing 50 wt.% of each polymer had the lowest miscibility of the studied materials.An increase in the ionic conductivity was observed for materials with higher concentrations of PHEMA despite the concentration of salt.This is due to the larger amount of amorphous polymer that favors ion conductivity of the electrolytes.Therefore, the ratio between the crystalline and amorphous structure of the materials was a main factor that can be used to tailor their ionic conductivity.

Figure 1
Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra of PVDF/PHEMA electrolyte containing 0, 25, 50, 75 wt.% PVDF and pure PVDF for comparison.The characteristic absorption bands of PVDF were observed at approximately 1632, 1410 and 1238 cm -1 and were associated with C = C, C -F

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Curve of ionic conductivity of samples neat polymer and polymer electrolyte.