Leaching of a Gold Bearing Partially Roasted Sulphide . Laboratory Scale Studies

This research aimed at defining a route for recovering precious metals from a very heterogeneous gold bearing sulphide and arsenide concentrate that was partially roasted and dumped by the 1960s when Santo António mine closed. Gold occurs in this concentrate as free particles in the range of 10-100 μm, most of them still enclosed in the pyrite and arsenopyrite matrix. Its content varies from 20 to 150 g of Au/ton, being higher at the dump upper levels and in the finer concentrate fractions. Preliminary tests demonstrated the refractoriness of this product, since the leaching with conventional cyanide solutions and with other leaching solutions gave very low recoveries. However, high concentrated cyanide solutions recover more than 60% of Au, although with high NaCN and lime consumptions and poor settling characteristics. Iron was shown to be highly dissolved in these solutions. Some prior treatments clearly favoured the cyanidation process, in particular a roasting step. Thus, a large number of roasting experiments was carried out to define the most favourable conditions for recovering gold. However, no clear relationship between roasting conditions and gold dissolution was found due to the heterogeneity of the product and high variance of gold experimental recoveries. These recoveries were calculated considering gold contained in both the leaching residues and leachates, and uncertainties of these results are relatively high. Roasting the product at 450-700 °C for 1 h guarantees a high probability to dissolve at least 74% Au in a highly concentrated NaCN solution stirred for 24 h. The 600-700 °C roasting range is clearly preferable for consuming less cyanide and lime. Pre-washing the roasted product seems not to reduce the cyanide consumption. Regarding the silver recovery, the NaCN and lime consumption are higher while using the products roasted at the lowest tested temperatures. Products roasted at higher temperatures have better settling performance.


Introduction
Santo António gold mines are situated in the North of Portugal and were already explored in the 1st century A.D. by the Romans.These mines were reactivated around 1950 and closed 10 years later.The following two reasons explain to some extent such unsuccess: (i) an optimistic estimate of higher gold content was made; (ii) the flowsheet including a roasting step was based in few experimental tests.Thus, some unexpected surprises in the operation performance arose, namely low gold recoveries by cyanidation and poor gold cementation using Merril-Crowe process, with no de-aeration.Around 1980, two other soli-tary unsuccessful trials took place without continuity, perhaps due to the same intrinsic main causes, i.e., high refractoriness of the ore and very random gold content.One of those trials processed all the stocked ore by milling it up to a very fine grain size followed by cyanidation, adsorption of gold onto activated carbon, burning it and melting the resulting ashes 1 .The other is the core of this work carried out between 1984-1986, that aimed at recovering the gold content in a 2000 ton dump of partially roasted sulphide concentrate by adopting a batch operation in a small ownbuilt plant 2 .
Cyanide is still the most used reagent for recovering gold from its ores.In the case of refractory ores containing complex minerals, gold dissolution is not a simple process and its rate becomes depressed after a certain time of cyanidation 3 .Mineralogical identification of the ore and diagnostic leaching are alternative methods for establishing and designing a metallurgical flowsheet for refractory ores 4 .Some alternative leaching agents, namely thiourea, have been tried due to the environmental concerns, generally without economic success 5 .An usual approach for processing complex refractory gold ores is a pre-oxidation treatment prior the gold leaching step and the most known options are roasting, pressure oxidation and bioxidation [6][7][8] .Pressure oxidation is a technology where sulfuric acid can play an important role for oxidising arsenopyrite effectively [9][10][11] .Biological processes are a reality as production technologies chosen for a significant refractory gold treatment plants worldwide.Several references discuss its application as biorector and bioheap leaching methods for refractory gold bearing sulphides and arsenides, where cyanide, as well as ammonium thiosulfate, are used as leaching agents [12][13][14][15][16][17] .
With the objective of designing a feasible flowsheet for recovering gold from those 2000 ton dump of partially roasted sulphide concentrate, following its mineralogical and chemical characterisation, some trials to concentrate gold by using magnetic separation and froth flotation processes were carried out without success.Then, several leaching screening tests were carried out using conventional cyanide concentrations of 0.5% w/v NaCN, conditioning the pulp and testing some treatments prior to cyanidation.Thiourea was tested as leaching agent, too.As general conclusion one can point out the failure of all those foreseen routes, except either leaching the concentrate with higher cyanide concentration or roasting it followed by cyanidation.Therefore, much more effort was invested in these two last lines of research.

Gold Recovery Estimation
Gold recovery is usually computed by using the following expression: where ms is mass of solution, mr of residue and Aus and Aur are the gold contents (w/w) in solution and residue, respectively.The results obtained are expressed in percentage.However, if the gold bearing product is sufficiently uniform and the gold particles are very fine, a small variance in gold ore content is expected and gold recovery can be very well estimated by using the following expression: where p stands for product.It means that the ratio between the gold determined in the leachate and average gold content in the ore well estimates gold recovery and there is no need to determine gold in residues.However, in the case of gold ores, the use of expression (1) is frequently a must.In this case, the estimate of recovery variance as a function of the different factors present in expression ( 1) is given by: where ( )0 means the derivative to be computed at the mean value of the variables.The development of this equation gives: be illustrated by considering the following data: mr = 1 kg; ms = 2 kg; Aur = 15 g/ton; Aus = 27.5 g/ton.Sample average recovery is about 78.6% and estimated standard deviation is around 25.8%.If Aur = 7 g/ton then the calculated value for recovery is 90% and the standard deviation is 13.8%.These results indicate that uncertainty about true recovery values is much more affected by gold residue uncertainty than gold solution uncertainty, and it decreases as both gold content in the product and its recovery increase.
Based in these considerations and (i) assuming normal distribution for the recovery variable; (ii) estimating recovery variance by the above expression; (iii) considering t Student statistic defined as: where µη is the true mean recovery and sη is the sample standard deviation of the mean recovery; and (iv) respective t value at t-Student tables, then intervals can be built where the true recovery value is contained with a given degree of confidence, generally taken as 95%.

Experimental
A sample of about 100 kg was taken from the dumped sulphides and considered as a representative sample.Due to the known randomness of gold in the product, all the leaching tests used either 0.5 or 1 kg of ore.Experimental recoveries were computed through gold and silver values in both the final leachate and corresponding leaching residue.For this purpose the final leaching residue was first sampled, then the sample digested with hot aqua regia solution, followed by water washing the residue and then analysing the gold content in that solution by atomic absorption spectrometry (A.A.S.).This method of analysis was also used to determine other metals in the leachates and other solutions.In the case of gold determinations the background correction was used.
Commercial reagents and tap water were used for all the experimental work.In the leaching tests the pulp was agitated in a 5 L glass beaker and experiments were controlled by sampling leachates at predetermined times.Electrode immersion in the stirred pulp was used for monitoring pH, and readings were taken only after stable pH values were achieved.For the cyanidation tests, lime was used to raise the pH to an alkaline level, and at the end of each experiment, the residue was washed with constant volumes of a stock lime solution.Free cyanide was determined by titration with silver nitrate using potassium iodide as indicator.
Carbon and sulphur in solid products were determined using an oxygen combustion method followed by absorption of the resulting gases.Carbon was quantified by the percentage of CO2 absorbed in a sodium hydroxide solution and sulphur was titrated as sulphate.
In order to simulate the industrial scale conditions, sulphides were roasted by using a 40 cm diameter x 100 cm length rotary kiln where the feed was directly heated by an air-propane flame that was turned on-off according to a temperature control device.

Characterisation
Gold occurs in the original ore generally in arsenopyrite that is associated with iron sulphides, mainly pyrite and chalcopyrite.Galena and sphalerite are also usual minerals and native bismuth occurs sometimes as small inclusions in arsenopyrite 2 .In the partially roasted sulphides bearing ore, gold was observed by microscopy as particles whose size was in the 10 to 100 µm range, either as completely free or still inserted in grains containing sulphur and arsenium.Most of these grains still contain a few altered core that is bounded by a very porous surface resulting from both the industrial roasting step performed in a rotary kiln directly heated by a fuel-air flame, according to the old mine reports, and weathering.Grains of wolframite and pecheblend were also observed at the microscope.The only gold particle semi-quantitative analysis carried out revealed 63.6% Au and 36.3%Ag 2 .
Table 1 shows the size distribution analysis of 8 samples.Most of the coarser particles retained in the sieves are, in fact, agglomerates of finer particles, perhaps produced at the roasting step by rolling and binding the concentrate particles of sulphides.According to a previous analysis, the overall chemical composition of the product is 65.0 and 72.4 g/ton Ag and Au, respectively; and in percentage, SiO2 = 17.50;Fe = 32.74;S = 8.10;As = 5.00; Cu = 0.10 18 .
Table 2 presents the results obtained by analysing 14 different size fractions from about 8 kg sample.Gold, silver and most of the usual non-ferrous metals increase in the finer fractions, mainly those smaller than 0.150 mm.Considering both the gold content in the 14 fractions and the respective mass percentage, computed average gold content is around 65 g/ton, less than 72.4 g/ton Au referred before.Due to the large relative variation of the finer and gold richer percentage sizes, a considerable scatter of the gold content of the samples is expected.In addition, it was also verified that average gold values corresponding to the deeper levels of the dump were unfortunately around 20 g/ton.
Carbon in the product was 1.95%, probably due to the deposited organic matter from the vegetation at the dump surroundings.Sulphur was found to be 3.70%.
The product is naturally acid, and the aqueous suspension (solid/water = 1) has a pH ranging from 2.8 to 2.9, 9 to 11 g/L Fe and around 0.2 g/L Cu.

Screening tests
Only about 9.5% of the product remained insensible to a weak magnetic field whereas 6% was strongly magnetic.Chemical analysis of 7 different magnetic fractions revealed no remarkable differences in Au, Ag, Cu, Bi, Zn and Pb contents.Therefore, it was not possible to take advantage of this property to concentrate the product.
Froth flotation at pH range of 9 to 10 using Na2CO3, reagent 3477® and Aerofloat 25® gave the results presented in Table 3.As shown in that table, despite an evident concentration, the tailings were not poor enough to be rejected.
Figures 1 and 2 summarise the product behaviour under normal cyanide leaching solutions of 0.5% w/v NaCN.In the second case, shown in Fig. 2, the leaching conditions were essentially equal but the product was dry milled to <0.3 mm.At the times assigned A and B more sodium cyanide was added to the pulp, respectively 0.17 and 4.32 g in the first experiment and 0.13 and 3.93 g in the second leaching test.
The main indications of these tests were the following: -the lime needed to achieve adequate alkalinity is very high, and despite of that, the pulp pH decreases with time; -the settling and filtering pulp behaviour is clearly poor; -the dissolved iron is lower than in acidic solutions, as expected, but it increases with stirring time; -the initially small amount of dissolved gold is progressively lost by the solution, thus the overall gold recovery is very low; -further sodium cyanide additions to the stirred solutions immediately promote a visible increase in copper, gold and iron concentrations; -size reduction does not affect substantially the product leaching behaviour.
It seems that cyanide degradation occurs in the bulk solution having gold losses as consequence.Thus, some alternatives to improve gold dissolution can be suggested: (a) the addition of much more cyanide, i.e., the use of higher concentrated cyanide solutions; (b) to submit the product to some specific treatments that either remove chemical species accounting for degrading cyanide or speeding up their transformation; and (c) use other leaching agents that can be expected to advantageously replace cyanide, such as thiourea.

High concentrated cyanide solutions
Figures 3 and 4 refer to two of those experiments carried out with high cyanide concentration.The general conclusion of these tests is that recoveries higher than 60% of Au are possible under the following leaching conditions: (i) adding 50-70 kg of lime per ton of product; (ii) stirring the pulp for 72 h; (iii) maintaining not less than 0.2% of free cyanide in solution.However, high NaCN consumption, of around 70 kg/ton, is expected, and in order to avoid such NaCN consumption, the frequent monitoring of pH and free cyanide is recommended, since both decrease very fast at the first 15-20 h of leaching.Besides, maintaining high alkalinity, a good practice is having free cyanide concentration as low as possible so as to keep gold dissolving.

Treatments prior to cyanidation
Several treatments prior to cyanidation were tried, in general with no substantial success: dry milling all the product to <0.3 and <0.1 mm; prolonged pulp conditioning using lime; oxidising the pulp by an extended air bubbling; using lime rather than caustic soda for pH adjustment;    pre-washing the product with water, HCl, HCl + NH4Cl, HNO3 and H2SO4 solutions.These last two hot acid solutions improved cyanidation recoveries: 58% of the gold was recovered from the product previously hot washed with HNO310% solution for 2 h at 65 °C; and, as shown in Fig. 5, about 56% Au and 73% Ag were recovered from the product previously hot washed with 7% v/v hot H2SO4 solution at 70-80 °C.A sensible decrease in lime and NaCN consumption as well as in dissolved Cu and Fe relative to cyanidation with no acid washing treatment were also observed.Figure 6 shows roasting as a very effective treatment prior to cyanidation, since 93% Au was recovered in the product heated to 700 °C for 1 h.Moreover, a spectacular improvement in the settling and filtering capabilities of the pulp was achieved, as well as a reduced consumption of lime and NaCN, and, in addition, much less iron was dissolved, too.

Other leaching reagents
Stirring the product for 24 h in a 20% dilute HCl + HNO3 3:1 solution, under 1:3 solid:liquid ratio, around 51% of Au was recovered.Further cyanidation of the residue contributed to add 15% to the already recovered gold, thus the overall Au recovery was 66%.
By simultaneous stirring and electrolysing a pulp with a 10% NaCl solution, thus producing chlorine, as a result of the oxidation of chloride ions, about 35% of Au was dissolved.Additionally, 28% of Au is recoverable in 24 h by cyanidation of the residue.This result confirms an already reported partial dissolution of gold using sodium hypochlorite solutions 18 .
Thiourea was not an effective leaching agent for this product.In fact, by using a thiourea leaching solution of 4% v/v at pH = 1, obtained by adding H2SO4, only 30% of the gold content was recovered and the resulting leachate contained more than 50 g/L of iron.As in the cyanidation tests, the phenomena of loosing gold already dissolved was also observed during the thiourea leaching experiment.As shown in Fig. 7, even with the roasted product, thiourea leaching offers no remarkable advantage over cyanidation, since both gold and silver recoveries in such experiment    were about 72%.Perhaps high thiourea concentration solutions and longer stirring times are needed.

Development of a Cyanidation Route
From the above results it is reasonable to assume that one of the cyanide consuming secondary reactions involves iron, perhaps through the following mechanisms: and Iron hydroxide, Fe(OH)2, with Ks = 4.8 x 10 -16 , probably forms, as a very fine precipitate, at the beginning of the experiments, after adding lime to the pulp.The high surface area of this precipitate turns reaction (8) quite possible to take place followed by the further oxidation of Fe(CN)6 4-to Fe(CN)6 3-, whose Eº = -0.358V(SHE), thus increasing iron dissolution and cyanide consumption.Iron is also dissolved from sulphides minerals through reactions similar to (9) pushed by further oxidation of S 2-→ S2O3 2- → SO3 2-→ SO4 2-and the low solubility of calcium sulphate formed by calcium from added lime.Moreover, the reaction between sulphate and cyanide ions produces thiocyanate ions, which contribute to increase cyanide consumption 19 .
Anyway, either dissolving iron by acid pre-washing the product or increasing iron (III) and decreasing sulphur content by roasting it, both treatments reduce iron in leachates and decrease cyanide consumption.
Thus, in view of the preliminary results of gold recovery by the cyanidation of the roasted product, and due to the existence in the plant of two gas fired furnaces, one rotary kiln and one hearth furnace, it was decided to proceed by developing a metallurgical route involving roasting prior to cyanidation.

Selection of roasting conditions
The criteria adopted to select the conditions for roasting the product were the subsequent cyanidation gold and silver recoveries as well as sodium cyanide and lime consumption.Thus, some roasting tests were carried out at 450, 500, 550, 600, 650 and 700 °C where the product was held for 1 h.An additional two-step roasting cycle at 500 °C for 1/2 h and 625 °C for 1/2 h was carried out to generate maximum porosity in the pyrite and arsenopyrite mineral matrix 20 .
Figure 8 shows that the sulphur content decrease as the temperature and roasting time increase.Arsenium was not analyzed but must be meaningful, since sometimes it was visible as white As2O3 even after finishing the roasting process.The product changed to a red bloody color for roasting temperatures higher than 600 °C due to Fe2O3 generation.For roasting temperatures ≥600 °C the obtained products were much less acid than the original one.Consequently, much less lime is needed to obtain correct alkalinity for cyanidation; conversely, if the product was roasted at temperatures ≤550 °C, the lime needed for achieving correct alkalinity is still high and approximately the one needed at the initial condition when the roasting process was carried out at 450 °C.The pre-washing can reduce the lime consumption mainly at these lower roasting temperatures, according to the data shown in Table 4.
The roasted products were leached for 24 h in stirred triplicate tests with an initial addition of 50 kg NaCN/ton of product and a 1:3 solid:liquid ratio.The perspective of using an excessively high cyanide concentration intended: (i) a correct basis of comparison with those preliminary cyanidation tests where original product was used; (ii) to guarantee an excess of reagent during the stirring time, to have a permanent dissolution capacity to all the leaching solutions.
Figure 9 shows the free cyanide concentration against time for some tests with no pre-washing but with pre-conditioning step, except the 500/625 °C case.Table 5 shows the cyanide consumption for some leaching tests.The  con clu sions are the fol low ing: (i) NaCN needed to leach the roasted prod ucts is less than that to leach the non-roasted prod uct; and, (ii) the NaCN con sump tion increases for prod ucts roasted at lower tem per a tures, and surpris ingly, for prod ucts pre-washed.This anom a lous fact was at trib uted to the very strongly con tam i na tion of the water used at the wash ing step that was col lected from a well strongly con tam i nated by leachates from some tons of prod uct.
A lin ear re gres sion model as log(free NaCN, %) = b0 + b1 (time, min) fit ted to all the ex per i ments, ex plains, reason ably, the free cy a nide changes for most of the ex per iments car ried out, mainly af ter the be gin ning of the leach ing pro cess.There fore, this model could be used for mon i tor ing the free cy a nide con cen tra tion with time.The fact that NaCN con sump tion in creases in versely to the roast ing tem per a ture and with pre-washing is re flected by the time co ef fi cient in the re gres sion ex pres sion as it is pre sented in the last col umn of Ta ble 5 for 10 av er age ex per i ments.
Two sta tis ti cal hy poth e sis tests us ing the dif fer ences be tween ei ther the Au or Ag re cov ery val ues, from the cyanidation of the pre-washed and non-pre-washed roasted prod ucts, were done in or der to as sess mean ing ful dif fer ent leach ing be hav iour.De spite the av er age Au and Ag re cov er ies in pre-washed prod ucts have mean dif fer ences of 2.07 and 7.75% re spec tively, higher than in the non-washed prod ucts, the hy poth e sis test based on the t-Student sta tis tic gives no ev i dence to re ject the null hy poth e sis of equal Au or Ag re cov er ies for both washed and non-washed prod ucts.In con se quence, Ta ble 6 shows the pooled Au and Ag av er age re cov er ies ranked by the roast ing tem per a tures.Clearly, the high est Ag re cov er ies are re lated to the low est roast ing tem per a tures in the range and the high est Au re cov ery is found for the 650 °C prod uct, al though not very dif fer ent from other val ues.How ever, those mean val ues do not re flect the large vari abil ity for both Ag and Au re cov er ies, a char ac ter is tic shown better in Figs. 10 and 11 where true mean Au and Ag re cov er ies 95% con fi dence in ter vals were built for dif fer ent ex per i ments with the roasted prod ucts.The prod uct roasted at 650 °C has the high est mean Au recov ered value of 92.1%.Sim i lar gold re cov er ies even higher than 81% were ob tained for the 500 °C prod uct.Therefore, these val ues do not as sign clearly the best roast ing con di tions for re cov er ing gold in the ore; and look ing at the re cov er ies fre quency dis tri bu tion, it can only be said that cyanidation has a prob a bil ity of about 60% to re cover at least 80% of gold (or around 93% to re cover more than 74% of Au) in the prod ucts roasted un der any of the tested con di tions.In con se quence, other cri te ria, as sil ver re cov ery, cy a nide and lime consumptions must de cide among all the ex per i ments.By  weighing the value of silver recovered and NaCN and lime costs, roasting temperatures in the range of 600 to 700 °C seem to be preferable.Additionally, the resulting residues settle and filter better.
Despite the evident possibility of increasing precious metals recoveries, by increasing stirring time, the overall results are not that high.In fact, gold and silver in the roasted products were in the range of 35.2 to 153.4 g of Au/ton of product, with a 78.1 g/ton mean average, and 25.4 to 69.3 g of Ag/ton of product, with a 45.4 g/ton mean average.However, the respective leaching residues were in the range of 4.1 to 36.5 g of Au/ton of residue, with a 11.0 g/ton mean average, and 10.2 to 38.4 g of Ag/ton of residue with a 21.6 g/ton mean average.That is, residues are not still a worthless raw material.

Conclusions
In this gold sulphide concentrate three main reasons explain most of the variability response found at leaching tests: (i) gold exists as free and non-free particles with sizes of <10 µm to >100 µm; (ii) the product has completely roasted particles, as well as partially and almost intact sulphides particles; and (ii) the granulometric composition of the samples is quite different and gold in finer fractions is higher than in coarse ones.As consequence, the samples of sulphide concentrate used in the tests showed a sensible gold content scattering.
Even using either 0.5 or 1 kg samples of sulphide concentrate, in the experiments carried out, and computing gold recoveries considering the gold content in both the corresponding solutions and residues, significant differences in gold recoveries were still found under similar leaching conditions.
The cyanidation of this product, using conventional NaCN concentration of 0.5% w/v, was not feasible, since the small amount of gold initially dissolved, was easily lost, and final gold recovery was very low.Some of the added cyanide was spent reacting with copper and iron, but other secondary reactions that consume cyanide may occur, such as those producing thiocyanate ions.Additionally, very high lime amount, of about 50 to 70 kg/ton of product, was needed for adjusting pulp alkalinity, and the solutions obtained, settle and filter poorly.
Thiourea showed to be a non-effective reagent to recover the gold contained in this partially roasted sulphide material and offered no visible advantages over cyanide, a less expensive leaching reagent.
By using highly concentrated cyanide solutions, about 60% of Au in the concentrate was leached with no prior treatments.However, both poor settling and filtering characteristics remained.With these solutions long stirring time of about 72 h is recommended and high cyanide consumption of around 70 kg of NaCN /ton of product must be expected.Carefully monitoring the leaching process in order to maintain free cyanide around 0.2%, as NaCN, can reduce substantially the amount of such reagent used during the leaching process.
As expected, milling the partially roasted sulphide did not benefit gold recovery, due to the non-significant relative increase of surface exposed to cyanidation in this already porous and weathered product.
Among prior treatments, HNO3 and H2SO4 acid prewashing were effective for improving settling capability, for reducing iron and copper dissolution and affording NaCN.
The roasting process has made substantial modifications in the product: (i) improved settling behavior; (ii) less iron was dissolved; (iii) lime and NaCN consumption were reduced; and (iv) more gold was dissolved in less stirring times.
The effect of roasting conditions on this heterogeneous product, as evaluated by the cyanidation experiments carried out, was the following: (i) silver recoveries are higher for the lowest roasting temperatures at the 450-700 °C range; (ii) lime and NaCN consumption are lower for  products roasted at the upper temperatures in that range; (iii) pre-washing the roasted products reduces lime required for adjusting pH of the pulp, mainly for those roasted at 550 °C or below; (iv) after roasting the product for 1 h at any temperature, in the 450-700 °C range, one can say that there is a probability of about 93% that highly concentrated cyanide solutions leach at least 74% of the Au, in 24 h; (v) there is no evidence for believing that pre-washing the roasted products improves either gold or silver recoveries.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Product cyanidation using 0.5% NaCN solution; 1 kg of product, 1 L of solution, 50 g of lime; 0.17 and 4.32 g NaCN were added to the pulp at times A and B, respectively.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Cyanidation using 0.5% NaCN solution and the product milled to <0.3 mm; 1 kg of product, 1 L of solution, 50 g of lime; 0.13 and 3.93 g NaCN were added to the pulp at times A and B, respectively.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Product cyanidation using 2.5% NaCN solution; 1 kg of product, 1 L of solution, 71 g of lime; 25 g NaCN were added to the pulp at time A. Au recovery = 61.2%.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Product cyanidation using 1.25% NaCN solution; 1 kg of product, 2 L of solution, 54 g of lime; 20 g NaCN were added to the pulp at time A. Au recovery = 64.3%.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Product cyanidation using 0.5% NaCN solution; 1 kg of product roasted at 700 ºC, 2 L of solution, 18 g of lime; 400 mL of water and 2 g NaCN were added to the pulp at time A. Au recovery = 93.4%.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Sulphur in the products roasted under different conditions.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Mean gold recovery 95% confidence intervals from cyanida- tion tests with different roasted products.

Figure 11 .
Figure 11.Mean silver recovery 95% confidence intervals from cyani- dation tests with different roasted products.

Table 1 .
Product size distribution analysis.

Table 2 .
Chemical composition of several product fractions.

Table 3 .
Results of product froth flotation tests.

Table 4 .
Lime consumption with roasted products, kg/ton.
Au and Ag av er age re cov er ies in roasted prod ucts cyanidation, %.