Abstract
This article aims to provide more and better evidence regarding the degree and nature of the interaction of countries within global value chains (GVCs), based on metrics compatible with the international fragmentation of production. The main focus is on the Chinese specialization pattern in vertically integrated production networks. Our results suggest that China’s production has advanced to other stages located more at the beginning/bottom of the GVC, while increasing its importance in cross-country production sharing and becoming less dependent of intermediate imports embodied in its exports. The decline in re-exported intermediate imports in China was not translated into lesser diversification of its exports. On the contrary, China has climbed the ladder of production complexity, while becoming more integrated into world trade and relying less and less on imported inputs, as well as becoming more competitive in the production of components.
Keywords:
global value chains; international competitiveness; vertical specialization patterns; China
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016).
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016).
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016).
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016).
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016).
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016).
Source: Own elaboration based on WIOD (release 2013) data. Note: We use
Source: Own elaboration based on WIOD (release 2013) data. Note: We use
Source: own elaboration based on WIOD (release 2013) data. Note: we use
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016) and TiVA Nowcast Estimates.
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016) and Simoes and Hidalgo (2011). Notes: (1) each dot represents a country-year combination. Due to unavailability of ECI data, six countries (Taiwan, Malta, Cyprus, Brunei, Luxembourg, and Iceland) were withdrawn from the sample, which was based on all other TiVA countries.
Source: Own elaboration based on OECD-WTO TiVA database (December 2016) and Simoes and Hidalgo (2011). Note: (1) due to unavailability of ECI data, six countries (Taiwan, Malta, Cyprus, Brunei, Luxembourg, and Iceland) were withdrawn from the sample, which was based on all other TiVA countries.