Relative growth and morphometry of sagittae otoliths of weakfishes, Cynoscion guatucupa (Cuvier, 1830) and Cynoscion jamaicensis (Vaillant & Bocourt, 1883), in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean, Brazil

The weakfishes, Cynoscion guatucupa and C . jamaicensis , are important demersal fishery resources and are targeted by multifleet operations in the Southwest Atlantic. This study describes the length-weight relationships between sagittae otoliths (length-O L , height-O H , thickness-O T, and weight-O WT ) and the sizes of the fish (total length-L T , standard length-L S , and total weight-W T ). The proportion between otolith length and height (aspect ratio-O AR ) was also compared between species. The samples were obtained monthly from March 2017 to February 2018 from small-scale commercial fisheries from landings of bottom trawls and gillnets on the continental shelf in the Rio de Janeiro state, southeastern coast of Brazil. The ANCOVA did not indicate significant differences in relative growth between sexes for both species ( p > 0.05) while the length frequency was different ( p < 0.001). Cynoscion guatucupa showed positive allometry, W T = 4E-06L T3.21 and C. jamaicensis negative allometry, W T = 2E-05L T2.90 ( p < 0.05). Both species showed differences in the condition factor between the sexes ( p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the measurements of the otoliths between the two species ( p < 0.001). All regressions between fish measurements and otolith morphometry were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for both species. The best estimates of fish size and weight were rela-ted to the otolith length: O L vs L T (r² = 0.93; 0.96); O L vs L S (r² = 0.92; 0.96); O L vs W T (r² = 0.91; 0.93) for C. guatucupa and C. jamaicensis , respectively. This information adds useful biological data for multiple types of studies, e.g ., food ecology (prey-predator), age and growth, reproduction, fisheries assessment and long-term landing monitoring. Our results confirmed the historical pattern of relative growth, supporting that otolith growth reflects the somatic growth of weakfishes in the study area, reinforcing the importance to determine these reference points. Abstract


INTRODUCTION
Otoliths are complex, metabolically inert, intermittently growing polycrystalline structures located in the inner ear of bony fish (Volpedo and Vaz dos Santos, 2015).They are responsible for balance in the water column and sound detection (Popper et al., 2005).They function as phenotypic markers (Tuset et al., 2008;Volpedo et al., 2017), with morphological and morphometric patterns that have been used in paleontological studies (Aguilera et al., 2013;Klokler, 2020), trophic ecology of 2 Mendonça et al. piscivores (Bustos et al., 2014;Miotto et al., 2017), stock identification (Avigliano et al., 2015;Zischke et al., 2016), habitat use (Avigliano et al., 2014;Carvalho et al., 2017), populational connectivity (Teimori et al., 2012;Davoren and Halden, 2014), and estimates of age and growth parameters (Vazdos-Santos and Rossi-Wongtschowski, 2019).Morphometric studies between species make it possible to expand the use of otoliths as key elements for understanding species and populations.The use of bivariate morphometry has been widely used to describe the relationships between fish; using otolith measurements is common (Vaz-dos- Santos et al., 2007;Perin and Vaz-dos-Santos 2014;Carvalho et al., 2014), including lengthweight relationships (Tuset et al. 2003a, Lega et al., 2013).The combination of the allometric model with the study of this structure, which formed during the early development of fish, produces a powerful and precise estimate (Campana, 2001).
Length-weight relationship models (LWR) are considered an important tool in the study of fisheries biology, as they provide baseline information for estimating growth rates, age and other components of population dynamics (Haimovici and Velasco, 2000;Giariizzo et al., 2015;Barradas et al., 2016;Costa et al., 2018).The knowledge of two biological parameters (linear a and allometric b, coefficients) provided by LWRs allows indirect estimates of different population characteristics, such as: i) determination of fish weight using a given length or vice versa; ii) analysis of the growth pattern as a function of the allometric coefficient, comparing populations from different regions and environmental conditions; iii) assessment of biomass and body conditions as an indicator of the species' well-being and developmental performance (i.e.evidence of fat accumulation and gonad development) (Froese et al., 2011).Based on the condition factor (K), inferences can be made about recent nutritional status and energy investments in cyclical activities, such as reproduction and migration, making it possible to relate environmental conditions to the behavioral aspects of the species (Vazzoller, 1996;Van Dijk et al., 2005).In this way, populations in different climatic and food situations can be compared, reproductive cycles and food activity identified, evaluating the efficiency of the use of different food sources (Weatherley, 1972).
The shape and size of the otoliths represent a pattern among bony fish families, usually species-specific (Harvey, 2000;Tuset et al., 2008).Studies demonstrating a positive correlation between otolith length and fish length and weight are common (Battaglia et al., 2010;Souza et al., 2019;Chanthran et al., 2020).Variations may occur between species and individuals, due to physiological or exogenous factors (Volpedo and Echeverría, 1999;Lombarte et al., 2003).Although many studies address these variations, otolith morphometric studies of weakfishes are scarce with only one study available on Jamaican weakfish, where a physical oceanographic influence is the main factor that affects the relative growth and otolith dimensions (Spach and Yamaguti, 1989a, b).
Sciaenidae is a family of coastal fish, abundant and widely distributed in the Southwest Atlantic, which includes some of the most important species in fisheries on the inner continental shelf of southeastern Brazil (Vazzoller et al., 1999).They have a majority share in demersal landings in small, medium and large-scale fisheries, either as target species for gillnet and bottom trawl fleets or as bycatch in shrimp fisheries (MPA, 2010;Chao et al., 2015;FIPERJ, 2020).In general, juveniles occur in estuaries and coastal lagoons, while adults inhabit the inner continental shelf and greater depths (Menezes and Figueiredo, 1980;Fischer et al., 2011).
Popularly known as croakers, drums and weakfishes, sciaenids have relatively large otoliths, with interspecific differences in shape (Monteiro et al., 2005), being considered appropriate models for studies on shape variation and function (Ramcharitar et al., 2001;Cruz and Lombarte, 2004).Otoliths of different species have been used in studies related to allometric variations (Aguirre, 2003;Monteiro et al., 2005;Bervian et al., 2006), correlations between size and sound production (Cruz and Lombarte, 2004), size and habitat use (Hoff and Buiman, 1993;Paxton, 2000), as well as for group systematics (Paxton, 2000) and prey identification, using food items recovered from the digestive tract, feces and regurgitated material from piscivorous animals (Tollit et al., 1997;Granadeiro and Silva, 2000).Mendonça et al.Cynoscion guatucupa (Stripped weakfish, maria-mole or pescada-olhuda in Portuguese) and Cynoscion jamaicensis (Jamaica weakfish or goete in Portuguese) are sciaenids commonly captured by gillnet and bottom trawl fisheries in practically the entire southeastern and southern coast of Brazil (Haimovici and Miranda, 2005;Castro et al., 2005;FIPERJ, 2020).They have a prolonged reproductive period with multiple spawnings (Vazzoler and Braga, 1983;Vieira and Haimovici, 1993).Both are carnivorous and reach about 60 and 40 cm in total length, respectively (Haimovici and Velasco, 2000;Castro et al., 2005), attracting significant commercial interest as target species for small and large-scale fisheries in this Brazilian coastal area (Chao et al., 2015).Between 2017 and 2019, only considering the state of Rio de Janeiro, around 65 tons of C. guatucupa (46 t by bottom trawls and 19 t by gillnets) and 180 tons of C. jamaicensis (120 t by bottom trawls and 60 t by gillnets) were landed (FIPERJ, 2020).Although they represent important resources in terms of landed volume, most of what is known is about the populations of the Southern Brazilian coast, with a focus on age and growth (Vieira and Haimovici, 1993;Castro et al., 2002;Miranda and Haimovici, 2007), reproduction (Vieira and Haimovici, 1997) diet (Rondineli et al., 2007) or assessment of stocks and fisheries in the Southern and Southeastern Brazilian coast (Spach and Yamaguti, 1989a,b;Castro and Petrere Jr., 2001;Volpedo et al., 2007;Alves et al., 2020).The major information available on their biologies for the Southeastern Brazilian coast is derived from the REVIZEE program and other fishing cruises from past decades (Santos, 1963(Santos, , 1968;;Haimovici, 2000;Castro et al., 2002;Cergole et al., 2005).Current information is needed that can contribute to better knowledge and regional management of these resources.
Therefore, this study aims to: a) characterize the length-weight relationships (LWR) and condition factor (k) of weakfishes; b) evaluate possible differences between sexes and species; and c) characterize the relationships between the dimensions of the sagittae otolith and the length and weight of the fish.From this information, we provide useful data for regional studies of age and growth, reproduction, evaluation and management of these species.These results may serve as references for future comparisons to monitoring and can also be used by researchers studying the eating habits of top predators to determine the size and weight of prey-fish or reconstruction of trophic webs from recovered otoliths.

Sampling and data acquisition
The specimens were collected monthly between March 2017 and February 2018 from small-scale fishing landings occurring next to the Municipal Fish Market of Macaé, located on the northern coast of Rio de Janeiro state, Southeastern Brazilian coast.Commercial fisheries were carried out with small-scale bottom trawlers and gillnets, in coastal waters between 15 and 50 meters deep (between Cabo de São Tomé 21°50'S and Cabo Frio 22°50'S) (Figure 1).This region is characterized by seasonal coastal upwelling events of the South Atlantic Central Water mass (SACW) caused by northeasterly winds, occurring more intensely during spring and summer (Valentin et al., 1987;Pantaleão et al., 2016).
All specimens were identified using regional identification literature (Figueiredo, 1992;Menezes et al., 2003) and measured at Total Length (L T , ± 1 mm), Standard Length (L S , ± 1 mm) and Total Weight (W T , ± 1 g).Sexes were determined macroscopically by examining the gonads using the standard classification (Brown-Peterson et al., 2011).The otoliths were extracted, cleaned, dried and placed in numbered microtubes with silica gel pellets.The otoliths were measured with a digital caliper (0.01 mm) and weighed (O WT ) with a precision electronic balance (0.00001 g).O L (length) was considered the greatest distance between the tip of the rostrum and the posterior margin; O H (height) as the greatest distance between the dorsal and ventral margins; and O T (thickness) the greatest distance between the proximal and distal faces of the otolith, in the region of the nucleus (Lombarte and Tuset, 2015).The otolith aspect ratio (O AR ) was calculated by dividing O L by O H (Figure 2).

Data analysis
The measured data were previously tested for normality and homoscedasticity of variance, and nonparametric analyses were performed whenever the prerequisites for normality were not met (Zar, 2010).Differences in lengths (L T , L S ) and in total weight (W T ) were tested between species and sexes using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05).L T values were distributed in a 20 mm size class and differences in sex ratio were determined using the chi-square test (χ 2 , p < 0.05), followed by Yates correction (Zar, 2010).
The length-weight relationship (LWR) was described by the potential model: W T = aT L b .Data were transformed into decimal logarithms for estimates of parameters a and b, where a corresponds to the linear coefficient (related to body shape) and b corresponds to the angular or allometric coefficient (related to isometric growth) (Froese, 2006).For each b, the Student's t-test (t = b-ß o /s b ) is the was applied to test the hypothesis that the calculated value was equal to 3.0 (Zar, 2010); where b is the parameter estimate, ß o is Mendonça et al. the parameter value hypothesized, and s b is the standard error of parameter estimate.The 95% confidence intervals (CI) of a and b were also estimated.All outliers observed in the regression were excluded to better fit the model.Linear regression models were compared between sexes using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA, p < 0.05) (Zar, 2010).The physiological condition was quantitatively estimated through the condition factor (K), from the equation: K = W T /L T b , where k is the allometric condition factor and b is the coefficient of the potential equation of the LWR of males and females (Huxley, 1924).K values between sexes were compared using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test (KW, p < 0.05).
No significant differences were found between the dimensions measured in the right and left otolith using the paired Student's t-test (p < 0.05) (Volpedo and Tompson, 1996).In this study, only data from the left otolith were used.The relationships between the dimensions measured in the otoliths (O L , O H , O T , O WT ) and the length-weight of the fish (L T , L S , W T ) were determined using the least squares method, in linear regressions of decimal logarithms of the  (Battaglia et al., 2010).
The coefficient of determination (r 2 ) was used to verify the agreement between the models and the data collected.The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare otolith measurements between

RESULTS
Significant differences were evident in body lengths and total weight between the two species (p < 0.001) (Table 1).The highest values of L T , L S and W T were recorded for the stripped weakfish, Cynoscion guatucupa.
A total of 807 specimens of C. jamaicensis were obtained for this study: 376 females, 376 males and 55 individuals with undetermined sexes.The L T range varied between 108 and 345 mm (234.5 ± 49 mm), L S between 80 and 299 mm (198.1 ± 43 mm)  and W T between 13.5 and 544 g (188.8 ± 115.8 g).Significant differences were verified between the sexes, with males larger (KW LT , H = 10.82,p < 0.001; KW LS , H = 11.24,p < 0.001) and heavier (KW LT, H= 11.43; p < 0.001).A similar pattern was observed in the L T structure for both sexes, with approximately 53% of females and 57% of males occurring between classes of L T 130 and 230 mm (Figure 3).Despite the balance observed in the sex ratio (1:1), significant differences were observed between the L T 190 mm (female predominance) and 230 mm (male predominance) classes (χ 2 = 8.82, p < 0.05; χ 2 = 8.16, p < 0.05).
The relationships between fish size and sagittae otolith dimensions were described using potential regression models between the measures, being statistically different (p < 0.05).The determination coefficients ranged between 0.81 and 0.96 for C. guatucupa, and C. jamaicensis from 0.63 to 0.94 (Table 2).The best equations obtained to determine the size and weight of the weakfishes were related to the length of the otolith (Figure 5  The shape of the sagittae otoliths of both species is elliptical, but the significant differences in the ratio O L /O H (p < 0.05) showed an elongated shape for C. guatucupa and a more robust shape in C. jamaicensis.In both species rostrum and antirostrum are absent.

DISCUSSION
Our results may serve as a reference point for future comparisons aimed to understand the effects and causes of the spatio-temporal variations and fishing pressure on the stocks of weakfishes.The estimates of relative growth may vary in the same species (i.e., C. jamaicensis) and between species (i.e., C. guatucupa and C. jamaicensis), and represent a suitable tool for understanding the variability of fish stocks.The strong correlation between size and weight and otolith dimensions and Mendonça et al. fish sizes, indicates that the models obtained are robust predictors for estimating fish length from the morphometry of the otoliths.Likewise, Smoliński and Berg (2022) showed that the fish length-scale size relationship of Atlantic herring varies over time and between cohorts.They attribute this variation to changing environmental conditions, more specifically the temperature that presented a negative effect on stock total biomass and a positive effect on fish length when conditioned on scale size.Thus, the use of these relationships has been useful in fisheries biology, supporting other population estimates as well as stock assessment analyses.
The length structure obtained here for the two species is following the pattern described in other studies, where the greatest lengths and weights recorded for southeastern and southern Brazil are associated with the Stripped weakfish, C. guatucupa (Haimovici and Miranda, 2005;Castro et al., 2005).In contrast, Alves et al. (2020) reported that the Jamaica weakfish C. jamaicensis presents rapid growth, early maturation and small size in southern Brazil.Adults of both species perform seasonal movements along the Brazilian coast.The Striped weakfish moves north during the autumn and spring (April-September), leaving important fishing areas in Uruguay and Argentina, arriving on the southern Brazilian coast, then returning south during the summer (Miranda and Haimovici, 2007).The spatio-temporal distribution was also observed for the most age classes, with a higher proportion of juveniles (immature) using estuarine waters, while adults prefer more saline and deeper areas (Macchi and Acha, 1998;Jaureguizar et al., 2006).The Jamaica weakfish is clinal in nature, with occurrence limited to waters down to 17 °C, moving towards its southern limit of distribution (34°S) following the penetration of warm Tropical Water of Brazil Current towards the south in spring and summer (September-February) (Vazzoler and Braga, 1983;Spach and Yamaguti, 1989a).Both species are captured by a wide variety of fishing gear (e.g., shrimp nets -Cazorla, 2000; recreational fisheries -Volpedo, 2000; bottom trawls and gillnets - Cergole et al., 2005, Perez Comesaña et al., 2014;paired-trawls -Miranda and Haimovici, 2007;and Beach-seines -Costa et al., 2018).The selectivity of each gear type determines the size of the population structure based on capture data.According to Fonteles-Filho (2011), fishing exploits only that portion that is accessible to fishing gear, the catchable stock.However, this is made up of the adult stock plus a part of the young stock, making up the total catch.From these data, we can assume that both the size and weight of the fish represent variables dependent upon each other in such a way that the variation in one is reflected in the other.
The variability in responses to changes in environmental conditions is of fundamental importance in the evolutionary fitness of species (Melbinger and Vergassola, 2015).The estimated lengthweight relationships (LWR) showed values of the coefficients a and b like those reported in the literature for the same region of this study (Haimovici and Miranda, 2005;Castro et al., 2005).Our results show an opposite pattern between species, with negative allometric growth for C. guatucupa and positive allometric growth for C. jamaicensis.The LWR showed no significant differences between males and females for both species.Despite factors such as structure in size and gonadal maturity influence this relationship (Fonteles-Filho, 2011), we believe that this absence of differences occurs because fishing fleets operate in shallow areas, up to 50 m, of the inner continental shelf of the northern coast of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil (FIPERJ, 2020); there, juveniles and adults share the same habitat, with the predominance of adults associated with the selectivity of the fishing gear and also with the selectivity of fishermen, seeking commercial-sized fish.
The differences observed between this and other studies, can be attributed to a combination of factors such as, the number of specimens examined, size structure, gonadal maturity, selectivity of gear and fishermen and local environmental factors (Hossain et al., 2014).Segura et al. (2012) observed a value of b = 2.92, obtained in Uruguay for individuals from 360 to 450 mm in total length (L T ), for C. guatucupa.Haimovici and Velasco (2000), also recorded negative allometric growth (b = 2.77), slightly lower for samples collected off Rio Grande do Sul (L T : 58 -575 mm).Nonetheless, Muto et al. (2000) 2.92, values like those reported here, even though having included smaller fish (L T : 47 -389 mm).For C. jamaicensis observed in mangrove areas in the northern region of the Brazilian coast, the value of b was 3.13, with a total length range from 20 to 216 mm (Joyeux et al., 2008).Although also collecting only small individuals (L T : 29 -185 mm) in the Southern Brazilian coast (coast of Paraná state), Passos et al. (2012) have obtained b values like those reported for the North Brazilian coast (b = 3.13).Haimovici and Velasco (2000) also recorded positive allometric growth (b = 3,14) for samples collected in Rio Grande do Sul (L T : 140 -329 mm).For the southeastern coast of Brazil, Vianna et al. (2004) reported b = 3.17 -365 mm).The differences observed in the LWR between these species reflect distinct life history characteristics and contrary seasonal displacement patterns, being influenced by environmental conditions and differential habitat use, which affect food availability and consequently the energy directed to reproduction and the reproductive dynamics themselves (Longhurst and Pauly, 2007).
The LWR and the condition of individuals can be influenced by several intrinsic and extrinsic factors (Perin and Vaz-dos-Santos, 2014).Therefore, the variations in the condition factor (K) of both species can be correlated with total length range, reproductive period, seasons, sex of individuals, age, sexual maturity, food availability, sample size, and type of fishing gear (Haimovici and Velasco, 2000).This index (K) represents all biotic and abiotic interactions responsible for the well-being of individuals, i.e., an indicator either of the recent nutritional conditions of fish or of the accumulation of energy of individuals, related to the expenditure of reserves in cyclic activities such as reproduction (Vazzoler, 1996).The differences observed between the sexes (males showing higher K than females), occurred for both species, suggesting that, in general, males invest less energy in gonadal development than in somatic growth, especially in adult individuals.However, investigations about the reproductive aspects of these populations are necessary for better statements; it is expected that the highest values of K are proportional to the largest individuals and to the sexual maturity of the adult individuals.
The morphometry of otoliths (e.g., O L , O H , O T , O WT , O AR ) usually involves dimensions that are correlated with each other and are commonly also correlated with the size and weight of the fish (L T , L S , W T ).These correlations found in this study were expected, as similar records for otolith dimensions and somatic growth have been documented for different species groups and fish stocks (e.g.Battaglia et al., 2010;Munk, 2012;Souza et al., 2019).Some studies observed that fish growth rate can influence otolith size, reinforcing the link between fish size and otolith size (Huuskonen and Karjalainen, 1998).Our data demonstrate a strong association between O L vs L T (r 2 = 0.93; 0.96), O L vs L S (r 2 = 0.92; 0.96), O L vs W T (r 2 = 0.91; 0.93); and O L vs O WT (r 2 = 0.94; 0.96) both for C. guatucupa and C. jamaicensis, respectively.Therefore, documenting the connection between otolith and fish dimensions may help to reinforce standardized age-reading criteria in future investigations (Munk, 2012).
For the Atlantic coast off Argentina (35º -41ºS), the morphometric relationships between the dimensions of the sagittae otolith and the length and weight of C. guatucupa were determined by Baldás et al. (1997), Waessle et al. 2003, andPerez Comesaña et al. (2014).In Brazil (between 20º18'S -32º10'S), only the previous study by Spach and Yamaguti, (1989b) records variations in the morphometry of sagittae otoliths of C. jamaicensis (L T : 70 -280 mm), with the determining coefficients of the relationship O L vs L S ranging between: r 2 = 0.93 and 0.98.For all these authors, there is consensus that the otolith can be a good predictor of fish size (LT, LS, WT).Spach and Yamaguti, (1989b) observed that C. jamaicensis showed differences between the southeastern and southern regions of Brazil, both in the relative growth and in the dimensions of the otoliths.They attributed these differences to the oceanographic conditions of each region (e.g., temperature and food availability) and the clinal nature of the morphometric variations of the species, which occupies areas with different environmental conditions along the southeastern Brazilian coast, avoiding cold waters during winter.Volpedo (2001) Somatic-otolith size correlations for weakfishes Ocean and Coastal Research 2022, v70:e22036 11 Mendonça et al. registered, for C. guatucupa on the Buenos Aires coast, a negative correlation with the temperature and a positive with salinity and latitude with the morphometric characteristics of the otoliths.She concludes that larger otoliths occur in low temperature and high latitude environments.Thus understanding this relationship is fundamental for conservation studies and the assessment of fish stocks.
The scarcity of these studies for the Brazilian coast limits the possibility of other direct comparisons with the results presented here.Despite this, the samples analyzed from the large number of individuals collected, in different strata of length, also allowed a good accuracy of the coefficients of determination, reducing the possibility of bias in the derivation of the equations and confirming the good application of this tool.Furthermore, this framework based on mathematical models provides support for taxonomic identification from sagittae otoliths, including studies related to feeding ecology (prey-predator), as well as age and growth, geographic variations, and a possible influences of environmental factors.

CONCLUSION
In this study, we confirmed that otoliths and body (length and weight) sizes are efficient variables for monitoring weakfishes on the Southeastern Brazilian coast, given that the development of the body and the otolith may reflect changes in the other indicators of stock health.Here we provide a descriptive note that may serve as a reference point and may support future studies to assess the potential for using these data in regional investigations to estimate some life-history parameters (e.g., age and von Bertalanffy coefficient growth -k, size at maturity -L50, and gonadosomatic index -IGS) of these commercial important sciaenids.Our data indicated a species-specific pattern, which can be confirmed using analytical tools based exclusively on morphology, complementing the potential use of these rigid structures in the taxonomic identification of these species and the eventual distinction between fish stocks.This study was developed from a partnership between the "Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade (NUPEM/UFRJ)", within the scope of the "Projeto MULTIPESCA: Ciência para a sustentabilidade da pesca, pescado e pescadores do Rio de Janeiro" and the "Laboratório de Biologia do Nécton e Ecologia Pesqueira" (ECOPESCA/UFF -Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Marinha e Ambientes Costeiros-PPG-BMAC/UFF). ABB received a PhD grant from "Projeto MULTIPESCA" and actually is financied by Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ; process E-26/204.455/2021).
All the steps carried out on the premises of the Fluminense Federal University (UFF) were performed with the assistance of the "Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program" (PIBIC/UFF) and "Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel" (CAPES), where P. Mendonça holds a PhD's degree scholarship.The Project "MULTIPESCA: Ciência para a sustentabilidade da pesca, pescado e pescadores do Rio de Janeiro" is an environmental offset measure established through a Consent Decree/Conduct Adjustment Agreement between PetroRio and the Brazilian Ministry for the Environment, with the FUNBIO as an implementer.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.The northern coast of Rio de Janeiro (southeastern Brazilian coast) shows Macaé, 22OS -41OW (fishery landing site) and the main small-scale fishery area (in gray bordered by the dashed line).The continuous line represents the isobaths: 10, 20, 50, and 100 meters deep.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. LWRs and regressions lines for pooled sexes of Cynoscion guatucupa, x (n = 740) and Cynoscion jamaicensis, o (n = 752) obtained from gillnet and bottom trawl small-scale fisheries in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazil).Continuous gray line indicates the regression line for C. guatucupa.Dotted black line indicates regression for C. jamaicenses.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Relationships between fish sizes and sagittae otolith measurements of Cynoscion guatucupa (x) and Cynoscion jamaicensis (o) obtained from gillnet and bottom trawl small-scale fisheries in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazil).
, when collecting off the southeastern coast of Brazil, recorded b = Somatic-otolith size correlations for weakfishes Ocean and Coastal Research 2022, v70:e22036 10 Mendonça et al.
(LT: 80 -260 mm); Muto et al. (2000) b = 3.14 (LT: 32 -274 mm); and Castro et al. (2005) b = 3.14 (LT: 110 parameters (x -y): O L vs L T ; O L vs L S ; O L vs W T ; O L vs O WT ; O L vs O H ; O L vs O T ; W T vs O WT ; O T vs O H ; O WT vs O T ; O WT vs O H
vs L T ; O L vs L S ; O L vs W T ; O L vs O H ; O L vs O T ; O T vs O WT ; O WT vs W T (Table