O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o crescimento e a produção de bananeiras com resistência à sigatoka-negra, em comparação ao desempenho de cultivares tradicionais suscetíveis à doença. Vinte cultivares foram plantadas no planalto Jaguaribe-Apodi, no Nordeste do Brasil: 15 com resistência à sigatoka-negra, a saber, Pacovan Ken, PV42-68, BRS Vitória, BRS Japira, BRS Preciosa, BRS Garantida, Thap Maeo, BRS Tropical, BRS Platina, BRS Maravilha, FHIA 02, FHIA 18, Galil 18, Caipira e Buccaneer; e cinco suscetíveis à doença, a saber, Williams, Grande Naine, Pacovan, Prata Anã e Maçã. O crescimento e a produção de cachos das bananeiras foram avaliados durante três ciclos sucessivos. 'BRS Tropical' e 'Caipira' podem substituir 'Maçã', que é bastante suscetível à murcha de Fusarium. As cultivares BRS Maravilha, BRS Platina, FHIA 02, FHIA 18 e Galil 18 apresentam porte adequado e alto potencial de rendimento, sendo alternativas ao tradicional subgrupo Prata. Já a cultivar Buccaneer é alternativa às cultivares suscetíveis do subgrupo Cavendish e pode ser explorada em agrossistema irrigado.

Termos para indexação:
Musa; Mycosphaerella fijiensis; cultivares de bananeira; sigatoka-negra

Autoria

Olmar Baller Weber

Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Rua Dra. Sara Mesquita, no 2.270, Planalto do Pici, CEP 60511-110 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. E-mail: olmar.weber@embrapa.br, deborah.garruti@embrapa.brEmbrapa Agroindústria TropicalBrazilFortaleza, CE, BrazilEmbrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Rua Dra. Sara Mesquita, no 2.270, Planalto do Pici, CEP 60511-110 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. E-mail: olmar.weber@embrapa.br, deborah.garruti@embrapa.br

Deborah dos Santos Garruti

Normândia Pereira Norões

Frutacor, Distrito Irrigado de Jaguaribe-Apodi, Quadra 02, s/no, CEP 62930-000 Limoeiro do Norte, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: normandianoroes@hotmail.comFrutacorBrazilLimoeiro do Norte, Ceará, BrazilFrutacor, Distrito Irrigado de Jaguaribe-Apodi, Quadra 02, s/no, CEP 62930-000 Limoeiro do Norte, Ceará, Brazil. E-mail: normandianoroes@hotmail.com

Sebastião de Oliveira e Silva

Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Rua Embrapa, s/no, Caixa Postal 007, CEP 44380-000 Cruz das Almas, BA, Brazil. E-mail: ssilva3000@gmail.comEmbrapa Mandioca e FruticulturaBrazilCruz das Almas, BA, BrazilEmbrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Rua Embrapa, s/no, Caixa Postal 007, CEP 44380-000 Cruz das Almas, BA, Brazil. E-mail: ssilva3000@gmail.com

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Figuras | Tabelas

Figuras (2)
Tabelas (4)

Thumbnail

Figure 1:
Dendrogram constructed by the cluster analysis (UPGMA) of banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil. Dissimilarity generated with the average values of the agronomic variables evaluated during the three production cycles.

Thumbnail

Figure 2:
Principal component analysis with average values from the three production cycles for: banana (Musa spp.) plant height from the ground up to the point of emission of the bunch (BPH); diameter of the base of the pseudostem (PD); fresh weight of fruits (FW), of hands (HW), and of bunches without stalks (BW); number of hands (HN) and of fruits in the bunch (FN); number of days from planting to harvest of the first bunch (Cycle); and number of green leaves in the flowering phase (GLN). F1, first component; and F2, second component.

Thumbnail

Table 1:
Traits of the banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil.

Thumbnail

Table 2:
Plant height from the ground up to the point of emission of the bunch (BPH), diameter of the base of the pseudostem (PD), number of green leaves at the flowering stage (GLN), and number of hands (HN) and of fruits in the bunch (FN) of banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil1ABDI, H.; WILLIAMS, L.J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, v.2, p.433-459, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/wics.101.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101... .

Thumbnail

Table 3:
Period from planting to harvest, as well as fresh weight of hands (HW), of fruits (FW), and of bunches without stalks (BW) of the banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil⁽¹⁾.

Thumbnail

Table 4:
Correlation matrix among the studied variables of banana (Mus a spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil⁽¹⁾.

Figure 1: Dendrogram constructed by the cluster analysis (UPGMA) of banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil. Dissimilarity generated with the average values of the agronomic variables evaluated during the three production cycles.

Figure 2: Principal component analysis with average values from the three production cycles for: banana (Musa spp.) plant height from the ground up to the point of emission of the bunch (BPH); diameter of the base of the pseudostem (PD); fresh weight of fruits (FW), of hands (HW), and of bunches without stalks (BW); number of hands (HN) and of fruits in the bunch (FN); number of days from planting to harvest of the first bunch (Cycle); and number of green leaves in the flowering phase (GLN). F1, first component; and F2, second component.

Table 1: Traits of the banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil.

Cultivar	Group	Subgroup	Genealogy (origin)⁽¹⁾	Sensibility to plant diseases
Pacovan Ken	AAAB	Prata	Pacovan hybrid (AAB) x M 53 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
PV42-68	AAAB	Prata	Pacovan hybrid (AAB) x M 53 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
BRS Vitória	AAAB	Prata	Pacovan hybrid (AAB) x M 53 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
BRS Japira	AAAB	Prata	Pacovan hybrid (AAB) x M 53 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
BRS Preciosa	AAAB	Prata	Pacovan hybrid (AAB) x M 53 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
BRS Garantida	AAAB	Prata	Prata São Tomé hybrid from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
Thap Maeo	AAB	Mysore	Mysore-type cultivar from Thailand and Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
BRS Tropical	AAAB	Prata	Yangambi hybrid 02 x M 53 from Embrapa, Brazil	Moderately resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt
BRS Platina	AAAB	Prata	Prata Anã hybrid (AAB) x M53 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt
BRS Maravilha	AAAB	Prata	Prata Anã hybrid (AAB) x SH31-42 (AA) from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD and Fusarium wilt, and moderately resistant to YS⁽³⁾
FHIA 02⁽⁴⁾	AAAB	Prata	FHIA hybrid from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt
FHIA 18	AAAB	Prata	FHIA hybrid from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, moderately resistant do YS, and susceptible to Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾
Galil 18	AAAB	Prata	FHIA hybrid from Multiplanta, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD⁽⁵⁾
Buccaneer	AAAA	Gros Michel	High Gate hybrid from Jamaica and Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt
Caipira	AAA	Ibota	Cultivar from Embrapa, Brazil	Resistant to BLSD, YS, and Fusarium wilt
Pacovan	AAB	Prata	Cultivar from Embrapa, Brazil	Susceptible to BLSD and YS, and moderately susceptible to Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾ (Foc, race 1).
Prata Anã	AAB	Prata	Cultivar from Embrapa, Brazil	Susceptible to BLSD and YS, and moderately susceptible to Fusarium wilt⁽²⁾ (Foc, race 1)
Maçã	AAB	Prata	Cultivar from Embrapa, Brazil	Susceptible to BLSD and Fusarium wilt⁽³⁾, and moderately resistant to YS⁽⁵⁾
Williams	AAA	Cavendish	Cultivar from Embrapa, Brazil	Susceptible to BLSD and YS, and resistant to Fusarium wilt⁽³⁾ (Foc, race 1)
Grande Naine	AAA	Cavendish	Cultivar from Embrapa, Brazil	Susceptible to BLSD and YS, and resistant to Fusarium wilt⁽³⁾ (Foc, race 1)

⁽¹⁾Embrapa, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Brazil); and Multiplanta, Multiplanta Tecnologia Vegetal Ltda. ⁽²⁾According to Borges et al. (2009)BORGES, A.L.; SILVA, A.L. da; BATISTA, D. da C.; MOREIRA, F.R.B.; FLORI, J.E.; OLIVEIRA, J.E. de M.; ARAÚJO, J.L.P.; PINTO, J.M.; CASTRO, J.M. da C. e; MOURA, M.S.B. de; AZOUBEL, P.M.; CUNHA, T.J.F.; SILVA, S. de O. e; CORDEIRO, Z.J.M. Sistema de produção da bananeira irrigada. 2009. (Embrapa Semiárido. Sistemas de produção, 4). Available at: <Available at: https://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Banana/BananeiraIrrigada/index.htm >. Accessed on: June 3 2016.
https://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrap... . ⁽³⁾According to Cunha et al. (2015)CUNHA C.M.S.; HINZ, R.H.; PEREIRA, A.; TCACENCO, F.A.; PAULINO, E.C.; STADNIK, M.J. A SCAR marker for identifying susceptibility to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in banana. Scientia Horticulturae, v.191, p.108-112, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.038.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.0... . ⁽⁴⁾FHIA 02 belongs to the Prata subgroup (Jesus et al., 2013JESUS, O.N. de; SILVA, S. de O. e; AMORIM, E.P.; FERREIRA, C.F.; CAMPOS, J.M.S. de; SILVA, G. de. Genetic diversity and population structure of Musa accessions in ex situ conservation. BMC Plant Biology, v.13, p.1-22, 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-41.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-41... ). ⁽⁵⁾According to Costa et al. (2012)COSTA, F. da S.; COELHO, E.F.; BORGES, A.L.; PAMPONET, A.J.M.; SILVA, A. dos A.S.M. da; AZEVEDO, N.F. de. Crescimento, produção e acúmulo de potássio em bananeira 'Galil 18' sob irrigação e fertilização potássica. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.47, p.409-416, 2012. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2012000300013.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X201200... . BLSD, black leaf streak disease; YS, yellow Sigatoka; and Foc, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense fungus.

Table 2: Plant height from the ground up to the point of emission of the bunch (BPH), diameter of the base of the pseudostem (PD), number of green leaves at the flowering stage (GLN), and number of hands (HN) and of fruits in the bunch (FN) of banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil1ABDI, H.; WILLIAMS, L.J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, v.2, p.433-459, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/wics.101.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101... .

Banana cultivar

BPH (m)

PD (cm)

GLN

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Pacovan Ken

3.8bA

4.7dB

5.6dC

27.8aA

34.2bB

37.8cC

14.3bA

13.0bA

10.3aA

7.3aA

8.3bA

9.5aB

113.6aA

126.6aA

156.8aB

PV42-68

3.8bA

5.3dB

6.0dC

29.1aA

35.1bB

38.5cC

12.8bB

12.9bB

9.1aA

7.2aA

8.1bA

9.0aB

104.4aA

124.9aA

139.3aA

BRS Vitória

4.0bA

4.5cA

5.7dB

28.5aA

31.6aB

35.3cC

12.9bB

12.0bB

9.0aA

7.1aA

8.6bB

8.8aB

107.3aA

128.9aA

137.1aA

BRS Japira

4.0bA

4.9dB

6.0dC

27.9aA

32.4bB

38.6cC

14.4bA

14.0bA

8.9aA

7.5aA

8.4bA

8.8aA

110.9aA

126.8aA

130.0aA

BRS Preciosa

3.7bA

4.3cB

5.8dC

26.7aA

33.0bB

38.3cC

11.8aA

11.0aA

9.9aA

6.8aA

8.7bB

8.9aB

98.3aA

137.8aB

140.9aB

BRS Garantida

3.6bA

4.4cB

5.8dC

24.9aA

31.6aB

38.1cB

12.3bB

10.3aA

9.8aA

6.6aA

7.0aA

8.3aB

88.9aA

111.4aB

124.9aB

Thap Maeo

3.5bA

3.7bA

5.1cB

27.2aA

30.2aA

37.1cB

11.7aA

11.9bA

12.1aA

11.3cA

12.9dB

15.8dC

204.0cA

237.3cB

278.7dC

BRS Tropical

3.7bA

3.9bA

4.3bB

33.6bA

33.8bA

33.8cA

13.2bB

11.9bB

9.0aA

7.3aB

7.2aB

7.6aB

134.3bA

132.2aA

137.8aA

BRS Platina

2.9aA

3.7bB

4.1bB

26.9aA

33.3bB

37.0cC

11.8aA

11.2aA

10.2aA

8.2bA

9.1bA

10.8bB

120.3aA

140.3aA

178.5bB

BRS Maravilha

2.8aA

3.4bB

4.3bC

26.0aA

32.5bB

37.5cC

10.3aA

8.9aA

9.3aA

10.2cA

10.8cA

12.1cB

153.3bA

182.8bB

213.2cC

FHIA 02

2.6aA

3.6bB

4.2bC

25.9aA

33.2bB

36.0cB

10.2aA

10.3aA

8.8aA

10.3cA

11.2cB

12.1cB

155.6bA

179.3bA

217.8cB

FHIA 18

2.8bA

3.5bB

4.2bC

26.1aA

32.3bB

36.4cC

10.6aA

10.0aA

9.9aA

10.0cA

10.5cA

13.2cB

152.3bA

175.2bA

226.6cB

Galil 18

3.2aA

4.1cB

4.1bB

32.6bA

36.7bB

36.7cB

10.8aA

10.9aA

10.1cA

10.8cA

12.0cB

167.8bA

164.8bA

180.0bA

Buccaneer

2.8aA

3.7bB

4.2bC

28.1aA

35.3bB

36.2cC

10.3aA

11.9bA

9.8aA

8.0bA

11.0cB

12.4cC

138.1bA

210.3cB

210.8cB

Caipira

2.7aA

3.3aB

3.9bC

25.2aA

29.8aB

29.3bB

10.5aA

12.3bB

9.8aA

8.4bA

10.0cB

10.5bB

178.8cA

225.6cB

238.9cB

Pacovan

3.6bA

4.1cA

5.7dB

24.3aA

30.3aB

35.3cC

11.2aA

13.4bB

10.5aA

7.9bA

8.0bA

9.3aA

110.3aA

114.9aA

139.3aA

Prata Anã

2.6aA

3.6bB

3.2aB

26.8aA

32.3bB

29.9bB

11.7aB

14.0bC

7.8aA

9.3cA

10.1cA

9.6aA

148.8bA

170.3bA

149.4aA

Williams

2.5aA

3.0aA

3.1aA

25.8aA

29.4aB

26.6aA

9.8aA

10.0aA

11.1aA

8.0bA

11.0cB

10.4bB

148.8bA

205.6cB

183.6bB

Grande Naine

2.5aA

2.9aB

3.1aB

26.6aA

28.4aA

31.2bB

11.3aA

11.0aA

11.1aA

8.3bA

9.3bA

12.1cB

156.6bA

168.9bA

237.1cB

⁽¹⁾Values followed by equal letters, lowercase in the columns and uppercase in the lines for each parameter, do not differ significantly by the Scott-Knott test, at 5% probability.

Table 3: Period from planting to harvest, as well as fresh weight of hands (HW), of fruits (FW), and of bunches without stalks (BW) of the banana (Musa spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil⁽¹⁾.

Banana cultivar

Period until harvest

HW (kg)

FW (g)

BW (kg)

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Cycle 1

Cycle 2

Cycle 3

Pacovan Ken

282.9bA

432.2bB

599.3bC

3.0cA

2.7bA

190.9bA

194.4bA

167.1cA

21.7cA

24.6cA

26.0cA

PV42-68

299.0bA

447.2bB

600.3bC

3.2cB

2.7cA

2.7bA

222.3cB

175.7bA

181.2cA

23.3cA

21.9bA

24.4bA

BRS Vitória

271.0aA

431.8bB

604.6bC

3.0cA

2.9cA

2.6bA

194.0bA

195.1bA

167.5cA

20.8cA

25.1cA

23.1bA

BRS Japira

299.0bA

431.3bB

619.6bC

3.5dB

3.0cA

2.9bA

239.1cB

195.2bA

194.7cA

26.5dA

24.8cA

25.3bA

BRS Preciosa

262.0aA

422.9bB

605.0bC

2.7bA

2.5bA

2.6bA

187.3bA

157.3bA

162.3cA

18.4bA

21.2bA

22.9bA

BRS Garantida

262.0aA

401.8aB

612.1bC

2.7bB

3.0cB

2.1aA

200.2bB

191.7bB

136.7bA

17.8bA

20.8bA

17.2aA

Thap Maeo

268.7aA

399.3aB

589.1aC

2.1aA

1.9aA

118.4aA

113.4aA

105.7aA

24.2cA

26.9cA

28.8cA

BRS Tropical

298.3bA

430.7bB

587.5aC

1.8aA

2.2aA

98.3aA

119.3aA

124.0aA

13.2aA

15.8aA

16.9aA

BRS Platina

294.9bA

411.3aB

604.3bC

3.6dB

2.8cA

2.8bA

247.5cB

181.7bA

170.2cA

30.0dA

25.5cA

30.4dA

BRS Maravilha

262.0aA

396.9aB

577.3aC

2.9cA

3.0cA

3.1bA

192.4bA

178.1bA

176.3cA

29.5dA

32.5dA

37.6eB

FHIA 02

262.0aA

390.8aB

589.5aC

3.0cA

3.4cA

2.8bA

199.2bB

212.2bB

157.5cA

31.0dA

37.7eA

34.3dA

FHIA 18

262.0aA

393.3aB

589.3aC

3.0cA

3.3cA

3.2bA

198.4bA

194.6bA

183.2cA

30.2dA

34.0eA

41.5eB

Galil 18

279.3bA

390.8aB

572.3aC

3.1cB

2.7cA

2.4aA

189.4bA

180.4bA

158.6cA

31.8dA

29.7dA

28.6cA

Buccaneer

262.0aA

433.6bB

623.3bC

3.8dB

2.9cA

3.0bA

223.0cB

154.3bA

184.7cA

30.8dA

32.5dA

37.1eB

Caipira

298.5bA

416.3bB

587.9aC

2.1aA

2.0aA

2.7bB

98.5aA

89.4aA

118.8aA

17.6bA

20.2bA

27.8cB

Pacovan

287.8bA

419.8bB

610.3bC

2.7bA

2.6bA

2.2aA

191.5bB

179.7bB

143.9bA

21.1cA

20.6bA

20.1aA

Prata Anã

271.2aA

421.8bB

589.0aC

2.1aA

2.2aA

1.8aA

130.5aA

128.7aA

114.6aA

19.4bA

21.9bA

17.2aA

Williams

262.0aA

427.4bB

600.1bC

4.0dC

3.1cB

2.6bA

216.2cB

166.1bA

146.7bA

32.2dB

34.2eB

27.0cA

Grande Naine

262.0aA

419.3bB

600.1bC

3.7dB

3.2cA

2.9bA

199.2bB

174.7bB

147.6bA

31.2dA

29.5dA

35.0dA

⁽¹⁾Values followed by equal letters, lowercase in the columns and uppercase in the lines for each parameter, do not differ significantly by the Scott-Knott test, at 5% probability.

Table 4: Correlation matrix among the studied variables of banana (Mus a spp.) cultivars planted at the Frutacor farm, in the municipality of Limoeiro do Norte, in the state of Ceará, Brazil⁽¹⁾.

Variables	PD	BPH	GLN	HN	FN	BW	FW	HW	Cycle
PD	-	0.58	0.22	-0.12	-0.35	-0.06	0.30	0.03	0.22
BPH		-	0.62	-0.54	-0.69	-0.51	0.27	-0.15	0.38
GLN			-	-0.39	-0.37	-0.54	-0.09	-0.28	0.58
HN				-	0.89	0.71	-0.15	0.08	-0.43
FN					-	0.57	-0.41	-0.02	-0.30
BW						-	0.49	0.75	-0.48
FW							-	0.86	-0.16
HW								-	-0.27
Cycle									-

⁽¹⁾Values underlined represent significant correlations by the least significant difference t-test, at 5% probability. PD, pseudostem diameter; BPH, banana plant height; GLN, number of green leaves at the flowering stage; HN, number of hands in the bunch; FN, number of fruits in the bunch; BW, fresh weight of bunches; FW, fresh weight of fruits; HW, fresh weight of hands; and Cycle, number of days from planting to harvest.

Como citar

copiar

Embrapa Secretaria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento; Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Caixa Postal 040315, 70770-901 Brasília DF Brazil, Tel. +55 61 3448-1813, Fax +55 61 3340-5483 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: pab@embrapa.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Mensagem

[TFN1] ⁽¹⁾Embrapa, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Brazil); and Multiplanta, Multiplanta Tecnologia Vegetal Ltda. ⁽²⁾According to Borges et al. (2009)BORGES, A.L.; SILVA, A.L. da; BATISTA, D. da C.; MOREIRA, F.R.B.; FLORI, J.E.; OLIVEIRA, J.E. de M.; ARAÚJO, J.L.P.; PINTO, J.M.; CASTRO, J.M. da C. e; MOURA, M.S.B. de; AZOUBEL, P.M.; CUNHA, T.J.F.; SILVA, S. de O. e; CORDEIRO, Z.J.M. Sistema de produção da bananeira irrigada. 2009. (Embrapa Semiárido. Sistemas de produção, 4). Available at: <Available at: https://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Banana/BananeiraIrrigada/index.htm >. Accessed on: June 3 2016.
https://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrap... . ⁽³⁾According to Cunha et al. (2015)CUNHA C.M.S.; HINZ, R.H.; PEREIRA, A.; TCACENCO, F.A.; PAULINO, E.C.; STADNIK, M.J. A SCAR marker for identifying susceptibility to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in banana. Scientia Horticulturae, v.191, p.108-112, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.038.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.0... . ⁽⁴⁾FHIA 02 belongs to the Prata subgroup (Jesus et al., 2013JESUS, O.N. de; SILVA, S. de O. e; AMORIM, E.P.; FERREIRA, C.F.; CAMPOS, J.M.S. de; SILVA, G. de. Genetic diversity and population structure of Musa accessions in ex situ conservation. BMC Plant Biology, v.13, p.1-22, 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-41.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-41... ). ⁽⁵⁾According to Costa et al. (2012)COSTA, F. da S.; COELHO, E.F.; BORGES, A.L.; PAMPONET, A.J.M.; SILVA, A. dos A.S.M. da; AZEVEDO, N.F. de. Crescimento, produção e acúmulo de potássio em bananeira 'Galil 18' sob irrigação e fertilização potássica. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.47, p.409-416, 2012. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2012000300013.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X201200... . BLSD, black leaf streak disease; YS, yellow Sigatoka; and Foc, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense fungus.