Strelhow, Miriam Raquel Wachholz; Bedin, Livia Maria; Sarriera, Jorge Castellá

doi:10.1590/1982-43272766201713

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Articles • Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 27 (66) • Jan-Apr 2017 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272766201713 copiar

Escala de Coping Religioso para Crianças: Adaptação e Propriedades Psicométricas

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Resumo:

Coping religioso se refere ao uso de estratégias relacionadas à fé religiosa para lidar com situações estressantes. Esse estudo apresenta a adaptação da escala de Coping Religioso para Crianças (CRC) para crianças brasileiras e verifica suas propriedades psicométricas. Participaram 1.612 crianças (54,71% meninas) entre 8 e 13 anos (M = 10,19, DP = 1,47). Análises de componentes principais e fatoriais confirmatórias indicaram que a CRC é composta por duas dimensões: Coping Religioso Positivo, com 17 itens em três fatores (Crença no suporte de Deus, Busca à instituição religiosa, Intercessão), e Coping Religioso Negativo, composto por 11 itens em três fatores (Descontentamento com Deus ou com outros, Reavaliação negativa do significado, Reavaliação de punição). O instrumento apresentou confiabilidade adequada. Análises fatoriais multigrupo indicaram que as cargas fatoriais dos itens são semelhantes por sexo. A escala apresentou bons índices de ajuste para essa amostra, demonstrando ser um instrumento promissor para futuras pesquisas.

Palavras-chave:
stress; religiosidade; psicometria; análise fatorial

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Av.Bandeirantes 3900 - Monte Alegre, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto - São Paulo - Brasil, Tel.: (55 16) 3315-3829 - Ribeirão Preto - SP - Brazil
E-mail: paideia@usp.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Correspondence address: Miriam Raquel Wachholz Strelhow. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Psicologia, Departamento de Psicologia do Desenvolvimento e da Personalidade. Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600. CEP 90035003. Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil. E-mail: raquelwch@gmail.com

	Component
	1	2	3
Factor 1: Belief in God's support
18. I think that God will help me get through it.	.861
22. I think about God always being with me.	.852
02. I think God is watching over me.	.795
15. I think about God very much.	.759
10. I try to see how God might be making me a better person.	.636
24. I try to get to know God better.	.615
20. I tell God to help me and He does it.	.596
12. I pray to God to take away my problems.	.588		.360
32. I think God is calming me.	.585
04. I thank God for the problem not being worse.	.563
06. I ask God to help me understand it.	.536		.363
01. I pray that God will make me feel better.	.436		.333
08. I talk with God and He tells me how to feel better.	.340	.344
17. I think about what my faith says about fixing problems.	.322		.317
Factor 2: Seeking the religious institution
03. I talk to the leader of my religion (for example, minister/priest/rabbi).		.789
26. I go to church/temple/synagogue.		.786
27. I read the holy book of my religion (for example, the Bible).		.767
Factor 3: Intercession
11. I ask others to pray for me.			.788
16. I think my family and friends are praying for me.			.638
21. I pray that I do not die.			.603
Reliability (Cronbach's alpha)	.92	.76	.64
Explained variance (%)	42.12	7.39	5.53

	Component
	1	2	3
Factor 1: Discontent with God or others
19. I stop believing in God.	.799
29. I think God does not love me.	.714
09. I get angry at God.	.631
25. I think God cannot help me.	.568
23. I think people at church/temple/synagogue blame me for it.	.422	.321
Factor 2: Negative reappraisal of meaning
05. I wonder why God lets this happen to me.		.793
07. I tell myself God tried to help me but it didn't work.		.684
13. I wonder if God is mad at me.		.588
14. I think that God gave some of us problems for a reason.		.514	.377
Factor 3: Punishing reappraisal
30. I think that evil (for example, the devil) did this to me.			.790
31. I think God did this because I was a bad person.			.739
28. I think that maybe God is punishing me.	.425		.429
Reliability (Cronbach's alpha)	.71	.64	.62
Explained variance (%)	31.84	10.77	9.23

	^_X2	df	p	TLI	CFI	RMSEA (C.I.)	SRMR
1. Model 1 with 32 items in two dimensions	2224.91	463	< .001	.811	.824	.067 (.065 - .070)	.079
2. Model 1 with 28 items in two dimensions	1779.51	349	< .001	.816	.830	.070 (.067 - .073)	.080
3. Model 1 with 28 items in two dimensions, and 14 covariances among errors	1025.19	335	< .001	.907	.918	.050 (.046 - .053)	.073
1. Model 2, with 32 items in six factors	1632.24	450	< .001	.870	.882	.056 (.053 - .059)	.064
2. Model 2, with 28 items in six factors	1250.00	336	< .001	.878	.891	.057 (.054 - .060)	.065
3. Model 2, with 28 items in six factors and six covariances among errors	904.05	332	< .001	.922	.932	.045 (.042 - .049)	.061

Item	Factor	Factor Loading
04	Belief in God's support	.660
06	.692
08	.695
10	.689
12	.754
15	.647
17	.662
18	.710
20	.704
22	.650
24	.639
03	Seeking the religious institution	.590
26	.574
27	.584
11	Intercession	.671
16	.684
21	.528
9	Discontent with God or others	.562
19	.531
23	.550
25	.577
29	.609
05	Negative reappraisal of meaning	.553
07	.585
13	.682
28	Punishing reappraisal	.739
30	.402
31	.588