Abstract
Resolutions issued by Sistema Conselhos are essential tools to guide and promote ethical and quality psychology practices. Given the complexity involved in elaborating such documents, this descriptive, qualitative research outlines the main changes in the text of the recently published CFP Resolution no. 006/2019 when compared with CFP Resolution no. 007/2003Resolução CFP n° 007/2003, de 14 de junho de 2003. (2003). Institui o manual de elaboração de documentos escritos produzidos pelo psicólogo, decorrentes de avaliação psicológica e revoga a Resolução CFP nº 017/2002. Conselho Federal de Psicologia. https://site.cfp.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2003/06/resolucao2003_7.pdf
https://site.cfp.org.br/wp-content/uploa...
, both addressing the elaboration of psychological documents. Documentary data was investigated by content analysis. Results indicated few qualitative differences between the analyzed Resolutions, among them the prohibition of descriptive writing, the requirement for a theoretical framework to support professional reasoning, and the obligation to return documents. Concern with the principles that guide document elaboration stands out, responding to a political scenario of major setbacks regarding respect for human rights and minorities.
Keywords:
Normative; Psychological Report; Psychological Opinions