Abstract
The present study investigated the scientific production of the Teste Desenho da Figura Humana, between the years 2002 and 2012. Fourteen journals were used, in which we analyzed 39 articles based on some criteria established by Witter and others deemed relevant by the author. The data showed an increase of publications since 2006, the year 2006 being the most profitable. The research report was the most used form and southeast, region had published more in that period. There was still the predominance of multiple and feminine authorship and researches applied to clinical and academic contexts. The evaluation system more used was Koppitz, representing 28.2% of the sample. There was also evidence that the most frequent types were convergent-discriminant construct validity and reliability among raters. These results highlight the need for studies that seek to address the gaps identified here.
Scientific production; Bibliometric; DFH