ABSTRACT
Efficiency of weed control can be increased if the herbicide formulation provides higher target coverage and evaporation time that enable an adequate distribution of herbicide on the target plant, allowing the absorption to continue even after the droplets evaporation. The aim of this research was to assess the influence of glyphosate formulations on the wetted area and evaporation time of droplets on different targets. Tests were conducted with droplets sizing from 500 μm containing three formulations of glyphosate (isopropylamine salt, ammonium salt and potassium salt) deposited on three surfaces, two leaves (Bidens pilosa and Cenchrus echinatus) and glass slides. Sequential images analyses were used to quantify the evaporation time and the wetted area. An experimental system was utilized that was composed of a droplet generator, a stereo microscope with a camera to capture images, as well as an environmental chamber controlled for temperature and relative humidity. The kind of glyphosate formulations and target surfaces are crucial in the wetted area and evaporation time. The isopropylamine salt decreased the wetted area and evaporation time when compared with ammonium salt and potassium salt for all the surfaces deposited on. Bidens pilosa allows an increased wetted area for all the glyphosate formulations when compared to Cenchrus echinatus and glass slides.
evaporation time; wetted area; herbicide; application technology
Means accompanied by the same letters, lowercase for the same glyphosate formulation and uppercase for the same droplet deposition surface, do not differ significantly at 5% probability by Tukey test. Least significant difference (LSD) = 0.76.
Means accompanied by the same letters, lowercase for the same glyphosate formulation and uppercase for the same droplet deposition surface, do not differ significantly at 5% probability by Tukey test. Least significant difference (LSD) = 61.84.