Resumo
Este estudo teve como objetivo testar a capacidade preditiva de traços patológicos da personalidade e adaptabilidade de carreira sobre quatro construtos que compõem o bem-estar no trabalho: engajamento no trabalho, satisfação no trabalho, burnout e workaholism. Participaram 204 adultos brasileiros trabalhadores (M idade = 34,02; DP = 10,39) que responderam instrumentos que mensuram traços patológicos, recursos de adaptabilidade de carreira e componentes do bem-estar no trabalho. Nossos achados indicaram que os traços patológicos estão, de modo geral, relacionados negativamente com satisfação no trabalho e engajamento no trabalho e positivamente com burnout e workaholism. Após a inserção da adaptabilidade de carreira houve aumento da explicação na maioria dos modelos, sendo que a contribuição única de adaptabilidade foi significativa apenas para predição de satisfação no trabalho.
Palavras-chave
personalidade patológica; psicologia organizacional; orientação profissional e de carreira; bem-estar
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Note. Items representing the model were removed from the presentation of results. The figure shows the two predictive models tested, the first is formed only by pathological personality traits as predictor variables and the second is presenting the dimensions of career adaptability added. Values from the first model are in parentheses. Only the values of the variables that were significant predictors were presented (p<0.05); Fit indices of the models: (X²/df = 1.34; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.04) X²/df = 1.21; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.03; SD = Self-devaluation; Ant = Antagonism; Emo = Emotional Apathy; Imp = Impulsivity; Vul = Vulnerability; Anx = Anxious worry; Hop = Hopelessness; Need = Routine Need; Comp = Compulsion to work; Engage = Engagement; Conc = Concern; Cont = Control; Curi = Curiosity; Conf = Confidence; Coop = Cooperation. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
Note. Items representing the model were removed from the presentation of results. The figure shows the two predictive models tested, the first is formed only by pathological personality traits as predictor variables and the second is presenting the dimensions of career adaptability added. Values from the first model are between parentheses. Only the values of the variables that were significant predictors were presented (p<0.05). Fit indices of the models: (X²/df = 1.24; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.03) X²/df = 1.18; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.03; SD = Self-devaluation; Ant = Antagonism; Emo = Emotional Apathy; Imp = Impulsivity; Vul = Vulnerability; Anx = Anxious worry; Hop = Hopelessness; Need = Routine Need; Comp = Compulsion to work; Coll = Satisfaction with colleagues; Sala = Satisfaction with salary; Lead = Satisfaction with the boss; Natu = Satisfaction with the nature of the work; Prom = Satisfaction with promotion; Conc = Concern; Cont = Control; Curi = Curiosity; Conf = Confidence; Coop = Cooperation. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
Note. Items representing the model were removed from the presentation of results. In the figure, the two predictive models tested are represented, the first formed only by pathological personality traits as predictor variables and in the second the dimensions of career adaptability were added. Values from the first model are between parentheses. Only the values of the variables that were significant predictors were presented (p<0.05). Fit indices of the models: (X²/df = 1.23; CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.03) X²/df = 1.17; CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.96; RMSEA = 0.03; SD = Self-devaluation; Ant = Antagonism; Emo = Emotional Apathy; Imp = Impulsivity; Vul = Vulnerability; Anx = Anxious worry; Hop = Hopelessness; Need = Routine Need; Comp = Compulsion to work; Illu = Illusion for work; Psyc = Psychic wear; Indo = Indolence; Guil = Guilt; Conc = Concern; Cont = Control; Curi = Curiosity; Conf = Confidence; Coop = Cooperation. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
Note. Items representing the model were removed from the presentation of results. In the figure, the two predictive models tested are represented, the first formed only by pathological personality traits as predictor variables and in the second the dimensions of career adaptability were added. Values from the first model are between parentheses. Only the values of the variables that were significant predictors were presented (p<0.05). Fit indices of the models: (X²/df = 1.32; CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.04) X²/df = 1.24; CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.03; SD = Self-devaluation; Ant = Antagonism; Emo = Emotional Apathy; Imp = Impulsivity; Vul = Vulnerability; Anx = Anxious worry; Hop = Hopelessness; Need = Routine Need; Comp = Compulsion to work; Work = Workaholism; Conc = Concern; Cont = Control; Curi = Curiosity; Conf = Confidence; Coop = Cooperation. *p<0.05; **p<0.01