Soluções ozonizadas favorecem o reparo de feridas cutâneas experimentalmente induzidas em ratos

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar os efeitos de soluções ozonizadas sobre o reparo tecidual de feridas em ratos. Foram realizados os tratamentos: água ozonizada (GA), cloreto de sódio 0,9% (GCL), óleo ozonizado (GO) e creme de alantoína 0,2% (GAL). À avaliação morfométrica, as feridas do grupo GA apresentaram maior grau de retração (p<0,05) aos três e oito dias de tratamento (37,96% e 84,81%, respectivamente). A coloração de picrosirius red mostrou que os grupos GA e GO apresentaram maior deposição (p<0,05) de colágeno do tipo I aos 15 e aos 22 dias de tratamento, respectivamente. Já a variável neovascularização foi maior (p<0,05) nas feridas do grupo GO nos dias três, oito e 15, o que fora ratificado à imunoistoquímica, com maior imunomarcação de VEGF nas feridas do grupo GO (p<0,05). Conclui-se que a água ozonizada potencializa a retração da ferida e auxilia na fase de maturação e remodelamento, enquanto o óleo ozonizado promove maior neovascularização durante o reparo tecidual e maior deposição de colágeno do tipo I a partir da terceira semana de tratamento.

TERMOS DE INDEXAÇÃO:
Água ozonizada; cicatrização; óleo ozonizado; ozonioterapia; feridas cutâneas; ratos

Autoria

Rafael C. Sanguanini

Graduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCA), Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.Universidade Federal de GoiásBrazilGoiânia, GO, BrazilGraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGCA), Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5677-8634

Mariana F. Bento

Graduação em Medicina Veterinária (Bolsista PIBIC/CNPq), Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.Universidade Federal de GoiásBrazilGoiânia, GO, BrazilGraduação em Medicina Veterinária (Bolsista PIBIC/CNPq), Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.

Evelyn de Oliveira

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6998-0834

Emmanuel Arnhold

Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.Universidade Federal de GoiásBrazilGoiânia, GO, BrazilDepartamento de Zootecnia, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.

Mariana B.R. Faleiro

Faculdade de Odontologia (FO), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Av. Universitária esquina com 1ª Avenida s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Campus Colemar Natal e Silva, Goiânia, GO 74605-220, Brazil.Universidade Federal de GoiásBrazilGoiânia, GO, BrazilFaculdade de Odontologia (FO), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Av. Universitária esquina com 1ª Avenida s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Campus Colemar Natal e Silva, Goiânia, GO 74605-220, Brazil.

Leandro G. Franco

Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.Universidade Federal de GoiásBrazilGoiânia, GO, BrazilDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia (EVZ), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Universitário Samambaia, Goiânia, GO 74690-900, Brazil.

Moema P.C. Matos

Veridiana Maria B.D. Moura ^**Corresponding author: vdmoura@ufg.br

*Corresponding author: vdmoura@ufg.br

Conflict of interest statement.- The authors have no competing interests.

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Figuras | Tabelas | Fórmulas

Figuras (4)
Tabelas (5)
Fórmulas (1)

Thumbnail

Fig.1.
Wound on the back of rats of groups ozonized water (GA), 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL), ozonized oil (GO), and 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL) on days zero (upper) and eight (lower) after injury induction. Wounds of similar size to day zero in all groups; the GA rat wound exhibits greater retraction at 8 days after injury induction when compared to that of the other groups.

Thumbnail

Fig.2.
Photomicrographs of the skin of rats from different groups at 15 days after wound induction, showing newly formed vessels (arrows). (A) Group ozonized water (GA) showing moderate neovascularization. HE, obj.40x. (B) Group 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL) showing discreet neovascularization. HE, obj.40x. (C) Group ozonized oil (GO) showing marked neovascularization. HE, obj.40x. (D) Group 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL) showing discreet neovascularization. HE, obj.40x.

Thumbnail

Fig.3.
Photomicrographs of rat skin showing type I and III collagen fibers at 8, 15, and 22 days after induction in groups ozonized water (GA), 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL), ozonized oil (GO), and 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL). Picrosirius red, obj.40x.

Thumbnail

Fig.4.
Photomicrographs of the skin of rats from different groups at 8 days after wound induction. (A) Group ozonized water (GA) showing moderate anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x. (B) Group 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL) showing discreet anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x. (C) Group ozonized oil (GO) showing marked anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x. (D) Group 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL) showing moderate anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x.

Thumbnail

Table 1.
Means, medians and ranks sums, respectively, referring to the percentage of skin wound retraction in rats submitted to different treatments at 3, 8, 15, and 22 days after the surgical procedure

Thumbnail

Table 2.
Means, medians and ranks sums, respectively, of neovascularization in the skin wound of rats at 3, 8, 15, and 22 days after induction and treatment with ozonized water (GA), sodium chloride (GCL), ozonized oil (GO), and allantoin (GAL)

Thumbnail

Table 3.
Means of collagen fibers in rat skin wounds at 8, 15, and 22 days after induction and treatment in groups GA, GCL, GO, and GAL

Thumbnail

Table 4.
Mean percentage of type I and III collagen fibers in relation to total collagen in wounds at 8, 15, and 22 days after induction in groups GA, GCL, GO, and GAL

Thumbnail

Table 5.
Means, medians and ranks sums, respectively, of VEGF immunostaining in the skin wound of rats at 3, 8, 15, and 22 days after induction in groups GA, GCL, GO, and GAL

Thumbnail

Fig.1. Wound on the back of rats of groups ozonized water (GA), 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL), ozonized oil (GO), and 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL) on days zero (upper) and eight (lower) after injury induction. Wounds of similar size to day zero in all groups; the GA rat wound exhibits greater retraction at 8 days after injury induction when compared to that of the other groups.

Fig.2. Photomicrographs of the skin of rats from different groups at 15 days after wound induction, showing newly formed vessels (arrows). (A) Group ozonized water (GA) showing moderate neovascularization. HE, obj.40x. (B) Group 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL) showing discreet neovascularization. HE, obj.40x. (C) Group ozonized oil (GO) showing marked neovascularization. HE, obj.40x. (D) Group 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL) showing discreet neovascularization. HE, obj.40x.

Fig.3. Photomicrographs of rat skin showing type I and III collagen fibers at 8, 15, and 22 days after induction in groups ozonized water (GA), 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL), ozonized oil (GO), and 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL). Picrosirius red, obj.40x.

Fig.4. Photomicrographs of the skin of rats from different groups at 8 days after wound induction. (A) Group ozonized water (GA) showing moderate anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x. (B) Group 0.9% sodium chloride (GCL) showing discreet anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x. (C) Group ozonized oil (GO) showing marked anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x. (D) Group 0.2% allantoin cream (GAL) showing moderate anti-VEGF immunostaining. IHC, obj.40x.

Table 1. Means, medians and ranks sums, respectively, referring to the percentage of skin wound retraction in rats submitted to different treatments at 3, 8, 15, and 22 days after the surgical procedure

Group	Period
Group	3 days	8 days	15 days	22 days*
GA	37.6/37.9/35.3^a	84.9/84.8/27.2^a	100/100/14.0^a	100^a
GCL	33.4/33.1/29.5^a	78.1/80.2/20.4^ab	99.5/100/12.3^a	100^a
GO	22.6/24.4/16.8^b	69.8/72.7/14.0^b	98.2/100/11.8^a	100^a
GAL	21.9/22.6/16.3^b	62.4/66.7/12.3^b	98.2/100/11.8^a	100^a

^a,b,ab
Within the same period, a value is only statistically different from another if there are no equal letters. A value identified as “a” is different from a value identified as “b”, but not from a value identified as “ab”, by the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05); *At 22 days after the surgical procedure, all rats showed 100% wound retraction. Thus, the tests were not applied because all values are equal and therefore, there is no difference to be tested; GA = ozonized water group, GCL = sodium chloride group, GO = ozonized oil group, GAL = allantoin group.

Table 2. Means, medians and ranks sums, respectively, of neovascularization in the skin wound of rats at 3, 8, 15, and 22 days after induction and treatment with ozonized water (GA), sodium chloride (GCL), ozonized oil (GO), and allantoin (GAL)

Group	Period
Group	3 days	8 days	15 days	22 days
GA	9.33/9/5.16^ab	18.66/19/6.50^ab	10.00/10/6.00^ab	6.33/6/2.00^b
GCL	8.33/8/3.50^b	14.66/14/2.33^b	9.33/9/4.50^b	8.66/9/7.66^a
GO	11.00/11/9.50^a	20.33/20/9.00^a	14.00/13/10.66^a	8.66/9/7.66^a
GAL	10.66/10/7.83^ab	20.00/20/8.16^a	9.33/9/4.50^b	8.50/8.5/7.00^a

^a,b,ab
Within the same period, a value is only statistically different from another if there are no equal letters. Thus, a value identified as “a” is different from a value identified as “b”, but not from a value identified as “ab”, by the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05).

Table 3. Means of collagen fibers in rat skin wounds at 8, 15, and 22 days after induction and treatment in groups GA, GCL, GO, and GAL

Group	Period
Group	8 days	15 days	22 days
GA	4.71^a	20.54^a	22.87^a
GCL	6.67^a	15.51^a	21.06^a
GO	3.66^ab	10.73^a	25.12^a
GAL	1.29^b	10.17^a	24.03^a

^a,b,ab
Within the same period, a value is only statistically different from another if there are no equal letters. Thus, a value identified as “a” is different from a value identified as “b”, but not from a value identified as “ab”, by the Duncan test (p<0.05); GA = ozonized water group, GCL = sodium chloride group, GO = ozonized oil group, GAL = allantoin group.

Table 4. Mean percentage of type I and III collagen fibers in relation to total collagen in wounds at 8, 15, and 22 days after induction in groups GA, GCL, GO, and GAL

Period	Collagen fiber	Group
Period	Collagen fiber	GA	GCL	GO	GAL
8 days	I	77.33^a	75.93^a	50.10^a	54.83^a
8 days	III	22.67^A	24.07^A	49.90^A	45.17^A
15 days	I	93.46^a	88.83^ab	84.60^ab	82.10^b
15 days	III	6.54^B	11.17^AB	15.40^AB	17.90^A
22 days	I	84.59^b	86.49^ab	90.20^a	84.41^b
22 days	III	15.41^A	13.51^AB	9.80^B	15.59^A

^a,b,ab
Within the same period, groups followed by the same lowercase letter have statistically equal means (considering type I collagen fibers); ^A,B,AB within the same period, groups followed by the same uppercase letter have statistically equeal means (considering type III collagen fibers); For these comparisons, Duncan test was used (p<0.05); GA = ozonized water group, GCL = sodium chloride group, GO = ozonized oil group, GAL = allantoin group.

Table 5. Means, medians and ranks sums, respectively, of VEGF immunostaining in the skin wound of rats at 3, 8, 15, and 22 days after induction in groups GA, GCL, GO, and GAL

Group	Period
Group	3 days	8 days	15 days	22 days
GA	1.33/1/6.50^a	2.66/3/6.67^ab	1.00/1/3.00^b	0.66/1/5.33^b
GCL	1.00/1/4.50^a	2.00/2/3.00^b	1.66/2/6.66^ab	0.33/0/3.66^b
GO	1.66/2/8.50^a	3.00/3/8.50^a	2.33/2 /9.66^a	1.66/2/10.0^a
GAL	1.33/1/6.50^a	3.00/3/7.83^ab	1.66/2/6.66^ab	1.00/1/7.00^ab

^a,b,ab
Within the same period, a value is only statistically different from another if there are no equal letters. Thus, a value identified as “a” is different from a value identified as “b”, but not from a value identified as “ab”, by the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05); GA = ozonized water group, GCL = sodium chloride group, GO = ozonized oil group, GAL = allantoin group.

D W R = \frac{(I W A - W A^{N})}{I W A} \times 100

Como citar

copiar

Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Caixa Postal 74.591, 23890-000 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 21) 2682-1081 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: pvb@pvb.com.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Soluções ozonizadas favorecem o reparo de feridas cutâneas experimentalmente induzidas em ratos

PlumX

Mensagem

[1] *Corresponding author: vdmoura@ufg.br