Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Use of bone marrow for detection of toxic chemicals for the elucidation of poisoning in forensic veterinary medicine

Uso de medula óssea para detecção de produtos químicos tóxicos para a elucidação de intoxicação em patologia veterinária forense

ABSTRACT:

In forensic toxicology, the detection of toxic chemicals from human bone marrow is often used in cases with an extended post mortem interval; however, in veterinary medicine, this practice is not used. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the suitability of bone marrow for toxicological analysis in dogs and cats. Six animals with suspected poisoning were selected; the carcasses were sent for necropsy, and the organs were collected and preserved in buffered formalin and processed routinely for histological examination. In addition, bone marrow samples from the femur, humerus, and tibia were collected for toxicological analysis by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS). This analysis confirmed the presence of aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, asulam, carbendazim, chlorpyrifos, dichlorvos, thifensulfuron methyl and trifloxysulfuron-sodium and associated with clinical symptoms and anatomo-histopathological alterations it was recognized the poisonings. It is expected that this study will promote the toxicological investigation of bone marrow and open avenues for the use of this tissue as an option for the detection of toxic chemicals in cases of forensic pathology.

INDEX TERMS:
Bone marrow; toxic chemicals; poisoning; forensic toxicology; aldicarb; dichlorvos; chlorpyrifos; pesticides; herbicides; crimes

RESUMO:

Na toxicologia forense, a detecção de substâncias químicas tóxicas provenientes da medula óssea humana é frequentemente usada em casos com intervalo post mortem prolongado; no entanto, na medicina veterinária, essa prática não é utilizada. Portanto, este estudo foi realizado para investigar a utilização da medula óssea nas análises toxicológicas em cães e gatos. Seis animais com suspeita de intoxicação foram selecionados; as carcaças foram enviadas para necropsia e os órgãos foram coletados e preservados em formalina tamponada e processados rotineiramente para exame histológico. Amostras de medula óssea de fêmur, úmero e tíbia foram coletadas para análise toxicológica por cromatografia líquida acoplada à espectrometria de massa-massa (LC-MS). A análise por LC-MS confirmou a presença dos agrotóxicos aldicarbe, aldicarbe sulfona, asulam, carbendazim, clorpirifós, diclorvós, tifensulfuron metil e trifloxisulfuron-sódico, e em associação com sinais clínicos e achados anatomo-histopatológicos comprovou-se as intoxicações. Espera-se que este estudo promova a utilização da medula óssea como uma opção na investigação toxicológica para a detecção de produtos químicos tóxicos em casos de patologia forense.

TERMOS DE INDEXAÇÃO:
Medula óssea; produtos químicos tóxicos; intoxicação; toxicologia forense; aldicarbe; diclorvos; clorpirifós; agrotóxicos; herbicidas; crimes

Introduction

Intentional exogenous poisoning is one of the main causes of crimes against animals leading to death. Carbamates and organophosphates are the most common active compounds used in criminal poisoning (Siqueira et al. 2015Siqueira A., Salvagni F.A, Yoshida A.S., Gonçalves-Junior V., Calefi A.S., Fukushima A.R., Spinosa H.S. & Maiorka P.C. 2015. Poisoning of cats and dogs by the carbamate pesticides aldicarb and carbofuran. Res. Vet. Sci. 102:142-149. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.006> <PMid:26412534>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.0...
). Regardless of the toxic chemicals suspected, samples of the stomach contents, kidney, liver and adipose tissues are collected for routine toxicological examination. However, carcasses in an advanced state of decomposition or skeletonization can compromise post mortem evaluation and make it difficult to process samples for toxicological analysis because of inadequate soft tissue content (Fukushima et al. 2018Fukushima A.R., Gonzalez M.V.D., Florio J.C., Salomone G.M., De-Siqueira A., Carvalho V.M., Zaccarelli-Magalhaes J., Anazawa T.A., Leoni L.A.B., Nicoletti M.A., Maiorka P.C. & Spinosa H.S. 2018. Study of aldicarb commercial granule using dissolution profile: a contribution for identification of metabolites. Int. J. Curr. Innov. Res. 4(4):1173-1176.).

In such cases, bones have emerged as vital for macroscopic and toxicological evaluations. In forensic science, toxicological examination of human bones, particularly bone marrow, is used for the detection of psychoactive illicit drugs, and some pesticides, involved in cases of suicide, overdose, and poisoning among professionals working with these substances (McIntyre et al. 2000McIntyre I.M., King C.V., Boratto M. & Drummer O.H. 2000. Post-mortem drug analyses in bone and bone marrow. Ther. Drug Monit. 22(1):79-83. <https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-200002000-00017> <PMid:10688265>
https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-2000020...
, Drummer 2008Drummer O.H. 2008. Drugs in bone and bone marrow, p.131-137. In: Jenkins A.J. (Ed.), Drug Testing in Alternate Biological Specimens. Humana Press, New Jersey., Cartiser et al. 2011Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-...
). As the bone marrow is located inside the medullary canal, it is protected from external contaminations and the heterolytic actions of putrefying bacteria. Thus, its structure is preserved for a longer period than other tissues (Cartiser et al. 2011Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-...
) and it was showed that the histological preservation of bone marrow for up to 3 months after death (Grellner & Glenewinkel 1997Grellner W. & Glenewinkel F. 1997. Exhumations: synopsis of morphological and toxicological findings in relation to the postmortem interval Survey on a 20-year period and review of the literature. Forensic Sci. Int. 90(1/2):139-159. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00154-0> <PMid:9438373>
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00...
).

In addition to its greater resistance to putrefaction, the bone marrow is highly vascular with a high lipid content that favors the accumulation of lipophilic drugs. Owing to these characteristics, bone marrow can be considered as a potential tissue for the toxicological analysis of skeletal bodies or cadavers with extended post mortem intervals (Cartiser et al. 2011Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-...
).

The first use of bone marrow in forensic toxicology was used to study the kinetics of alcohol (Casier et al. 1943Casier H., Thomas F. & Delanouis A.L. 1943. La répartition de l’alcool chez l’homme et les animaux au cours de l’intoxication éthylique. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 69:186-204.). In the 1980s, further studies examined the correlation between toxic chemicals concentrations in the bone marrow and in the blood of poisoned animal models and humans (Winek & Esposito 1981Winek C.L. & Esposito F.M. 1981. Comparative study of ethanol levels in blood versus bone marrow, vitreous humor, bile and urine. Forensic Sci. Int. 17(1):27-36. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)90185-7> <PMid:7216079>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)901...
, Winek & Luhanik 1981Winek C.L. & Luhanik J.M. 1981. A storage study of ethanol in rabbit and human bone marrow. Forensic Sci. Int. 17(3):191-196. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)90166-3> <PMid:7239369>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)901...
, Winek & Janssen 1982Winek C.L. & Janssen J.K. 1982. Blood versus bone marrow isopropanol concentrations in rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 20(1):11-20. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)90100-1>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)901...
, Winek et al. 1982Winek C.L., Pluskota M. & Wahba W.W. 1982. Plasma versus bone marrow flurazepam concentration in rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 19(2):155-163. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)90041-X>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)900...
, 1983Winek C.L., Matejczyk R.J. & Buddie E.G. 1983. Blood, bone marrow and eye fluid ethanol concentrations in putrefied rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 22(2/3):151-159. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(83)90008-7> <PMid:6642341>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(83)900...
, 1985Winek C.L., Costantino A.G., Wahba W.W. & Collom W.D. 1985. Blood versus bone marrow pentobarbital concentrations. Forensic Sci. Int. 27(1):15-24. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(85)90100-8> <PMid:3988192>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(85)901...
). Bone marrow from skeletal remains has only recently been studied to investigate the use of xenobiotics and correlate their use with mortality (Cartiser et al. 2011Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-...
).

In the study of bone marrow, different collection sites may be used, such as the femur (Winek & Jones 1980Winek C.L. & Jones T. 1980. Blood versus bone marrow ethanol concentrations in rabbits and humans. Forensic Sci. Int. 16(2):101-109. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(80)90162-0> <PMid:7429375>
https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(80)901...
), ribs (Schloegl et al. 2006Schloegl H., Rost T., Schmidt W., Wurst F.M. & Weinmann W. 2006. Distribution of ethyl glucuronide in rib bone marrow, other tissues and body liquids as proof of alcohol consumption before death. Forensic Sci. Int. 156(2/3):213-218. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.024> <PMid:15946814>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005...
) or vertebral bodies (Maeda et al. 2006Maeda H., Zhu B.L., Ishikawa T., Oritani S., Michiue T., Li D.R., Zhao D. & Ogawa M. 2006. Evaluation of post-mortem ethanol concentrations in pericardial fluid and bone marrow aspirate. Forensic Sci. Int. 161(2/3):141-143. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.01.016> <PMid:16842951>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006...
). Nevertheless, a standard sampling procedure has not yet been established in the scientific community. Depending on the lipophilicity of the drug, the concentration may depend on the amount of yellow or red bone marrow present (Cartiser et al. 2011Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-...
). Many substances such as, ethanol, bromoisoval, diazepam, flurazepam, triazolam, amitriptyline, nortriptyline, desipramine, doxepin, sertraline, moclobemide, cocaine, methamphetamine, amphetamine, morphine and paraquat could be detected in bone marrow (Drummer 2008Drummer O.H. 2008. Drugs in bone and bone marrow, p.131-137. In: Jenkins A.J. (Ed.), Drug Testing in Alternate Biological Specimens. Humana Press, New Jersey.). However, in veterinary medicine, there are no studies using bone marrow as a site for the detection of toxic chemicals. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate toxic chemicals in the bone marrow of dogs and cats with suspected exogenous intoxication.

Materials and Methods

In this study, six animals (three dogs and three cats) were necropsied, and fragments of abdominal and thoracic organs were collected in 10% buffered formalin for histological analysis. The organs were processed by a routine paraffin inclusion technique, and histological sections of 3−5μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).

The bone marrow of the femur, tibia and humerus was collected of each animal, weighed and a pool was used to toxicological analysis. Chromatographic analyses were performed using an ultra-fast liquid chromatographic (UFLC) system (Shimadzu LC20) equipped with a binary pump (Shimadzu LC20ADXR), an autosampler (Shimadzu SIL20ACXR), and a column oven (Shimadzu CTO20AC).

Each bone marrow pool was extracted by modified QuEChERS method (Anastassiades et al. 2003Anastassiades M., Lehotay S.J., Stajnbaher D. & Schenck F.J. 2003. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/ partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 86(2):412-431. <PMid:12723926>). The sample (5.0g) was transferred to a polypropylene tube (50mL), following the addition 5.0mL of ultrapure water and 10.0mL of acetonitrile/0.1% acetic acid and ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v), and the mixture was vortexed for 1 minute. Magnesium sulfate (4.0g) and sodium acetate (1.0g) were added, and the mixture was vortexed for another 1 minute and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 11 minutes. Subsequently, the mixture was kept at −20°C overnight (12 hours) in order to break emulsions and then centrifuged at 4,000 rpm, −5°C, for 5 minutes. The organic layer (1.0mL) was transferred to a 2.0mL microtube containing 150mg of anhydrous magnesium sulfate, 30mg of primary and secondary amine (PSA), and 30mg of dispersive C18. Tubes were shaken for 1 minute and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 12 minutes. The extracts were used for chromatographic analyses.

A total of 171 analytes from different classes was used to study the full scope of the method. All pesticides were evaluated by LC-MS using a multiresidue analysis technique and this analysis was carried out using a 5500 Triple Quad mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, MDS SCIEX, Ontario, Canada). The instrument was operated using electrospray ionization source (ESI) in positive and negative ion modes. Instrument settings, data acquisition and data processing were controlled by the Analyst software (Version 1.5.1, Applied Biosystems). Source parameters were optimized as follows: ion spray voltage, 5.5 kV for ESI (+) and 4.5 kV for ESI (-); curtain gas, 20psi; collision gas, 8psi; nebulizer gas, 30psi; auxiliary gas, 30psi; ion source temperature, 500°C.

Separations were achieved using a Shimadzu Shim-pack XR-ODSII column (2.0 × 100mm, 2.2µm particle size) and a Phenomenex Synergi Fusion-RP column (2.0 × 50mm, 2.5µm particle size). The column temperature was set to 60°C.

The samples were injected into the LC-MS/MS system under the following conditions: flow rate, 0.5mL/minute; injection volume, 5μL; column furnace temperature, 60°C; automatic sampler temperature; 20°C; and total run time, 13 minutes. These conditions were established internally by the laboratory and were used after validation in studies (Oliveira et al. 2018Oliveira F.A.S., Pereira E.N.C, Gobbi J.M., Soto-Blanco B. & Melo M.M. 2018. Multiresidue method for detection of pesticides in beef meat using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS) after QuEChERS extraction. Food Add. Cont., A 35(1):94-109. <https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1395519> <PMid:29058520>
https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.13...
).

For the mobile phase, used throughout the experiment, phase A was the aqueous fraction composed of a mixture of aqueous ammonium acetate solution 10mmol/L acidified with 0.1% formic acid, and phase B was an organic fraction, comprising methanol.

Calibration curves were obtained using acetonitrile as a solvent to standardize the results of recovery and simplify the experiment. The following concentrations were used for calibration: 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0 and 100µg.kg-1. All solutions were prepared independently. For the purpose of simultaneous quantification and identification, two or three multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions were used for each analyte to avoid false negatives at trace pesticide levels. The peaks were evenly distributed along the chromatographic window and were resolved symmetrically. Data were analyzed using the Analyst program (Version 1.5.1, Applied Biosystems). The regression curve model for each compound was selected using a homoscedasticity test. The quality of fit and significance of the employed regression model were evaluated using the lack-of-fit test. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) for all tested pesticides were determined to be 5.0 and 10.0ppb, respectively.

All analytical reagents used had a purity of >98% and were purchased from Riedel-de Haën grade PESTANAL (Seelze, Germany) or Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, USA).

Results

A summary of the case and animal identification, the anatomopathological conclusions from the necropsy reports, microscopic examination and toxicological results are enumerated in Table 1.

Table 1.
Identification of animals, clinical signs, anatomopathological conclusions and results of toxicological analyses by LC-MS

All the cadavers were in excellent conditions because they were kept in a cold room. Within this study, we detected 8 different pesticides and their metabolites in bone marrow (Table 1). Measured concentrations of all compounds were higher than the LOD (5.0 ppb), but lower than the LOQ (10.0 ppb).

Discussion

The main purpose of this study was not to propose that the toxicological examination of the viscera is substituted by that of bone marrow, but to demonstrate that the bone marrow may be a good choice as a sampling site for toxicological screening. The bone marrow is a highly vascularized tissue, well protected by bone, and its lipid matrix may act as a repository for chemical agents. This may be particularly important when the carcass is in an advanced stage of decomposition or skeletonization.

One of the greatest difficulties during sample collection was the small amount of bone marrow present in each bone. Therefore, the collection of bone marrow from various bones (femur, humerus, and tibia) to generate a pool of bone marrow for each animal was necessary. In this study, the pool was used to provide the minimum amount of sample needed for extraction (5.0g) as per the QueChERS methodology and the assay. These bones were selected because they had a relatively larger medullary canal and, consequently, a greater amount of marrow in relation to the vertebrae and ribs. The LC-MS assay was able to detect the toxic chemicals in the bone marrow of five animals (Table 1). In addition, it was identified a greater number of toxicants (aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, asulam, carbendazim, trifloxysulfuron, dichlorvos, chlorpyrifos, and thifensulfuron-methyl).

Aldicarb is a carbamate and is one of the most commonly chemicals used for criminal poisoning of animals (Xavier at al. 2007aXavier F.G., Righi D.A. & Spinosa H.S. 2007a. Fatal poisoning in dogs and cats: a 6-year report in a veterinary pathology servisse. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 44(4):304-309. <https://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2007.26632>
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456....
, Siqueira et al. 2012Siqueira A., Cassiano F.C., Landi, M.F.A., Marlet E.F. & Maiorka P.C. 2012. Non-accidental injuries found in necropsies of domestic cats: a review of 191 cases. J. Feline Med. Surg. 14(10):723-728. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X12451374> <PMid:22694958>
https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X12451374...
). Aldicarb was detected in bone marrow of animals 1, 2, 4 and 5 and its metabolite, aldicarb sulfone (Harper et al. 1998Harper F.D., Weisskopf C.P. & Cobb G.P. 1998. Extraction of aldicarb and its metabolites from excreta and gastrointestinal tissue. Anal. Chem. 70(15):3329-3332. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac971268k> <PMid:11013730>
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac971268k...
) just in Feline 1. That is, it was found in 80% (4/5) of the poisoned animals. Aldicarb is extremely toxic to mammals and its toxicity is mediated through inhibition of acetylcholine esterase, a respiratory enzyme. All of these animals showed generalized circulatory disorders compatible with poisoning picture. The pesticide aldicarb known as “chumbinho”, is one of the most toxic of registered pesticides, and has its use restricted to agriculture in Brazil. In spite of it, aldicarb is being very often involved in severe poisoning in animals (Xavier et al. 2007bXavier F.G., Righi D.A. & Spinosa H.S. 2007b. Toxicology of the pesticide aldicarb (“chumbinho”): general, clinical and therapeutical features in dogs and cats. Ciência Rural 37(4):1206-1211. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000400051>
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-8478200700...
). It is controlled in Brazil and is allowed only for agricultural uses upon prescription from a responsible technician. However, aldicarb is sold illegally for the extermination of domestic animals and is erroneously indicated as rat poison. As the marketing of aldicarb is illegal, to avoid detection during inspection, it is routinely mixed with other toxic substances in an unlabeled manner. Its use is justified by its high toxicity, ease of acquisition in the illegal trade, and inefficiency of the monitoring mechanisms (Xavier et al. 2017bXavier F.G., Righi D.A. & Spinosa H.S. 2007b. Toxicology of the pesticide aldicarb (“chumbinho”): general, clinical and therapeutical features in dogs and cats. Ciência Rural 37(4):1206-1211. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000400051>
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-8478200700...
). Our results agree with other reports of fatal cases of carbamate poisoning in dogs and cats in Brazil (Medeiros et al. 2009Medeiros R.J., Monteiro F.O., Silva G.C. & Nascimento Junior A. 2009. Casos de intoxicações exógenas em cães e gatos atendidos na Faculdade de Veterinária da Universidade Federal Fluminense durante o período de 2002 a 2008. Ciência Rural 39(7):2105-2110. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000151>
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-8478200900...
, Siqueira et al. 2015Siqueira A., Salvagni F.A, Yoshida A.S., Gonçalves-Junior V., Calefi A.S., Fukushima A.R., Spinosa H.S. & Maiorka P.C. 2015. Poisoning of cats and dogs by the carbamate pesticides aldicarb and carbofuran. Res. Vet. Sci. 102:142-149. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.006> <PMid:26412534>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.0...
).

Asulam, a systemic herbicide highly effective against bracken, also was detected in Feline 1, and belongs to the group of carbamates - sulfanilylcarbamate. When administered orally or intravenously, it is excreted in the urine in 24 hours (Heijbroek et al. 1984Heijbroek W.M.H., Muggleton D.F. & Parke D.V. 1984. Metabolism of the carbamate herbicide, asulam, in the rat. Xenobiotica 14(3):235-247. <https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00498258409151408> <PMid:6711013>
https://doi.org/10.3109/0049825840915140...
). Kaufmann & Kaenzig (2004)Kaufmann A. & Kaenzig A. 2004. Contamination of honey by the herbicide asulam and its antibacterial active metabolite sulfanilamide. Food Add. Cont. 21(6):564-571. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030410001677790> <PMid:15204534>
https://doi.org/10.1080/0265203041000167...
found sulfanilamide residues in 15 Swiss honeys out of some 350 samples. Bees occasionally collect nectar from meadows treated with the herbicide asulam. Such honey is not only contaminated by asulam, but also by its degradation product sulfanilamide. Carbamates pesticides can be divided into carbamate insecticides, mostly monomethyl carbamates, fungicidal dithiocarbamates and carbamates herbicides and fungicides. The toxicity of carbamate herbicides and fungicides is very heterogenous and its rather related to the aromatic moiety (herbicides) and the benzimidazole moiety (fungicides) than to the carbamate rest. Acute toxicity of carbamates herbicides and fungicides is generally low compared to the carbamate insecticides. However, as previously reported, Aldicarb is sold illegally, and many other substances could be added to this product, like the asulam.

The animals 3 and 4, showed other pesticides, from the organophosphorus group, also with action anti-acetylcholinesterase: dichlorvos (Feline 3) and chlorpyrifos (Canine 4). Dichlorvos is classified as highly toxic and it is used an agricultural insecticide on crops and stored products, besides as an antihelminthic for dogs, swine and horses, and to kill fly larvae. It is poisonous if swallowed, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin. The high dose of dichlorvos produces a detrimental effect on acetylcholinesterase activity (Verma et al. 2008Verma S.K., Raheja G. & Gill K.D. 2008. Role of muscarinic signal transduction and CREB phosphorylation in dichlorvos-induced memory deficits in rats: An acetylcholine independent mechanism. Toxicology 256(3):175-182. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.11.017>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.11.01...
).

Chlorpyrifos is an organophosphorothionate insecticide with nonsystemic anticholinesterase effects reported following exposure by skin contact, ingestion, or inhalation. It is one of the most widely used organophosphorus insecticides in the world. Chlorpyrifos has been widely used in agriculture, horticulture, viticulture and forestry on a wide range of crops, as well as in residential and nonresidential applications to control cockroaches, fleas, ticks on cattle and pests in animal dwellings (Sultatos 1994Sultatos L.G. 1994. Mammalian toxicology of organophosphorus pesticides. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 43(3):271-289. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287399409531921> <PMid:7966438>
https://doi.org/10.1080/1528739940953192...
). The Feline 3 presented prostration and tremors, and the nervous system is the primary target because acetylcholinesterase and/or butlycholinesterase catabolyze the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, thereby terminating its synaptic function. The sialorrhea and vomiting also was presented by this animal are typical muscarinic signals showed in the anticholinesterase poisoning. It is well-established that severe poisoning by organophosphorus compounds strongly affects the cardiorespiratory system (Cunha et al. 2018Cunha A.F., Felippe I.S.A., Ferreira-Junior N.C., Resstel L.B.M., Guimarães D.A.M., Beijamini V., Paton J.F.R. & Sampaio K.N. 2018. Neuroreflex control of cardiovascular function is impaired after acute poisoning with chlorpyrifos, an organophosphorus insecticide: possible short and long term clinical implications. Toxicology 398/399:13-22. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.02.005> <PMid:29471072>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.02.00...
).

Owing to its greater sensitivity, the LC-MS technique can be used to detect other toxin residues, including carbendazim, a fungicidal compound from the benzimidazole group; trifloxysulfuron-sodium, an herbicidal compound of the sulfonylurea class and thifensulfuron-methyl, a sulfonylurea herbicide. Our results confirmed the deposition of carbendazim within the bone marrow of Felines 1 and 2 (Table 1). The carbendazim is a highly effective, broad-spectrum, systemic fungicide used to protect fruits and other products from spoiling. and, it is relatively stable and persistent in the environment (Thomas et al. 1996Thomas D.H., Loez-Ávila V., Betowsk L.D. & Emom J.V. 1996. Determination of carbendazim in water by high-performance immunoaffinity chromatography on-line with high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array or mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 724(1/2):207-217.). It is important to note that the presence of more than one type of chemical substance in the marrow bone has been detected in some animals (Feline 1, Feline 2 and Canine 4). The Feline 1 showed four substances in bone marrow, and this animal was found dead without any clinical signs or prior disease. Macroscopically, the esophageal and stomach content revealed numerous rounded, blackened, and firm millimetric structures with an appearance suggestive of aldicarb pesticide.

Besides the aldicarb and carbendazim, trifloxysulfuron-sodium was found just in Feline 2. This cat was taken to emergency veterinary care due to the sudden appearance of respiratory and neurological symptoms. But, the clinical picture worsened, and this animal died. Trifloxysulfuron-sodium is a post-emergence herbicide without European Union regulatory approval for use. It has a high aqueous solubility, is relatively volatile and, based on its chemical properties, is mobile and may leach to groundwater in some situations. It is moderately persistent in soil systems but is generally non-persistent in aquatic systems. It has a low mammalian toxicity and has a high potential to bioaccumulate (PPDB 2020PPDB 2020. Pesticides Propetiers DataBase, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire. Available at <Available at https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/1151.htm > Accessed on May 18, 2020.
https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/R...
).

Finally, the thifensulfuron-methyl was found in Canine 4. Thifensulfuron-methyl is a post-emergence herbicide for the control of grass and broad-leaved weeds and it is unlikely to presente an acute hazard. This herbicide has relatively long persistence in water and its partitioning into sediments is minimal. The sulfonylurea linkage in this compound is resistant to hydrolysis in weakly alkaline waters, and the microbial and photolytic degradation in dugout waters are slow (Cessna et al. 2006Cessna A.J., David B Donald D.B., Bailey J., Waiser M. & Headley J.V. 2006. Persistence of the sulfonylurea herbicides thifensulfuron-methyl, ethametsulfuron-methyl, and metsulfuron-methyl in farm dugouts (ponds). J. Environ. Qual. 35(6):2395-2401. <https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0462> <PMid:17071910>
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0462...
). Lazartigues et al. (2011)Lazartigues A., Wiest L., Baudot R., Thomas M., Feidt C. & Crein-Olivé C. 2011. Multiresidue method to quantify pesticides in fish muscle by QuEChERS-based extraction and LC-MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400(7):2185-2193. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4945-z>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4945-...
used the same extraction method (QuEChERS) and LC-MS to detect thifensulfuron-methyl on three fish species (in their muscles), naturally or orally exposed: roach (Rutilus rutilus), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and carp (Cyprinus carpio).

Brazil is one of the greatest consumers of pesticides in the world. Thus, the comparison of toxicological results with the clinical signs and anatomopathological findings is important to confirm whether the toxic chemicals found were related to the death of the animal. The success in the detection of toxic chemicals in human bone marrow was essentially dependent on the analytical method used and the methodology used in the pretreatment and extraction of the toxic chemicals from the sample, especially the adipose tissue matrix (Cartiser et al. 2011Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-...
). In the present study, the QuEChERS extraction technique and the analytical method (LC-MS) were effective for the detection of pesticides in the bone marrow of cats and dogs. The degree of contact of drugs to the bone structures depends on the anatomical location of the bone and the local blood supply. The long bones (i.e., femur) receive the most blood supply while the short, flat, or irregular bones receive more superficial supply through the periosteum (Drummer 2008Drummer O.H. 2008. Drugs in bone and bone marrow, p.131-137. In: Jenkins A.J. (Ed.), Drug Testing in Alternate Biological Specimens. Humana Press, New Jersey.). Given this and the our results, the choice of femur, humerus and tibia bones was adequate.

In addition to the lack of studies in veterinary medicine that have investigated the detection of toxic chemicals in the bone marrow, there have been no studies in human forensic toxicology on the use of bone marrow for the detection of pesticides. Ackan et al. (2009)Ackan R., Hila A., Daglioglu N., Cekin N. & Gulmen M.K. 2009. Determination of pesticides in postmortem blood and bone marrow of pesticide treated rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 189(1/3):82-87. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.017> <PMid:19446970>
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009...
treated six rabbits with endosulfan and six with diazinon and collected bone marrow and analyzed by chromatography gas (GC-MS), and found these isomers and its metabolites in this sample. The authors concluded that cause of death can be determined as acute pesticide poisoning by toxicological analysis of samples from bone marrow.

Finally, the anatomopathological examination is very important and should always be accompanied by a toxicological examination in cases of suspected poisoning and may reveal pre-existing diseases that may not have been diagnosed antemortem. Canine 6 was the only one that did not show any pesticides in the bone marrow. The anatomopathological conclusion was neutrophilic and fibrinous myocarditis with generalized hyperemia.

Forensic toxicological analyses have traditionally focused the use blood, body fluids, and certain organs in examination of deaths due to poisoning. This study is preliminary, but showed that bone marrow might be used as an alternative specimen since it’s a potential depot for pesticides.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this case study, we have concluded that bone marrow can be used for the detection of toxic chemicals to investigate poisoning in forensic veterinary medicine. Aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, asulam, carbendazim, chlorpyrifos, dichlorvos, thifensulfuron methyl and trifloxysulfuron were deposited in the bone marrow of cats and dogs and were detected by LC-MS analysis.

Acknowledgments

We thank the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” (CNPq) for the financial support (Process 305617/201/-6).

References

  • Ackan R., Hila A., Daglioglu N., Cekin N. & Gulmen M.K. 2009. Determination of pesticides in postmortem blood and bone marrow of pesticide treated rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 189(1/3):82-87. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.017> <PMid:19446970>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.017
  • Anastassiades M., Lehotay S.J., Stajnbaher D. & Schenck F.J. 2003. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/ partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 86(2):412-431. <PMid:12723926>
  • Cartiser N., Bévalot F., Fanton L., Gaillard Y. & Guiltton J. 2011. State-of-the-art of bone marrow analysis in forensic toxicology: a review. Int. J. Legal Med. 125(2):181-198. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6> <PMid:21061013>
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0525-6
  • Casier H., Thomas F. & Delanouis A.L. 1943. La répartition de l’alcool chez l’homme et les animaux au cours de l’intoxication éthylique. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 69:186-204.
  • Cessna A.J., David B Donald D.B., Bailey J., Waiser M. & Headley J.V. 2006. Persistence of the sulfonylurea herbicides thifensulfuron-methyl, ethametsulfuron-methyl, and metsulfuron-methyl in farm dugouts (ponds). J. Environ. Qual. 35(6):2395-2401. <https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0462> <PMid:17071910>
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0462
  • Cunha A.F., Felippe I.S.A., Ferreira-Junior N.C., Resstel L.B.M., Guimarães D.A.M., Beijamini V., Paton J.F.R. & Sampaio K.N. 2018. Neuroreflex control of cardiovascular function is impaired after acute poisoning with chlorpyrifos, an organophosphorus insecticide: possible short and long term clinical implications. Toxicology 398/399:13-22. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.02.005> <PMid:29471072>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.02.005
  • Drummer O.H. 2008. Drugs in bone and bone marrow, p.131-137. In: Jenkins A.J. (Ed.), Drug Testing in Alternate Biological Specimens. Humana Press, New Jersey.
  • Fukushima A.R., Gonzalez M.V.D., Florio J.C., Salomone G.M., De-Siqueira A., Carvalho V.M., Zaccarelli-Magalhaes J., Anazawa T.A., Leoni L.A.B., Nicoletti M.A., Maiorka P.C. & Spinosa H.S. 2018. Study of aldicarb commercial granule using dissolution profile: a contribution for identification of metabolites. Int. J. Curr. Innov. Res. 4(4):1173-1176.
  • Grellner W. & Glenewinkel F. 1997. Exhumations: synopsis of morphological and toxicological findings in relation to the postmortem interval Survey on a 20-year period and review of the literature. Forensic Sci. Int. 90(1/2):139-159. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00154-0> <PMid:9438373>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00154-0
  • Harper F.D., Weisskopf C.P. & Cobb G.P. 1998. Extraction of aldicarb and its metabolites from excreta and gastrointestinal tissue. Anal. Chem. 70(15):3329-3332. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac971268k> <PMid:11013730>
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/ac971268k
  • Heijbroek W.M.H., Muggleton D.F. & Parke D.V. 1984. Metabolism of the carbamate herbicide, asulam, in the rat. Xenobiotica 14(3):235-247. <https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00498258409151408> <PMid:6711013>
    » https://doi.org/10.3109/00498258409151408
  • Kaufmann A. & Kaenzig A. 2004. Contamination of honey by the herbicide asulam and its antibacterial active metabolite sulfanilamide. Food Add. Cont. 21(6):564-571. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030410001677790> <PMid:15204534>
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030410001677790
  • Lazartigues A., Wiest L., Baudot R., Thomas M., Feidt C. & Crein-Olivé C. 2011. Multiresidue method to quantify pesticides in fish muscle by QuEChERS-based extraction and LC-MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400(7):2185-2193. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4945-z>
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4945-z
  • Maeda H., Zhu B.L., Ishikawa T., Oritani S., Michiue T., Li D.R., Zhao D. & Ogawa M. 2006. Evaluation of post-mortem ethanol concentrations in pericardial fluid and bone marrow aspirate. Forensic Sci. Int. 161(2/3):141-143. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.01.016> <PMid:16842951>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.01.016
  • McIntyre I.M., King C.V., Boratto M. & Drummer O.H. 2000. Post-mortem drug analyses in bone and bone marrow. Ther. Drug Monit. 22(1):79-83. <https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-200002000-00017> <PMid:10688265>
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-200002000-00017
  • Medeiros R.J., Monteiro F.O., Silva G.C. & Nascimento Junior A. 2009. Casos de intoxicações exógenas em cães e gatos atendidos na Faculdade de Veterinária da Universidade Federal Fluminense durante o período de 2002 a 2008. Ciência Rural 39(7):2105-2110. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000151>
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000151
  • Oliveira F.A.S., Pereira E.N.C, Gobbi J.M., Soto-Blanco B. & Melo M.M. 2018. Multiresidue method for detection of pesticides in beef meat using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS) after QuEChERS extraction. Food Add. Cont., A 35(1):94-109. <https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1395519> <PMid:29058520>
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1395519
  • PPDB 2020. Pesticides Propetiers DataBase, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire. Available at <Available at https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/1151.htm > Accessed on May 18, 2020.
    » https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/1151.htm
  • Schloegl H., Rost T., Schmidt W., Wurst F.M. & Weinmann W. 2006. Distribution of ethyl glucuronide in rib bone marrow, other tissues and body liquids as proof of alcohol consumption before death. Forensic Sci. Int. 156(2/3):213-218. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.024> <PMid:15946814>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.024
  • Siqueira A., Cassiano F.C., Landi, M.F.A., Marlet E.F. & Maiorka P.C. 2012. Non-accidental injuries found in necropsies of domestic cats: a review of 191 cases. J. Feline Med. Surg. 14(10):723-728. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X12451374> <PMid:22694958>
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X12451374
  • Siqueira A., Salvagni F.A, Yoshida A.S., Gonçalves-Junior V., Calefi A.S., Fukushima A.R., Spinosa H.S. & Maiorka P.C. 2015. Poisoning of cats and dogs by the carbamate pesticides aldicarb and carbofuran. Res. Vet. Sci. 102:142-149. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.006> <PMid:26412534>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.006
  • Sultatos L.G. 1994. Mammalian toxicology of organophosphorus pesticides. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 43(3):271-289. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287399409531921> <PMid:7966438>
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/15287399409531921
  • Thomas D.H., Loez-Ávila V., Betowsk L.D. & Emom J.V. 1996. Determination of carbendazim in water by high-performance immunoaffinity chromatography on-line with high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array or mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 724(1/2):207-217.
  • Verma S.K., Raheja G. & Gill K.D. 2008. Role of muscarinic signal transduction and CREB phosphorylation in dichlorvos-induced memory deficits in rats: An acetylcholine independent mechanism. Toxicology 256(3):175-182. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.11.017>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.11.017
  • Winek C.L. & Esposito F.M. 1981. Comparative study of ethanol levels in blood versus bone marrow, vitreous humor, bile and urine. Forensic Sci. Int. 17(1):27-36. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)90185-7> <PMid:7216079>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)90185-7
  • Winek C.L. & Janssen J.K. 1982. Blood versus bone marrow isopropanol concentrations in rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 20(1):11-20. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)90100-1>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)90100-1
  • Winek C.L. & Jones T. 1980. Blood versus bone marrow ethanol concentrations in rabbits and humans. Forensic Sci. Int. 16(2):101-109. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(80)90162-0> <PMid:7429375>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(80)90162-0
  • Winek C.L. & Luhanik J.M. 1981. A storage study of ethanol in rabbit and human bone marrow. Forensic Sci. Int. 17(3):191-196. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)90166-3> <PMid:7239369>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(81)90166-3
  • Winek C.L., Costantino A.G., Wahba W.W. & Collom W.D. 1985. Blood versus bone marrow pentobarbital concentrations. Forensic Sci. Int. 27(1):15-24. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(85)90100-8> <PMid:3988192>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(85)90100-8
  • Winek C.L., Matejczyk R.J. & Buddie E.G. 1983. Blood, bone marrow and eye fluid ethanol concentrations in putrefied rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 22(2/3):151-159. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(83)90008-7> <PMid:6642341>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(83)90008-7
  • Winek C.L., Pluskota M. & Wahba W.W. 1982. Plasma versus bone marrow flurazepam concentration in rabbits. Forensic Sci. Int. 19(2):155-163. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)90041-X>
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(82)90041-X
  • Xavier F.G., Righi D.A. & Spinosa H.S. 2007a. Fatal poisoning in dogs and cats: a 6-year report in a veterinary pathology servisse. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 44(4):304-309. <https://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2007.26632>
    » https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2007.26632
  • Xavier F.G., Righi D.A. & Spinosa H.S. 2007b. Toxicology of the pesticide aldicarb (“chumbinho”): general, clinical and therapeutical features in dogs and cats. Ciência Rural 37(4):1206-1211. <https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000400051>
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000400051

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    14 Dec 2020
  • Date of issue
    Oct 2020

History

  • Received
    06 Aug 2020
  • Accepted
    20 Aug 2020
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Caixa Postal 74.591, 23890-000 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 21) 2682-1081 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: pvb@pvb.com.br