| GIS studies (nonparticipatory) from the IS literature |
Barret et al.
(2001)Barrett, M., Sahay, S., & Walsham, G.(2001). Information Technology
and Social Transformation: GIS for Forestry Management in India. The
Information Society, 17(1), 5-20.; *Hayes and Rajao
(2011); Puri (2006)Puri, S. K. (2006). Technological frames of stakeholders shaping the SDI
implementation: a case study from India. Information Technology for
Development, 12(4),311-331.;
*Rajao and Hayes (2009)Rajão, R., & Hayes, N., (2009). Conceptions of control and IT
artefacts: an institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system.
Journal of Information Technology, 24(4),
320-331.; Sahay and Robey, 1996Sahay, S., & Robey, D. (1996). Organisational context, social
interpretation and the implementation and consequences of geographic information
systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 6(4),
255–282.; Wastell (2006)Wastell, D. (2006). Information systems and evidence-based policy in
multi-agency networks: the micro-politics of situated innovation. Journal of
Strategic Information Systems, 15(3),197-217.
|
| PGIS studies from the IS literature |
Aynekulu et al. (2006); Chambers (2006); Nabwire and
Nyabenge (2006); Mans (2006); *Puri
(2007)Puri, S. K. (2007). Integrating scientific with indigenous knowledge:
constructing knowledge alliances for land management in India. MIS
Quarterly, 31(2), 355-379.; *Puri and Sahay
(2003)Puri, S., & Sahay, S. (2003). Participation through communicative
action: a case study of GIS for addressing land/water development in India.
Information Technology for Development, 10(3),
179–200.; Shrestha (2006); Walsham and Sahay (1999)Walsham, G., & Sahay, S. (1999). GIS for district-level
administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly,
23(1), 39-66.
|
| PGIS studies from non-IS literature |
Aswani and Lauer
(2006)Aswani, S., & Lauer, M. (2006). Incorporating fishermen's local
knowledge and behaviour into Geographical Information Systems (GIS) for designing
marine protected areas in Oceania. Human Organization, 65(1),
81–102.; Bojorquez-Tapia et al. (2001); *Corbett and Keller (2005)Corbett, J., & Keller, C. (2005). An analytical framework to examine
empowerment associated with Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS).
Cartographica. 40(4), 91-102.; *Dunn (2007); Eisner at al. 2012Eisner, W., Jelacic, J., Cuomo, C., Kim, C., Hinkel, K., & Del Alba,
D. (2012). Producing an indigenous knowledge Web GIS for Arctic Alaska communities:
challenges, successes, and lessons learned. Transactions in GIS,
16(1),17-37.); *Elwood (2006);
*Ghose (2001); *Kyem (2001)Kyem, P. (2001). Power, participation, and inflexible institutions: an
examination of the challenges to community empowerment in participatory GIS
Applications. Cartographica, 38(3/4), 5-17.;
*McCall (2003)McCall, M. (2003). Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: A
review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory
spatial planning. Habitat International, 27(4),
549-573.; Peters-Guarin (2012)Peters-Guarin, G., McCall, M. K., & van Westen, C. (2012). Coping
strategies and risk manageability: using participatory geographical information
systems to represent local knowledge. Disasters, 36
(1),1-27; Sieber (2006)Sieber, R. (2006). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems:
a Literature Review and Framework. Annals of the Association of American
Geographers, 96(3),491-507.
|
| * Critical views of GIS and PGIS |
