SUMMARY
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory characteristics of male and female patients with kidney disease admitted for hemodialysis.
METHODS: This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study analyzed the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory data from electronic health records of patients admitted for hemodialysis at a university hospital between January 2022 and November 2023, comparing men’s and women’s profiles. All adult patients were consecutively included, except those with missing data.
RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were included: 53.9% of whom were male and 43.4% self-identified as white. Chronic kidney disease was diagnosed at admission in 78.5% of cases, with diabetes mellitus being the leading etiology, affecting 20.4% of men and 26.6% of women. Men had significantly higher serum creatinine (7.9 vs. 6.3 mg/dL; p<0.001), potassium (4.8 vs. 4.6 mEq/L, p=0.039), and phosphorus levels (5.9 vs. 5.0 mg/dL; p=0.004), whereas women had significantly higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol cholesterol (46 vs. 37 mg/dL; p<0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol cholesterol (120.4 vs. 97.8 mg/dL; p=0.004), and total cholesterol (198 vs. 161 mg/dL; p<0.001). Among patients with diabetes mellitus, women more frequently used statins (67.7 vs. 42.4%; p=0.042) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (58.1 vs. 27.3%; p=0.013). They also had higher total cholesterol (199 vs. 156 mg/dL; p=0.005) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol cholesterol levels (117 vs. 92 mg/dL; p=0.043), while men had higher serum phosphorous levels (6.3 vs. 5.0 mg/dL; p=0.028).
CONCLUSION: Significant gender-based differences were identified in the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory characteristics of patients admitted for hemodialysis. Men presented higher serum creatinine, phosphorus, and potassium levels, whereas women showed higher cholesterol fractions and greater use of statins and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers.
KEYWORDS:
Diagnostic tests; routine; Gender; Hemodialysis
INTRODUCTION
Despite the availability of various renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities, approximately 88% of the 157,000 Brazilians undergoing dialysis in 2023 were receiving conventional hemodialysis (HD)1. The majority of these patients reside in the Southeast region, which accounts for nearly 60% of the national HD population2. In São Paulo, the prevalence of patients on HD reaches 57.7 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, reflecting the high regional demand for this treatment.
Indications for HD may arise from either acute or chronic kidney conditions. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as a sudden decline in renal function. Its management remains challenging, particularly regarding the timely reversal of renal insult and prevention of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Depending on the clinical scenario, RRT—most commonly HD—may be required3.
CKD is characterized by a gradual and irreversible decline in kidney function, ultimately requiring RRT in advanced stages4. In Brazil, the leading causes of CKD are systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) and diabetes mellitus (DM)1. Globally, CKD affects an estimated 9.1% of the population (8.5–9.8%)5. Among individuals with DM, 20–40% develop CKD and are at increased risk for cardiovascular complications5,6. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and kidney dysfunction are closely linked5,6.
Management strategies for CKD and CVD include the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for reno- and cardioprotection across all disease stages. In recent years, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists have also demonstrated significant benefits in both renal and cardiovascular outcomes6,7.
Additionally, gender-based differences in CKD and CVD prevalence and in metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes have been widely discussed in the literature8.
Given this context, the present study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory profiles of male and female patients with kidney disease who were admitted for hemodialysis at Hospital São Paulo (HSP), a leading university referral center, based on real-world data.
METHODS
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (CAAE 7954624.0.0000.5505; October 4, 2024). The Committee formally waived the requirement for written informed consent, as most patients had been transferred to other HD centers, making it difficult to contact them despite reasonable efforts. Furthermore, the Committee determined that the study involved minimal risk, that all clinical data and images were fully anonymized, and that the waiver would not adversely affect the rights or welfare of the patients.
This single-center, observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients admitted to the hemodialysis unit of HSP, a public university referral center for dialysis, between January 2022 and November 2023. All patients with CKD, acute-on-CKD, or AKI were consecutively included. Data were obtained from electronic health records.
Inclusion criteria were: admission for HD and availability of complete admission forms and medical records in the HSPaffiliated systems. Patients with partially or completely missing data were excluded. Of 193 medical records reviewed, 30 were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria.
Clinical–epidemiological data, including gender, age, ethnicity, CKD etiology, type and number of comorbidities, and chronic medications (e.g., insulin, biguanides, sulfonylureas, erythropoietin, vitamin D, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, ACEi, ARBs, and SGLT2i), were extracted from the HD unit admission forms. Laboratory parameters were retrieved from electronic health records. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using an equation incorporating age, gender, and serum creatinine levels.
Analyzed diseases included CKD, acute-on-CKD, AKI, SAH, DM, rheumatologic, hematologic, oncologic, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases. Lupus nephritis was classified separately from glomerular diseases.
Patients were stratified by gender to identify gender-based differences. The primary outcome was the analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters in patients admitted for HD. Secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory differences among patients with diabetic kidney disease and the presence of prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. These events were categorized as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with or without ST-segment elevation, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and events of undetermined cause. Disease classification was based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics Version 2021. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies; quantitative variables were presented as mean and standard deviation. Pearson’s chi-square test was used for categorical variable comparisons. After applying the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the independent t-test was used for numerical variables with a normal distribution, and the results were expressed as mean±standard deviation. For numerical variables without a normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney test was applied, and the results were expressed as median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3). A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Graphs were created using GraphPad Prism Version 8.0.1 (Dotmatics, Boston, MA, USA).
RESULTS
A total of 163 medical records were analyzed for patients admitted to the HD unit between January 2022 and November 2023. Of these, 88 (53.9%) were men and 75 (46.0%) were women. The mean age was 52.5±17.6 years, with no significant difference between genders (Table 1).
Clinical, epidemiological, and comorbidity profiles of patients undergoing hemodialysis, stratified by gender.
At admission, 128 (78.5%) patients were diagnosed with CKD, while 21.5% presented with acute-on-CKD or AKI. In women, the main CKD etiologies were DM (26.6%), undetermined (16.0%), and SAH (13.3%). Among men, the most frequent causes were DM (20.4%), undetermined (18.1%), SAH (17%), and glomerulopathies (17%) (Figure 1).
Etiologies of chronic kidney disease. DM: diabetes mellitus; ADPKD: autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
Although SAH was not the leading cause of CKD, 76% of patients had hypertension as a comorbidity and 64 patients (39.2%) had DM. Other comorbidities included rheumatologic, hematologic, oncologic, and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases. The number of comorbidities per patient was not different between men and women. Additionally, 31.9% had a history of smoking and 14.1% reported alcohol use. Eye disorders were observed in 23 (14.1%) patients: 52.1% with hypertensive or diabetic retinopathy, 26.0% with glaucoma, 17.3% with cataracts, and 4.3% with retinitis pigmentosa. Hypothyroidism was documented in 12.8% of patients. A history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events was present in 13.5% of patients, with 40.9% having AMI, 36.4% stroke, 18.2% TIA, and 4.5% undetermined events.
In terms of medication, 49.1% were using furosemide and 46% used ACEi or ARBs. Insulin was used by 23.3% of patients. Erythropoietin was already being used by 19.6% of patients for CKD-related anemia. Statin use was also common (38.7%), slightly more frequent among women, though not statistically significant (Table 1).
Serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in men, although no difference was seen in eGFR. Serum phosphorus was higher in men (p=0.002). Lipid profile analysis showed that women had significantly higher total cholesterol (p<0.001), HDL (p=0.004), and LDL (p=0.004) compared to men (Table 2).
Given the high prevalence of DM, a subgroup analysis of diabetic patients showed a mean age of 60.9±12.2 years with no gender difference. Comorbidity count and residual diuresis were similar between genders. Among diabetic patients, 57.8% used insulin and 54.7% used statins, with greater statin use in women (67.7% vs. 42.4%; p=0.042). ARB use was significantly more common among diabetic women than men (58.1 vs. 27.3%; p=0.013). Additionally, among diabetic patients, men exhibited higher phosphorous levels (6.3 [3.9; 7.9] vs. 5.0 [4.2; 5.6] mg/dL; p=0.028), whereas women had higher total cholesterol (199.3±51.8 vs. 156.0±45.4 mg/dL; p=0.005), LDL (117.2±45.2 vs. 92.0±32.7 mg/dL; p=0.043), and HDL levels (51 [43.5; 59.5] vs. 36 [29.5; 54] mg/dL; p=0.016). Potassium concentrations were comparable between diabetic men and women (4.9 [4.4; 5.5] vs. 4.6 [4.2; 5.0] mEq/L; p=0.1), as were triglycerides (116 [90; 196] vs. 110 [78; 223] mg/dL; p=0.7).
DISCUSSION
Analysis of the 163 patients initiating hemodialysis at HSP revealed a higher prevalence in men, with most individuals in their sixth decade of life. The primary etiology of CKD was DM, followed by undetermined causes and SAH. Laboratory abnormalities differed by gender: women had more pronounced dyslipidemia in both the general population and diabetic subgroups, while men showed higher serum phosphorus levels, including among diabetics.
Overall, the patient profile mirrored findings from other Brazilian regions according to the last census, with a predominance of older and white males in dialysis1. Laboratory alterations identified—particularly in hemoglobin, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone levels—are common complications in CKD progression, including anemia, hyperphosphatemia, and secondary hyperparathyroidism2,4,5.
Approximately one-third of the cohort reported a history of smoking, a known modifiable risk factor for CKD progression9. Hypothyroidism, also frequently observed, is linked to declining renal function via multiple mechanisms, including glomerular basement membrane changes, reduced tubular mass, and diminished cardiac output10.
A considerable number of patients had prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular dysfunction. CVD remains a leading cause of death among CKD patients, with ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, and ischemic heart disease becoming more common as renal function declines4,5. Similarly, cerebrovascular events are associated with mineral bone disorder, uremic toxins, acid–base disturbances, and anemia—factors that increase stroke risk by over 40% from CKD stage 3 onward11.
In contrast to national data that list SAH as the most common CKD etiology1, SAH ranked third in our cohort. DM was the leading cause in both genders, aligning with international trends7. Although 76% of the patients had hypertension, it may often be secondary to CKD from another primary cause. The lack of fundoscopic exams limited further evaluation of hypertensive retinopathy.
Men had higher serum creatinine levels, which were expected due to greater muscle mass and metabolism differences12. This reinforces the limitations of isolated creatinine values, with eGFR offering a more accurate renal function assessment. Interestingly, men also presented with higher serum phosphorus levels. Although the literature often reports elevated phosphorus in postmenopausal women—potentially due to hormonal changes13—we did not assess menopausal status in our cohort. Evidence indicates that estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women is associated with lower serum phosphorus levels, likely through enhanced phosphaturia14. In addition, poor adherence to dietary phosphate restrictions and phosphate binder use, previously reported more frequently among men in other settings8,15, may contribute to our findings. Nevertheless, some studies suggest that gender-related adherence may actually favor men16.
Regarding lipid profiles, women exhibited significantly higher total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL levels—differences likely driven by hormonal and metabolic changes in postmenopausal women. Estrogen normally promotes LDL receptor expression, and its reduction leads to higher LDL and a more atherogenic profile17. While men maintain stable testosterone levels, their lipid metabolism is less affected by age.
Although women had higher HDL, this cardioprotective effect may be impaired in CKD due to structural and metabolic changes that reduce HDL functionality18. Despite more frequent statin use among women, concerns remain about underdosing or lower adherence, potentially due to adverse effects. Additionally, women are often underrepresented in statin trials19, raising questions about dosing and efficacy. Our finding that only 54.7% of diabetic patients used statins highlights the need to reinforce indications for statin therapy in CKD6,7.
Over half of the patients were on ACE inhibitors or ARBs. These agents are cornerstone therapies in CKD, particularly in diabetic populations, for renal and cardiovascular protection6,7. Greater ARB use among diabetic women may suggest better tolerance and lower discontinuation rates due to side effects such as hyperkalemia.
Non-diabetic men exhibited higher serum potassium levels than women, consistent with previous findings in men with non-dialysis CKD stages G3–G5, particularly among smokers20. Nevertheless, hyperkalemia affects nearly 50% of patients with CKD stages 4–5, regardless of gender20, and is closely linked to impaired renal function as well as the use of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or potassium-sparing diuretics—factors that may contribute to cardiovascular events21,22.
Elevated potassium levels may also reflect dietary patterns or indicate more advanced diabetic nephropathy, potentially associated with hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism22. Further investigation into treatment adherence and disease severity is warranted.
Notably, 5% of patients were still receiving metformin at the time of HD initiation, despite its contraindication in individuals with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 due to the risk of lactic acidosis23. This finding underscores the need for ongoing medical education to ensure the safe and appropriate use of medications in patients with advanced CKD.
This study has limitations: retrospective design has weaknesses, since the inclusion criteria were based on data collected for other purposes; were often not homogeneous; and had missing data. Its retrospective design also led to the exclusion of patients with incomplete records; not all patients had complete laboratory data; we could not fully evaluate patients with acute-on-CKD or AKI due to incomplete clinical evolution data; and adherence to medications, their doses, and dietary recommendations was not assessed.
CONCLUSION
This study identified gender-based differences in the clinical and laboratory profiles of patients admitted for HD. Men presented higher serum creatinine, phosphorus, and potassium levels, whereas women had higher cholesterol fractions and reported greater use of statins and ARBs. These findings highlight distinct clinical and laboratory patterns between male and female patients admitted for HD.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
-
1. Nerbass FB, Lima HDN, Strogoff-de-Matos JP, Zawadzki B, Moura-Neto JA, Lugon JR, et al. Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2023. J Bras Nefrol. 2025;47(1):e20240081. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0081en
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0081en -
2. Nerbass FB, Lima HDN, Lugon JR, Sesso R, Brazilian Dialysis Register Investigators. Hemodialysis in Brazil: differences across geographic regions regarding demographics, laboratory parameters and drug prescription. J Bras Nefrol. 2023;45(4):410-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0169en
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0169en -
3. Liu KD, Goldstein SL, Vijayan A, Parikh CR, Kashani K, Okusa MD, et al. AKI!Now initiative: recommendations for awareness, recognition, and management of AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(12):1838-47. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.15611219
» https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.15611219 -
4. Romagnani P, Remuzzi G, Glassock R, Levin A, Jager KJ, Tonelli M, et al. Chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17088. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.88
» https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.88 -
5. GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3 -
6. Fabre L, Pedregosa-Miguel JF, Rangel ÉB. Proteinuric and Non-proteinuric diabetic kidney disease: different presentations of the same disease? Diabetology. 2024;5(4):389-405. https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology5040030
» https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology5040030 -
7. Rossing P, Caramori ML, Chan JCN, Heerspink HJL, Hurst C, Khunti K, et al. Executive summary of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: an update based on rapidly emerging new evidence. Kidney Int. 2022;102(5):990-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.013
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.013 -
8. Venditti V, Bleve E, Morano S, Filardi T. Gender-related factors in medication adherence for metabolic and cardiovascular health. Metabolites. 2023;13(10):1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13101087
» https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13101087 -
9. Fu YC, Xu ZL, Zhao MY, Xu K. The association between smoking and renal function in people over 20 years old. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:870278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.870278
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.870278 -
10. Rhee CM. The interaction between thyroid and kidney disease: an overview of the evidence. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016;23(5):407-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000275
» https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000275 -
11. Shah B, Jagtap P, Sarmah D, Datta A, Raut S, Sarkar A, et al. Cerebro-renal interaction and stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53(4):1279-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14983
» https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14983 -
12. Jones CA, McQuillan GM, Kusek JW, Eberhardt MS, Herman WH, Coresh J, et al. Serum creatinine levels in the US population: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(6):992-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70074-5
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70074-5 -
13. Bosman A, Koek WNH, Campos-Obando N, Eerden BCJ, Ikram MA, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Sexual dimorphisms in serum calcium and phosphate concentrations in the Rotterdam study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34800-w
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34800-w -
14. Ix JH, Chonchol M, Laughlin GA, Shlipak MG, Whooley MA. Relation of sex and estrogen therapy to serum fibroblast growth factor 23, serum phosphorus, and urine phosphorus: the heart and soul study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(5):737-45. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.06.011
» https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.06.011 -
15. Bonolo P, Ceccato Md, Rocha GM, Assis Acúrcio F, Campos LN, Guimarães MD. Gender differences in non-adherence among Brazilian patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(5):612-20. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(05)06
» https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(05)06 -
16. Chen SL, Lee WL, Liang T, Liao IC. Factors associated with gender differences in medication adherence: a longitudinal study. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(9):2031-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12361
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12361 -
17. Hafe P. Gender differences in lipid profile and therapy. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019;38(8):571-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. repc.2019.09.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2019.09.003 -
18. Yamamoto S, Kon V. Mechanisms for increased cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney dysfunction. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2009;18(3):181-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/mnh.0b013e328327b360
» https://doi.org/10.1097/mnh.0b013e328327b360 -
19. Vaziri ND. Dyslipidemia of chronic renal failure: the nature, mechanisms, and potential consequences. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(2):F262-72. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00099.2005
» https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00099.2005 -
20. Valdivielso JM, Carriazo S, Martin M, Fernandez-Fernandez B, Bermudez-López M, Ortiz A, et al. Gender-specific risk factors and outcomes of hyperkalemia in CKD patients: smoking as a driver of hyperkalemia in men. Clin Kidney J. 2023;17(1):sfad212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad212
» https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad212 -
21. Heemels AMJ, Gadiot NPPM, Kerckhoffs APM, Goto NA. Exploring hyperkalemia risk in frail older patients using RAAS inhibitors. Drugs Aging. 2025;42(2):135-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01171-4
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01171-4 -
22. Goia-Nishide K, Coregliano-Ring L, Rangel ÉB. Hyperkalemia in diabetes mellitus setting. Diseases. 2022;10(2):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020020
» https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10020020 -
23. Sá JR, Rangel EB, Canani LH, Bauer AC, Escott GM, Zelmanovitz T, et al. The 2021-2022 position of Brazilian Diabetes Society on diabetic kidney disease (DKD) management: an evidencebased guideline to clinical practice. Screening and treatment of hyperglycemia, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia in the patient with DKD. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00843-8
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00843-8


