Association between effect of reception and game procedures in high-level Brazilian volleyball: The case of the women’s “Superliga” champion team

Costa, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira; Maia, Mariana Pereira; Rocha, Augusto Cézar Rodrigues; Martins, Leonardo Rodrigues; Gemente, Flórence Rosana Faganello; Campos, Mario Hebling; Milistetd, Michel; Freire, Auro Barreiros

doi:10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n6p663

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Articles • Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum 19 (6) • Nov-Dec 2017 • https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n6p663 copy

Association between effect of reception and game procedures in high-level Brazilian volleyball: The case of the women’s “Superliga” champion team

Análise da associação do efeito da recepção com os procedimentos de jogo no voleibol de alto nível brasileiro: O caso da equipe campeã da Superliga Feminina

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the association between effect of reception and game procedures practiced by the women’s “superliga” champion team in the side-out, as well as the behavior of the opposing central blocker, according to the performance level of the opposing team. The sample was composed of the observation of 21 games of the 2015-2016 Women’s “Superliga” champion team. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, SPSS software version 20.0 for Windows and significance of p≤0.05. The results showed that there was an association between performance level of the opposing team with the effect of reception (χ²=12.96 and ɸ =0,14, p=0,01), as well the effect of reception with the central blocker disposal (χ2=13.70 and ɸ =0.14, p=0.01), with the attack tempo (χ²=353.27 and ɸ =0.72, p<0.001), with the attack site (χ²=91.05 and ɸ =0.36, p<0.001) and the attack effect (χ²=30.11 and ɸ =0.21, p<0.001) according to the performance level of the opposing team. Together, the results showed that there were differences in the game procedures according to the opposing team classification, contributing to a better understanding of the game played in high-level women’s volleyball.

Key words
Analysis of situation; Efficacy; Volleyball

Level of the team that served		Effect of Reception			Total
Level of the team that served		Reception A	Reception B	Reception C	Total
HIGH	Occurred	62	36	16	114
	Expected	74.2	23.1	16.7	114
	% Total	9.0%	5.2%	2.3%	16.5%
	Adjusted Residues	-2.6^* * difference for p <0.05	3.3^* * difference for p <0.05	-0.2
MOD	Occurred	248	70	49	367
	Expected	239	74.4	53.6	367
	% Total	35.9%	10.1%	7.1%	53.1%
	Adjusted Residues	1.4	-0.8	-1.0
LOW	Occurred	140	34	36	210
	Expected	136.8	42.5	30.7	210
	% Total	20.3%	4.9%	5.2%	30.4%
	Adjusted Residues	0.6	-1.8	1.2
Total	Occurred	450	140	101	691
Total	% Total	65.1%	20.3%	14.6%	100.0%

Effect of Recepticion			Central blocker		Total
Effect of Recepticion			Centralized	Anticipated	Total
HIGH	Reception A	Occurred	43	19	62
		Expected	45.7	16.3	62
		% Total	37.70%	16.70%	54.40%
		Adjusted Residues	-1.1	1.1
	Reception B	Occurred	27	9	36
		Expected	26.5	9.5	36
		% Total	23.70%	7.90%	31.60%
		Adjusted Residues	0.2	-0.2
	Reception C	Occurred	14	2	16
		Expected	11.8	4.2	16
		% Total	12.30%	1.80%	14.00%
		Adjusted Residues	1.4	-1.4
MOD	Reception A	Occurred	137	111	248
		Expected	154.1	93.9	248
		% Total	37.30%	30.20%	67.60%
		Adjusted Residues	-3.9^* * difference for p <0.05	3.9^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception B	Occurred	51	19	70
		Expected	43.5	26.5	70
		% Total	13.90%	5.20%	19.10%
		Adjusted Residues	2.1^* * difference for p <0.05	-2.1^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception C	Occurred	40	9	49
		Expected	30.4	18.6	49
		% Total	10.90%	2.50%	13.40%
		Adjusted Residues	3.0^* * difference for p <0.05	-3.0^* * difference for p <0.05
LOW	Reception A	Occurred	84	56	140
		Expected	84.7	55.3	140
		% Total	40.00%	26.70%	66.70%
		Adjusted Residues	-0.2	0.2
	Reception B	Occurred	21	13	34
		Expected	20.6	13.4	34
		% Total	10.00%	6.20%	16.20%
		Adjusted Residues	0.2	-0.2
	Reception C	Occurred	22	14	36
		Expected	21.8	14.2	36
		% Total	10.50%	6.70%	17.10%
		Adjusted Residues	0.1	-0.1
Total		Occurred	439	252	691
Total		% Total	63.50%	36.50%	100.00%

Effect of Reception			Attack Tempo			Total
Effect of Reception			1^st tempo	2^nd tempo	3^rd tempo	Total
HIGH	Reception A	Occurred	13	47	2	62
		Expected	10.3	46.2	5.4	62
		% Total	11.40%	41.20%	1.80%	54.40%
		Adjusted Residues	1.3	0.3	-2.3*
	Reception B	Occurred	6	30	0	36
		Expected	6	26.8	3.2	36
		% Total	5.30%	26.30%	0.00%	31.60%
		Adjusted Residues	0	1.5	-2.2^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception C	Occurred	0	8	8	16
		Expected	2.7	11.9	1.4	16
		% Total	0.00%	7.00%	7.00%	14.00%
		Adjusted Residues	-1.9	-2.4^* * difference for p <0.05	6.3^* * difference for p <0.05
MOD	Reception A	Occurred	55	191	2	248
		Expected	39.9	186.5	21.6	248
		% Total	15.00%	52.00%	0.50%	67.60%
		Adjusted Residues	4.6^* * difference for p <0.05	1.2	-7.8^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception B	Occurred	4	66	0	70
		Expected	11.3	52.6	6.1	70
		% Total	1.10%	18.00%	0.00%	19.10%
		Adjusted Residues	-2.6^* * difference for p <0.05	4.1*	-2.9^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception C	Occurred	0	19	30	49
		Expected	7.9	36.9	4.3	49
		% Total	0.00%	5.20%	8.20%	13.40%
		Adjusted Residues	-3.3^* * difference for p <0.05	-6.3^* * difference for p <0.05	14.0^* * difference for p <0.05
LOW	Reception A	Occurred	39	100	1	140
		Expected	28.7	94.7	16.7	140
		% Total	18.60%	47.60%	0.50%	66.70%
		Adjusted Residues	3.7^* * difference for p <0.05	1.7	-7.1^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception B	Occurred	4	28	2	34
		Expected	7	23	4	34
		% Total	1.90%	13.30%	1.00%	16.20%
		Adjusted Residues	-1.4	2.0^* * difference for p <0.05	-1.2
	Reception C	Occurred	0	14	22	36
		Expected	7.4	24.3	4.3	36
		% Total	0.00%	6.70%	10.50%	17.10%
		Adjusted Residues	-3.3^* * difference for p <0.05	-4.0^* * difference for p <0.05	10.0^* * difference for p <0.05
Total		Occurred	121	503	67	691
Total		% Total	17.50%	72.80%	9.70%	100.00%

Effect of reception			Place of Attack					Total
Effect of reception			P.1	P.2	P.3	P.4	P.6	Total
HIGH	Reception A	Occurred	4	15	22	18	2	61
		Expected	2.2	14.6	16.7	23.8	3.8	61
		% Total	3.50%	13.30%	19.50%	15.90%	1.80%	54.00%
		Adjusted Residues	1.9	0.2	2.2^* * difference for p <0.05	-2.2^* * difference for p <0.05	-1.4
	Reception B	Occurred	0	9	9	15	3	36
		Expected	1.3	8.6	9.9	14	2.2	36
		% Total	0.00%	8.00%	8.00%	13.30%	2.70%	31.90%
		Adjusted Residues	-1.4	0.2	-0.4	0.4	0.6
	Reception C	Occurred	0	3	0	11	2	16
		Expected	0.6	3.8	4.4	6.2	1	16
		% Total	0.00%	2.70%	0.00%	9.70%	1.80%	14.20%
		Adjusted Residues	-0.8	-0.5	-2.7*	2.6*	1.1
MOD	Reception A	Occurred	7	72	71	77	21	248
		Expected	7.4	75.7	50.7	95.3	18.9	248
		% Total	1.90%	19.60%	19.30%	21.00%	5.70%	67.60%
		Adjusted Residues	-0.3	-0.9	5.6^* * difference for p <0.05	-4.2^* * difference for p <0.05	0.9
	Reception B	Occurred	1	31	4	32	2	70
		Expected	2.1	21.4	14.3	26.9	5.3	70
		% Total	0.30%	8.40%	1.10%	8.70%	0.50%	19.10%
		Adjusted Residues	-0.9	2.8^* * difference for p <0.05	-3.4^* * difference for p <0.05	1.4	-1.7
	Reception C	Occurred	3	9	0	32	5	49
		Expected	1.5	15	10	18.8	3.7	49
		% Total	0.80%	2.50%	0.00%	8.70%	1.40%	13.40%
		Adjusted Residues	1.4	-2.0^* * difference for p <0.05	-3.8^* * difference for p <0.05	4.2*	0.7
LOW	Reception A	Occurred	5	37	53	40	5	140
		Expected	4	41.3	37.3	51.3	6	140
		% Total	2.40%	17.60%	25.20%	19.00%	2.40%	66.70%
		Adjusted Residues	0.9	-1.4	5.2^* * difference for p <0.05	-3.4^* * difference for p <0.05	-0.7
	Reception B	Occurred	0	16	3	12	3	34
		Expected	1	10	9.1	12.5	1.5	34
		% Total	0.00%	7.60%	1.40%	5.70%	1.40%	16.20%
		Adjusted Residues	-1.1	2.4^* * difference for p <0.05	-2.6^* * difference for p <0.05	-0.2	1.4
	Reception C	Occurred	1	9	0	25	1	36
		Expected	1	10.6	9.6	13.2	1.5	36
		% Total	0.50%	4.30%	0.00%	11.90%	0.50%	17.10%
		Adjusted Residues	0	-0.7	-4.0^* * difference for p <0.05	4.5^* * difference for p <0.05	-0.5
Total		Occurred	21	201	162	262	44	691
Total		% Total	3.00%	29.10%	23.50%	38.00%	6.40%	100.00%

Effect of reception			Attack effect				Total
Effect of reception			Error	Block	Continuity	Point	Total
HIGH		Occurred	5	4	17	36	62
		Expected	6	4.9	19.6	31.5	62
	Reception A	% Total	4.40%	3.50%	14.90%	31.60%	54.40%
	Reception A	Adjusted Residues	-0.6	-0.6	-1	1.7
		Occurred	2	4	13	17	36
		Expected	3.5	2.8	11.4	18.3	36
	Reception B	% Total	1.80%	3.50%	11.40%	14.90%	31.60%
	Reception B	Adjusted Residues	-1	0.9	0.7	-0.5
		Occurred	4	1	6	5	16
		Expected	1.5	1.3	5.1	8.1	16
	Reception C	% Total	3.50%	0.90%	5.30%	4.40%	14.00%
	Reception C	Adjusted Residues	2.2^* * difference for p <0.05	-0.3	0.5	-1.7
MOD	Reception A	Occurred	6	22	90	130	248
		Expected	12.2	20.9	95.3	119.6	248
		% Total	1.60%	6.00%	24.50%	35.40%	67.60%
		Adjusted Residues	-3.2^* * difference for p <0.05	0.4	-1.2	2.3^* * difference for p <0.05
	Reception B	Occurred	7	5	24	34	70
		Expected	3.4	5.9	26.9	33.8	70
		% Total	1.90%	1.40%	6.50%	9.30%	19.10%
		Adjusted Residues	2.2^* * difference for p <0.05	-0.4	-0.8	0.1
	Reception C	Occurred	5	4	27	13	49
		Expected	2.4	4.1	18.8	23.6	49
		% Total	1.40%	1.10%	7.40%	3.50%	13.40%
		Adjusted Residues	1.8	-0.1	2.6*	-3.3^* * difference for p <0.05
LOW	Reception A	Occurred	8	12	50	69	139
		Expected	10.6	12.6	54.5	61.2	139
		% Total	3.80%	5.70%	23.90%	33.00%	66.50%
		Adjusted Residues	-1.5	-0.3	-1.4	2.3*
	Reception B	Occurred	4	4	12	14	34
		Expected	2.6	3.1	13.3	15	34
		% Total	1.90%	1.90%	5.70%	6.70%	16.30%
		Adjusted Residues	1	0.6	-0.5	-0.4
	Reception C	Occurred	4	3	20	9	36
		Expected	2.8	3.3	14.1	15.8	36
		% Total	1.90%	1.40%	9.60%	4.30%	17.20%
		Adjusted Residues	0.9	-0.2	2.2*	-2.5^* * difference for p <0.05
Total		Occurred	45	59	259	327	691
Total		% Total	6.50%	8.60%	37.50%	47.40%	100.00%

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Trindade, Centro de Desportos - RBCDH, Zip postal: 88040-900 - Florianópolis, SC. Brasil, Fone/fax : (55 48) 3721-8562/(55 48) 3721-6348 - Florianópolis - SC - Brazil
E-mail: rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Goaiana, GO, Brasil, CEP:74690-900. E-mail: conti02@hotmail.com