|
Goto et al. (2005)Goto, K., N. Ishii, T. Kizuka and K. Takamatsu (2005). “The impact of metabolic stress on hormonal responses and muscular adaptations.” Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(6): 955-963.
|
Young untrained men (n = 26) |
TS group: 4 × 10, 2 min of RI between sets. CS group: 4 × 2 × 5, 30 and 60 s of RI between repetitions and sets, respectively. Load: 10 RM |
12 weeks 3 × week |
Equated |
CSA of quadriceps muscle |
Greater increase (p < 0.01) in CSA in TS group compared with CS. |
5 |
|
Oliver et al. (2013)Oliver, J. M., A. R. Jagim, A. C. Sanchez, M. A. Mardock, K. A. Kelly, H. J. Meredith, G. L. Smith, M. Greenwood, J. L. Parker, S. E. Riechman, J. D. Fluckey, S. F. Crouse and R. B. Kreider (2013). “Greater gains in strength and power with intraset rest intervals in hypertrophic training.” J Strength Cond Res 27(11): 3116-3131.
|
Young trained men (n = 22) |
TS group: 4 × 10, 2 min of RI between sets. SC group: 4 × 2 × 5, 60 s of RI between and within sets. Load: 60 to 75% 1RM |
12 weeks
4 × week |
Equated |
Total lean body mass (DEXA) |
Similar increase (p = 0.86) in lean body mass between TS group (ES = 0.25) and CS group (ES = 0.14). |
4 |
| Iglesias-Soler et al. (2015) |
Young trained men and women
(n = 13) |
TS group: 4 × 10, 3 min of RI between sets. CS group: 32, 17.4 sec of RI between repetitions. Load: 10 RM |
5 weeks
2 × week |
Equated |
Thigh circumference corrected by skinfold thickness |
Similar increase (P = 0.38) in thigh circumference between TS group (ES = 0.35) and CS group (ES = 0.32). |
4 |
|
Arazi et al. (2017)Arazi, H., A. Khanmohammadi, A. Asadi and G. G. Haff (2018). “The effect of resistance training set configuration on strength, power, and hormonal adaptation in female volleyball players.” Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 43(2): 154-164.
|
Young untrained women
(n = 30) |
TS group: 4 × 10, 2 min of RI between sets. CS group: 4 × 2 × 5, 30 and 60 s of RI between repetitions and sets, respectively. Load: 10 RM |
5 weeks
3 × week |
Not reported |
Arm and thigh circumference |
CS group showed slightly (ES = 0.34 vs. 0.17), not significant (p > 0.05), greater increase in arm circumference. CS and TS groups showed similar increases in thigh circumference (ES = 0.19 vs. 0.17 respectively) |
5 |
