Relationship between stress components in brazilian judo athletes

Brazão, Manuella Colin; Castellani, Rafael Moreno

doi:10.1590/rbce.42.2019.260

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Artigo original • Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Esporte 42 • 2020 • https://doi.org/10.1590/rbce.42.2019.260 copy

Relationship between stress components in brazilian judo athletes

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Este estudo teve como objetivo descrever a relação entre os principais componentes do estresse em 93 atletas do judô masculino e feminino de nível competitivo. Os participantes preencheram quatro formulários: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), o Brief COPE (referente às estratégias de coping), o Primary Appraisal Adjective Checklist (PAAC) e Wrestling Coping Resources Questionnaire (WCRQ). Os resultados mostraram uma relação positiva entre ameaça, dano e afeto negativo, bem como entre desafio, benefício e afeto positivo. Encontramos uma relação negativa entre avaliação cognitiva secundária e estratégias de recusa e desinvestimento comportamental. Este estudo confirmou a relação entre os componentes da teoria de Lazarus e Folkman.

Keywords:
Avaliação cognitiva; Coping; Afeto; Judô

	Threat	Damage	Challenge	Benefit	secondary evaluation	positive affection	negative affection
self distraction	0,259	0,344^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^W W = weak correlation	0,297	0,277	0,192	0,297	0,382
active coping	0,120	0,104	0,488^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,367^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^W W = weak correlation	0,204	0,388	0,129
Denial	0,288	0,379^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^W W = weak correlation	0,202	0,185	-0,509^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,125	0,472^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;
drug usage	0,015	0,246	0,162	0,039	-0,416^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,108	0,192
emotional support	0,202	0,294	0,204	0,188	0,035	0,201	0,233
instrumental support	0,245	0,271	0,194	0,194	0,048	0,407^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,282
behavioral divestment	0,133	0,189	0,102	0,118	-0,708^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^S S = strong correlation.	-0,124	0,194
Ventilation	0,243	0,302	0,299	0,380^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^W W = weak correlation	0,272	0,282	0,289
positive revaluation	0,308	0,208	0,286	0,230	0,079	0,272	0,202
Planning	0,251	0,144	0,483^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,456^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,102	0,445^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^M M = moderate correlation;	0,244
Mood	0,032	0,127	0,247	0,094	0,194	0,288	0,102
Acceptance	0,139	0,262	0,202	0,156	0,106	0,284	0,188
Religion	0,292	0,179	0,292	0,276	0,196	0,293	0,293
self-blaming	0,308	0,292	0,391^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^W W = weak correlation	0,292	0,188	0,290	0,388^* * Significant values for p ≤0,01. ^W W = weak correlation

	ANB + APB	BAN + EAP	EAN + BAP	EAN + EAP	Chi Square	MD	Sig.
Threat	2,14 (0,66)	2,26 (0,63)	2,88 (0,52)	3,31 (0,76)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05);	29,26	1,17	0,001*
Challenge	3,45 (0,77)	4,08 (0,60)	3,29 (0,63)	4,18 (0,61)^C C = Significantly different from EAN + BAP (p < 0.05);	26,38	0,89	0,001*
Damage	1,40 (0,38)	1,32 (0,46)	2,47 (0,66)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05); ^,^B B = Significantly different from BAN + EAP (p < 0.05);	2,22 (0,86)^B B = Significantly different from BAN + EAP (p < 0.05);	40,01	1,15	0,001*
Benefit	3,33 (0,63)	3,87 (0,57)^C C = Significantly different from EAN + BAP (p < 0.05);	2,96 (0,68)	3,91 (0,52)^C C = Significantly different from EAN + BAP (p < 0.05);	25,54	0,95	0,001*
secondary evaluation	3,18 (0,56)	3,23 (0,58)	3,14 (0,52)	2,72 (0,94)	5,68	0,51	0,168
self distraction	4,24 (1,02)	4,18 (1,22)	4,15 (1,65)	5,39 (1,49)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05); ^,^B B = Significantly different from BAN + EAP (p < 0.05); ^,^C C = Significantly different from EAN + BAP (p < 0.05);	11,47	1,24	0,003*
active coping	6,08 (1,12)	6,44 (1,19)	6,12 (1,28)	6,81 (1,11)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05); ^,^B B = Significantly different from BAN + EAP (p < 0.05);	8,98	0,73	0,012*
Denial	3,65 (1,28)	3,51 (1,42)	4,56 (1,59)	4,64 (1,12)	6,32	1,13	0,085
use substances	2,57 (0,98)	3,26 (1,83)	2,88 (1,51)	2,62 (1,68)	2,33	0,69	0,482
emotional support	6,07 (1,32)	5,79 (1,55)	5,87 (1,86)	6,33 (1,29)	2,00	0,54	0,525
instrumental support	5,66 (1,71)	5,68 (1.31)	5,83 (1,89)	6,49 (1,08)	5,52	0,83	0,822
behavioral divestment	3,44 (1,52)	3,02 (1,45)	3,59 (1,70)	3,08 (1,70)	3,54	0,57	0,288
Ventilation	5,13 (1,33)	5,11 (1,23)	4,98 (1,11)	5,22 (1,43)^C C = Significantly different from EAN + BAP (p < 0.05);	6,62	0,24	0,009*
positive revaluation	5,98 (1,48)	6,52 (1,08)	5,89 (1,46)	6,56 (1,34)	4,48	0,67	0,214
Planning	5,66 (1,52)	6,52 (1,15)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05);	5,92 (1,47)	6,53 (1,23)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05);	7,15	0,87	0,008*
Mood	5,09 (1,86)	5,81 (1,96)	5,31 (1,25)	5,77 (1,86)	4,57	0,72	0,182
Acceptance	5,35 (1,62)	5,84 (1,55)	5,66 (1,21)	5,79 (1,63)	1,65	0,49	0,523
Religion	4,87 (2,01)	4,79 (1,72)	4,79 (1,69)	5,82 (1,31)	5,98	1,03	0,108
self-blaming	4,94 (1,29)	5,33 (1,38)	5,62 (1,58)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05);	6,24 (1,32)^A A = Significantly different from ANB + APB (p < 0.05); ^,^B B = Significantly different from BAN + EAP (p < 0.05);	9,20	1,3	0,001*

Colégio Brasileiro de Ciências do Esporte Universidade de Brasilia - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Faculdade de Educação Física, Asa Norte - CEP 70910-970 - Brasilia, DF - Brasil, Telefone: +55 (61) 3107-2542 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: rbceonline@gmail.com

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Autor correspondente: Rafael Moreno Castellani E-mail:
rafael.moreno@usp.br