Abstract:
The article analyzed the confirmation hearings of Court of Accounts (TCU) ministerial nominees between 1988 and 2023 to understand what they reveal about the appointment process and horizontal accountability. Using content analysis of Senate hearing transcripts the study reveals preferences and conflicts that are not apparent in the senators’ votes. Among these preferences is the minister profile valued by Senators (experienced politicians with “political sensitivity”). The research also identifies the topics that interest senators in the debate on horizontal accountability and reveal the conflicts between senators and TCU (regarding the autonomy and responsiveness of the TCU before Congress). In other words, the confirmation hearings for TCU ministers are a significant locus of power, comparable to those for positions at the Central Bank of Brazil and in foreign relations.
Keywords:
confirmation hearings; Senate; court of audit; appointed positions