Abstract:
This article delves into the notion of the Anthropocene, a new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on the planet. It examines the debates surrounding this proposition, exploring its origins, its implications within the scientific community, and the disputes associated with the meanings and formalization of the term. We shed light on four key ideas in dialogue with the Anthropocene: Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene, and Technocene. Capitalocene, Plantationocene and Chthulucene serve as Ariadne's thread in this labyrinth of “cenes”, notably resembling Harawayan weaving. Meanwhile, the Technocene prompts a reflection on the influence of technoscience on the Earth system, as well as on the intersections and contradictions between post-humanist perspectives in this techno-human entanglement. The article also emphasizes the importance of an “indomesticable” Anthropocene, which can foster mutual listening, even among polyphonic voices.
Keywords:
Anthropocene; controversies; climate change; post-human; technoscience