Translation, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ): FRAQ-Brazil

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ) for the elderly Brazilian population as well as to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of this instrument.

METHOD:

The study used internationally accepted guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process. The questionnaire in its final Portuguese version was then applied to 120 elderly people to assess the measurement properties. The participants were interviewed twice in the first assessment (examiners 1 and 2 at an interval of 30to60minutes) and again after 2 to 7 days by examiner 1. The internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach' s alpha coefficient. To evaluate the reliability of the intra- and inter-evaluators, the Kappa coefficient for categorical variables was used; for numeric variables, the intra-class correlation coefficient (2-way mixed model) and the respective 95% confidence intervals were used in addition to the concordance test of Bland and Altman.

RESULTS:

The Brazilian version of the FRAQ was obtained while maintaining a semantic, idiomatic, cultural and conceptual equivalence. The internal consistency was α=0.95, while for intra-examiner reliability, an intrarater correlation coefficient (ICC-3,1) of 0.91 was obtained with an intra-class correlation Kappa coefficient of 0.89 and a Bland and Altman mean difference (bias) of -0.52. Regarding the inter-examiner reliability, the ICC=0.78, Kappa=0.76 and bias=0.12.

CONCLUSIONS:

The translation and cultural adaptation of the FRAQ for the elderly Brazilian population was successfully performed. The instrument demonstrated excellent reliability and internal consistency, thus making it useful for assessing the perception of the risk of a fall among elderly Brazilians.

questionnaires; translations; reproducibility of results; accidental falls; physical therapy

OBJETIVO:

Traduzir e adaptar culturalmente o Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ) para a população idosa brasileira e avaliar a consistência interna e a confiabilidade desse instrumento.

MÉTODO:

O estudo utilizou as diretrizes internacionais para adaptação transcultural. Em seguida, o questionário em sua versão final em português foi aplicado em 120 idosos, a fim de se avaliarem as propriedades de medida. Os participantes foram entrevistados duas vezes na primeira avaliação (examinadores 1 e 2, com intervalo de tempo de 30 a 60 minutos) e novamente entre 2 e 7 dias pelo examinador 1. A consistência interna foi estimada pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Para avaliar a confiabilidade intra e interavaliadores, utilizou-se o coeficiente Kappa para as variáveis categóricas. Já para as variáveis numéricas, utilizou-se o Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse(CCI) (modelo 2-way mixed) e seus respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95%, além do teste de concordância de Bland e Altman.

RESULTADOS:

A versão brasileira do FRAQ foi adquirida mantendo-se as equivalências semântica, idiomática, cultural e conceitual. A consistência interna foi de α=0,95, já a confiabilidade intraexaminador obteve CCI (3,1)=0,91, Kappa de 0,89 e Bland e Altman, por meio da diferença da média (viés)=-0,52. Quanto à confiabilidade interexaminador, CCI=0,78, Kappa=0,76 e viés=0,12.

CONCLUSÕES:

A tradução e a adaptação cultural do FRAQ para a população idosa brasileira foi realizada com sucesso. O instrumento demonstrou excelente confiabilidade e consistência interna, tornando assim útil para avaliação da percepção do risco de queda entre os idosos brasileiros.

questionários; tradução; reprodutibilidade dos testes; acidentes por quedas; fisioterapia

Introduction

An aging population is a worldwide phenomenon, but the Brazilian elderly population is growing at a faster rate than that observed in developed countries. It is estimated that in 2025, Brazil will have the sixth largest elderly population in the world^{1 - 3}. An increase in life expectancy is related to a high rate of comorbidities⁴; in this context, falls and instability are among the geriatric syndromes that encompass the most frequent changes in the health of the elderly.

Falls and the consequent injuries are a public health problem of great social impact that is faced today by all countries with a significant aging population^{5 , 6}. This is a reality not only because of the high prevalence of falls per year, which in Brazil is between 27% and 35%^{1 , 7 , 8}, but also because of the resulting morbidity and mortality and the high social and economic costs resulting from the subsequent injuries. At the same time, this type of public health problem is preventablegiven the factors that can be changed^{1 , 9 , 10}.

A fall is the most serious and frequent domestic accident among the elderly, and falling is the main cause of accidental death in people over 65 years old¹¹. In addition, a fall may be responsible for a decline in functional capacity, greater dependency, a poor quality of life and a higher risk for institutionalization^{7 , 9}, in addition to the high costs to the health system⁶.

In this context, several studies are being performed that aim to prevent falls among the elderly^{12 - 16}, allowing some organizations, such as the American Geriatrics Society, the British Geriatrics Society^{17 , 18} and the Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology⁷, to develop guidelines to prevent falls with strategies based on scientific evidence.

Although there are already several identified and proven risk factors, the development of a unique tool that predicts falls is still difficult, most likely because of the multifactorial etiology of falls, i.e., falls are derived from a combination of intrinsic, behavioral-related to the activities-and environmental factors^{5 , 7 , 17}, which require a multifactorial assessment.

In addition, in evaluating the risk factors for falls in the elderly, it is critical to know the degree to which the individual is aware of or has knowledge of such risks because preventive changes cannot take place unless there is an awareness of the potential problems.

The Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ) is a questionnaire that aims to evaluate the perception of the risk for falls in individuals over 65 years old. The instrument was developed at the University of Alberta, Canada and contains 26 multiple-choice closed-ended questions and 2 open-ended questions and is divided into 2 parts. The first part contains 3 questions to be administered by the interviewer, and the second part contains 25 questions to be answered individually by the interviewee. All the 26 multiple-choice questions have only 1 correct answer. Because 1 question about medications contains 8 correct answers and 1 question does not include an answer key, the questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 32 points; the higher the score, the better the awareness of falling risks of that elderly person. The instrument has construct validity¹⁹ and reasonable test-retest reliability²⁰. In addition to Portuguese, the translation of the FRAQ into Chinese has been requested and is currently in progress.

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ) for the elderly Brazilian population and evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of this instrument. To allow collaborative research in future systematic reviews of reliability studies, this manuscript was prepared according to the guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies proposed by Kottner e tal .²¹ in 2011.

The use of the FRAQ-Brazil will lead to knowledge of the awareness among the elderly of the risk factors for falling and, thereby, enable the development of educational programs that will improve understanding in this important area and optimize a preventive approach. This translation will also allow comparisons between elderly populations from different countries.

Method

Type of study

This is a cross-sectional methodological study of a transcultural adaptation and an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the FRAQ that was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Parana State, Brazil (Opinion 009/2012, CAAE 0346.0.268.000-11) and was authorized by the authors of the original FRAQ.

Population and sample

The calculation of the sample size was performed according to the formula [total n=(Zα_/2)² × p(1-p)/e²]²². Considering an expected prevalence (p) of approximately 7.4% of the population that is over 65 years old in Brazil, according to the 2010 Census²³, a confidence interval Zα_/2=1.96 and an acceptablemargin of error of 5% (e=0.05), an n=105.3 was obtained. Taking into account possible losses, a sample 10% larger was chosen, and 120 elderly persons were studied.

The study included patients aged 65 years or older of both genders, who were enrolled in the Family Health Program (FHP) of the city of Londrina, Parana State, Brazil, who presented sufficient cognitive conditions as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and who agreed to participate of the study by signing the free and informed consent form after an explanation of the goals and methods of the study by the researcher.

According to many authors^{24 - 26}, the level of education should be considered in choosing the most appropriate MMSE cutoff score; therefore, based on the study of Lawrence and Veras²⁶, we considered a cutoff score of 19 for illiterate and 25 for literate (with more than 4 years of schooling).

We excluded elderly people who did not achieve the minimum MMSE score, elderly patients with hearing and/or visual deficiencies identified at the time of the interview, individuals with Alzheimer' s disease or any other neurological deficit that could compromise cognition and the patients who did not agree to participate in the study at time of the visit.

Procedures

The methodological procedures for the translation and cultural adaptation of the FRAQ were developed according to the guidelines proposed by Beaton e tal .²⁷, which are international standards designed to maintain the equivalence between the original source and the target versions. The proposal comprises 6 steps that are described below.

Stages I and II: Initial translation into Portuguese and synthesis of the two translations

The first stage was the translation of the instrument from English to Brazilian Portuguese. For that purpose, 2 independent translations (T1 and T2) were made by 2 bilingual translators, whose mother tongue was Portuguese. Only one of the translators was sworn in and was informed about the concepts involved in the research, while the other translator had no knowledge of such concepts. The translators developed written reports on the difficulties encountered and the justification of the translation choices.

The translators and the investigator met with the aim of producing a common version of the translation (T12), a summary version obtained from the analysis of the independent translations. In this version, the goal was a consensus among the translators rather than any personal opinion. A written report was produced to document the entire process of the summary version.

Stage III: Back translation

After obtaining the translations and the summary version in Portuguese, the instrument was translated back into English by another translator whose mother tongue was English and who was fluent in Portuguese. This translator was not aware of the concepts involved in the research and also produced a written report on the difficulties encountered and the justification of the choices made in the process of the reverse translation or back translation (BT).

Stage IV: Review by an expert committee

A committee of experts was organized that comprised a physical therapist, a nurse, a pharmacist, a psychologist, a social worker and a physical educator. All of these professionals held doctoral degrees and had experience in the gerontology field. A doctoral student (with a background in physical therapy) with experience in public health and gerontology was also part of the committee and was the author responsible for the research. On the day of the meeting, everyone had access to the translations, the summary version and the original version of the questionnaire for analysis and discussion.

In 2 meetings, an attempt was made to meet the 4 equivalences suggested by Beaton e tal .²⁷: semantic, idiomatic, experiential and conceptual equivalence. The role of the expert committee was to consolidate all the versions of the questionnaire and to develop the penultimate version for the field tests during the pretest stage.

Stage V: Pretest

The pretest was administered in 30 elderly people (≥65 years old) selected by convenience who met the inclusion criteria of the study. The elderly people were interviewed individually with the pretest version of the FRAQ, and they were then asked about the difficulties in understanding the items, the misunderstanding of words and/or the clarity of the response options. Feedback was requested for improvements in the final version of the instrument. The questions not understood by 15% or more of the participants were reformulated.

Stage VI: Submission of documentation to the authors

Stage VI was the last stage and consisted of the submission of all the documentation of the translation of the original questionnaire and the adaptation process for evaluation by the original authors of the FRAQ.

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the FRAQ-Brazil

To evaluate the reliability of the FRAQ-Brazil, 120people aged 65 years or older who were enrolled in the FHP of the city of Londrina, Parana State, Brazil were interviewed. They were randomly selected from the records of the community health agents. The socio-demographic information of the participants was collected in a specific questionnaire.

The FRAQ was applied by 2 independent and previously trained interviewers with experience in the physical therapy field (examiners 1 and 2) on the same day with an interval of 30 to 60 minutes between the evaluations to assess the inter-rater reliability. After 2-7 days, examiner 1 reapplied the questionnaire to assess the intra-rater reliability. All 3 interviews were conducted in the homes of the elderly people.

The 2 examiners were aware of the study' s methodology, but they were not permitted communicate with each other. Additionally, to avoid influencing the examiners, each questionnaire was scored only at the end of the entire data collection, i.e., after the third interview.

Data analysis

The internal consistency was estimated with Cronbach' s alpha coefficient, and the following categories were considered: α≥0.9, excellent; 0.8≤α<0.9, good; 0.7≤α<0.8, acceptable; 0.6≤α<0.7, questionable; 0.5≤α<0.6, poor and α<0.5, unacceptable²⁸. To assess the intra-and inter-rater reliability, the Kappa coefficient was used for the nominal categorical variables. Values of 0-0.20 had a poor reliability; values of 0.21-0.40 were reasonably reliable; values of 0.41-0.60 were considered moderately reliable; values of 0.61-0.80 were substantially reliable, while values greater than 0.81 were considered to have an excellent or nearly perfect reliability²⁹.

Regarding the numerical variables, the intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC, (2-way mixed model)^{30 - 32} and the respective 95% confidence intervals for each ICC value were used. ICC values of <0.40 were considered to be poor, 0.40≤ICC<0.75 were reasonable to good and an ICC≥0.75 indicated an excellent reliability^{31 , 32}. The Bland and Altman agreement tests were also used according to these authors' guidelines³³, which allows visualizing the mean difference between the measurements and their respective 95% confidence intervals, the extreme limits of agreement and the standard deviation of the mean difference.

The statistical significance was set at 5% (p<0.05) in all the tests. The analyses were performed using the SPSS^(r) (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 15.0) and Graphpad Prism 5.0 software programs.

Results

The process of translation and cultural adaptation produced the Brazilian version of the FRAQ (^Appendix1). The T1 and T2 versions presented few differences, which were resolved in the synthesis T12 (Table 1) by prioritizing the use of terms and expressions more familiar to the Brazilian population. The back-translated version was very similar to the original, and only minor changes in grammatical structures were required.

Table 1
Modifications carried out during the translation period.

Questionnaire Item – term	T1 and T2	Version T12
Several questions – Seniors	T1 – Older people	Elderly
	T2 – Elderly
Q2 – Do you feel you are at risk for falling at any given moment?	T1 – Do you feel you are at risk of falling at any given moment?	Do you feel you are at risk of falling at any moment?
	T2 – Do you feel you are at risk of falling at any moment?
Q3 – Stubbing toe	T1 – Stub one's toe	Stub one's toe
	T2 – Twist one's toe
Q8 – Knitted slippers	T1 – Knitted slippers	Knitted slippers
	T2 – Knitted flip-flops
Q8 – Lace up walking shoe	T1 – Shoes with shoelaces	Lace-up walking shoe
	T2 – Lace up walking shoe
Q12 – Stroke	T1 – Stroke	Stroke
	T2 – cerebrovascular
	accident
Q16 – "nerve pills"	T1 – "Anxiolytics"	"Nerve pills"
	T2 – "Nerve pills"
Q20 – When getting out of bed, it is best to:	T1 – When you get up, it is better to:	When you get up, it is better to:
	T2 – When you get out of bed, it is better
	to:
Q21 – Salty potato chips	T1 – Salty potato chip	Salty potato chips
	T2 – Salty potato chips
Q22 – ... is more likely	T1 – … has/have higher	… has/have higher probability
	probability
	T2 – … it is more likely

• ^T1
  =Version of the first translator
• ^T2
  =Version of the second translator
• ^T12
  =Summary version

The results of the cultural adaptation performed by the expert committee are shown in Table 2. The committee' s work was essential in acquiring the semantic, idiomatic, conceptual and experiential equivalences, thus obtaining the pretest version via consensus among the team. Some terms were replaced by similar ones because the original items are not among the activities normally performed by the Brazilian population, such as walking in the snow and taking a bath. Although the FRAQ is a self-administered questionnaire, it was unanimously decided that an interview would be the best way to use the instrument in Brazil.

Table 2
Modifications suggested by the expert committee for the pre-tes t version.

Item of T12 translated summary version	Modifications suggested by the expert committee
Q3 – Broken hip	Broken pelvis and\or leg
Q3 – Stub one's toe	Hurt\Stub toe
Q3 – Be unable to carry out regular activities	Impossibility to carry out regular activities
Q5 – Likely	Likely\common
Q5 – Nursing home	Rest home or Nursing home
Q5 – In a farm	In a ranch\farm
Q8 – Knitted slippers	Slippers (rubber, cloth or wool)
Q8 – Lace up walking shoe	Sneakers
Q8 – Boots for walking	Boots
Q9 – Get in and out of a bath tub	Get in and out of the shower
Q9 – Walk on the snow	Walk outdoors
Q15 – Intake of alcohol	Use of alcoholic drink
Q16 – Names of drugs	All drug examples have been removed
Q16 – "Nerve pills"	Expression suppressed
Q16 – Drugs to lower blood pressure	Drugs to lower pressure
Q16 – Pain killers such as codeine or morphine	Pain killers such as morphine
Q16 – Drug for asthma	Drugs for asthma or bronchitis
Q18 – To be physically active	Keep oneself physically active
Q20 – When you get up, it is better to	How is it better to get out of bed:
Q22 – Higher probability of falling	Higher chance of falling
Q22 – Probability of fall	Chance to fall
Q24 – Probability of falling	Chance to fall
Q25 – has effect on falls?	leads to falls?

The order of questions 21 and 15 was switched to "confuse" or prevent the induction of only positive responses. Regarding question 16, which contained examples of drugs with commercial names, all the titles were removed because the names did not correspond to the drugs used in Brazil and to keep the participant from being limited to only the mentioned drugs.

In the administration of the pretest version to 30 elderly people, there was no need for reformulations because all of these participants understood the questions. The sociodemographic features of the 120 elderly persons who participated in the evaluation of the psychometric properties are described in Table3. The majority were female (74.2%) with mean age of 75 years. Cronbach' s alpha coefficient demonstrated excellent internal consistency: α=0.95.

Table 3
Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.

Gender	n	%
Female	89	74.2
Male	31	25.8
Age group
65 ├ 75	58	48.3
75 ├ 85	51	42.5
85 ├	11	9.2
Schooling
No schooling	15	12.5
To 4 th grade	68	56.7
From 5 th to 8 th grade	12	10.0
High school	13	10.8
Higher education	12	10.0
Total	120	100%

The Kappa coefficient was excellent regarding the evaluation of the intra-rater reliability, while for the inter-rater reliability, the Kappa coefficient indicated substantial reliability according to the Cicchetti e tal .²⁹ classification. As for the numerical variables, the test-retest intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were considered excellent^{31 , 32}, with ICC(3,1)=0.91 and ICC(3,1)=0.78, respectively. All the values presented had p<0.0001, demonstrating statistically significant results (Table4).

Table 4
Reliability tests: Kappa coefficient and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.

	Kappa coeficient		ICC (model 2-way mixed)
	Kappa	[95% CI]	ICC (3,1)	[95% CI]
Intra- rater	0.89*	[0.87- 0.91]	0.91*	[0.84- 0.94]
Inter- rater	0.76*	[0.73- 0.79]	0.78*	[0.69- 0.84]

• ^*
  p<0.0001
• ^ICC
  =Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
• ^CI
  =Confidence Interval

The mean differences, the standard deviations of the mean differences and the extreme limits of agreement are shown in the Bland-Altman scatter plot (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Bland-Altman plot (A=intra-rater; B=inter-rater). SD=Standard Deviation; ULA=Upper Limit of Agreement; LLA=Lower Limit of Agreement.

Discussion

There is a great interest in the scientific community in developing questionnaires that assess health status. Despite the growing number of developed and applied scales and instruments, not all of them are available in different countries and different languages³⁴. Generally these instruments are found in English, which requires a process of translation and transcultural adaptation as well as the analysis of the measurement properties of the instruments^{35 , 36}.

Cruz e tal .³⁷ describe the existence of international instruments that are not available for Brazilian researchers, which demonstrates the need for the adaptation and validation of the new scales. It is noteworthy that instruments with the same goal as the FRAQ are not available in the Brazilian literature, i.e., instruments that evaluate the perception of the risk of falls in the elderly.

However, specific tests of balance and postural control that allow the identification of the clinical predictors of the risk of falls in elderly people, such as the Functional Reach Test (FRT)³⁸, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)^{39 , 40}, the Time Up and Go test (TUG)⁴⁰ and the Tinetti' s balance test (Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment-POMA)⁴¹, are available to researchers and clinicians. In this context, the Falls Efficacy Scale-International should be emphasized because this instrument is already adapted for use in Brazil (FES-I-Brazil)⁴² and presents excellent psychometric properties, which assess the self-efficacy related to falls; the FES-I-Brazil is useful for understanding the reasons why the elderly develop a fear of falling and identifying the elderly persons who are more susceptible to falling.

Some studies have been performed to present some of the main methodological issues and problems associated with the translation of questionnaires for use in the transcultural research relevant to health professionals^{43 , 44}. Although there are different methods^{45 , 46}, some instruments have specific protocols for their translation and adaptation, as occurs for the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)⁴⁷, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)⁴⁸ and the Motor Function Measure Scale (MFM)⁴⁹, among others. In this study, the Beaton e tal .²⁷ method was chosen because this method is complete, has excellent quality, is the most accepted and used internationally and is the evaluation method used in recent systematic reviews of studies on transcultural adaptations and the evaluation of measurement properties^{50 - 53}.

Each society has its own beliefs, attitudes, habits, behaviors and social habits. These features guide people regarding who they are, how they should behave and what they should do and should not do. These rules or concepts reflect the culture of a country and differentiate one country from another⁴⁷. The items of a questionnaire should not only be linguistically well translated but also must be adapted culturally to maintain the content validity of the instrument³⁵. In the process of the adaptation of the FRAQ, the role of the expert committee was critical in this regard, ensuring experiential equivalence by replacing habits such as taking a bath and walking on the snow because these activities do not correspond to the Brazilian reality.

Another adaptation that was required was in the item "Knitted slippers", translated by T1 as "pantufas de tricô" (knitted slippers) and by T2 as "chinelos de tricô" (knitted sandals), which in the final version with the adjustments by the expert committee appeared as "chinelo de borracha, tecido ou lã" (rubber, fabric or wool sandals) because, in Brazil, the use of slippers is common among the elderly, so the presence of this type of footwear among the answer options was considered relevant.

In semantic equivalence, i.e., the evaluation of grammar and vocabulary, the words that do not have a literal translation of similar meaning must be translated into Portuguese terms that represent an equivalence of meaning⁵⁴. In this context, the most complex item for translation in the FRAQ was "lace-up walking shoe", which in the synthesized version appeared as "sapato de caminhada com cadarço" (walking shoe with laces) and, after the committee discussion, appeared as "tênis" (sneakers). Another adapted topic was "nursing home", which was translated as "casa de repouso" (nursing home), but in the final version, the word "asilo" (asylum) was added, a term more widely used in Brazil; in the end, the term appeared as "asilo ou casa de repouso" (asylum or nursing home).

Beaton e tal .²⁷ reported that idiomatic equivalence addresses the difficulties in translating the colloquial expressions of a given language, seeking an equivalence in the target version. The expression "stubbing toe", which was translated as "topar o dedo do pé" (bumping toe), had to be adapted for better understanding and clarity to "dedo do pé machucado/batido" (hurt/hit toe).

There were no difficulties in the conceptual equivalence of the FRAQ because all the items used had the same concepts. Often words represent different concepts or meanings across cultures. For example, the meaning of "ver a sua família tanto quanto você gostaria" (see your family as much as you would like to) would be different in cultures with different concepts of what a "family" is²⁷.

The decision to convert the FRAQ, originally a self-administered questionnaire, into an interview format was based on the low educational level still present among the elderly in Brazil. According to Orfale e tal .⁵⁵, many Brazilian questionnaires are administered as an interview or provide some instructions for the completion of the questionnaire due to the lack of practice of the patients in completing self-administered questionnaires and/or the low educational level; process already observed in other questionnaires translated into Brazilian Portuguese^{47 , 56}.

Cronbach' s alpha coefficient was presented by Cronbach⁵⁷ in 1951 as a way to estimate the reliability of a questionnaire administered in a research study. Alpha measures the correlation between the answers in a questionnaire by analyzing the answers given by the interviewees. Because all the items of a questionnaire use the same measurement scale, the α coefficient is calculated from the variance of the individual items and the variance of the sum of the items of each evaluator⁵⁸. The internal consistency of the Brazilian FRAQ yielded an α=0.95, which ensures that the adjustments that were made maintained the homogeneity of the instrument components.

The evaluation questionnaires must be reproducible over time, i.e., they should produce the same or similar results for 2 or more administrations with the same patient, assuming that his/her clinical condition has not changed⁵⁹. In the analysis of the intra-and inter-rater reliability of the FRAQ, excellent results were obtained according to the ICC. The Kappa coefficient was another statistical measure that demonstrated excellent and substantial reliability, with values of 0.89 (intra-rater) and 0.76 (inter-rater) for the categorical variables.

Although many reliability studies present only the ICC, this measure alone does not provide enough information for this type of study; thus, the additional use of the Bland and Altman⁵² method is recommended. The Bland and Altman test provides a Figure in which the size and the amplitude of the differences in the measurements and the errors or outliers can be easily interpreted. In addition, this method presents the values of the confidence intervals for the mean differences and the limits of agreement⁶⁰, the latter of which supports the clinical decision. In the analysis of the FRAQ, the data indicated a good agreement with a bias near zero and small limits of agreement.

Because the FRAQ has not yet been translated and adapted for other countries and other languages, it was not possible to compare the difficulties found in the processes of translation and adaptation and the measurement properties with other cultures. Regarding the responsiveness evaluation, because the FRAQ is a questionnaire about awareness/knowledge, the development of a clinical trial in health education is planned in the near future, which will measure this attribute and contribute to the increased awareness of the risk of falling among the elderly.

The first step to reduce the number of falls among elderly people is an awareness of the risk factors. In this sense, the application of the FRAQ will identify such lack of knowledge, and from this revelation, an awareness of the risks that are ignored by the participants will help to target more efficient prevention programs. It is recommended that the FRAQ be used by public health professionals working closely with the elderly, such as community health workers, who can be trained regarding the risk factors for falls and, thereby, provide more qualified assistance and contribute significantly to the reduction of the number of falls among the elderly.

Conclusion

The translation of the FRAQ into the Portuguese language and the cultural adaptation of the FRAQ for the elderly Brazilian population were successfully performed following internationally accepted methodological standards. The Brazilian version of the FRAQ maintained semantic, idiomatic, cultural and conceptual equivalences and demonstrated excellent reliability and internal consistency, which makes the FRAQ a useful tool to evaluate the awareness of the risk of falling among Brazil' s elderly.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge all the elderly persons and the professionals who participated and collaborated in this study.

References

• ¹
  Siqueira FV, Facchini LA, Piccini RX, Tomasi E, Thumé E, Silveira DS, e tal . Prevalência de quedas em idosos e fatores associados. Rev Saúde Pública.2007;41(5):749-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000500009
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000500009
• ²
  Veras R. Envelhecimento populacional contemporâneo: demandas, desafios e inovações. Rev Saúde Pública.2009;43(3):548-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000025
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000025
• ³
  Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE. Perfil dos Idosos Responsáveis pelos Domicílios no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério de Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Diretoria de Pesquisa;2002.
• ⁴
  Almeida MF, Barata RB, Montero CV. Prevalência de doenças crônicas auto-referidas e utilização de serviços de saúde, PNAD/1998, Brasil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva.2002;7(4):743-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232002000400011
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232002000400011
• ⁵
  Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia-SBGG. Projeto Diretrizes. Quedas em idosos: prevenção [Internet]. [cited2012 Aug]. São Paulo: Associação Médica Brasileira e Conselho Federal de Medicina. Available from: http://www.projetodiretrizes.org.br/livro.php.
  » Available from: http://www.projetodiretrizes.org.br/livro.php
• ⁶
  Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Quedas de idosos: SUS gasta quase R$81 milhões com fraturas em idosos em2009 [Internet]. [cited2011 Nov]. Available from: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/saude/visualizar_ texto.cfm?idtxt=33674&janela=1.
  » Available from: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/saude/visualizar_ texto.cfm?idtxt=33674&janela=1.
• ⁷
  Perracini MR, Ramos LR. Fatores associados a quedas em uma coorte de idosos residentes na comunidade. Rev Saúde Pública.2002;36(6):709-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102002000700008
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102002000700008
• ⁸
  Siqueira FV, Facchini LA, Silveira DS, Piccini RX, Tomasi E, Thumé E, e tal . Prevalence of falls in elderly in Brazil: a countrywide analysis. Cad Saúde Pública.2011;27(9):1819-1826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000900015
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000900015
• ⁹
  Fabrício SCC, Rodrigues RAP, Costa ML Jr. Causas e consequências de quedas de idosos atendidos em hospital público. Rev Saúde Pública.2004;38(1):93-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000100013
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000100013
• ¹⁰
  Riera R, Trevisani VFM, Ribeiro JPN. Osteoporose: a importância da prevenção de quedas. Rev Bras Reumatol.2003;43(6):364-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0482-50042003000600008
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0482-50042003000600008
• ¹¹
  Fuller GF. Falls in the elderly. Am Fam Physician.2000;61:2159-68. PMid:10779256.
• ¹²
  Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing.2006;35(2):37-41.
• ¹³
  Gusi N, Carmelo Adsuar J, Corzo H, Del Pozo-Cruz B, Olivares PR, Parraca JA. Balance training reduces fear of falling and improves dynamic balance and isometric strength in institutionalised older people: a randomised trial. J Physiother.2012;58(2):97-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70089-9
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70089-9
• ¹⁴
  Sherrington C, Tiedemann A, Fairhall N, Close JC, Lord SR. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated meta-analysis and best practice recommendations. NSW Public Health Bull.2011;22(3-4):78-83. PMid:21632004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/NB10056
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/NB10056
• ¹⁵
  Leung DP, Chan CK, Tsang HW, Tsang WW, Jones AY. Tai chi as an intervention to improve balance and reduce falls in older adults: A systematic and meta-analytical review. Altern Ther Health Med.2011;17(1):40-8. PMid:21614943.
• ¹⁶
  Hanley A, Silke C, Murphy J. Community-based health efforts for prevention of falls in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging.2011;6:19-25. PMid:21472088 PMCid:PMC3066249.
• ¹⁷
  American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc.2001;49(5):664-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x
• ¹⁸
  Panel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons, American Geriatrics Society and British Geriatrics Society (2011), Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older Persons. J Am Geriatr Soc.2011;59(1):148-157. PMid:21226685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x
• ¹⁹
  Wiens CA, Koleba T, Jones CA, Feeny DH. The Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire: Development and Validation for use with older adults. J Gerontol Nurs.2006;32(8):43-50. PMid:16915745.
• ²⁰
  Sadowski C, Nguyen V, Jones CA, Feeny D. Fall risk awareness questionnaire in community-dwelling older adults. In: The American Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting: Proceedings of the American Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting;2010 May12-15; Florida. J Am Geriatr Soc.2010;4suppl:S48.
• ²¹
  Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajeweski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, e tal . Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol.2011;64(1):96-106. PMid:21130355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
• ²²
  Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Thomson Learning;2000.
• ²³
  Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE [Internet]. Censo Demográfico2010. [cited2011 Dec]. Available from: www.ibge.gov.br.
  » Available from: www.ibge.gov.br
• ²⁴
  Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc.1992;40:922-35. PMid:1512391.
• ²⁵
  Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto IH. Sugestões para o uso do mini-exame do estado mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr.2003;61(3B):777-81. PMid:14595482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014
• ²⁶
  Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-Exame do Estado Mental: características psicométricas em idosos ambulatoriais. Rev Saúde Pública.2006;4(4):712-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000500023
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000500023
• ²⁷
  Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa1976).2000;25(24):3186-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
• ²⁸
  George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update.4thed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon;2003.
• ²⁹
  Cicchetti D, Bronen R, Spencer S, Haut S, Berg A, Oliver P, e tal . Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis.2006;194(8):557-64. PMid:16909062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000230392.83607.c5
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000230392.83607.c5
• ³⁰
  Krebs DE. Declare your ICC type. Phys Ther.1986;66(9):1431. PMid:3749277.
• ³¹
  Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull.1979;86(2):420-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
• ³²
  Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res.2005;19(1):231-40. PMid:15705040.
• ³³
  Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet.1986;1:307-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
• ³⁴
  Duarte PS, Miyazaki MCOS, Ciconelli RM, Sesso R. Tradução e adaptação cultural do instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida para pacientes renais crônicos (KDQOL-SFTM). Rev Assoc Med Bras.2003;49:375-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302003000400027
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302003000400027
• ³⁵
  Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol.1993;46:1417-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
• ³⁶
  Terwee CB, Bot SD, De Boer MR, Van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, e tal . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol.2007;60(1):34-42. PMid:17161752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
• ³⁷
  Cruz LN, Polanczyk CA, Camey SA, Hoffmann JF, Fleck MP. Quality of life in Brazil: normative values for the Whoqol-bref in a southern general population sample. Qual Life Res.2011;20(7):1123-9. PMid:21279448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9845-3
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9845-3
• ³⁸
  Lopes KT, Costa DF, Santos LF, Castro DP, Bastone AC. Prevalence of fear of falling among a population of older adults and its correlation with mobility, dynamic balance, risk and history of falls. Rev Bras Fisioter.2009;13(3):223-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000026
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000026
• ³⁹
  Santos GM, Souza ACS, Virtuoso JF, Tavares GMS, Mazo GZ. Predictive values at risk of falling in physically active and no active elderly with Berg Balance Scale. Rev Bras Fisioter.2011;15(2):95-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000200003
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000200003
• ⁴⁰
  Gonçalves DFF, Ricci NA, Coimbra AMV. Functional balance among community-dwelling older adults: a comparison of their history of falls. Rev Bras Fisioter.2009;13(4):316-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000044
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000044
• ⁴¹
  Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc.1986;34(2):119-26. PMid:3944402.
• ⁴²
  Camargos FFO, Dias RC, Dias JMD, Freire MTF. Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Among Elderly Brazilians (FES-I-BRAZIL). Rev Bras Fisioter.2010;14(3):237-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000300010
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000300010
• ⁴³
  Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology.2004;126(Suppl1):S124-8. PMid:14978648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
• ⁴⁴
  Peters M, Passchier J. Translating instruments for cross-cultural studies in headache research. Headache.2006;46(1):82-91. PMid:16412155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00298.x
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00298.x
• ⁴⁵
  Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res.1998;7:323-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008846618880
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008846618880
• ⁴⁶
  Hilton A, Strutkowiski M. Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes. Cancer Nurs.2002;25:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001
• ⁴⁷
  Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol.1999;39(3):143-50.
• ⁴⁸
  Lopes AD, Stadniky SP, Masiero D, Carrera EF, Ciconelli RM, Griffin S. Tradução e adaptação cultural do WORC: um questionário de qualidade de vida para alterações do manguito rotador. Rev Bras Fisioter.2006;10(3):309-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552006000300010
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552006000300010
• ⁴⁹
  Iwabe C, Miranda-Pfeilsticker BH, Nucci A. Motor function measure scale: portuguese version and reliability analysis. Rev Bras Fisioter.2008;12(5):417-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552008000500012
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552008000500012
• ⁵⁰
  Costa LCM, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. J Clin Epidemiol.2009;62(9):934-43. PMid:19595572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.019
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.019
• ⁵¹
  Puga VOO, Lopes AD, Costa LOP. Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of self-report outcome measures relevant to shoulder disability in Portuguese: a systematic review. Rev Bras Fisioter.2012;16(2):85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000012
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000012
• ⁵²
  Hiratuka E, Matsukura TS, Pfeifer LI. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Gross Motor Function Classification System into Brazilian-Portuguese (GMFCS). Rev Bras Fisioter.2010;14(6):537-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000600013
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000600013
• ⁵³
  Martins J, Napoles BV, Hoffman CB, Oliveira AS. The Brazilian version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: translation, cultural adaptation and reliability. Rev Bras Fisioter.2010;14(6):527-536.
• ⁵⁴
  Luft CDB, Sanches SO, Mazo GZ, Andrade, A. Versão brasileira da Escala de Estresse Percebido: tradução e validação para idosos. Rev Saúde Pública.2007;41(4):606-615. PMid:17589759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000400015
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000400015
• ⁵⁵
  Orfale AG, Araújo PMP, Ferraz MB, Natour J. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res.2005;38:293-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2005000200018
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2005000200018
• ⁵⁶
  Pimenta CAM, Teixeira MJ. Questionário de dor McGill: proposta de adaptação para a Língua Portuguesa. Rev Esc Enf USP.1996;30:473-83. PMid:9016160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62341996000300009
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62341996000300009
• ⁵⁷
  Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.1951;16(3):297-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
• ⁵⁸
  Hora HRM, Monteiro GTR, Arica J. Confiabilidade em Questionários para Qualidade: Um Estudo com o Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach. Produto & Produção.2010;11(2):85-103.
• ⁵⁹
  Jenkinson C. Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations. Soc Sci Med.1995;41:1395-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00119-R
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00119-R
• ⁶⁰
  Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil.1998;12:187-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/026921598672178340
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/026921598672178340

Appendix 1 continued...

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Dec 2013

History

• Received
  10 Feb 2013
• Reviewed
  10 June 2013
• Accepted
  05 July 2013