Sahin et al (2017)2121 Sahin C, Akdemir A, Ergenoglu AM, et al. Which should be the preferred technique during laparoscopicovarian cystectomy. Reprod Sci 2017;24(03):393-399. Doi: 10.1177/1933719116657195 https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116657195...
|
2.32 ± 2.01 |
2.38 ± 2.57 |
− |
2.78 ± 2.85 |
3.24 ± 3.01 |
3.17 ± 3.40 |
− |
3.71 ± 3.09 |
Zhang et al (2016)1717 Zhang CH, Wu L, Li PQ. Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55 (04):507-511. Doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.0...
|
1.90 ± 0.70 |
1.80 ± 1.0 |
1.90 ± 0.80 |
2.0 ± 0.90 |
2.90 ± 1.80 |
3.0 ± 1.8 |
3.0 ± 1.5 |
3.1 ± 1.6 |
Asgari et al (2016)2222 Asgari Z, Rouholamin S, Hosseini R, Sepidarkish M,Hafizi L, Javaheri A. Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293(05):1015-1022. Doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3918-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3918-...
|
− |
1.25 ± 0.84 |
− |
− |
− |
2.10 ± 0.88 |
− |
− |
Tanprasertkul et al (2014)2424 Tanprasertkul C, Ekarattanawong S, Sreshthaputra O, Vutyavanich T. Impact of hemostasis methods, electrocoagulation versus suture, in laparoscopic endometriotic cystectomy on the ovarian reserve: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;97 (Suppl 8):S95-S101
|
1.76 ± 1.50 |
2.09 ± 1.66 |
2.11 ± 1.84 |
− |
2.09 ± 1.62 |
1.96 ± 1.68 |
1.72 ± 1.68 |
− |
Takashima et al (2013)2626 Takashima A, Takeshita N, Otaka K, Kinoshita T. Effects of bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma on the ovarian reserve and outcome of in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39(07):1246-1252. Doi: 10.1111/jog.12056 https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12056...
|
− |
3.16 ± 1.27 |
− |
− |
− |
2.88 ± 0.83 |
− |
− |
Ferrero et al (2012)2727 Ferrero S, Venturini PL, Gillott DJ, Remorgida V, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. Hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture after surgical stripping of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19 (06):722-730. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.0...
|
− |
1.85 ± 1.67 |
1.75 ± 1.94 |
1.75 ± 1.82 |
− |
2.65 ± 2.42 |
2.25 ± 1.53 |
2.30 ± 1.77 |
|
Bipolar energy
|
Hemostatic agent
|
Song et al (2014)1919 Song T, Lee SH, Kim WY. Additional benefit of hemostatic sealant in preservation of ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: a multi-center, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014;29(08):1659-1665. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu125 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu125...
|
− |
2.04 ± 0.64 |
− |
− |
− |
2.67 ± 0.95 |
− |
− |
Sönmezer et al (2013)2020 Sönmezer M, Taskin S, Gemici A, et al. Can ovarian damage be reduced using hemostatic matrix during laparoscopic endometrioma surgery? A prospective, randomized study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287(06):1251-1257. Doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2704-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2704-...
|
1.64 ± 0.93 |
2.84 ± 1.12 |
− |
− |
2.72 ± 1.49 |
3.07 ± 1.43 |
− |
− |
|
Bipolar energy
|
Ultrasonic energy
|
Zhang et al (2016)1717 Zhang CH, Wu L, Li PQ. Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55 (04):507-511. Doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.0...
|
1.9 ± 0.7 |
1.8 ± 1.0 |
1.9 ± 0.8 |
2.0 ± 0.9 |
1.5 ± 0.9 |
1.8 ± 0.9 |
1.9 ± 1.0 |
2.0 ± 1.0 |
Decline rate of serum AMH
|
|
Bipolar energy
|
Suture
|
Asgari et al (2016)2222 Asgari Z, Rouholamin S, Hosseini R, Sepidarkish M,Hafizi L, Javaheri A. Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293(05):1015-1022. Doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3918-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3918-...
|
53.42 ± 15.28 |
15.94 ± 18.55 |
Song et al (2015)2323 Song T, Kim WY, Lee KW, Kim KH. Effect on ovarian reserve of hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture during laparoendoscopic single-site cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22(03):415-420. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.0...
|
42.2 ± 9.12 |
24.6 ± 6.35 |
|
Bipolar energy
|
Hemostatic agent
|
Kang et al (2015)1818 Kang JH, Kim YS, Lee SH, Kim WY. Comparison of hemostatic sealants on ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;194:64-67. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08...
|
41.2 ± 8.92 |
15.4 ± 6.1 |
Song et al (2014)1919 Song T, Lee SH, Kim WY. Additional benefit of hemostatic sealant in preservation of ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: a multi-center, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014;29(08):1659-1665. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu125 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu125...
|
41.2 ± 9.32 |
16.1 ± 9.1 |
Number of antral follicles
|
Author, year
|
1m
|
3m
|
6m
|
12m
|
1m
|
3m
|
6m
|
12m
|
|
Bipolar energy
|
Suture
|
Zhang et al (2016)1717 Zhang CH, Wu L, Li PQ. Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55 (04):507-511. Doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.0...
|
3.2 ± 1.6 |
3.6 ± 1.3 |
3.9 ± 1.4 |
4.2 ± 1.5 |
3.1 ± 1.4 |
4.7 ± 1.3 |
6.0 ± 1.9 |
6.3 ± 2.0 |
Sahin et al (2017)2121 Sahin C, Akdemir A, Ergenoglu AM, et al. Which should be the preferred technique during laparoscopicovarian cystectomy. Reprod Sci 2017;24(03):393-399. Doi: 10.1177/1933719116657195 https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116657195...
|
4.26 ± 4.12 |
5.30 ± 4.59 |
− |
5.86 ± 4.53 |
6.79 ± 4.54 |
7.48 ± 5.02 |
− |
7.55 ± 5.23 |
Takashima et al (2013)2626 Takashima A, Takeshita N, Otaka K, Kinoshita T. Effects of bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma on the ovarian reserve and outcome of in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39(07):1246-1252. Doi: 10.1111/jog.12056 https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12056...
|
− |
2.7 ± 0.9 |
− |
− |
− |
1.7 ± 0.7 |
− |
− |
Özgönen et al (2013)2525 Özgönen H, Erdemoglu E, Günyeli I, Güney M, Mungan T. Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation and intracorporeal suture application to ovarian reserve in benign ovarian cysts. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287(04):729-732. Doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2638-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2638-...
|
6.9 ± 1.04 |
8.63 ± 1.21 |
− |
− |
7.23 ± 1.38 |
8.60 ± 1.24 |
− |
− |
|
Bipolar energy
|
Ultrasonic energy
|
Zhang et al (2016)1717 Zhang CH, Wu L, Li PQ. Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55 (04):507-511. Doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.0...
|
3.2 ± 1.6 |
3.6 ± 1.3 |
3.9 ± 1.4 |
4.2 ± 1.5 |
3.0 ± 1.7 |
3.6 ± 1.4 |
3.9 ± 1.3 |
4.0 ± 1.2 |