Objective:
To compare refractive and vectorial outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) versus toric intraocular lenses (IOL) in the treatment of preexisting corneal astigmatism at the time of phacoemulsification.
Methods:
This longitudinal observational case series assessed 62 eyes of 31 consecutive cataract patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism between 0.75 and 2.50 diopters in both eyes. Patients were randomly assorted in two groups: one assigned to receive AcrySof Toric™ IOL in both eyes, and another one assigned to have AcrySof Natural™ IOL associated with LRI, also in both eyes. All patients were re-evaluated, postoperatively, at 1, 3 and 6 months, when refractive astigmatism analysis was performed using vectorial methods proposed by Thibos. Variability of outcomes within each group and between groups were assessed and compared.
Results:
Manifest refractive cylinder, in diopters (D), as means ± standard deviation, in the LRI group for 1-month, 3-month and 6-month re-evalutions were respectively -0.66 ± 0.30; -0.70 ± 0.21 and -0.74 ± 0.26 when compared to -0.58 ± 0.24; -0.63 ± 0.20, and -0.62 ± 0.17 in the toric IOL group. (p value ≥ 0.06). Vectorial analysis evidenced greater astigmatism reduction in the toric IOL group in the 6th postoperative month, when postoperative mean astigmatic power vector was 0.31 D, when compared to 0.37 D in the LRI group (p value = 0.00).
Conclusions:
A trend of slightly better refractive outcomes favoring toric IOL group was seen, although such a trend was not statistically significant. Vectorial analysis, however, suggests that the use of toric IOL may constitute a more advantageous approach in the treatment of pre-existing corneal astigmatism, simultaneously with phacoemulsification.
Cataract; Astigmatism /therapy; Lens, Intraocular
