Peaceful rise and the limits of Chinese exceptionalism

Throughout the last thirty years of opening to the world Beijing has stressed that its rise will be peaceful and that, from a strategic point of view, China is exceptional. There are many challenges facing Beijing’s response to the US rebalancing to the Asia-Pacific, but we consider that the ones with greater impact are, in point of fact, of a domestic nature and constitute limits to Chinese exceptionalism.


Introduction
China will not follow the path of Germany leading up to World War I or those of Germany and Japan leading up to World War II, when these countries violently plundered resources and pursued hegemony.Neither will China follow the path of great powers vying for global domination during the Cold War.Instead, China will transcend ideological differences to strive for peace, development, and cooperation with all countries of the world. 1 It is trite to mention that the rise of China has changed the world we live in.Indeed, by opening to the world China has also embarked on a process of domestic transformation.One of the main characteristics of this dual development has been to stress the inherently peaceful and cooperative nature of the huge undertaking of lifting one-fifth of mankind out of poverty.The concern with this emphasis was so great that even the initial label "Peaceful Rise" was considered to be too assertive and, thereby, changed to "Peaceful Development."Beijing, by making the claim that unlike previous great powers China will be different, has reinforced a deeply-rooted historical perception of being exceptional.
Notwithstanding, after a cycle of thirty years of growth China is currently at a crossroads, since it is no longer feasible to keep a low-profile foreign policy whilst being the second economy in the world with global interests and the second biggest military expenditure.Therefore, this article has four building-blocks in order to try to understand what are the factors constraining Beijing's response to this new reality.Firstly, there is the need to understand the multilevel factors of the current strategic crossroad, and then to analyse the roots of Chinese exceptionalism and their impact on foreign policy.Thirdly, we will be looking into the US The low-profile approach reaped its benefits and, nowadays, China is a vital country in the world.At the same time, Beijing is now a victim of its accomplishments and is caught in a "Success Trap." 5 This trap has many levels but it is in the foreign policy dimension that it becomes more manifest.A brief analysis of traditional elements of power will tell us that China besides the fact that it has the world's biggest population-in practical terms it means that one out of every five people in the world is Chinese-and the fourth largest territory, is also the second biggest economy in the world and military budget, a huge consumer of natural resources, in particular natural gas and oil.In addition, it is a permanent member of the Security Council of the United Nations Organization and an official nuclear power.It is, of course, the economic dimension that is overwhelming since it also entails being the biggest exporter, second greatest receiver of Foreign Direct Investment, largest foreign currency reserves and the biggest creditor. 6This wealth has enabled Beijing to invest and modernise its military as can be seen by its budget.Although a distant second in global terms-despite the cuts the US is paramount with US$ 682 billion-China has a rising budget of US$ 249 billion. 7oreover, it is investing heavily in a space programme and a "blue-water navy."The most obvious sign of the latter is the aircraft carrier Liaoning, although not yet "Made in China," but an important signal that China wants to have a greater naval capacity.On top of all this China continues to be one a dictatorship, thereby, raising concerns about the possibility of succeeding in establishing a normative challenge: a non-democratic illiberal blueprint for the world. 8hat is more, Beijing is now extending its influence beyond borders and truly becoming a global player.It is essentially this new element of its foreign policy that makes it so hard to continue following the low-profile dictum of Deng Xiaoping.Not only has China reinforced its Diaspora and it now has many Chinese workers in, for instance, Africa but it is also the greatest trading partner of African countries.In Europe, Chinese presence is also felt and it the region where it is most visible the attempt to reconvert its economy.China is no longer "just" associated with being the "factory of the world" and exporting low-quality products based on low-income wages, but also with high-quality technology.The best example is the buy of Volvo by Zhejiang Geely Holding Group that fits like a glove into this new "face" of Chinese foreign policy.This situation is helped by the fact that many countries in Europe are experiencing budget difficulties, thereby making it easier for China to become a "powerful actor within Europe itself." 95 Godement, François (2012

Revista BRasileiRa de Política inteRnacional
In this general picture of greater Chinese involvement in European affairs Portugal is no exception.China is no longer viewed solely through the lens of Macao; a territory that the Portuguese administered for centuries and that is, since 1999, a Special Administrative Region of China.In a parallel way, Beijing has invested heavily in companies that have a good technological input in the energy sector such as EDP, the national electricity provider, and REN, the company that manages the national electricity infrastructures.China Three Gorges controls 21% of EDP and China State Grid a quarter of REN.In addition, China has built a special relationship with the German colossus that can be ascertained by the fact that "nearly half of all EU exports to China come from Germany; nearly a quarter of EU imports from China go to Germany." 10 The overall picture of Chinese growing influence in the world has been complemented by the perception that we are witnessing a truly generational shift in Beijing.Not only were Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang born after 1949, but this is the first generation that does not carry the legitimacy either directly in case of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping or indirectly in the case of Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao (both were blessed by Deng), the legitimacy of the revolutionary founding moment and myth: the Long March.There are also other signs such as the fact that Xi has already assumed the three crucial power positions in China: secretary-general of the CCP, President of China and Chairman of the Central Military Commission.His predecessor, Hu Jintao, had to wait two years before Jiang Zemin relinquished his seat at the Military Commission that tells us who controls the Army within China.Furthermore, the rise of the "Fifth generation" has been accompanied by the reduction of five to seven members of the Standing Committee Politburo being that of those, five are new members.All of this has led to the conclusion that it has been the "largest transition over the last 30 years." 11e also have to had that it indicates the beginning of a new thirty years' cycle, being that the first was carried out by Mao and the second by Deng.12Moreover, China has been able to "consolidate land borders and beginning to turn outward." 13n this sense, China is reasserting its historical central place as the Middle Kingdom, after a period of decay and absence mostly in the last two centuries. 14In order to understand the challenges of this "China 3.0" we have to look at the concept of Chinese exceptionalism.It is to this that we now turn.

Return of the Middle Kingdom to the Center 15
The Middle Kingdom has exerted a strong fascination in the West long admired for its splendorous civilisation. 16China had a tradition of being central, and this centrality was mainly characterised by the superiority of its civilisation.It is interesting to note that this perception of centrality evolved into a nationalist and then ideological direction throughout the 20 th century, but it has never ceased to exert its influence. 17This emphasis on culture and civilisation can be explained by the absence of any rival civilisation, any serious contender for a cultural challenge but also due to natural geographical barriers. 18Throughout history, mainly after 221 B.C., the Middle Kingdom reinforced the idea that it was not just superior in terms of civilisation, it was civilisation per se, and its foreign relations were an extension of this idea, in other words, "(…) international society was the extension of internal society." 19The relations between the centre and the periphery were based on the cultural superiority of the former and also on a correlative concept of proximity, in which there was a connection between space and morality, in the sense that the closer a country was to the Chinese emperor the higher its moral conduct. 20In fact, this cultural superiority was embodied in the Chinese conception of civilisation, wen, which also means Chinese writing, that it is the only language.Indeed, it is language itself as distinguished from mere varieties of speech. 21The strength of this cultural superiority was reinforced by the fact that foreign rule such as the Mongols (the Yuan dynasty between 1280 and 1368) and the Manchu (the Qing dynasty from 1644 to 1911) adopted Chinese civilisation.There were also the Jurchen, who became the Jin from 1115-1234 but never dominated China as a whole.This perception of assimilating what is foreign and adapting it to the Chinese way can also be seen in more modern times with Mao Zedong's "sinicization" of Marxism-Leninism, which later become known as Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought. 22Unlike Karl Marx and Friedrich Revista BRasileiRa de Política inteRnacional Engels, who considered peasants not revolutionary but conservative, Mao adopted Marxism into the realities of the Chinese population and made it the crucial key for success. 23Likewise, Deng Xiaoping had the need to introduce capitalism under the mantle of "socialism with Chinese characteristics." International relations of the Middle Kingdom can be characterised as based on the concept of inequality and this view of the international was based on a cultural superiority. 24This was a system based on bilateralism never multilateralism and reflecting Chinese superiority.It also showed that all foreign countries were considered equal and, therefore, benefited from an impartial treatment, at least in theory. 25There was also the perception that the tribute system was economically ruinous for China, since it paid more than it received. 26China did not feel "an aggressive mission either to civilise the rest of the world or to shoulder its burdens." 27t was this civilisation that westerners met in the 19 th century and which they sought to open.We tend to look at the 19 th century and consider that the most important event was the confrontation between China and the West and that China was a giant with feet of clay, a static and dying empire, incapable of accepting change or accommodating herself to foreigners.There is a degree of truth in the fact that, despite all the examples of pragmatism and flexibility, it remains that the Chinese confronted the Europeans in the 19 th century with all the "immemorial maxims." 28hen we look at China around the time of the Opium Wars, we tend see China's response related to its size, inertia and adherence to its own standard of civilisation.China's foreign policy was based upon her sense of superiority in warfare, her skill in civilising barbarians and the possession of precious trading goods that would bring the barbarians to accept the tributary system. 29But the barbarians, interested in the opium trade, had no desire to be civilised by the Chinese.They did not leave, and proposed an alternative system of international relations, in which its members were sovereign states on a level of equality, at least in theory.This came to be accepted by the successor to the Middle Kingdom, the Republic of China.Nonetheless the Chinese situation vis-à-vis the foreign powers did not change much.To make things worse, the "new" Great Power, Japan, did not diminish its appetite for Chinese territory.In contrast, it increased, as we can see by the "Twenty-One Demands" that were presented to the Chinese government after Japan's occupation of the German concession of Shandong.They were presented as an ultimatum with the threat of using force and included the recognition of Japan's special position in Shandong, in Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, a joint-operation of iron and steel industries, the non-alienation of coastal areas to any third power, and more importantly, the control by Japan of important administrative positions within China's domestic apparatus.
It is against this increasing loss of sovereign control over its own country that we have to appreciate the Chinese government's approach to the peace treaty at Versailles.China was in Versailles due to the fact that it had entered the war in 1917 on the side of the Allies and was defending its sovereignty for the first time in a multilateral forum and it feared being represented by Japan.For China, and in accordance with the line pursued in its foreign policy, the Shandong question became the bone of contention and also a touchstone for the Wilsonian principles. 30hina's claim was one of the many victims of the Treaty of Versailles and the handover of the province that was the birth of Confucius to Japan led to the unique and unprecedented nationalist "May 4 th Movement."Albeit not with a nationwide scope, it was the first time that the Chinese voiced their displeasure at the imposed international arrangements. 31This was due to the perception that such action went against the spirit of the League of Nations and China was not seeking territorial expansion but rather restoration.China's refusal to sign the peace treaty-the only delegation to do so-was an assertive moment regarding the rejection of the "(…) unjustified, and in the eyes of the Chinese unjustifiable, international order to be imposed upon it in spite of its protest." 32It was the first active participation in managing its international relations as it was searching for its place and a role in international society.In 1919, there was the intention not of resisting imperialism and the humiliation of the unequal treaties but of rolling it back.This was done through an active rather than passive diplomatic activity based on the evocation of western principles such as national self-determination and territorial integrity.In this sense, China chose to resist the imposition of the standard of civilization and its unequal treaties both in imperial and republican times.
It is noteworthy that despite the complex bilateral relationship with Japan, China has benefited immensely from some of Tokyo's pioneering efforts even if 30 Zhang, Yongjin (1991).China in the International System, 1918-1920 Revista BRasileiRa de Política inteRnacional some of these measures were instrumental rather than cognitive. 33For instance, the victory of Japan over Russia in 1904-1905 proved that non-Westerns could actually defeat westerners in a war and it later galvanized nationalist movements.It was a mind-blowing historical event that helped the demise of the Czars in Russia.Moreover, Japan at Versailles insisted on the introduction of a racial equality clause amongst great powers, albeit not with a universal nature.The idea of racial equality, as we have seen, was sparked by Japan at Versailles and "the irony of it all was that the contender seemed to have done so without truly recognising the inherent importance of the challenge." 34t is against this background usually referred to as the "century of humiliation" in which China was divided amongst the great powers, that China anchors its goal of reverting to the Great Power group.China needs to reoccupy its rightful place and, at the same time, it goes to great lengths to emphasise that unlike Germany and Japan, its rise will be peaceful.In the words of Wang Yizhou: "This is not a traditional expansion comparable with the scramble for territory and supremacy of Germany and Japan during World War II.Instead, it is about progressing towards objectives in a reasonable and orderly manner, consistent with China's interests as well as with the international norms under the framework of international coordination." 35It remains to be seen how this can be achieved, even more now that there are evident signs of a spill-over to the political and military realms of China's economic weight. 36For instance, all the activities and incidents in the South China Sea have worked against this assertion a benign and benevolent China.In this process China is facing the resistance of the "lonely superpower." 37erica's Pacific Century 38 Our new focus on this region reflects a fundamental truth-the United States has been, and always will be, a Pacific nation. 39hese words of President Obama show without a shadow of a doubt the US intent in rebalancing to the Asia-Pacific as a crucial strategic move within its Grand Strategy.This is to say that in order to maintain its hegemonic position Washington has realised that it needs to upgrade the Asia-Pacific within its strategic framework.This entails the compromise that the US global readjustment of its military facilities and personnel abroad will not come at the expense of this region, but also "prosperity of the Asia-Pacific." 40This and has been mostly prompted by China's rise and also by the multi-dimensional potential of this region, in particular its economic weight.It has also been enable by the end of the war in Iraq and the quasi-end of the intervention in Afghanistan.The reduction of US military involvement in these two territories has given the Armed Forces a breathing space.Even if the geographical borders of the Asia-Pacific region are not yet clearly defined, and therefore are still better defined as frontiers, nonetheless there is a US willingness to include India as a key-player, thereby enlarging this region to include two oceans, namely the Pacific and the Indian. 41The prevailing perception in Washington is to see India as a counterweight to Chinese influence in the region as can be observed, for instance, in the case of Burma. 42Taking into account the complex, to put it mildly, bilateral relationship between these two democratic giants, the US and India, it remains to been if the latter can actually fulfil these expectations and deliver a coherent and reliable "Look East" foreign policy in order to check the Chinese incursions into the Indian sphere of influence. 43rom the mostly military and security tone of the "pivot" to the more economic emphasis of the "rebalancing" we are now witnessing two important goals: to make the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) a dream come true and to readjust the rebalancing within the Pacific. 44The latter can be seen in the greater emphasis given to the Southeast Asia and in the multilevel initiatives that have been developed by the US.A manifest example is the Lower Mekong Initiative that encompasses a greater cooperation with countries such as Vietnam and the touching on areas such as health, education and environment.Also of great importance has been the revitalisation of the relationship with the Philippines, Singapore and Indonesia and the stationing of Marines in Darwin, Australia.

Revista BRasileiRa de Política inteRnacional
The "Forward-deployed diplomacy" entails the shift of the weight of American diplomatic machinery and soft power.The latter is evident for instance in the use of the military as tool of humanitarian assistance.
The relationship between the US and the Pacific has been intense, if not always peaceful.From a strategic point of view, the discussion concerning the role of the Pacific islands in the territorial expansion of the US was prompted by the Hawaii archipelago. 45In fact, already in 1842 President Tyler had incorporated these inlands into the Monroe Doctrine, but the real debate only came at the end of the 19 th century and was associated with the war against Spain in 1898.Throughout these years the US was able to consolidate its continental expansion, either through purchase, agreement or conquest, and then after the first industrial war: the American Civil War.The war with Spain was for the US a golden opportunity to acquire territories that, for the first time, would be annexed without the immediate goal of being incorporated into the Union and, therefore, under the umbrella of the Constitution.In other words, the debate between those that considered that the US was different and therefore should not become an imperial power, and those that believed that Manifest Destiny extended to the "Far-West" was won by the latter.Spain was utterly defeated and the US annexed, amongst other territories, Guam and the Philippines.Like in Cuba, the Philippines put up resistance but to no avail.Meanwhile Hawaii was also annexed and become an important logistical hub. 46he relationship with the Asia-Pacific grew more powerful particularly towards China.At this point there was the hope that China could become the anchor of US interests in this region and there was also enormous interest in the "China market."This perception of China only changed in 1949 with the victory of Mao Zedong in the Civil War.This contrasted with Japan, a country viewed with mixed feelings: on the one hand, there was admiration for the fact that Japan had become a great power in such short-span of time, and on the other there was the fear and discrimination towards "Asians."This, of course, changed dramatically with the rise of Japan as a revisionist power and Pearl Harbor.The unconditional surrender of the Rising Sun entailed US occupation and military presence.Japan has been, since 1945, the bedrock of US strategy towards the Pacific.US commitment to this region since then can be seen not only through its military umbrella, but also from the fact that it was there that the US fought two wars with "boots on the ground": Korea and Vietnam.It is also a volatile region as we can observe from the Cold War "unfinished business," such as the Korean Peninsula and Taiwan or the North Korea nuclear program.At the same time, we have witnessed greater intensity in the territorial disputes in the South China Sea, between several contenders.In addition, since the beginning of the economic and financial crisis China has displayed a more assertive foreign policy and, in this context, the US has asked for a "greater clarity of strategic interests," 47 in particular relating to the discussion around the "string of pearls." 48For the US what is at stake here is the legitimacy of its hegemony and the credibility of being the security provider in the Asia-Pacific.In this regard, the goal is to maintain the strategic advantage. 49This seems to be confirmed with the positive response by some countries to this more assertive Chinese foreign policy.Some countries like Burma, for example, are trying to balance the overwhelming Chinese presence with a reopening of relations with Washington.
On the Chinese side, there is a great discussion within academia about what should be the best response and three trends can be identified: nationalists, globalists and the defensive realists.The first ones, like Yan Xuetong, espouse that the unipolarity of the US is ending and that the 21 st century will become a bipolar world.Therefore, not only does China need to achieve strategic parity but it also needs to change the rules of the game in international relations.In a nutshell, to reflect politically and militarily its already economic weight. 50Globalists like Wang Yizhou prefer to discuss a "creative involvement" that entails a more active part in global governance, greater overseas interests, and in order to safeguard those interests "China will be transform itself gradually from a land power to a maritime power." 51Lastly, defensive realists like Wang Jisi stake that there is still much to be done at home and that the challenges include mass urbanization, demographic trends, gap between rich and poor and environmental degradation. 52Since these are by-products or consequences of economic growth tackling these issues will not be easy.

Strategy begins at Home
The key to China's success in addressing global challenges also depends on whether it can accelerate the pace of domestic reforms and properly handle internal political, economic and social issues. 53e set of domestic challenges that Xi Jinping's team will have to deal with is impressive, even more in what appears to be a greater assertiveness and individual leadership of the Chinese leader. 54Furthermore, some of the challenges go so deep that they may constitute limits to the maintenance of China's exceptional rise.In fact, the same could also be said of the US in the sense that it needs to put its house in order. 55The depth of these challenges has not gone unnoticed to the US military evaluation of the factors shaping leadership perceptions and these include continued economic reform and the shift to try to develop a domestic market, nationalism, regional challenges to China's interests in the South China Sea, domestic unrest, environment and demographics. 56he first challenge has to with the balance between continuing economic reform whilst closing political change.This has been a very difficult balance to strike, but the Chinese leadership has managed to do it for the last decades.A good example of this tension between the monopoly of political power by the CCP and rising individual empowerment can be observed in the Document 9 issued by the Central Party Office in April 2013.It establishes seven non-debatable themes such as "universal values, media freedom, civil society, citizens' rights, the CCP's historical aberrations, the privileged capitalist class and the independence of the judiciary." 57Another area of strain includes the control of the Internet and social networks.Here we also find the tension between economic activity and profit-internet in Chinas has 500 million users-and the need to control information and fear of its subversive power. 58But unlike other dictatorships China has financial resources to buy sophisticated technology to control cyberspace.The tools are many and varied and they include the infamous "50 Cent Party," users paid to write positive comments about the government and denounce those who are critical; a cyber-police, the Great Firewall of China, a filter and pre-censorship; blocking of Facebook or YouTube and its Chinese versions-Renren and Youkou; and the Chinese version of twitter, namely, Sina Weibo with 300 million users.It has been the latter that has been more effective in escaping control of the authorities as can be seen by the families' mobilization after the railway accident in Wenzhou. 59 second domestic challenge is linked to the economic reform and the ability to keep the pace of China's "state capitalism" or "market authoritarian model." The outcome of the Third Plenum of the 18 th CCP Central Committee has been to put an enormous emphasis on reforming the economy towards a more marketoriented framework. 60Even though it is still unclear how the elite at Zhongnanhai will carry out this Herculean task, it is difficult to ascertain whether Xi Jinping has the necessary domestic support at the top to carry this through.This is linked to the fact that in order for Xi Jinping to prevail at the helm of China it was necessary to compromise with the party elders and the conservatives, and it is precisely these two groups that have the greatest interests in maintaining the economic status quo, mostly the state-owned enterprises.These and the universe of companies in their orbits account for more than half of China's output and jobs. 61Moreover, this uncertainty is the key factor driving the private sector to send their money and families abroad.For instance, a recent survey concluded that more than 85% send their children to school abroad. 62urthermore, one of the main problems in China's economy remains without a solution, namely, the debt of provincial and local authorities.In order to make sure that these authorities would not be hurdles for the modernisation of the Chinese economy, they were given a slice of the economic reform pie, in what Susan Shirk called the "playing to the provinces." 63The current reality of this debt is still not known but the official estimates at the end of 2010 concluded that it would be worth between US$ 803 billion to over US$ 2 trillion, meaning 13% to 36% of the Gross Domestic Product as of the end of 2010. 64Another problem very much linked to provincial and local authorities, although not exclusively, has to do with corruption.Hu Jintao considered the struggle against corruption as the life and death of the CCP and Xi Jinping has taken this mantle to the forefront as well.To tackle corruption is always important in a country, but in a Revista BRasileiRa de Política inteRnacional dictatorship that is led by a Vanguard Party, it is deadly.Xi is very much aware of this and the need to reinforce the Leninist legacy that only the CCP can lead the process of economic growth into development: the alternative is chaos and territorial fragmentation like what happened during the "century of humiliation" or with the Soviet Union. 65Particularly in a time where there is an increase in the inequality of income distribution.
One of the most crucial developments in the coming decades, according to Elisabeth Economy, is China's plan to urbanize 400 million by 2030. 66This will entail the increase in the already strained resources such as water and energy, "since urban Chinese consume more resources than those in rural areas (roughly 3.5 times as much energy and 2.5 times as much water)." 67This process will reinforce Chinese energy foreign policy and will encompass greater dam projects in the Tibetan plateau.These have already been a cause for controversy with neighbouring countries since China plans to divert and dam the main rivers of the region. 68ater is already an issue domestically since due to environmental degradation many of China's rivers are polluted. 69In point of fact, environment is one of the main reasons or the over 100,000 mass protests annually. 70Notwithstanding, Chinese population has already began this migration, although in many cases illegal, from the countryside to the cities.In the last 20 years about 150 million living in the countryside went to the cities.Estimates tell us that in the next 20 to 30 years, 300 million do the same. 71Lastly, there is the tragic reality of demography.Although China has the world's biggest population it is now facing, due to enhanced longevity and the one-child policy, a demographic crisis.In fact, China has the worst of two worlds: not yet a social security and pension system in place and already a rapidly aging population, and a shrinking labor force.In 2015, there will be circa 200 million Chinese people over 60, 300 million by 2030 and perhaps as many as 480 million in 2050. 72In a country that is the factory of the world this may prove to be a huge obstacle.

Conclusion
On balance, the rise of China has left an undeniable footprint in international relations and it will continue to do so.The claim that China's rise will be different and peaceful because China is exceptional seems to be facing increasing strategic constrains.From a regional and global perspective, the US responded by rebalancing to the Pacific.We are still a long way of fully comprehending the outcomes of this strategic move as well as the next steps of the Chinese leadership.The Fifth Generation led by Xi Jinping is at a crossroads and we are still witnessing the first steps of a China 3.0.In terms of shaping the 21 st century China will face Herculean challenges, of which the domestic ones will be paramount.Since these stem from the process of economic growth they will be extraordinarily difficult to tackle with but they will determine the ability of China to think strategically.To paraphrase Richard Haass, we consider that strategy begins at home.

Abstract
Throughout the last thirty years of opening to the world Beijing has stressed that its rise will be peaceful and that, from a strategic point of view, China is exceptional.There are many challenges facing Beijing's response to the US rebalancing to the Asia-Pacific, but we consider that the ones with greater impact are, in point of fact, of a domestic nature and constitute limits to Chinese exceptionalism.
Keywords: Chinese exceptionalism; peaceful rise; US foreign policy.
).China at Crossroads.London: European Council on Foreign Relations.6 For an excellent and thorough analysis of the emergence of the Chinese development model see Mah, Luis (2013).A emergência do modelo de desenvolvimento chinês.R:I Relações Internacionais, Vol.38, pp.45-56.
45 McDougall, Walter A. (2004).Let the Sea make a Noise, a History of the North Pacific from Magellan to MacArthur, New York: Perennial and (1997).Promised Land, Crusader State, the American Encounter with the World since 1776, Boston and New York: Mariner Books.46 See Herring, George (2008).From Colony to Superpower, US Foreign Relations since 1776, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press and LaFeber, Walter (1989).The American Age, United States Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad since 1750, New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co.