| Arluke (1999)24
|
Qualitative - observational: interview |
130 interviewees: technicians, caregivers, researchers, post-graduate fellows, administrative staff |
- |
Institutional emotional support; policy on performing euthanasia (rotation/volunteers); rituals of recognition and purpose of animal research |
| Chang and Hard (2002)25
|
Quantitative - questionnaire and interview |
27 participants: veterinarians and caregivers |
- |
Seminars for appreciation, training, integration; emotional support |
| Rohlf and Bennett (2005)26
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
148 participants: animal facility staff, researchers and research support |
Event Impact Scale - Revised |
Counseling on death, stress management, informing on recruitment about the practice of euthanasia |
| Davies and Duncan (2010)27
|
Qualitative - group discussion |
Animal technicians |
- |
- |
| Kang et al. (2018)28
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
193 researchers: users and non-users of laboratory animals |
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory |
- |
| Friese and Latimer (2019)29
|
Qualitative - interview and observation |
Animal technicians, laboratory leaders, postgraduate scientists, and a veterinarian |
- |
The practice of environmental enrichment to promote the health and well-being of both animals and caregivers; adoption of an interspecies approach, recognizing the connection between animal care and the well-being of those involved in biomedical research |
| Scotney et al. (2019)30
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
229 participants |
Professional Quality of Life Scale |
Resources aimed at ensuring mental well-being and a positive work/life balance for all employees |
| (ProQOL) |
| Engel et al. (2020)31
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
309 participants: veterinary technicians and veterinary doctors |
Questionnaire developed by the research team |
Recognize the risks inherent in the job; transparent communication; institutional support with resources and a supportive environment; refinement and training to improve animal welfare |
| LaFollette et al. (2020)4
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
801 participants: animal facility staff |
ProQOL |
Psychological and social support, coping tools, relaxation techniques such as mindfulness |
| Pavan et al. (2020)32
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
70 participants: animal facility staff |
Questionnaire developed by the research team |
Socialization, mandatory training for beginners, open dialogue about fatigue, training leaders in identifying fatigue symptoms, rotation for challenging tasks, counselling and psychological support, inviting researchers to present their projects to animal facility staff, raising staff awareness at regular meetings about institutional resources |
| Glenk et al. (2020)33
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
4 researchers |
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; Pet Attitude Scale; Inventory of Personality Characteristics |
Social support; ethical use of animals; relevance of research; self-care: leisure, sports, family time |
| Randall et al. (2021)14
|
Quantitative - cross-sectional study using a questionnaire |
422 respondents: caregivers, veterinarians, research support |
Questionnaire developed by the research team |
Dialogue with someone trustworthy, time away from work, self-care practices, physical activity, owning pets |
| Goñi-Balentziaga et al. (2021)18
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
498 participants: caregivers, veterinarians, technicians, researchers, students |
ProQOL |
- |
| Thurston et al. (2021)13
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
170 participants |
ProQOL |
Self-care practices (support groups, professional psychological support); information on compassion fatigue; counselling; actions aimed at mental health; institutional recognition; socialization; adequate remuneration (salary, time off, food); workload adequacy |
| Schlanser et al. (2021)19
|
Quantitative - cross-sectional study using a questionnaire |
65 veterinary officers and/or caregivers |
ProQOL |
- |
| O’Malley et al. (2022)12
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
415 participants |
Questionnaire developed by the research team |
Talking to someone, physical activity, self-care practices, professional help, taking time off work |
| Cushing et al. (2022)20
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
393 professionals, 50 of whom were biotherapists |
Brief COPE; Big Five Theory; Team-Member Exchange; Leader-Member Exchange; Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire; Questionnaire II; PEI (Psychological Empowerment Instrument); Job Satisfaction Scale; Perceived Stress Scale; Resilience Scale for Adults |
Training, strengthening confidence, emotional support, adequate working conditions, improving interpersonal relationships, supportive work environment, reducing workload, practices aimed at mental and emotional health such as mindfulness, yoga |
| Young et al. (2024)
|
Qualitative/ Quantitative - questionnaire application |
198 participants: caregivers and researchers |
ProQOL |
Factors related to organizational culture: support, appreciation and recognition, adequate training and remuneration; awareness of compassion fatigue, recognition of symptoms, destigmatization of compassion fatigue |
| von der Beck et al. (2024)22
|
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
- |
Provide an environment that meets the animals’ needs and promotes well-being; cooperate with the institution’s occupational health services, introduce mental rest and break tools, teach good ergonomic practices; open and effective communication between all people involved; participatory management and shared decisions; destigmatize animal research work through honesty, reflection and self-confidence. |
| Goñi-Balentziaga and Azkona (2024)
|
Quantitative - questionnaire application |
80 participants |
ProQOL, Cognitive and Affective Empathy Test and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale |
Psychological treatment |