Open-access Black sucupira seed oil (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth) as a growth-promoting additive for beef cattle

Óleo da semente de sucupira-preta (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth) como aditivo zootécnico para bovinos de corte

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different levels of black sucupira oil (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth) on nutrient intake, digestibility, rumen variables, and serum biochemistry. Four cannulated crossbred steers [body weight (BW) 450 ± 20 kg] were assigned to a 4 × 4 Latin square design with the treatments: (1) control (CON), without oil; (2) inclusion of 1.25 g oil seed (OS) kg-1 of dry matter (DM); (3) inclusion of 2.5 g OS kg-1 of DM; and (4) inclusion of 3.75 g OS kg-1 of DM. Results showed no significant effect (P > 0.05) of black sucupira oil seed on rumen pH and N-NH3 levels. However, the inclusion of 2.5 g OS in the diets significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) crude protein (CP) and DM digestibility. Differences were noted in the concentrations of isobutyric acid (0.67, 0.81, 0.71, 0.80 mmol L-1) and isovaleric acid (0.91, 1.14, 1.21, 1.11 mmol L-1), as well as total volatile fatty acids released in the rumen with OS inclusion. Sampling time significantly affected (P ≤ 0.05) rumen pH and N-NH3. Thus, it can be concluded that black sucupira seed oil decreases CP intake and digestibility, acting as a temporary nutritional modulator in beef cattle diets.

Keywords
essential oil; natural additives; ruminal fermentation; rumen fatty acids

RESUMO

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos de diferentes níveis de óleo de sucupira preta (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth) sobre o consumo de nutrientes, digestibilidade, variáveis ruminais e bioquímica sanguínea. Quatro novilhos mestiços canulados [peso corporal (PC) 450 ± 20 kg] foram distribuídos em um delineamento quadrado latino 4 × 4 com os respectivos tratamentos: (1) controle (CON), sem inclusão de óleo de semente (OS); (2) inclusão de 1,25 g de OS kg-1 de matéria seca (MS); (3) inclusão de 2,5 g de OS kg-1 de MS; e (4) inclusão de 3,75 g de OS kg-1 MS. Os resultados não mostraram efeito significativo (P > 0,05) do OS sobre o pH ruminal e os níveis de N-NH3. Entretanto, a inclusão de 2,5 g de OS nas dietas diminuiu (P ≤ 0,05) a digestibilidade da proteína bruta (PB) e da MS. Foram observadas diferenças nas concentrações de ácido isobutírico (0,67, 0,81, 0,71, 0,80 mmol L-1) e ácido isovalérico (0,91, 1,14, 1,21, 1,11 mmol L-1). O tempo de coleta afetou (P ≤ 0,05) o pH ruminal e o N-NH3. Assim, pode-se concluir que o OS diminui o consumo e a digestibilidade do PB, atuando como modulador nutricional temporário em dietas para bovinos de corte.

Palavras-chave
óleo essencial; aditivos naturais; fermentação ruminal; ácidos graxos ruminais

1. Introduction

Plants produce secondary metabolites with diverse chemical structures and biological activities (Yeshi et al., 2022), such as essential oils. There is a wide range of essential oils, and some of these oils have antimicrobial activities and are currently considered safe for human and animal consumption (FDA, 2006).

The black sucupira (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth) is a Fabaceae tree found frequently in the North, Northeast, and Midwest regions of Brazil. The essential oil from fruits contains terpenoids such as geraniol, farnesol, and caryophyllene (Jorge-Neto, 1970) and has been used in the pharmacy industry due to its antimicrobial activity (Almeida et al., 2006). Essential oils are frequently related to changes in the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacteria cell (Calsamiglia et al., 2007), due to the terpenoid contents (Abdillah et al., 2024).

Recent studies have been focusing on understanding the effect of these oils on the rumen environment, whether they have an effect similar to that of ionophores on the concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), decrease in methane emissions, and improvement of nutrients utilization (Kara & Pirci, 2024; Luo et al., 2024; Pawar et al., 2021). However, the black sucupira oil seed has not been investigated as a growth-promoting additive to beef cattle. Based on that, the hypothesis is that black sucupira oil seed is a possible modulator of rumen fermentation due to the antimicrobial action on rumen gram-positive bacteria.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the inclusion of different levels of black sucupira (Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth) seed oil on ruminal variables (pH, N-NH3, and VFA), nutrients intake digestibility of nutrients, and serum biochemical in beef cattle fed on low-quality roughage and concentrated supplementation.

2. Material and methods

The experiment was conducted at Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia at Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil (20°30ʹ20ʺ S, 54°37ʹ06ʺ W), according to the institutional committee on animal use (case number 639/2014).

Four cannulated crossbreed steers [body weight (BW), 450 ± 20 kg] were assigned to a replicate 4 × 4 Latin square design. The basal diet was composed of Megathyrsus maximus (Syn. Panicum maximum) cv Massai hay and 15 g kg-1 BW of concentrate. The concentrate was composed of (g kg-1): corn (810 g), soybean meal (160 g), urea (15 g), and mineral mixture (15 g). The black sucupira oil seed (OS) was obtained from Mundo dos Óleos® (Brasília, DF, Brazil; lot no. 0499). The OS treatments were: (1) control (CON), without the inclusion of oil; (2) inclusion of 1.25 g OS kg-1 of total dry matter (DM); (3) inclusion of 2.5 g OS kg-1 of total DM; and (4) inclusion of 3.75 g OS kg-1 of total DM. The ration (Table 1) was formulated to meet the requirements for growth (1.0 kg-1 day) of steers (NASEM, 2016).

Table 1
Chemical composition (g kg-1 DM) and ingredients of the experimental diets.

The experiment lasted for 84 days and was divided into four 21-day periods. The animals were adapted to the diets during the first 14 days of each period, and samplings were collected during the last seven days/period. All steers were housed individually in covered pens with feeders and water troughs.

The hay was offered twice daily (at 07:00 and 16:00 h) due to the refusals target of 150 kg-1 fed. The OS was infused with 1 kg of concentrate directly into the rumen via cannula on the morning feeding. The concentrate was fed as 15 g kg-1 of BW. Before each morning feeding, refusals from each animal were removed and weighed to calculate the intake. The daily dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated as the difference between the dry weight of the feed offered and the amount of refusals.

To determine pH and N-NH3, ruminal fluid samples were collected at the end of each experimental period at zero hours (before supplementation), 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after feeding. The ruminal fluid was manually collected (via cannula) from different locations in the rumen and filtered through the cotton fabric. Immediately after sampling, pH was measured using a digital pH meter (Quimis®, model: Q400AS).

A 50 mL aliquot of rumen fluid was stored frozen in plastic tubes after acidification with 5 drops of H2SO4 (50%) for subsequent determination of N-NH3. The rumen fluid was thawed and the supernatant was analyzed for non-protein nitrogen (NPN) content by adapting the method of Fenner (1965).

Samples of 5 mL of rumen fluid were stored frozen in plastic tubes after acidification with 5 drops of HPO3 for subsequent determination of volatile fatty acids (VFA). The VFA was determined by gas chromatography, according to the method recommended by Barbosa et al. (2001). A gas chromatograph was used (Thermo Finningan, model Trace GC Ultra, with flame ionization detector (FID)), equipped with a Nukol column linked to free fatty acids, 30 m long, 0.25 mm in diameter and 0. 25 µm thick. The carrier gas used was Helium (He) at 0.8 mL min-1.

The apparent digestibility of nutrients was carried out from the 15th to the 19th day of each experimental period and estimated using the total feces collection method, being obtained by the difference between what was consumed in the diet by the animal and what was excreted in the feces. Feces were collected immediately after defecation, weighed and sampled (100 g kg-1) at 6-hour intervals, and subsequently frozen. At the end of the experimental periods, the samples were pre-dried, weighed, and homogenized, followed by grinding (1 mm) for subsequent laboratory analysis.

Chemical analyses of the concentrate, hay, refusals, and feces were carried out according to the official methodologies (AOAC, 1995) for DM (967.03), CP (981.10), ash (942.05), ether extract (EE; 920.29) and acid detergent fiber (ADF; 913.18). The NDF (corrected for ash and protein - apNDF) was performed according to Van Soest et al. (1991) using thermostable alpha-amylase without sodium sulfite and corrected for residual ash (Mertens, 2002) and residual nitrogenous compounds (Licitra et al., 1996).

For analysis of serum concentrations of biochemical variables of ALT (alanine amino transferase), AST (aspartate amino transferase), albumin, GGT (gamma glutamyl transferase), urea, total proteins, and creatinine, 5 mL of blood were sampled at 7:00 am on the last day of each experimental period and were analyzed according to the kits’ specifications of Cobas C 111 equipment (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS Student statistical program. Consumption, apparent digestibility, and serum biochemical data were analyzed using a 4 × 4 Latin Square design. The statistical model used was: Yijk = μ+ Ti + Pj + Ak + eijk; where: Yijk is the observation of the effect of treatment i in period j, of animal k; μ is a constant; Ti is the random effect of square “i”; Pj is the random effect of period “j”; Ak is the random effect of steers “k” and eijk is the random error associated with each observation.

For rumen variables pH, N-NH3, and VFA, a Latin square design with subdivided plots was considered, where the plots were the treatments and the subplots were the incubation times of the samples in the rumen or the different ruminal fluid sampling times. For the rumen variables pH, N-NH3, and VFA, the statistical model included the effects of treatment, sampling times, animal, period and, treatment × time. The statistical model used was: Yijk = μ + Ti + Hj + Ak + Pj + (TH)ij + eijk, in which Yijk = observation of the effect of treatment i per collection time (for pH, N-NH3, and VFA) j in animal k; μ = overall mean; Ti = effect of treatment [i = 1 (0 g), 2 (1.25 g), 3 (2.5 g) and 4 (3.75 g)]; Hj = effect of times of the samples for ruminal parameters (j = 1, ....., 7); Ak = animal effect (k = 1, ..., 4); Pj = the period effect (j = 1, ....., 4); (TH)ij = interaction between treatment i and time j; and eijk = random error associated with each observation.

All the variables were subjected to analysis of variance based on a simultaneous 4 × 4 Latin squares. When significant differences were observed, the means were compared using the Tukey test at 0.05 significance level.

3. Results

The OS did not affect (P > 0.05) the intakes of DM, NDF, and organic matter (kg day-1 and g kg-1 BW; Table 2). However, the OS decreased crude protein intake from 1.22 to 1.06 kg day-1 in the 0 and 3.75 g of oil diets, respectively. EE intake was highest at levels of 1.25 and 2.5 g of OS in the diet.

Table 2
Nutrient intake of steers receiving different levels of black sucupira oil seed.

The digestibility of NDF, EE, and organic matter (OM) was not affected (P > 0.05) by the OS inclusion (Table 2). Feeding OS decreased (P ≤ 0.05) the DM and CP digestibility from 705.0 to 647.5 g kg-1, 740.0 to 690.0 g kg-1, in the 0 and 2.5 g of OS, respectively (Table 2).

No interactions were found (P > 0.05) between treatments and sampling times for pH and ruminal N-NH3 values (Tables 3 and 4). Likewise, OS in the diets did not affect pH (Table 3) and N-NH3 (Table 4). However, significant differences were found for rumen pH at different sampling times (Table 4), with the highest values observed between 2 and 4 hours after morning feeding (09:00 and 11:00 hours) for all treatments, decreasing after eating time from 6.86 to 6.03, respectively.

Table 3
Ruminal fluid pH means in steers submitted to different levels of inclusion of black sucupira seed essential oils in the diet.
Table 4
Ruminal N-NH3 (mg dL-1) in steers submitted to different levels of inclusion of black sucupira seed essential oils in the diet.

Sampling time affected (P ≤ 0.05) the N-NH3 concentrations with a peak between 2 and 4 hours after supplementation (09:00 and 11:00 hours) for all treatments, decreasing until reaching their minimum values 12 hours after morning feeding. Ruminal N-NH3 ranged from 4.71 to 33.89 mg dL-1, with an average of 16.3 mg N-NH3 dL-1 of ruminal fluid (Table 4).

There was no effect (P > 0.05) of OS on the concentrations (mmol L-1) of acetic acid, propionic acid, n-butyric acid, n-valeric acid, n-caproic acid, and on the total sum of short-chain fatty acids (Table 5). However, there was an effect (P ≤ 0.05) on the concentrations of isobutyric acid (0.67, 0.81, 0.71, and 0.80 mmol L-1) and isovaleric acid (0.91, 1.14, 1.21, and 1.11 mmol L-1) with the inclusion of OS in relation to the control treatment (without oil addition) (Table 5). Black sucupira seed oil decreased (P < 0.05) AST and did not affect other biochemical variables (albumin, ALT, creatinine, GGT, total proteins, and urea; Table 6).

Table 5
Effect of including black sucupira seed essential oils in the diet of cattle supplemented with the concentrate on the production of short-chain volatile fatty acids in the rumen.
Table 6
Serum biochemical parameters in steers submitted to different inclusion levels of black sucupira seed essential oils in the diet.

4. Discussion

In the current study, there was no effect on the intake of DM, NDF, and OM but reduced CP intake. Similarly, Hristov et al. (2013) also did not observe a significant effect on the DMI of cows fed with different levels of oregano extract. However, Yang et al. (2010) reported that dietary supplementation with cinnamaldehyde increased the DMI of feedlot cattle at the beginning of the fattening period but did not affect DMI after 4 weeks of feedlot. The effects of essential oils on nutrient intake are not well established. Overall, the results observed in other studies suggest that the effects of essential oils and their components on ruminant feed intake vary depending on the type of essential oil, the concentration provided in the diets, and the differences in the composition of the basal diet fed to the animals (Pukrop et al., 2019; Torres et al., 2021; Wells, 2024).

Bioactive compounds in essential oils are well recognized for their ability to modify rumen function by promoting digestion (Caroprese et al., 2023) and reducing protein degradation (Macheboeuf et al., 2008). The apparent DM and CP digestibility decreased with the inclusion of black oil seed. Benchaar et al. (2006, 2007, 2008) showed DM, OM, and CP digestibility greater than 60.0% and NDF digestibility of more than 52.0%, while the apparent digestibility resulted in DM, OM, CP, and NDF greater than 58%.

The antimicrobial activity of several essential oils acts as pH-dependent, with its activity potentiated at low pH (close to 5.5) (Castillejos et al., 2006; Rodriguez-Pardo et al., 2012). This is due to the hydrophilic state of the active molecules. As pH decreases, the molecules tend to become undissociated and interact more easily with bacterial cell membranes, exerting their antimicrobial effect (Cardozo et al., 2005). The average of pH in this study remained close to the value of 6.4, which is considered optimal for microbial growth (Van Soest, 1994), suggesting that major changes in the microbial population had not occurred.

The chemical composition and dosage of the essential oil can influence the effects on ruminal nitrogen (N) metabolism. According to the observed results, it was verified that there was a synchronism between the times of higher pH and those of higher concentration of ruminal N-NH3, demonstrating a relationship with feeding time. The N-NH3 concentrations remained above 6 mg dL-1 for all treatments from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. However, at 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., the observed values (4.71 and 4.93 mg dL⁻¹) suggest that the decrease in ruminal ammonia concentration may indicate an increase in microbial protein synthesis during these times (Tedeschi et al., 2000).

Essential oils may increase VFA (Tomkins et al., 2015), change the microbiota profile in the rumen (Caroprese et al., 2023) due to factors such as the degradation of the compounds in the rumen, microbial adaptation to the essential oil, rate of passage to the duodenum, volatilization, and absorption of the compounds by the rumen wall (Villalba & Provenza, 2010). The black sucupira oil seed did not affect the concentrations of the major VFAs, acetate and propionate, in the rumen. However, it increased the concentrations of isobutyrate (from 0.67 to 0.80 mmol L⁻¹ with 0 vs. 3.75 g of black sucupira oil seed) and isovalerate (from 0.91 to 1.11 mmol L⁻¹). The formation of these two branched-chain VFA occurs from the deamination or transamination of branched-chain amino acids (Firkins, 2021). The increases promoted by the black sucupira oil seed are beneficial since it is well-known that these VFA are essential substrates for the growth of bacteria that degrade fibrous carbohydrates (Firkins & Mitchell, 2023).

The AST serum concentrations were higher in the 0 g than when 1.25 g of black sucupira oil seed was provided. This indicates that the inclusion of the oil has no influence on the function of organs (liver and kidneys) associated with the blood substances tested in this study.

The concentration of urea N in the blood is highly correlated with the concentration of N-NH3 in the rumen (Petit & Flipot, 1992). The synthesis of urea in the liver is carried out from ammonia absorbed by the rumen, so the ruminal ammonia in excess of the microbial requirement is absorbed by the rumen wall into the portal blood, and most of it is converted into urea in the liver. As no changes in N-NH3 concentration were observed, changes in serum urea concentrations were also not observed.

4. Conclusions

The black sucupira oil seed has a positive effect of modulating rumen fermentation in the first 4 hours and decreases crude protein intake and digestibility. The 1.25 g of black sucupira oil seed was the best level of inclusion to increase the production of branched-chain VFA. Further studies would be needed to provide data to understand the action of the oil to the bacteria and the form of their supply in order for their effect to be permanent and to have the possibility of preventing acidosis in diets with a high proportion of concentrate.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; grant number 564435/2010-4) and Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT; TO 014/12) for granting the financial support for this study.

References

  • Abdillah, A. E., Sarah, D., Ardian, A. A., Anas, M. Al, Aprianto, M. A., Hanim, C., Kurniawati, A., Muhlisin, & Yusiati, L. M. (2024). Effect of nutmeg essential oil (Myristica fragrans Houtt.) on methane production, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in vitro. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52532-3.
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52532-3
  • Almeida, J. R. G. da S., Silva-Filho, R. N. da, Nunes, X. P., Dias, C. da S., Pereira, F. de O., & Lima, E. de O. (2006). Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Bowdichia virgilioides Kunt. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 16, 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2006000500009.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2006000500009
  • AOAC − Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. (1995). Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. AOAC International, Arlington, VA.
  • Barbosa, N. G. S., Lana, R. de P., Jham, G. N., Borges, A. C., Mâncio, A. B., Pereira, J. C., & Oliveira, J. S. (2001). Consumo e fermentação ruminal de proteínas em função de suplementação alimentar energética e protéica em novilhos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 30(5), 1558–1565. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000600025.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000600025
  • Benchaar, C., Petit, H. V., Berthiaume, R., Whyte, T. D., & Chouinard, P. Y. (2006). Effects of Addition of Essential Oils and Monensin Premix on Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, Milk Production, and Milk Composition in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(11), 4352–4364. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72482-1.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72482-1
  • Benchaar, C., Petit, H. V., Berthiaume, R., Ouellet, D. R., Chiquette, J., & Chouinard, P. Y. (2007). Effects of Essential Oils on Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, Rumen Microbial Populations, Milk Production, and Milk Composition in Dairy Cows Fed Alfalfa Silage or Corn Silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(2), 886–897. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)715722.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)715722
  • Benchaar, C., McAllister, T. A., & Chouinard, P. Y. (2008). Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, Ciliate Protozoal Populations, and Milk Production from Dairy Cows Fed Cinnamaldehyde, Quebracho Condensed Tannin, or Yucca schidigera Saponin Extracts. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(12), 4765–4777. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1338.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1338
  • Calsamiglia, S., Busquet, M., Cardozo, P. W., Castillejos, L., & Ferret, A. (2007). Invited Review: Essential Oils as Modifiers of Rumen Microbial Fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(6), 2580–2595. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-644.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-644
  • Cardozo, P.W., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., & Kamel, C. (2005). Screening for the effects of natural plant extracts at different pH on in vitro rumen microbial fermentation of a high-concentrate diet for beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 2572−2579. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83112572x.
    » https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83112572x
  • Caroprese, M., Ciliberti, M. G., Marino, R., Santillo, A., Sevi, A., & Albenzio, M. (2023). Essential Oil Supplementation in Small Ruminants: A Review on Their Possible Role in Rumen Fermentation, Microbiota, and Animal Production. Dairy, 4(3), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4030033.
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4030033
  • Castillejos, L., Calsamiglia, S., & Ferret, A. (2006). Effect of essential oil active compounds on rumen microbial fermentation and nutrient flow in in vitro systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 2649−2658. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72341-4.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72341-4
  • FDA − Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Risk Assessment of Streptogramin Resistance in Enterococcus faecium Attributable to the Use of Streptogramins in Animals. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
  • Fenner, H. (1965). Method for Determining Total Volatile Bases in Rumen Fluid by Steam Distillation. Journal of Dairy Science, 48(2), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(65)88206-6.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(65)88206-6
  • Firkins, J. L. (2021). Invited Review: Advances in rumen efficiency. Applied Animal Science, 37(4), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2021-02163.
    » https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2021-02163
  • Firkins, J. L., & Mitchell, K. E. (2023). Invited review: Rumen modifiers in today’s dairy rations. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(5), 3053–3071. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22644.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22644
  • Hall, M. B. Neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrates Nutritional relevance and analysis. Gainesville: University of Florida, 2000. 76p.
  • Hristov, A. N., Lee, C., Cassidy, T., Heyler, K., Tekippe, J. A., Varga, G. A., Corl, B., & Brandt, R. C. (2013). Effect of Origanum vulgare L. leaves on rumen fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(2), 1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5975.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5975
  • Jorge-Neto, J. (1970). Pharmacognostic study of essential oil of sucupira, Bowdichia virgilioides. Revista da Faculdade de Farmácia e Odontologia de Araraquara, 4, 203–204.
  • Kara, K., & Pirci, G. (2024). Immunity, rumen metagenomics, ruminal variables, and growth performance of calves fed milk with sage (Salvia officinalis) essential oil. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 56(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03831-w.
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03831-w
  • Licitra, G., Hernandez, T. M., & Van Soest, P. J. (1996). Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science Technology, 57, 347–358.
  • Luo, Z., Liu, T., Cairang, D., Cheng, S., Hu, J., Shi, B., Zhu, H., Chen, H., Zhang, T., & Yi, X. (2024). Oregano Essential Oil as a Natural Plant Additive Affects Growth Performance and Serum Antibody Levels by Regulating the Rumen Microbiota of Calves. Animals, 14(6), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060820.
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060820
  • Macheboeuf, D., Morgavi, D. P., Papon, Y., Mousset, J. -L., & Arturo-Schaan, M. (2008). Dose-response effects of essential oils on in vitro fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145(1–4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.044.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.044
  • Mertens, D. R. (2002). Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85, 1217–1240.
  • NASEM. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 8th Revised Edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2016.
  • Pawar, M., Kamra, D. N., Agarwal, N., Chaudary, L., & Chaturvedi, V. (2021). Use of essential oils as feed additive for modulation of rumen fermentation and methanogenesis in buffalo. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 21, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2021.00004.4.
    » https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2021.00004.4
  • Petit, H. V., & Flipot, P. M. (1992). Feed utilization of beef steers fed grass as hay or silage with or without nitrogen supplementation. Journal of Animal Science, 70, 876–883. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.703876x.
    » https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.703876x
  • Pukrop, J. R., Campbell, B. T., & Schoonmaker, J. P. (2019). Effect of essential oils on performance, liver abscesses, carcass characteristics and meat quality in feedlot steers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 257, 114296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114296.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114296.
  • Rodriguez-Pardo, M., Ferret, A., Zwieten, J., Gonzales, L., Bravo, D., & Calsamiglia, S. (2012). Effects of dietary addition of capsicum extract on intake, water consumption, and rumen fermentation of fattening heifers fed a high-concentrate diet. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 1879−1884. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3191.
    » https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3191
  • Tedeschi, L. O., Fox, D. G., & Russell, J. B. (2000). Accounting for the effects of a ruminal nitrogen deficiency within the structure of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. Journal of Animal Science, 78(6), 1648. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7861648x.
    » https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7861648x
  • Tomkins, N. W., Denman, S. E., Pilajun, R., Wanapat, M., McSweeney, C. S., & Elliott, R. (2015). Manipulating rumen fermentation and methanogenesis using an essential oil and monensin in beef cattle fed a tropical grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 200, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.013.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.013
  • Torres, R. N. S., Paschoaloto, J. R., Ezequiel, J. M. B., da Silva, D. A. V., & Almeida, M. T. C. (2021). Meta-analysis of the effects of essential oil as an alternative to monensin in diets for beef cattle. The Veterinary Journal, 272, 105659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105659.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105659
  • Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10). https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
    » https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  • Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press.
  • Villalba, J. J., & Provenza, F. D. (2010). Challenges in Extrapolating In Vitro Findings to In Vivo Evaluation of Plant Resources. In P. Vercoe, H. Makkar, & A. Schlink (Eds.), In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies (p. 233–242). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3297-3_11.
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3297-3_11
  • Weiss, W. P., Conrad, H. R., St. Pierre, N. R. (1992). A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Animal Feed Science Technology, 39, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4
  • Wells, C. W. (2024). Effects of essential oils on economically important characteristics of ruminant species: A comprehensive review. Animal Nutrition, 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2023.05.017.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2023.05.017
  • Yang, W. Z., Benchaar, C., Ametaj, B. N., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2010). Dose response to eugenol supplementation in growing beef cattle: Ruminal fermentation and intestinal digestion. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 158(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.019.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.019
  • Yeshi, K., Crayn, D., Ritmejerytė, E., & Wangchuk, P. (2022). Plant Secondary Metabolites Produced in Response to Abiotic Stresses Has Potential Application in Pharmaceutical Product Development. Molecules, 27(1), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010313
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010313

Edited by

  • Editor:
    Marion Pereira da Costa

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Feb 2025
  • Date of issue
    2025

History

  • Received
    03 July 2024
  • Accepted
    04 Nov 2024
location_on
UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia Avenida Milton Santos, 500 - Ondina , CEP 40170-110 Salvador-BA Brasil, Tel. 55 71 32836725, Fax. 55 71 32836718 - Salvador - BA - Brazil
E-mail: rbspa@ufba.br
rss_feed Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader
Accessibility / Report Error