Endoscopic Mini-or Less-Open Sublay Operation (E/MILOS) in ventral hernia repair: a minimally invasive alternative technique

ABSTRACT The ideal ventral hernia surgical repair is still in discussion1. The defect closure with a mesh-based repair is the base of surgical repair, in open or minimally invasive techniques2. The open methods lead to a higher surgical site infections incidence, meanwhile, the laparoscopic IPOM (intraperitoneal onlay mesh) increases the risk of intestinal lesions, adhesions, and bowel obstruction, in addition to requiring double mesh and fixation products which increase its costs and could worsen the post-operative pain3-5. The eTEP (extended/enhanced view totally intraperitoneal) technique has also arisen as a good option for this hernia repair. To avoid the disadvantages found in classic open and laparoscopic techniques, the MILOS (Endoscopically Assisted Mini or Less Open Sublay Repair) concept, created by W. Reinpold et al. in 2009, 3 years after eTEP conceptualization, allows the usage of bigger meshes through a small skin incision and laparoscopic retro-rectus space dissection, as the 2016 modification, avoiding an intraperitoneal mesh placement6,7. This new technique has been called E-MILOS (Endoscopic Mini or Less Open Sublay Repair)8. The aim of this paper is to report the E-MILOS techniques primary experience Brazil, in Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo.


Technical note A B S T R A C T A B S T R A C T
The ideal ventral hernia surgical repair is still in discussion 1 .The defect closure with a mesh-based repair is the base of surgical repair, in open or minimally invasive techniques 2 .The open methods lead to a higher surgical site infections incidence, meanwhile, the laparoscopic IPOM (intraperitoneal onlay mesh) increases the risk of intestinal lesions, adhesions, and bowel obstruction, in addition to requiring double mesh and fixation products which increase its costs and could worsen the post-operative pain [3][4][5] .The eTEP (extended/ enhanced view totally intraperitoneal) technique has also arisen as a good option for this hernia repair.To avoid the disadvantages found in classic open and laparoscopic techniques, the MILOS (Endoscopically Assisted Mini or Less Open Sublay Repair) concept, created by W. Reinpold et al. in 2009, 3 years after eTEP conceptualization, allows the usage of bigger meshes through a small skin incision and laparoscopic retro-rectus space dissection, as the 2016 modification, avoiding an intraperitoneal mesh placement 6,7 .This new technique has been called E-MILOS (Endoscopic Mini or Less Open Sublay Repair) 8 .The aim of this paper is to report the E-MILOS techniques primary experience Brazil, in Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo.
Keywords: Hernia, Ventral.Video-Assisted Surgery.Laparoscopy.Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy.We proceed with the introduction of two more 5-mm lateral trocars for the laparoscopic clamps and dissection of the retromuscular space (Figure 3).This Next, we close the hernia defect on the anterior wall with absorbable suture (Figure 4) (barbed, if available) and placement of a mid or high weight, largepore polypropylene mesh (Figure 5).We fixate it with glue or suture and, depending on the size of the defect, we don't fixate it at all.We corrected a total of nine hernias, as one of the patients had two distinct defects in the abdominal wall.Of these, seven were incisional and one was primary E/MILOS should preferably be indicated in patients who need reinforcement of the entire abdominal wall in the midline topography, that is, patients who have rectus abdominis diastasis associated with a ventral hernia 9 .Despite the literature indicating the technique predominantly in cases where the hernia is in the midline, our experience shows that the application of the technique is feasible in cases outside the midline as well.
It is important to emphasize that the surgical time of more than three hours is related to the technique's learning curve, which, according to the author of the technique, is between five and 10 procedures, depending on the surgeon's expertise 7 .
Other advantages of the technique are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 -Main Advantages of the E-MILOS Technique.
1. Hybrid minimally invasive technique 2. Placement of large meshes in the retromuscular space 3.No need to fixate the mesh in all cases 4. Less postoperative and chronic pain 5. Ease of closing the defect 6. Ease of hernia sac dissection and peritoneum closure 7. Ease of umbilicus reconstruction 8. Fewer skin incisions compared with eTEP 9. Allows minimally invasive treatment of rectus diastasis, off-midline hernias, concomitant ventral hernias, and large ventral hernias with the aid of posterior component separation

CONCLUSION
When compared with open surgery with mesh placement in the retromuscular space or with laparoscopic techniques (IPOM and eTEP), E/MILOS is as effective as the traditional techniques for correcting ventral hernias, but with a significantly lower number of postoperative complications, reoperations, and unplanned readmissions.
In addition, we confirmed that the technique is easily reproducible and feasible in a public hospital.

DOI: 10 .
1590/0100-6991e-20233405-en dissection must exceed at least 6 cm from the edges of the hernia defect.For this, if necessary, one can perform a posterior component separation, with the release of the transversus abdominis muscle.excellent exposure with a small incision.Through its lid, the first trocar is inserted, allowing the establishment of the pneumoperitoneum and the passage of the optics in the retromuscular space.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Opening of the posterior sheath of the rectus abdominis muscle.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Dissection of the preperitoneal and retromuscular space with malleable retractors and the aid of the Endotorch Light Tube TM .

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Placement of Alexis ® at the incision site and passage of lateral working trocars.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Synthesis of the defect with barbed wire associated with correction of rectus abdominis muscle diastasis Finally, we remove the trocars and the Alexis with subsequent closure of the anterior fascia of the rectus abdominis, fixation of the umbilical scar (if necessary), and skin closure.

( 1 .
umbilical).Furthermore, only two were outside the midline.Correction of rectus abdominis muscles diastasis was performed in 37.5% of the cases.The average size of the hernias was 4.3cm (range 1.5 -8.0) and the average size of the mesh used was 20 x 18cm (range 15 x 15 -25 x 20).The average surgical time was 3.5 hours.We converted one case to open surgery due to technical difficulties, and in only three cases the retromuscular space was drained, with an average drain time of 6.3 days.The mean length of stay was 1.75 days, with a mean postoperative follow-up time of 13 months (range 1 -21).None of the patients operated on evolved with postoperative complications and, to date, no patient has had hernia recurrence.Steps description Periumbilical incision (infra or supra) 2. Complete dissection of the hernia sac 3. Complete dissection of the hernia ring 4. Opening of the posterior sheath of the rectus 5. Posterior fascia dissection using malleable retractors 6. Dissection of the retromuscular and preperitoneal space in the linea alba with the Endotorch Light Tube TM 7. Incision of the posterior sheath in a longitudinal direction in the four quadrants to the medial border of the rectus abdominis muscle 8. Placement of Alexis ® with lid 9. Insertion of a 10 or 12mm trocar into the Alexis ® 10.CO 2 insufflation (10mmHg) into the retromuscular space 11.Insertion of two 5mm trocars 12. Endoscopic dissection of the retromuscular space with preservation of the linea alba, having the xiphoid process as the cranial limit and the lateral borders of the rectum and the semilunar line as the lateral ones 13.Closure of the hernia defect (of the anterior fascia of the rectus abdominis DISCUSSION Our first results of the E/MILOS technique in the treatment of ventral hernias, both primary and incisional, are promising.The combination of the benefits of the open technique with placement of a large mesh in the retromuscular space associated with a small incision (Figure 7), which generates lower rates of postoperative complications and less trauma to the abdominal wall, provides the E/MILOS technique with the main benefits of both open and laparoscopic repairs, avoiding their main limitations 8 .

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Placement of the mesh in the retromuscular space