Open-access Social Representations of pregnancy among trans men

Representaciones Sociales del embarazo entre hombres trans

ABSTRACT

Objective:  to understand the meanings and experiences of pregnancy among trans men in light of the Theory of Social Representations.

Methods:  this is a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study, carried out with trans men selected for convenience and availability. Data production took place from September to October 2021, via the Google Meet® platform, based on interviews with a semi-structured script. Interview lexicographic textual analysis was performed using the Reinert method and instrumented by IRAMUTEQ version 7.0.

Results:  social representations of pregnancy involved a wide field of meanings, in which efforts were articulated to accept opportune and solitary pregnancy, fear of the parturition process and influence of physical and emotional changes.

Final considerations:  the study reinforces the importance of advanced nursing practice in assisting the pregnancy-puerperal cycle, based on the perspective of comprehensive care, equity in access to services and respect for differences.

Descriptors:
Social Theory; Sexual and Gender Minorities; Pregnancy; Nursing Care; Health Education

RESUMO

Objetivo:  conhecer os significados e as experiências da gestação entre homens trans à luz da Teoria das Representações Sociais.

Métodos:  trata-se de estudo qualitativo, descritivo e exploratório, realizado com homens trans selecionados por conveniência e disponibilidade. A produção de dados ocorreu de setembro a outubro de 2021, pela plataforma Google Meet®, a partir de entrevistas com roteiro semiestruturado. A análise textual lexicográfica das entrevistas foi pelo método Reinert e instrumentalizada pelo IRAMUTEQ, versão 7.0.

Resultados:  as representações sociais da gestação envolveram um amplo campo de significados, em que foram articulados esforços em aceitar a gravidez oportuna e solitária, medo do processo de parturição e influência das mudanças físicas e emocionais.

Considerações finais:  o estudo reforça a importância de uma prática avançada de enfermagem na assistência ao ciclo gravídico-puerperal, partindo da perspectiva de uma integralidade no cuidado, da equidade no acesso à serviços e do respeito às diferenças.

Descritores:
Teoria Social; Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero; Gravidez; Cuidado de Enfermagem; Educação em Saúde

RESUMEN

Objetivo:  comprender los significados y vivencias del embarazo entre hombres trans a la luz de la Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales.

Métodos:  se trata de un estudio cualitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio, realizado con hombres trans seleccionados por conveniencia y disponibilidad. La producción de datos se realizó de septiembre a octubre de 2021, a través de la plataforma Google Meet®, a partir de entrevistas con un guión semiestructurado. El análisis textual lexicográfico de las entrevistas se realizó mediante el método Reinert e instrumentado por IRAMUTEQ, versión 7.0.

Resultados:  las representaciones sociales del embarazo involucraron un amplio campo de significados, en los que se articularon esfuerzos por aceptar el embarazo oportuno y solitario, el miedo al proceso del parto y la influencia de los cambios físicos y emocionales.

Consideraciones finales:  el estudio refuerza la importancia de la práctica avanzada de enfermería en la asistencia al ciclo embarazo-puerperal, desde la perspectiva de la atención integral, la equidad en el acceso a los servicios y el respeto a las diferencias.

Descriptores:
Teoría Social; Minorías Sexuales y de Género; Embarazo; Atención de Enfermería; Educación en Salud

INTRODUCTION

In Western society, paternal pregnancy is generally seen as an “unlikely” possibility for “trans men”, as reproduction is considered impossible for individuals conceived through the idea of abjection. This results in a condition called “symbolic sterility”, characterized by the denial of the right to choose reproduction and to exercise parenthood, whether biological or not(1).

In this scenario, trans men who have gone through pregnancy or are in the gestational process give meaning to the events of pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding as intrinsic elements in the construction of their masculinity. This occurs even though individuals have a vagina, uterus and ovaries, thus defying cisheteronormative reproductive norms(2,3).

Research has shown that trans men who have experienced pregnancy present specific demands related to the effects of hormone use, surgical interventions and changes in body perceptions that occur during this period(4). Allied to this, transphobia has promoted an “expulsion” of this public from healthcare services, based on non-respect for social names, inappropriate use of treatment pronouns, inappropriate questions, lack of information that takes into account their health specificities, among others, also creating barriers to access to comprehensive health(5,6).

In the context of care, from the perspective of health promotion, health education emerges as a resource to be used by nurses in the role of health educators, with the ability to enhance pregnant trans men’s reflection about their representations arising from their experiences, providing criticality and the ability to understand weaknesses and abilities to overcome the difficulties that may present them at this stage of life(7,8).

In this regard, investigating the social representations of trans men who have become pregnant or are going through pregnancy enables an understanding of their interpretations and information about this phenomenon from the perspective of common sense. This, in turn, allows nurses to develop health practices and engage in the fight against institutional transphobia(8). It is understood that the Theory of Social Representations (TSR) offers a theoretical framework to understand the daily life of specific groups, enabling the creation of practical knowledge by being integrated with experiences, which include historical, cultural and spatial context, and by guiding individuals’ communications and behaviors(9).

Therefore, given the above, this study had the guiding question: what are the meanings and experiences of pregnancy among trans men?

OBJECTIVE

To understand the meanings and experiences of pregnancy among trans men in light of the TSR.

METHODS

Ethical aspects

The research project was submitted to the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) Health Sciences Center (HSC) Research Ethics Committee (REC), under Opinion 4,862,503, approved in 2021, in compliance with Resolution 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council (CNS - Conselho Nacional de Saúde), which regulates guidelines and standards that deal with research with human beings. After approval of the research project at REC/UFPE, empirical data production began. Participant identification was anonymized using self-declared pseudonyms at the time of information collection.

Study design

This is a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study, structured according COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines and anchored by TSR of Serge Moscovici and followers. In order to access knowledge about the reality of a given social group, the TSR allows nursing to guide care and conduct healthcare based on the recognition of its characteristics and specificities(10).

Study setting

The research was conducted at a national level, involving individuals linked to prominent institutions for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transvestite and Transgender (LGBT) population in Brazil. These institutions include the Brazilian National LGBTI+ Alliance, the Ambulatório LGBT Patrícia Gomes, in Recife, Pernambuco, and the LGBT Health Coordination of the State of Pernambuco. The selection of these research sites followed intentional sampling criteria, aiming to incorporate essential characteristics to develop the research and cover the population of interest.

Data source

Study participants were trans men who met the following criteria: 1) inclusion: trans men who were pregnant or who were pregnant and aged 18 years or over; 2) exclusion: pregnant trans men or those who have gone through pregnancy, who had total visual and/or hearing impairment, given the researcher’s inability to understand Libras (Brazilian Sign Language) and Braille, and with health problems that hinder understanding and participation in the study or who did not have technological resources to carry out the research (computer, cell phone, tablet, internet, among others), considering the pandemic context. Participants were selected based on convenience and availability to be interviewed. The choice of this technique was due to the need to gather the population of interest, as they have peculiar characteristics or are difficult to identify(11). Seven participants were included through progressive insertion, based on theoretical saturation of responses to semi-structured interviews(12).

Data collection and organization

To collect information, which took place from September to October 2021, the semi-structured individual interview technique was used via telephone call or Google Meet®. A script helped conduct the interview and gathered questions about aspects relevant to the study objective. It was composed of the guiding questions as follows: 1. Tell me about how your pregnancy was. 2. Tell me about the changes (bodily, social, emotional, psychological, among others) from the beginning to the end of pregnancy. 3. Tell me about your healthcare provided by the health team for reception and care during pregnancy. 4. Do you know other trans men who have become pregnant or are pregnant?

Subsequently, meetings were scheduled with the target audience via telephone call or messaging applications, such as WhatsApp®, Instagram®, Facebook® or email, based on research participants’ availability. It was recommended that participants, at the time of the interview, remain in a private and silent environment, criteria necessary for there to be a minimum of external interference. Respondents were informed about the research objective through the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and about the need to sign the Image and Testimonial Release and Consent Form, made available by Google Forms®. Moreover, a form was used to fill out participant characterization data, made available before the interviews and on the main social networks (Facebook®, Instagram® and WhatsApp®). Individual online interviews were consented and recorded on video for a maximum of two hours, using the resource provided by Google Meet®. After each transcription, interviewees were sent for content validity, giving them the opportunity to add or remove information, if necessary. It was requested that cameras were turned on at the time of online interviews so that discursive pauses and intonations could be identified by the researcher as well as facial expressions, gestures and other body language.

Data analysis

Empirical information produced by individual interviews was subjected to text analysis using the Reinert method of text segment classification (TS), instrumented by the free software Interface de R pour les Analyzes Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (IRAMUTEQ) version 7.0. Descending Hierarchical Classification (DHC) was used as a technique for processing information(13).

RESULTS

The universe of meanings of seven trans men’s social representations about pregnancy is described below, supporting the questions proposed in this research, translating the “common sense” of this group. For greater data richness, Chart 1 presents characterization according to the profile of trans men’s pregnancy-childbirth cycle, in order to visualize their profile and better situate the sample, since the object of any social representation is defined based on the phenomenon and the chosen group(14). These were identified by self-declared pseudonyms at the time of the interviews.

Chart 1
Characterization of the profile of the pregnancy-childbirth cycle of trans men participating in this study. Recife, PE, Brazil, 2022

The analysis corpus of this study was composed of seven texts, submitted to analysis to obtain DHC, divided into 1,172 TS, relating 3,883 words, with 41,094 occurrences. DHC obtained 92.75% of the total TS, corresponding to 1,087 TS, generating four classes. Subsequently, classes are described following the order of partition and proportion they represent in relation to the total corpus.

Class 1 (Chart 2), “Discovery of pregnancy and its implications”, corresponds to 41.12% of TS, relating to the moment when trans men discover pregnancy and the consequences of this event in their lives. The meaning of this class concerns a moment in which the signs of pregnancy are confused with various comorbidities, attributing the confirmation of an unexpected pregnancy to the feeling of “falling apart”, “insecurity” and “not knowing what to do”, in addition to abortion as an alternative to termination. I4’s report stands out, which talks about the occurrence of a “corrective rape” and which resulted in pregnancy, this being the only report that highlights this fact, therefore, essential in reflections on implications for care.

Chart 2
Class 1: Discovery of pregnancy and its implications. Recife, PE, Brazil, 2022

Class 2 (Chart 3), “Family relationships, loneliness and lack of support”, corresponds to 27.97% of TS, relating to how trans men established their family ties during pregnancy, reflections on support from partners, questions about pregnancy about “whose child it would be”, attribution to the experience of pregnancy as a moment of “deprivation” and “solidarity”.

Chart 3
Class 2: Family relationships, loneliness and lack of support. Recife, PE, Brazil, 2022

Class 3 (Chart 4), “Senses and experiences during healthcare”, corresponds to 19.96% of TS and concerns the meanings built on experiences during healthcare, difficulties during reproductive planning in a trans-centered relationship, discomfort in sharing “feminine” spaces during prenatal care, denial of rights to pregnant men, reproduction of transphobic speeches by healthcare professionals and prenatal care between the public and private sectors. It is also evident that pregnancy is an experience of “self-knowledge”, “positive and negative changes” and “pedagogical”, based on the recognition of the potential of their body and the understanding of pregnancy as a phenomenon that constitutes their masculinity. Fear of childbirth becomes present and is related to the body’s ability to have a vaginal delivery, but, mainly, to the occurrence of obstetric and transphobic violence in healthcare institutions, given that care for the pregnancy-puerperal cycle takes place in places designed for the female and cisgender public, and, in the case of transmasculine pregnancies, this aspect can worsen.

Chart 4
Class 3: Senses and experiences during healthcare. Recife, PE, Brazil, 2022

Class 4 (Chart 5), “Body and emotional changes and strategies for hiding pregnancy”, corresponds to 10.95% of TS, relating to the physical and emotional changes resulting from the gestational process and the influence these have on the experience of these men. This class considers aspects such as increased desire to undergo mastectomy surgery after pregnancy, breast enlargement as one of the greatest discomforts, use of “binder” or “micropore tape” and bra during pregnancy, discomfort with the voice, use of cold coats as a strategy to hide their “pregnant belly”, swelling and pain in the surgical scar from masculinizing mastectomy, not feeling sexually desired by the partner and not recognizing oneself in the image reflected in the mirror.

Chart 5
Class 4: Body and emotional changes and strategies for hiding pregnancy. Recife, PE, Brazil, 2022

DISCUSSION

C1) Discovery of pregnancy and its implications

It is observed that the social representations of the impact of discovering pregnancy among trans men in this study who became pregnant in an unexpected way were anchored in feelings of “insecurity”, “falling apart”, “lack of responsibility” and “not knowing what to do”, crossed by “fear of social response”, in the face of expectations and acceptability regarding a pregnant transmasculine body. It is possible to consider that this category is associated, in some contexts, with the idea culturally constructed and dissipated by Western society about pregnancy as a biological, feminine and cisgender phenomenon. In this case, “cisheteronormative pregnancy” appears as an objectification of this reality and represents a universal and homogeneous character before men and women, considered as the model of acceptability of conceiving a child, especially the ability to give birth as a founding characteristic of femininity supported by social constructions of gender, highlighting socially pre-established roles, such as notions about motherhood and fatherhood.

It is clear that the contents of social representations about the impact of discovering pregnancy among trans men involve a wide field of meanings, in which their efforts to “accept” the opportune pregnancy are articulated through an individual and subjective process of empowerment by “leaving oneself aside”, by opting to continue the gestational process based on the recognition of this phenomenon as a potentiality of their body, taking risks in facing situations of transphobic violence and the challenges intrinsic to the pregnancy cycle.

Corrective rape may appear as a mechanism by which trans men are vulnerable and, consequently, subject to becoming pregnant, which, in this case, is characterized as sexual violence in which abusers aim to “correct” victims’ sexual orientation or gender identity, as presented in one of the cases in this study. It should be noted that rape is a crime, provided for in the Brazilian Penal Code, in its Article 213, as amended by Law 12,015 of 2009(15).

Questions in favor of or against abortion practices are present among healthcare professionals, even when it comes to legal abortion(16). From the perspective of social representations, condemnation of abortion practices is related to moral, social and cultural standards, crossed by religion and legislation(17). However, in this study, abortion appears as a viable alternative for maintaining the status quo promoted by the traditional family and the reproductive pillars that are based on cisheteronormativity.

Studies already demonstrate reports of spontaneous abortion and induced abortion among trans men and that it is related to several factors; therefore, it is necessary to recognize the need for healthcare services to guarantee adequate and humanized management of risk situations and comprehensive care. The violence and prejudice suffered in healthcare services by people who choose abortion are not exclusively directed at trans men, but are a reality that violates the right to choose of men and women who become pregnant(18,19).

In a study on social representations of pregnancy in primiparous women, authors state that the social representation of pregnancy can also be anchored in positive and negative reactions and that it highlights an ambivalence of feelings inherent to pregnancy, in which anxiety about the new is present, supporting the reports presented in this study by trans men(20).

C2) Family relationships, loneliness and lack of support

The meanings about family relationships established by trans men during pregnancy are represented by “harmonious relationships”, “lack of knowledge” and moments of “happiness” between subjects who are considered, by them, family members. These perceptions are crossed by expectations regarding transmasculine pregnancy in accordance with an idea of gender “detransition” or “retransition”. The reproduction of an idea of “detransition” by family members stands out, in which these men would once again recognize themselves as the gender designated at the time of their birth and play corresponding social roles by experiencing pregnancy, which is understood as an exclusively cisgender and heterosexual event(3).

It appears that the social representations of these trans men regarding family relationships during pregnancy are constituted by a social affirmation of this “pregnant” and “masculine body”, explaining pregnancy as a possible event and breaking with stereotypes constructed about this phenomenon, such as the elaborate idea that transgender people cannot have mutual emotional and sexual relationships as well as exercise the right to parenthood through pregnancy.

This moment was also represented as a “lonely experience”, since, as they believed in the risks of transphobic violence in public spaces due to their condition as a pregnant man, “social isolation” becomes a reality throughout the gestational process, and can extend until the postpartum period, generating significant trauma and repercussions on mental health. Another important aspect is supportive relationships with their partner during pregnancy. Among the three reports that established same-sex relationships between gay men (one trans man and the other cisgender), two of these are anchored by a “toxic masculinity” reproduced by cisgender partners. These relationships were signaled by a lack of support, and, when pregnant men felt supported, this event was related to the “financial” issue, understood as an “obligation” and being insufficient for pregnant trans men(3).

It is clear that same-sex and supportive relationships during pregnancy were represented by a “negative and conflict-ridden” relationship that permeates historical, social and cultural constructions about gender roles attributed to pregnant people. In this case, trans men occupy the role of “caregivers”, and their cisgender partners reproduce behaviors under the lack of commitment to the effective exercise of parenthood or even lack of knowledge and insecurity to recognize and take over their role in raising children in the face of clashes with socially established family standards.

Three reports stand out in which relationships occurred with transcentric couples, in the case of a configuration in which two transsexuals and transvestites have an affective-sexual relationship. They were marked by “mutual respect and support” and permeated by respect for their gender identity and pregnancy as an event that constituted their masculinity, including the dynamics among family members. It is also observed that trans men represent pregnancy as a “lonely” and “oppressive” moment. Loneliness was the overarching theme that permeated the experiences, causing them to construct coping strategies to manage their feelings. Some speeches reinforce that pregnancy was marked by a deep feeling of “not recognizing oneself” and “lack of connection with a developing fetus”, which is in line with a study in which one of the participants stated that he “hated being pregnant” and described profound loneliness during pregnancy(3,21).

C3) Senses and experiences during healthcare

This category relates these subjects’ social representations about pregnancy to fear of the parturition process, which is the moment when healthcare is provided during labor and birth, being anchored by the socially widespread perception that they are not biologically capable of performing a vaginal delivery. This fact may be related to the occurrence of obstetric and transphobic violence in institutions marked by gender specificities, such as “maternity wards”, in addition to exposure of these “abject” bodies that are not recognized as possible to “gestate” among healthcare professionals at the time of childbirth(8).

It was observed that the content of social representations of healthcare during pregnancy was also linked to the preference for prenatal care in a private healthcare service with an obstetrician doctor and, consequently, through cesarean childbirth instead of vaginal delivery and obstetric care offered by the Brazilian Health System (SUS - Sistema Único de Saúde) services, in this case, seen as a place with a greater possibility of violence occurring during a “magical and challenging” moment in their life. Studies have shown that there are factors that influence the choice of childbirth route, such as psychocultural, socioeconomic, demographic aspects and, especially, medical interference, which sometimes contribute to a targeted decision. Sometimes, these factors converge to denaturalize vaginal delivery and praise the choice for cesarean birth; therefore, the decision to opt for childbirth does not always follow the clinical eligibility criteria and pregnant people’s initial wishes, compromising their autonomy in this process(22,23).

In the context of obstetric care, the persistence of the technocratic care model in healthcare services attributes responsibility to the institution and authority to medical professionals over pregnant people through the “control” of their bodies, evidenced by the passivity of users’ choice in the face of the doctor, seen as a “figure of knowledge”, in which they place their trust(24). There is a lack of preparation of pregnant men for labor and childbirth, with insecurity, anguish and fear present at this time. It is important that the health team accepts their demands, seeks to understand how care was provided during prenatal care and outlines the strategies that best suit these individuals, considering their specificities. It is noteworthy, therefore, that nurses play a fundamental role during this process, which ranges from prenatal care and continues through to the postpartum period(25).

In our study, among the seven trans men who underwent prenatal appointment, only one was followed up by a nurse who worked at a Family Health Unit (FHU), including situations of transphobic violence in prenatal care, such as the insistence on requesting the civil registry name to fill out forms during care, not guaranteeing respect for the use of social names, when not rectified, and compromising pregnant men’s adherence to the service. The condition of socioeconomic vulnerability that led this participant to seek care in the SUS stands out.

In this context, the social representations constructed about obstetric violence that emerge throughout reports of trans men in this study are assimilated with lack of respect for their social name during prenatal care appointments, disrespect for male gender identity during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle, delegitimization of pregnancy based on cisgender stereotypes by healthcare professionals, denial of access to public or private healthcare services intended only for cisgender pregnant women, denial of pregnant men’s right to sign the documents made available by health facilities at the time of childbirth as a “father” and difficulty in sitting in preferential seats for pregnant people identified in the country’s various public transports.

Despite this, positive experiences were reported during healthcare, characterized by clinical meetings that provided privacy, naturalization of trans pregnancy, recognition of their parenthood and absence of humiliating attitudes(26). Furthermore, pregnancy was assimilated as an event that enabled “self-knowledge”, “positive and negative changes” and “pedagogical” together with the recognition of the power of the transmasculine body to gestate and make this phenomenon a constituent of its masculinity. These aspects are directly related to the ability that pregnancy provided to bring important reflections to everyone who had the opportunity to share experiences with this group during pregnancy, whether friends, family or healthcare professionals, and who previously did not have access to these realities, acting as a mechanism for changing perspectives and social transformation.

C4) Body and emotional changes and strategies for hiding pregnancy

This category shows that the social representations of pregnancy among participants in this study are associated with the physical and emotional changes brought about by the gestational process, which sometimes appear simultaneously, having an influence on the experience of these subjects. Such changes are related to how these people perceive their body during pregnancy, through a process of non-recognition of their image as a man and reinforcing gender standards and roles attributed to pregnancy as “a more feminine thing a trans guy can do” (I1).

In this subjective conflict, the use of gender affirmation technologies, such as “binder”, “micropore tape”, coats, warm blouses and loose clothing, is important as a strategy for maintaining stereotypes constructed under the logic of hegemonic masculinity during pregnancy, hiding the physical characteristics provided by pregnancy and socially considered “feminine”, contributing to promoting a “passability” of this body in public spaces, generating safety and impacting their quality of life.

It is clear how difficult it is for trans men to deal with bodily changes, especially those that are close to the symbol of femininity, such as breast enlargement, increased “pregnant” belly and weight gain, impacted by the recommendation to interrupt masculinizing hormones during this period of their lives and interfering with the process of gender affirmation, through the reduction of characteristics socially seen as masculine in the materiality of their bodies.

Only one report in this study says they used hormones during pregnancy, generating “increased hair” in children after birth. There is a lack of literature on the effect of gender affirmation through the use of testosterone on the reproductive function of trans men. Sometimes, healthcare professionals use data resulting from research carried out with cisgender women, inferring recommendations for healthcare for this group(27). These data support one of the reports presented in this research, in which the idea of using testosterone and not menstruating, due to the effects of the medication, would have no risk of becoming pregnant; however, testosterone is not a contraceptive and, despite being used to promote “masculine” characteristics, some of these men maintain their reproductive functions adequately, and the use of internal or external condoms or other contraceptive methods is recommended(28).

With regard to breastfeeding, whether or not to undergo masculinizing mastectomy surgery before becoming pregnant was the main factor that affected the decision surrounding this experience. Furthermore, the fact of recognizing breastfeeding as a strategy to provide nutrition had significant influences that permeate feelings of “leaving oneself aside” to fulfill this role, which would be “a greater good” for children, and this practice can be given new meaning throughout the gestational process. In this study, of the seven trans men participating, five of them chose to breastfeed. Some reports available in the literature mention that many feel comfortable breastfeeding in public spaces, this being a political act(29).

It is necessary to use other infant feeding options for children of trans men who do not choose to breastfeed, such as the use of milk banks or milk formulas, and it is the responsibility of professionals to communicate during prenatal care about the different options, not putting pressure on users and respecting their autonomy(29). In this context, it is essential for professional nurses, in the exercise of their role as caregiver and educator, to use health education as a strategy to discuss with users the importance and different possibilities of infant feeding, considering their concrete reality.

With the increase in breasts, it is clear that these men often use strategies to hide this part of the body, through the use of “binder” or “micropore tape”; sometimes, the use becomes so intense that it ends up being compared to “torture”, due to the pain and discomfort caused. The use of these technologies results in frequent isolation, due to a context of transphobic violence that can last until the postpartum period(30-33). For some trans men, using these strategies to hide characteristics typical of pregnancy were part of their experience, in order to increase feelings of security when going out in public, with use of coats, warm sweaters and loose clothing being the main ones, in an attempt to not promote the visualization of the changes brought about by pregnancy. Studies show that trans men who went through this experience noticed that their pregnancies were often identified as obesity, and were generally easier to disguise with clothing than the breast itself(18,29).

From that same study, those who pass as a cisgender man reported being perceived as an obese man and never as a pregnant woman. In contrast, other trans men became publicly visible while pregnant, however some participants feared a greater likelihood of transphobic violence(26). This data supports one of the reports mentioned here, in which the fact of being pregnant has been something positive, generating feelings of “happiness when seeing the belly grow”, without affecting their masculinity.

Study limitations

This study faced challenges due to limitations associated with the restricted number of participants, as it focused on a specific and difficult-to-reach population. These difficulties were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic period, especially due to the socioeconomic vulnerability of the context. Furthermore, there were obstacles in the inclusion of transgender men in the study, as some of them did not respond to the main researcher’s contacts or did not express interest in participating in the research conducted by a cisgender person.

Contributions to health, nursing or public policy

This study reinforces the importance of advanced nursing practice in the context of prenatal, obstetric and postpartum care, starting from the perspective of comprehensive care, equity in access to services and respect for differences, highlighting sexual orientation and gender identity as Social Determinants of Health. Therefore, they can support future reflections in the field of study on transmasculinities, sexual and reproductive rights with repercussions on the formation of public health policies for an equitable, comprehensive, welcoming and resolute practice for the trans population, breaking stigmas and transphobic processes.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

Social representations about pregnancy among trans men involved a wide field of meanings, in which their efforts were articulated in “accepting” pregnancy by “leaving oneself aside” and choosing to continue the gestational process, being represented as a “lonely experience”. Healthcare was linked to the preference for prenatal care in a private service and, consequently, through cesarean childbirth. Physical and emotional changes brought about by the gestational process were related to how these people perceive their bodies during pregnancy, through a process of non-recognition of his image as a man and reinforcing gender standards and roles attributed to pregnancy as something feminine.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank all trans men for their support in developing this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sousa D, Iriart J. Living with dignity”: health needs and demands of trans men in Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2018;34(10):e00036318. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00036318
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00036318
  • 2 Brandt JS, Patel AJ, Marshall I, Bachmann GA. Transgender men, pregnancy, and the “new” advanced paternal age: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2019;128:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.07.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.07.004
  • 3 Pereira DMR, Araújo EC, Silva ATCG, Abreu PD, Calazans JCC, Silva LLSB. Scientific evidence on experiences of pregnant transsexual men. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2022;31:e20210347. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2021-0347en
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2021-0347en
  • 4 Castro-Peraza ME, García-Acosta JM, Delgado-Rodriguez N, Sosa-Alvarez MI, Llabrés-Solé R, Cardona-Llabrés C, et al. Biological, psychological, social, and legal aspects of trans parenthood based on a real case-a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060925
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060925
  • 5 Gomes MS, Sousa FJG, Fraga FA, Ribeiro CR, Lemos A. Transsexual men and access to health services: integrative review. Res, Soc Develop. 2021;10(1):e2110212018. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.12018
    » https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.12018
  • 6 Pinho AR, Rodrigues L, Nogueira C. (De)Construction of Trans Parenthood: Pregnant Men. Ex Aequo. 2020;41:195-205. https://doi.org/10.22355/exaequo.2020.41.12
    » https://doi.org/10.22355/exaequo.2020.41.12
  • 7 Rigolon M, Carlos DM, Oliveira WA, Salim NR. “Health does not discuss trans bodies”: Oral History of transsexuals and transvestites. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73:e20190228. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0228
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0228
  • 8 Mascarenhas RNS, Santos VVC, Santana BS, Monteiro AA, Couto TM, Sousa AR, et al. Homem trans e gestação paterna: experiências durante o período gravídico-puerperal. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2024;29(4):e16172023. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232024294.16172023
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232024294.16172023
  • 9 Jodelet D. As representações sociais. Rio de Janeiro: UERJ; 2001.
  • 10 Moscovici S. Representações sociais: investigações em psicologia social. 11. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2015.
  • 11 Sampieri RH, Collado CF, Lucio MPB. Amostragem na pesquisa qualitativa. In: Sampieri RH, Collado CF, Lucio MPB. Metodologia de Pesquisa. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso; 2013.
  • 12 Minayo MCS. Sampling and saturation in qualitative research: consensus and controversies. Rev Pesqu Qual [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Jan 18];5(7):01-12. Available from: https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/82/59
    » https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/82/59
  • 13 Camargo BV, Justo AM. Tutorial para uso do software IRAMUTEQ: (Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires) [Internet]. Florianópolis: Laboratório de Psicologia Social da Comunicação e Cognição; 2018 [cited 2024 Jan 18]. Available from: http://iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/tutoriel-portugais-22-11-2018
    » http://iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/tutoriel-portugais-22-11-2018
  • 14 Marcolino EC, Clementino FS, Souto RQ, Santos RC, Miranda FAN. Social Representations of nurses on the approach to children and adolescents who are victims of violence. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2021;29:e3509. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5414.3509
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5414.3509
  • 15 Presidência da República (BR). Lei nº 12.015, de 07 de agosto de 2009. Altera o Título VI da Parte Especial do Decreto-Lei no 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 - Código Penal, e o art. 1o da Lei no 8.072, de 25 de julho de 1990, que dispõe sobre os crimes hediondos, nos termos do inciso XLIII do art. 5o da Constituição Federal e revoga a Lei no 2.252, de 1o de julho de 1954, que trata de corrupção de menores. 2009.
  • 16 Santos DLA, Fonseca RMGS. Necessidades em saúde de mulheres vítimas de violência sexual na busca pelo aborto legal. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2022;30:e3561. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5834.3561
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5834.3561
  • 17 Evangelista FAN, Roman LMF, Amaral MS. Estar grávida é ser mãe? representações sociais das mulheres grávidas sobre o processo gestacional. In: Matos TNF. Psicologia em diferentes contextos e condições. Ponta Grossa: Atena; 2020.
  • 18 Angonese M, Lago MCS. Reproductive health and rights for the population of transvestites and transsexuals: abjection and symbolic sterility. Saude Soc. 2017;26(1):256-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902017157712
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902017157712
  • 19 Light A, Wang L, Zeymo A, Gomez-Lobo V. Family planning and contraception use in transgender men. Contraception. 2018;98(4):266-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.006
  • 20 Fonseca GFM, Moraes LF. Representação social da gravidez em mulheres primigestas assistidas no ambulatório de pré-natal da maternidade escola da UFRJ. In: Matos TNF. A psicologia na construção de uma sociedade mais justa. Ponta Grossa: Atena; 2020.
  • 21 Ellis SA, Wojnar DM, Pettinato M. Conception, pregnancy, and birth experiences of male an gender variant gestational parents: it’s how we could have a family. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):62-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12213
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12213
  • 22 Lima B, Freitas EAM. The choice of the mode of delivery: an integrative review. Rev Fam Cic Vida Saúde Contexto Soc. 2020;8(1):114-25. https://doi.org/10.18554/refacs.v8i1.4496
    » https://doi.org/10.18554/refacs.v8i1.4496
  • 23 Spingolon DN, Teston EF, Maran E, Varela PLR, Biazyan SF, Ribeiro BMSS. Perceptions of pregnant women regarding the choice of the route of delivery. Saúde Pesquisa. 2020;13(4):789-98. https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9206.2020v13n4p789-798
    » https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9206.2020v13n4p789-798
  • 24 Pimenta LF, Silva SC, Barreto CN, Ressel LB. Acultura interferindo no desejo sobre o tipo de parto. Rev Pesqui: Cuid Fundam. 2014:6(3):987-97. https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2014v6n3p987
    » https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2014v6n3p987
  • 25 Backes MTS, Carvalho KM, Ribeiro LN, Amorim TS, Santos EKA, Backes DS. The prevalence of the technocratic model in obstetric care from the perspective of health professionals. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74:e20200689. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0689
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0689
  • 26 Hoffkling A, Obedin-Maliver J, Sevelius J. From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(Suppl 2):332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1491-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1491-5
  • 27 Moravek MB, Kinnear HM, George J, Batchelor J, Shikanov A, Padmanabhan V, et al. Impact of exogenous testosterone on reproduction in transgender men. Endocrinol. 2020;161(3):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqaa014
    » https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqaa014
  • 28 Hahn M, Sheran N, Weber S, Cohan D, Obedin-Maliver J. Providing patient-centered perinatal care for transgender men and gender-diverse individuals. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(5):959-963. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003506
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003506
  • 29 MacDonald T, Noel-Weiss J, West D, Walks M, Biener M, Kibbe A, et al. Transmasculine individuals’ experiences with lactation, chestfeeding, and gender identity: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(106). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0907-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0907-y
  • 30 Charter R, Ussher JM, Perz J, Robinson K. The transgender parent: Experiences and constructions of pregnancy and parenthood for transgender men in Australia. Int J Transgend Health. 2018;19(1):64-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1399496
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1399496
  • 31 Duque, T. Gêneros incríveis: um estudo socioantropológico sobre as experiências de (não) passar por homem e/ou mulher. Campo Grande: EDUFMS; 2017.
  • 32 Malmquist A, Jonsson L, Wikström J, Nieminen K. Minority stress adds an additional layer to fear of childbirth in lesbian and bisexual women, and transgender people. Midwifery. 2019;79:102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102551
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102551
  • 33 Bizic MR, Jeftovic M, Pusica S, Stojanovic B, Duisin D, Vujovic S, et al. Gender Dysphoria: bioethical aspects of medical treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9652305. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9652305
    » https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9652305

Edited by

  • EDITOR IN CHIEF:
    Antonio José de Almeida Filho
  • ASSOCIATE EDITOR:
    Márcia Ferreira

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    10 Jan 2025
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    06 Mar 2024
  • Accepted
    24 June 2024
location_on
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Ir para o topo Reportar erro