Construction and validation of an educational gerontotechnology on frailty in elderly people

Silva, Cynthia Roberta Dias Torres; Felipe, Sarah Giulia Bandeira; Carvalho, Khelyane Mesquita de; Gouveia, Marcia Teles de Oliveira; Silva Júnior, Fernando Lopes; Figueiredo, Maria do Livramento Fortes

doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0800

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

ORIGINAL ARTICLE • Rev. Bras. Enferm. 73 (suppl 3) • 2020 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0800 copy

Construction and validation of an educational gerontotechnology on frailty in elderly people

Construção e validação de gerontotecnologia educativa sobre fragilidade em idosos

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Objective:

to construct and validate an educational gerontechnology on frailty in elderly people.

Method:

a methodological study developed in three stages: educational video construction, validation by expert judges and elderly people. Validation was carried out by 22 judges and 22 elderly people. Educational Content Validation Instrument was used for judges and questions adapted from the Suitability Assessment of Materials questionnaire for elderly people. For validation, agreement criterion greater than 80% was considered, verified using Content Validation Index and binomial test.

Results:

the video addresses recommendations for elderly people at risk of frailty and health-promoting habits, using cordel literature. An agreement greater than 80% was verified in all items assessed by judges and the target audience.

Conclusion:

the video proved to be valid in terms of content and appearance by judges and elderly people, with the potential to mediate health-promoting educational practices in healthy aging.

Descriptors:
Frailty; Aged; Educational Technology; Audiovisual Aids; Health Education

Items	Judges' agreement		p ^┼ ┼ Binomial test.
Items	n (%)	I-CVI^* * Item-level Content Validity Index;	p ^┼ ┼ Binomial test.
Objectives
1. Contemplate the theme	22 (100)	1	1
2. Suitable for teaching-learning	22 (100)	1	1
3. Enables clarification of doubts	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
4. Favors reflection on the theme	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
5. Influences adoption of new behaviors	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
Structure and presentation
6. Language compatible with public understanding	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
7. Language suitable for the type of material	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
8. Language verses with interaction/involvement	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
9. Information with correct content	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
10. Exposure of objective content	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
11. Explanatory content display	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
12. Presented content is required	22(100)	1	1
13. Logically exposed ideas	22(100)	1	1
14. Theme is current	22(100)	1	1
15. Has size suitability	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
Relevance
16. Encourages learning	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972
17. Collaborates with the knowledge area	22(100)	1	1
18. Stimulates interest in the theme	21 (95.5)	0.95	0.972

Items	Judges' agreement		p ^┼ ┼ Binomial test.
Items	n (%)	I-CVI^* * Item-level Content Validity Index;	p ^┼ ┼ Binomial test.
Content
1. The purpose is evident	22 (100)	1	1
2. Content addresses behaviors	22 (100)	1	1
3. Content is focused on purpose	22 (100)	1	1
4. The content highlights the main points	22 (100)	1	1
Literacy requirement
5. Reading level	20 (90.9)	0.90	0.863
6. Uses active voice	22 (100)	1	1
7. Uses vocabulary with common words	22 (100)	1	1
8. Context comes before new information	22 (100)	1	1
9. Information is presented by topic	22 (100)	1	1
Illustration
10. The purpose of the illustration is clear	22 (100)	1	1
11. Types of illustration	22 (100)	1	1
12. The illustrations are relevant	22 (100)	1	1
13. Subtitles help understand the illustrations	20 (90.9)	0.90	0.863
14. Sufficient number of scenes to understand the content	22 (100)	1	1
Layout and presentation
15. Layout feature	22 (100)	1	1
16. Font size and font	20 (90.9)	0.90	0.863
17. Colors make reading possible	22 (100)	1	1
Stimulation/Motivation to learning
18. Uses interaction	22 (100)	1	1
19. The guidelines are specific and provide examples	22 (100)	1	1
20. Motivation and self-efficacy	22 (100)	1	1
Cultural fit
21. It is similar to logic, language and experience	22 (100)	1	1
22. Cultural image and examples	22 (100)	1	1

Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding author: Cynthia Roberta Dias Torres Silva. E-mail: cynthiarobertatorres@gmail.com