Abstracts
ABSTRACT This paper aims to analyse the (anti)competitive effects of a merger reviewed by the Brazilian competition Authority (CADE): a transaction between BM&FBOVESPA S.A. (BVMF) and CETIP S.A., originating B3 S.A. in 2017. The deal involved the industries of over-the-counter trade and stock, commodities, and futures exchanges. By applying the difference-in-differences and augmented synthetic control methods, this paper reports an ex-post evaluation of the BVMF-CETIP merger. The results revealed a reduction in the average trading fee of B3 in the stock exchange market after the merger. Moreover, tests of robustness revealed similar results; in addition, some estimates showed a coefficient for the merger effects statistically equal to zero. Therefore, we found no adverse competitive effects (relating to a rise in trading fees) resulting from the BVMF-CETIP merger. Considering the literature on the topic, this study seems to have filled an academic gap by conducting the empirical analysis of a merger in the stock market to assess its effect.
KEYWORDS:
Competition policy; Quasi-experiments; Stock exchanges; Ex post evaluation; Merger
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail


