| 2000-2001 |
exports increased considerably |
demand and prices increased |
started investing in reducing environmental risks |
| 2002 |
exports decreased considerably |
demand and prices fell |
developed some new products |
| 2003 |
exports still decreased |
demand and prices fell and U.S. dollar weakened but some competitors exited the market |
ceased the activities of its rare earth metals factory for 3 months |
| 2004 |
exports stabilized |
demand stabilized |
invested in production, focused mainly on rare metals and started buying some raw materials from Brazil |
| 2005 |
exports increased considerably |
demand and prices of rare metals and, to some extent, rare earth metals increased |
Zimal (Switzerland) acquired a 50%+1 share in the firm, it continued investing in technology andnew product development |
| 2006 |
exports increased |
prices of rare earth metals continued increasing: demand increased and China started protecting its environment more |
continued investing |
| 2007 |
exports increased |
U.S. dollar weakened, China restricted exports of rare earth metals |
continued investing in technology and new product development |
| 2008 |
exports increased |
prices increased in the beginning but thereafter, started falling |
focused on cutting costs |
| 2009 |
exports decreased |
the economic crisis, demand and prices fell, especially for niobium |
stopped all major investment projects |
| 2010 |
exports increased considerably |
due to a Brazilian competitor's problems, demand for ferro-niobium-tantalum alloy increased and demand for rare earth metals started recovering |
decreased production costs in the first quarter but continued investing in the second quarter, bought back its shares from Zimal |
| 2011 |
exports increased |
demand for tantalum but also other metals increased, prices for tantalum increased considerably |
due to change in ownership, started importing several raw materials from Molycorp, it invested in increasing production capacity |
| 2012 |
exports decreased slightly |
demand fluctuated and in the end of 2012, prices fell |
doubled niobium production, invested in increasing efficiency, production capacity and flexibility, opened a modern laboratory |
| 2013 |
exports decreased considerably |
prices decreased, demand for niobium and tantalum was low |
increased production capacity of REMs and made adjustments in its technology to start using American raw materials |
| 2014 |
exports decreased considerably |
prices decreased slightly, exchange rates were unfavorable |
invested in increasing efficiency, production capacity and flexibility |
| 2015 |
export data are not available yet |
demand and prices fluctuated, Molycorp had major financial difficulties, a considerable part of Molycorp Silmet's tantalum and niobium production building burned down |
continued operating and started reconstructing its production building after the fire |