Objective: to analyze the effectiveness of digital self-care in the management of pain and functional disability among people with spine musculoskeletal disorders.
Method: a systematic literature review, developed with the PRISMA checklist, of randomized clinical trials of people with spine musculoskeletal disorders and digital interventions accessed by means of computers, smartphones or other portable devices. Databases researched: National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Médica dataBASE, SciVerse Scopus, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Science Citation Indexes, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Physiotherapy Evidence Database. The descriptive synthesis of the results and by means of meta-analyses (fixed-effects model) was performed with the Review Manager software. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.
Results: a total of 25 trials were selected (5,142 participants), which showed statistically significant improvements (p <0.05) in 54% (12/22) in the pain levels and 47% (10/21) in functional disability in the Intervention Group. The meta-analyses showed moderate effects on pain intensity and small effects on functional disability. There was a predominance of medium quality studies.
Conclusion: the digital care interventions showed a beneficial result in pain intensity and in functional disability, mainly for chronic low back pain. Digital care emerges as promising to support self-management of the spine musculoskeletal conditions. PROSPERO registry number CRD42021282102.
Descriptors:
Low Back Pain; Neck Pain; Back Pain; Self-Management; Pain Management; Internet
Highlights:
(1) The digital interventions were not inferior to in-person care.
(2) Digital care is promising to support self-management.
(3) There is a need to standardize the report of results in clinical trials.
(4) Better quality studies are required.
(5) Attention should be paid in strategies to support user acceptance and adherence.
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

*SD = Standard Deviation; †IV = Inversion of Variance; ‡95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval; §Chi2 = Chi-square test; ||p = Significance level; ¶I2 = Higgins Heterogeneity Coefficient; **SE = Standard Error; ††SMD = Standardized Mean Difference
*SD = Desviación Estándar; †IV = Inversión de varianza; ‡95%CI = Intervalo de Confianza del 95%; §Chi2 = Prueba de Chi-cuadrado; ||p = Nivel de significación; ¶I2 = Coeficiente de Heterogeneidad de Higgins; **SE = Error estándar; ††SMD = Diferencia de Media Estandarizada