Movement undertaken by newly graduated nurses towards the strengthening of their professional autonomy and towards patient autonomy.

practice in terms of compliance with the autonomy bioethical framework and at pointing out ways to overcome the problems identified. The strategy adopted for data collection was the focal group and the theoretical framework was based on the Grounded Theory. Two phenomena emerged from the results: 1) Perceiving the fragility of nurse and patient autonomy and 2) Moving towards the strengthening of nurse and patient autonomy. This allowed for the identification of the core category: movement undertaken by newly graduated nurses towards the strengthening of their professional autonomy and towards patient autonomy. Understanding the experience enabled us to expand the knowledge concerning newly graduate nurses’ coping, thus favoring our action as nursing professors.


MOVEMENT UNDERTAKEN BY NEWLY GRADUATED NURSES TOWARDS THE STRENGTHENING OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY AND TOWARDS PATIENT AUTONOMY
This study involved newly graduated nurses performing in a public hospital and aimed at apprehending how they interpret the reality of their practice as well as their knowledge and experiences; at identifying and problematizing aspects related to the caregiving practice in terms of compliance with the autonomy bioethical framework and at pointing out ways to overcome the problems identified.The strategy adopted for data collection was the focal group and the theoretical framework was based on the Grounded Theory.Two phenomena emerged from the results: 1) Perceiving the fragility of nurse and patient autonomy and 2) Moving towards the strengthening of nurse and patient autonomy.
This allowed for the identification of the core category: movement undertaken by newly graduated nurses towards the strengthening of their professional autonomy and towards patient autonomy.Understanding the experience enabled us to expand the knowledge concerning newly graduate nurses' coping, thus favoring our action as nursing professors.
A estratégia adotada para obtenção dos dados foi a de grupo focal e o referencial metodológico a Grounded Theory.Dos resultados emergiram dois fenômenos: 1) Percebendo a fragilidade da autonomia do enfermeiro e do paciente.delimiting what is inherent in nursing so as to choose the best ways to perform in patient care (1) .
Hence, nurses use their autonomy and face dilemmas and moral conflicts that frequently arise in everyday nursing practice (2) .
Bioethics, especially disseminated through the publication of its four principles by Beauchamp and Childress -Autonomy, Beneficence, Nonmaleficence and Justice, has been an important tool to analyze the dilemmas and moral conflicts emerging in the routine practice of health care providers.
Autonomy, one of the bioethical principles, is the concept on which this study has focused.
Autonomy means the capacity of human rationality to create laws for itself."It is the capacity of self-government, of making coercion-free choices and assuming risks for such choices" (3) .
In the health care professional/patient relationship, autonomy presupposes competence and freedom to make conscious choices from possible options.It is the nurse's responsibility to provide all necessary explanations concerning a given situation and the risks involved in various alternative choices, so that all possibilities can be acknowledged and the choice that best meets one's needs is made feasible.
The patient is aware of himself and of his needs, and the professional masters the knowledge necessary for identifying the patient's problems and for the implementation of procedures to solve them.Both the health care provider and the patient must participate in the decision-making process (4)(5) .
Understanding autonomy as a value means overcoming authoritarian or paternalistic attitudes which still permeate the relations among health care professionals and between the latter and their patients (4-6)   .
The exercise of autonomy by nurses has been regarded as complex due to influences from the social structures in which their work is developed and from the barriers imposed by such structures.Withstanding to certain influences and breaking barriers that hinder the nurse's autonomous practice enables his redemption and strengthens relations among health care professionals, patients and relatives (7)(8) .
On the other hand, patients' rights are, many times, not observed, and the exercise of their autonomy is not valued.Citizenship, as the patient's fundamental right, is often denied.It should be understood as an indicator of the quality of health care services, since it is related to autonomy, privacy and professional confidentiality (5,8) .
Discussing and analyzing nursing care in light of the bioethical principle of autonomy simultaneously mean reflection and action in everyday situations that require analysis and decision-making.
As professors in a nursing undergraduate program, we understand that the nurse will be prepared for professional practice if he, concomitantly with the development of technical competence, is trained to recognize ethical conflicts, critically analyze their implications and use his sense of moral responsibility to make decisions regarding human life.
Our commitment is not fulfilled when we complete the education of our students, but it extends to the professionals involved with nursing care in our city and region through the commitment we have taken to our population's health care.
Therefore, because we believe that a problematizing analysis of health care provision by newly graduated nurses is opportune, we have proposed ourselves to develop it by using the autonomy framework due to its reach, complexity and currentness.

OBJECTIVES
This study aimed at describing: -Newly graduated nurses' perception of their professional autonomy.
-Newly graduated nurses' perception of the patient's decision-making process.The focal-group strategy was selected for data collection.This technique is recommended for cases in which the researcher considers the possibility of facing occasional difficulties in accessing information of participants with similar experiences by means of individual interviews and observation (9)   .The focal group occurred in two meetings.In the first meeting, the moderator promoted the introduction of participants and the presentation of objectives and Bioethics theoretical frameworks.Next, the group members were encouraged to speak and reflect about the care practice in their institution according to the autonomy bioethical framework.

METHODOLOGICAL PATHWAY
The questions guiding the discussion were: -Based on the autonomy bioethical framework, tell me about your professional experience.
-Talk about your professional experience in relation to the patient's decision-making process.
The recording of the experiences was made by using a tape recorder.The tapes were fully transcribed and submitted to analysis according to the Grounded Theory methodological framework.
To the creators of the Grounded Theory, this methodology consists in the discovery and development of a theory with basis on systematically obtained and comparatively analyzed information (10) .
To them, the theory means "a strategy to deal with research data which provides forms of conceptualization for description and explanation" (10) .
They introduce a method of constant comparative analysis where the researcher, when comparing an incident with another incident in the data, establishes conceptual categories that can explain such information.The theory is then generated by an induction process in which analytical categories emerge from the data and are developed as the work advances.
Categories are abstractions of the phenomenon observed in the data, and they form the main unit of analysis of the Grounded Theory.The theory is developed by working on the categories, which leads to the emergence of a core category.It is generally a process that results from the analysis (10) .
The data analysis phases are: discovering categories, connecting categories, development of memoranda and process identification (10) .This is a process described as theoretical sampling and the researcher decides which data to collect next as a result of the analysis that he has been performing.In this sense, the sampling adopted is not statistical, but theoretical, since the number of subjects or situations that must integrate the study is determined by what they denominated as theoretical saturation, that is, when the information begins to be repeated and new or additional data are no longer found (10) .
During data analysis, the authors realized that the content was dense enough in order to understand the experience of the 15 newly graduated nurses as concerns the investigated object.
In view of the evidence, the group of actors was again invited to gather with the purpose to learn about the experience of newly graduated nurses in relation to their autonomy and the patient's.It was suggested that they should express their opinions whether that experience represented the data provided to the researcher.At that moment, they had the opportunity to validate the analysis made by the researchers as well as to discuss the ways for overcoming the problems shown.

RESULTS
The discussion on professional experience based on the autonomy bioethical framework was developed according to two thematic approaches: A -nurse autonomy and B -patient autonomy.

A -Nurse autonomy
As regards the nurse's autonomy, the concepts which emerged from the experience accounts were organized in the following categories:

A1 -Understanding professional autonomy as an attribute as well as a conquest
Autonomy is understood as something inherent to the individual, and some people seem to be more autonomous than others.A nurse's title is not enough to confer professional autonomy.By solving problems rationally and without impositions, the nurse

A3 -Making use of professional autonomy
Interventions with physicians, such as reminding them about the adequate performance of certain procedures, observance of intercurrences, etc are conducts related to the use that nurses make of their autonomy.When using their autonomy, nurses must have control over everything that takes place in their work unit, and one of the main reasons for it is to avoid contradiction between the recommendations given to the patient by the physician and the orientation provided by the nurse.and that they do not have enough time to give patients more dedicated attention.On the other hand, because nurses remain near patients for longer periods, they have better chances to observe in more detail.However, when detecting something that has not been observed by physicians, the nurse may be misinterpreted.
Contradictorily, some physicians request that nurses and even auxiliaries and technicians perform procedures that are exclusively medical.
The patient arrives at the surgery, and the physicians do not realize that he has a catheter.This goes unnoticed to them.
Then, almost six days later, the patient is to be discharged -'Is the patient going to be discharged?Doctor, won't the catheter be removed?' -'Ah, does the patient still have a catheter?' -'You didn't order its removal... '  When a nurse comes, he brings a lot of theoretical knowledge, but many times, he does not have practical skills.So, auxiliaries think they know better and begin to pose questions to make sure that the nurse is really knowledgeable.

A7 -Pointing out other conflicts in the nurse/nurse relationship
In the relationship with their peers, they identify stronger collectivism among physicians than among nurses.They also perceive other nurses who establish alliances with physicians in order to hurt their colleagues as well as those who refuse to help their colleagues or who lack colleagueship when competing for positions, in addition to the ones who have chosen the profession for the wrong reasons.
Physicians are united, but nurses aren't.One is always trying to show that he is better than the other.Many times a nurse doesn't like another, so he joins a physician to try to cheat the other.
Our salaries are very low, and people want a higher position to earn more, then they end up cheating others.

B -Patient Autonomy
The concepts concerning patient autonomy which emerged from the discussions are presented in the following categories:

B1 -Perceiving respect from the institution in relation to patient autonomy
It means the evaluative conclusion reached by the nurse that his institution generally respects patient-family autonomy even when it is influenced by religious beliefs.However, some inpatients in specialized units and/or carriers of certain diseases have no autonomy.Nurses must make decisions for the patient in situations of reduced autonomy, but even in such situations, they usually want to hear the opinions of patients' relatives.
There was a patient from the vascular ward who was a Jehovah's Witness and needed a blood transfusion, but she didn't want to have it.Palliative alternative therapy was applied, and transfusion was not made.Only the surgical process was prolonged until the patient could be operated.I have worked in Intensive Care Units a lot.Patients do not have any autonomy there.They are CVA or hepatic lesion patients, and they don't really have any autonomy.There are few post-operated patients who are sent there and can say: "I want this, I want that'.
We do everything for the others.We make their decisions.
On many occasions, we must remain out of the conversation notsay: 'Do this, or not encourage the patient to act in a certain way because something happens later, the family will say; 'that nurse was forcing us to do it.

B2 -Observing nurse/patient/family communication for decision making
In the process of communication with the patient, the nurse many times ends up playing the

DISCOVERING THE CORE CATEGORY
By inter-relating the categories identified, it was possible to observe two phenomena: -perceiving the fragility of nurse and patient autonomy; -moving towards the strengthening of nurse and patient autonomy.
This allowed for the discovery of the core category, which evinced the phenomenon expressed through the movement undertaken by newly graduated nurses towards the strengthening of their own autonomy and towards patient autonomy.
In the condition of newly graduated nurses, they perceive that their autonomy is reduced by exposure among members of a hospital team and by the exposure of their still incipient skills, feeling observed and compared to other more experienced professionals.
Despite regarding autonomy as a personal attribute that is based on private life experiences, they acknowledge that it can be achieved in their work interactions, although it will never be absolute.
During their interactions with the health care

DISCUSSION
Autonomy understood by the nurses participating in this study as a personal attribute means that individuals may present different levels of self-determination, some more than others, according to their life history, social interactions, world views, ideological conceptions, education, economic and social conditions, lifestyles, personalities, etc.However, when they become professionals, their autonomy will be partly determined by the conception that society has of their profession, which influences the concept that the performers themselves will attribute to their professional activity.
Traditionally, due to its history connected to women's work and also regarded as subaltern, nursing has not received the same consideration as that given to other health care professions by modern and postmodern societies.

Upon completion of an undergraduate
program in nursing and their start in the work market, particularly in hospital positions, newly graduated nurses face conflicts stemming from the historical view of their profession, from the institution's organizational power structure, in which power is expressed by policies and rules that are apparently impersonal, but which confirm and ensure the dominant group's power (11) .
They submit themselves to hiring processes, training programs and supervision, which are classic forms of maintaining the organization's basic values, but somehow inhibit control over themselves.They will have to show competence and dedication; however, they may be betrayed by skills that were not thoroughly developed during the course of their undergraduate education, thus having to face judgment by their peers and by subordinate personnel and, finally, by the whole health care team.
Over time, they find out that professional autonomy can be achieved by attitudes of respect and by the development of competencies required by the activity, realizing that even so their selfdetermination will never be absolute.
As regards patients' autonomy, additionally to their illness condition which may somehow reduce it, certain actions and attitudes that depersonalize such patients can trigger feelings of insignificance and anger.
Asymmetric relationships are frequently observed between health care professionals and patients, where power is exhibited on one side and submission in on the other.Many times, professionals assume positions of power over the patient's body, and the latter, in his fragility, does not perceive himself as someone who has autonomy to question, thus passively accepting what is imposed to him and feeling, on many instances, bashful and embarrassed.Such coexistence of autonomy and heteronomy leads to conflicts in a system consisting of an unequal power system which is, at times, disrespectful (12)   .Hospitalized patients do not always participate in the decisions made about their lives and are not always communicated about such decisions so as to understand them, and that communication hardly ever occurs dialogically (13) .
In this study involving nurses from a public hospital that mostly assists underclass patients who have, therefore, been deprived of their basic life and health conditions, the question presented is: how can nurses lead such patients to autonomy?It was possible to show that nurses keep certain proximity with inpatients due to the peculiarities of their work, thus establishing ties and assuming cooperation and solidarity attitudes.These conditions can, according to Boemer (4) , grant these professionals "a parallel influence power", enabling them to help patients with the exercise of their autonomy, thus encouraging them to learn about and exert their rights.

CONCLUSION
This study enabled us to understand the experience of newly graduated nurses working at public state hospital and the interpretation that they give to the reality of their practice in relation to their own autonomy and to the autonomy of the patient, the object of their care.
The reflections on the fragility of their autonomy and the patient's self-determination were very important in motivating them to seek new ways for coping with such difficulties.
The ways pointed by the nurses for overcoming the problems identified seem to favor care based on alterity, which enables effective interaction through the practice of symmetrical and dialogical relationships.
team, nurses seek to exert professional autonomy by observing the factors that condition as well as those that reduce it.In these movements, they expose themselves and become involved in conflicts, particularly in situations of asymmetric autonomy and power.When facing conflicts, they perceive the possibilities to identify more appropriate attitudes for the development of their autonomy.By interacting with patients, nurses observe, analyze and perceive in them their self-determination, which is at times rather reduced due to their health conditions and situation of being institutionalized.Hence, they perceive the patient as also moving away from their fragile autonomy, caused by having to submit to institutional rules, by the care routine established, by difficulties in communicating with members of the health care team and family impositions, towards the achievement of a certain condition to administrate their lives.Nurses denote to feel powerless to reinforce patient autonomy, but, in this setting, the actors perceive one another, approach one another and become involved in a cooperation and solidarity process, seeking the preservation of each individual's identity and his self-determination.
approval by the Institution's Research Ethics Committee on April 2005 and the signature of Free Movement undertaken by newly graduated...
The doctor told me this'.Because the doctor sometimes tells the patients things and does not tell you about it.So you are there and you don't know about it.
As to physicians, they must realize that we are knowledgeable.For instance: Doctor, look!It is like this, the bandage is applied like this... Also, there is no point in just defying them.We must know what we are talking about, and then there is no argument.When you are working in a unit, you have to have control over everything, over what is wrong and over what isn't.A reason for it is that the patient himself demands: 'The doctor didn't do this, the doctor didn't do that.Sometimes, patients also report: 'At the beginning, the auxiliaries and technicians tested us many times, trying to find out how far they could go, up to what extent we were secure and up to what extent we were capable.Many times, in the same way we have to help, we must also say: 'I don't know how to do this.'Theytake it well.Now, after they get to know me and understand how I work, I feel that it is easier to say: 'I don't know how to do this either, but you can be sure that I will try to learn how to do it'.Because when you assign to someone else the things you don't know how to do, it's plain to see that you can't do it, and they realize it.In my first year of work, an auxiliary said: 'I have been working here for 25 years, and now you come and want to boss me around?'Tothem, the time one has worked for the institution means knowledge.whichphysicians blame the nursing staff for unsuccessful treatments, do not read the nursing notes and/or do not accept the physical examination performed by nurses.On the other hand, nurses point out physicians' failures to perform procedures, consider that physicians occupy a privileged position in the hospital hierarchy, So, you have to keep telling them.Although we describe the patient's development, they won't read it...That stems from old medical culture.A physician is always in a higher position than everybody else's.It's part of them, and that's it...The other employees are supposed to serve them.-'I'm telling you to do it, and you do it.'That's the way it is in some places.
Movement undertaken by newly graduated...BertiHW, Braga EM, Godoy I, Spiri WC, Bocchi SCM.Rev Latino-am Enfermagem 2008 março-abril; 16(2):184-91 www.eerp.usp.br/rlaerole of a conflict mediator.In such cases, the nurse uses strategies, leading the individual to understand that what is to come later can be worse.A patient in the Intensive Care Unit needed an endoscopy, but he didn't want to have it.The doctor then talked to him, but he still refused to do it.The nurse and the social worker talked to him, explained the procedure and he accepted.
The doctor many times orders tests and does not inform the patient about anything.The nurse, on the other hand, informs the patient about what the test is for, what type of test it is.